English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118524/149574 (79%)
Visitors : 78912187      Online Users : 369
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159541


    Title: 美國網路內容服務提供者的法律定位與功能變遷--以國家行為理論的邊界與再構成為中心
    The Legal Status and Functional Evolution of U.S. Internet Content Provider: Focusing on the Boundaries and Reconstitution of the State Action Doctrine
    Authors: 林昕璇
    Lin, Hsin-Hsuan
    Contributors: 政大法學評論
    Keywords: 網路內容服務提供者;國家行為理論;資訊關鍵基礎設施;新型治理者;準政府地位;通訊端正法第230條;公共職能例外;交錯穿插效果例外;內容審核;公私法混和組織體
    Internet content providers;State action doctrine;Information infrastructure;New governors;Quasi-Government;Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act;Public function exception;The entwinement exception;Content moderation;Public-private hybrid organizations
    Date: 2025-03
    Issue Date: 2025-09-17
    Abstract: 巨型數位平臺受公眾高度依賴，如何重構網路內容服務提供者、使用者與國家間之多邊法律關係，近年成為法學界、科技界和產業界共同竭力苦思的課題。數位平臺的核心技術與經營模式有別，對於侵權或不法內容的控管能力容有差異。諸國立法例多依業者的服務種類制定寬嚴不一之類型化監管規範，本文聚焦網路內容服務提供者，分析其針對第三方資訊之過濾與篩選行為能否評價為「（準）國家行為」，進而轉化為實質監管線上言論之公共職能機關，從而受憲法拘束。本文首先回顧美國《通訊端正法》第230條之立法背景與實務發展，檢視各學派之批判。其次，探討美國司法實務發展出的「國家行為理論」之理論適用與再構成，透過標竿判決分析平臺受憲法基本權規範拘束的可能性，最後提出結論。
    In recent years, the public has become highly dependent on digital platforms, making the reconstruction of multilateral legal relationships among internet content providers, users, and the state a critical issue. Given the diverse and complex nature of internet service providers—and their varying capabilities in controlling infringing or illegal content—many countries generally classify regulations based on the types of services intermediaries offer, resulting in varying levels of regulatory stringency.
    This paper focuses on internet content providers that generate communication content or offer search services. Specifically, it examines whether the filtering or screening actions taken by these platforms—particularly regarding cached or stored third-party information—can be considered“quasi-state actions.”If so, these internet content providers may effectively function as substantive public utilities with the authority to regulate online speech, thereby becoming subject to certain constitutional constraints.
    This paper first explores the legislative origins and practical evolution of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a key statute concerning U.S. internet content providers. It critiques outdated aspects of the legislation based on scholarly analysis, followed by an argument grounded in the boundaries and reconstitution of the“state action doctrine”as developed in U.S. jurisprudence. Through an analysis of representative court rulings, this paper investigates the permissible scope of constitutional constraints on internet content providers.
    Relation: 政大法學評論, 180, 211-281
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.53106/102398202025030180004
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202025030180004
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML19View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback