Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159425
|
Title: | 女性化家務投入程度對家務公平觀之影響:台灣和日本的比較研究 The Impact of “Feminine Task” on Housework Fairness: Comparing Taiwan and Japan |
Authors: | 游登澤 Yu, Teng-Tse |
Contributors: | 張峯彬 Chang, Feng-Bin 游登澤 Yu, Teng-Tse |
Keywords: | 家務分工 家務公平觀 女性化家務 東亞 Housework Division Housework Fairness Feminine Task East Asia |
Date: | 2025 |
Issue Date: | 2025-09-01 17:00:27 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 隨著時代進步,公領域中的性別差異已逐漸被弭平,然而私領域中男性與女性仍遵循著傳統的性別角色,由女性負擔大部分的無酬家務工作。即使男性對家務的負擔比例有逐漸提升的趨勢,但繁瑣無趣的「女性化家務」仍多是由女性負擔,過往研究認為,這是因為女性並沒有認知到家務分工是不公平的,使得性別革命發生停滯。本研究使用國際社會調查計畫(International Social Survey Program, ISSP)2012年、2022年「家庭與變遷中的性別角色」資料,與臺灣社會變遷基本調查(Taiwan Social Change Survey, TSCS)「2022第八期第三次:性別組」的資料,並以OLS多元迴歸分析「照顧工作」、「非照顧家務工作」和「非照顧女性化家務(female task sharing, FTS)」對家務公平觀的影響,與「國家」和「性別」在其中的交互作用。本研究發現,家務工作時數、FTS與照顧時數都對家務公平觀有負面的影響,但對各群體的影響程度不同,配偶的家務工作時數則對家務公平觀有正面效果。而配偶的照顧工作時數對於家務公平觀沒有影響,且性別與國家在家務工作分配對家務公平觀的影響間具有調節作用。研究結果顯示,在東亞家庭中,丈夫與妻子間在家務公平觀的構成因素上有所差異,不僅如此,連社會文化與經濟條件相似的台灣與日本妻子,對於什麼是在家庭互動中值得被感激的事情也有不同的看法。相對於女性,台日丈夫的家務公平觀構成因素並沒有顯著的差異。 As society has progressed, gender difference in the public sphere have gradually been reduced. However, in the private sphere, men and women still follow traditional gender roles, with women bearing the brunt of unpaid household work. Although there is a gradual trend toward men taking on a larger share of household responsibilities, the tedious and uninteresting “Feminine Task” are still primarily carried out by women. Previous research suggests that this is because women do not recognize that the division of housework is unfair, leading to a stagnation in the gender revolution. This study utilizes data from the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) 2012, “Family and Changing Gender Roles IV”, 2022, “Family and Changing Gender Roles V” , and the Taiwan Social Change Survey (TSCS) 2022, Round 8, Year 3 (Gender Group), using OLS multiple regression analysis to investigate the influence of “care work,” “non-care housework,” and “non-care female task sharing (FTS)” on perceptions of housework fairness, as well as the interaction effects of “country” and “gender”. This study found that the more care work, housework and female task you do, the lower housework fairness you have, but the extent of this impact varies across different groups. And the number of hours spent on housework by spouses has a positive effect on housework fairness. However, the number of hours spent on care work by spouses does not affect housework fairness. Additionally, gender and country play a moderating role in the influence of housework and housework fairness. The findings reveal that in East Asian couples, there are differences between husbands and wives in the factors that constitute household fairness. Furthermore, even among Taiwanese and Japanese wives with similar sociocultural and economic conditions, there are differing views on what constitutes factors in housework fairness. But there are no significant differences between housework fairness in Taiwanese and Japanese husbands. |
Reference: | 小林美希著、陳姵君譯,2022,《老公怎麼還不去死:家事育兒全放棄還要人服侍?!來自絕望妻子們的深層怒吼》。台灣:東販。(小林美希,2016,夫に死んでほしい妻たち。東京:朝日新聞出版。) 不破麻紀子、筒井淳也,2010,〈家事分担に対する不公平感の国際比較分析〉,《家族社会学研究》22(1) :52-63。 天下雜誌,2025,〈童話故事沒有下集?台灣每天146對夫妻離婚高居亞洲第二,以後更容易?〉。https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5134299,取用日期:2025年7月5日。 中央社,2024,〈暢銷書「老公怎麼還不去死」 6都圖書館預約逾2千人〉。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acul/202405130043.aspx,取用日期:2025年3月15日。 行政院性別平等會,2025,2022 年我國性別不平等指數(GII)發布說明。https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/B08994C9CFD296BA,取用日期:2025年7月1日。 李青芬、唐先梅,2020,〈不同世代健康狀況對主客觀家務分工與婚姻滿意度關係之影響〉。《輔仁民生學誌》26(1) :1-15。 李美玲、楊亞潔和伊慶春,2000,〈家務分工:就業現實還是平等理念?〉。《臺灣社會學》(24): 59-88。 呂玉瑕、伊慶春,2005,〈社會變遷中的夫妻資源與家務分工:臺灣. 七○年代與九○年代社會文化脈絡的比較〉。《臺灣社會學》(10): 41-94。 呂玉瑕,2011,〈臺灣民眾性別角色態度的變遷:1991-2001〉。《臺灣社會學刊》(48) :51-94。 黃正寬,2010,《性別角色社會化、相對工作時間與經濟依賴對家務分工的影響:台灣和日本的比較研究》。台北:國立政治大學社會學系碩士班碩士論文。 黃馨慧,2000,〈臺灣成年男性婚姻觀及其家務參與之研究〉。《中華家政學刊》(29) : 59-80。 唐先梅,1998,《家務工作公平觀之研究》。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告 (NSC 87-2412-H-180-001)。 唐先梅,1999,〈從家務工作的本質談雙薪家庭夫妻家事分工〉。《應用心理研究》(4) : 131-173。 唐先梅,2000,《家務工作公平觀之研究(II)》。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告 (NSC89-2412-H180-001-SSS )。 唐先梅,2002,〈影響夫妻家務公平觀之因素〉。《中華家政學刊》(31): 71-82。 翁康容、楊靜利、任軒立,2020,〈從家務分工看性別平權的知行落差〉。《人口學刊》(61) :97-139。 張晉芬、李奕慧,2007,〈「女人的家事」、「男人的家事」:家事分工性別化的持續與解釋〉。《人文及社會科學集刊》19(2) :203-229。 莫藜藜,1997,〈已婚男性家庭事務分工態度之研究〉。《東吳社會工作學報》(3) :117-155。 筒井淳也,2011,〈日本の家事分担における性別分離の分析〉。頁 55-73,收錄於田中重人・永井暁子編,《第3回家族についての全国調査(NFRJ08)第二次報告書 1 家族と仕事』》。東京:日本家族社会学会全国家族調査委員会。 筒井淳也,2014,〈女性の労働参加と性別分業─持続する「稼ぎ手」モデル〉,《日本労働研究雑誌》(648):70–83。 勞動統計處,2018,近年我國女性勞動參與狀況。https://www.mol.gov.tw/media/2fhmmxre/%E8%BF%91%E5%B9%B4%E5%A5%B3%E6%80%A7%E5%8B%9E%E5%8B%95%E5%8F%83%E8%88%87%E7%8B%80%E6%B3%81.pdf。取用日期:2025 年02月07日。 劉蒞,2023,《臺灣女性的多維性別意識形態與家務分工中的感知公平性》。台北:國立臺灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 劉子維,2025,〈台灣「誰該洗碗」貼文為何成網路熱點,引爆女性怨氣與「父權創傷」討論?〉。BBC 中文網,1月10日。https://ent.ltn.com.tw/news/breakingnews/3071117。取用日期:2025 年2月7日。 蔡明璋,2004,〈台灣夫妻的家務工作時間:親密關係的影響〉,《台灣社會學》(8):99-131。 蔡淑鈴,2004,〈高等教育的擴展對教育機會分配的影響〉,《台灣社會學》(7) :47-88。 蕭英玲,2005,〈台灣的家務分工:經濟依賴及性別的影響〉,《臺灣社會學刊》(34) :115-145。 賴爾柔、黃馨慧,1996,〈已婚男性參與家務分工之研究〉,《婦女與兩性研究通訊》(41) :10-18。 戴翠莪 ,2018,《家務公平觀的成因、影響與改變機制:多國跨時研究。行政院科技部專題研究計劃成果報告 (MOST105-2410-H305-002-MY2)》。 藍佩嘉,2004,〈女人何苦為難女人?僱用家務移工的三角關係〉,《台灣社會學》(8) :43-97。 藍佩嘉,2008,《跨國灰姑娘:當東南亞幫傭遇上台灣新富家庭》。台北:行人文化。 藍佩嘉,2009,〈照護工作:文化觀點的考察〉,《社會科學論叢》3(2): 25-35。 Baxter, J., 2000, “The Joys and Justice of Housework.” Sociology 34(4): 609–631. Jeanne A. Batalova, Philip N. Cohen, 2004, “Premarital Cohabitation and Housework: Couples in Cross-National Perspective.” Journal of Marriage and Family 64(3): 743–755. Braun, M., Lewin-Epstein, N., Stier, H. and Baumgärtner, M. K., 2008, “Perceived Equity in the Gendered Division of Household Labor.” Journal of Marriage and Family 70(5): 1145–1156. Brinton, M. C., 1993, Women and the Economic Miracle: Gender and Work in Postwar Japan. California: University of California Press. Brinton, Mary, 2001, “Married Women's Labor in East Asia Economies.” Pp. 1-37 in Women's Working Lives in East Asia edited by Mary C. Brinton. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press. Bubeck, Diemut Elisabet, 1995, Care, Gender, and Justice. Oxford: Oxford Academic. Byron, K., 2005, “A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 67(2): 169–198. Coleman, M. T., 1988, “The division of household labor: Suggestions for future empirical consideration and theoretical development.” Journal of Family Issues 9: 132-148. Coltrane, S., 2000, “Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 62: 1247–168. Davis, S. N., 2010. “Is Justice Contextual? Married Women’s Perceptions of Fairness of the Division of Household Labor in 12 Nations.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 41(1): 19–41. England, 2010, “The gender revolution: Uneven and Stalled.” Gender and Society 24(2): 149–166. Frances K. Goldscheider, 2000, “Men, children and the future of the family in the third millennium.” Futures 32(6): 525-538. Francisco Perales, Janeen Baxter, Tsui-o Tai., 2015, “Gender, justice and work: A distributive approach to perceptions of housework fairness.” Social Science Research 51: 51-63. Goldin, Claudia, 2025, “Babies and the macroeconomy.” Economica 92: 675-700. Goldscheider, Frances & Oláh, Livia & Puur, Allan., 2010, “Reconciling studies of men’s gender attitudes and fertility: Response to Westoff and Higgins.” Demographic Research 22: 189-198. Greenstein, T. N., & Teachman, J., 2009, “National Context, Family Satisfaction, and Fairness in the Division of Household Labor.” Journal of Marriage and Family 71(4): 1039–1051. Gupta, S., 1999, “The Effects of Transitions in Marital Status on Men’s Performance of Housework.” Journal of Marriage and Family 61(3): 700–711. Hochschild, Arlie and Anne Machung, 2012, The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. New Work: Penguin. Hsiao, Y. L., & Hammons, S., 2007, “The Judgment and Consequences of Justice Among American Newlyweds: A Social Exchange Perspective.” 歐美研究 37(1): 73-109. International Labour Organization, 2019, “The Unpaid Care Work and the Labour Market. An analysis of time use data based on the latest World Compilation of Time-use Surveys.” https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@gender/documents/publication/wcms_732791.pdf (Date visited: March 15, 2025). Julie, E. P. and E. Townsley, 1998, “Wives' and Husbands' Housework Reporting: Gender, Class, and Social Desirability.” Gender and Society 12(2): 188-218. Kan, M. Y., Sullivan, O. and Gershuny, J., 2011, “Gender convergence in domestic work: Discerning the effects of interactional and institutional barriers from large-scale data.” Sociology 45: 234–251. Kan, M.-Y., Zhou, M., Kolpashnikova, K., Hertog, E., Yoda, S., & Jun, J., 2022, “Revisiting the Gender Revolution: Time on Paid Work, Domestic Work, and Total Work in East Asian and Western Societies 1985–2016.” Gender & Society 36(3): 368-396. Lennon, M. C., & Rosenfield, S., 1994, “Relative Fairness and the Division of Housework: The Importance of Options.” American Journal of Sociology 100(2): 506–531. Major, B., 1993, “Gender, entitlement, and the distribution of family labor.” Journal of Social Issues 49: 141-159. McDonald, P., 2000, “Gender Equity in Theories of Fertility Transition.” Population and Development Review 26(3): 427–439. Piotrowski, M., Bond, E., & Beutel, A. M., 2020, “Marriage counterfactuals in Japan: Variation by gender, marital status, and time.” Demographic Research 43: 1081–1118. Poortman, A.-R., & Van Der Lippe, T., 2009, “Attitudes toward Housework and Child Care and the Gendered Division of Labor.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3): 526–541. Puur, Allan & Oláh, Livia & Tazi-Preve, Mariam & Dorbritz, Jürgen., 2008, “Men's childbearing desires and views of the male role in Europe at the dawn of the 21st century.” Demographic Research 19: 1883-1912. Ruppanner, L., 2008, “Fairness and Housework: A Cross-National Comparison.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 39(4): 509–526. Ruppanner, L., Bernhardt, E., & Brandén, M., 2017, “Division of housework and his and her view of housework fairness: A typology of Swedish couples.” Demographic Research 36: 501–524. Shaw, S. M., 1988, “Gender Differences in the Definition and Perception of Household Labor.” Family Relations 37(3): 333-337. South, S. J., & Spitze, G., 1994, “Housework in Marital and Nonmarital Households.” American Sociological Review 59(3): 327–347. Sung Sirin, Pascall Gillian., 2014, “Introduction: Gender and welfare states in East Asia.” Pp. 1-28 in Gender and welfare states in East Asia: Confucianism or gender equality, edited by Sung Sirin, Pascall Gillian. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Tai, T., & Baxter, J., 2018, “Perceptions of Fairness and Housework Disagreement: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Family Issues 39(8): 2461-2485. Thompson, L., 1991, “Family work: Women’s sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues” 12: 181-196. Tsutsui, J., 2016, “Female labor participation and the sexual division of labor: a consideration of the persistent male-breadwinner model.” Japan labor review 13: 80-100. Yang, J., 2017, “Gendered division of domestic work and willingness to have more children in China.” Demographic Research 37: 1949–1974. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 社會學系 110254015 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110254015 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [社會學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
401501.pdf | | 1052Kb | Adobe PDF | 1 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|