English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118524/149574 (79%)
Visitors : 78989952      Online Users : 362
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159237


    Title: 壽險業監理介入之最佳化效益分析
    Evaluating the Optimal Impact of Regulatory Intervention on Life Insurers
    Authors: 游世輝
    Yu, Shi-Hui
    Contributors: 張士傑
    曾毓英

    Chang, Shih-Chieh
    Tzeng, Yu-Ying

    游世輝
    Yu, Shi-Hui
    Keywords: 預期效用模型
    次順位債
    監理干預
    資產負債管理
    資本結構
    Utility-based model
    Subordinated debt
    Regulatory intervention
    ALM
    Capital structure
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-09-01 16:03:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在長期低利率環境下,台灣壽險業因高預定利率保單所帶來的財務壓力,普遍採取大規模海外投資策略,然而幣別錯配與會計評價方式差異已逐步侵蝕其財務穩健。隨著國際財務報導準則第17號(IFRS 17)與新一代清償能力制度(TW-ICS)將於2026年全面實施,壽險業資本結構與資產負債管理策略面臨重大轉型需求。
    本研究運用預期效用模型,結合2019年至2025年台灣壽險市場之實證資料,納入國內外資產報酬相關性、負債結構(保單與次順位債)、風險溢酬與幣別差異,並以單位保費之確定等值報酬(certainty equivalent payoff per unit of liability,ce/L)作為最適化目標。研究亦設置違約機率之上限限制,以模擬不同監理情境對保戶效用、資產配置與違約風險之影響,並進行多項敏感度分析。
    實證結果顯示:(1) 提升監理強度能顯著提升保戶效用並降低違約風險,且增資措施之效果優於單一限制風險性資產配置;(2) 次順位債之幣別設定對最適配置影響有限,關鍵仍為監理強度與投資策略;(3) 在各種公平條件設定下,嚴格監理均導致較高的 ce/L 與較低的違約機率;(4) 本國市場報酬率下滑或波動度增加將不利於保戶效用,而穩定低波動環境則可增進其利益;(5) 提高保單負債佔比可降低資金成本並提高效用,惟過高比例之次順位債則反而侵蝕保戶效用;(6) 保戶風險厭惡程度升高將壓抑高風險資產配置,而延長保險契約期間則有助於風險分散與回報穩定性。
    本研究建議壽險公司應積極充實資本,並強化外幣避險與資產負債管理策略,以因應新制挑戰;同時,監理機關應兼顧資本彈性與風險控管,推動多元籌資工具與監理措施雙軌並進,以維護保戶權益與系統穩定。
    Taiwan’s life insurers face rising financial pressure from legacy policies with high guaranteed interest rates amid a prolonged low interest rate environment. With IFRS 17 and the Taiwan Insurance Capital Standard (TW-ICS) set for implementation in 2026, capital structure and asset-liability management (ALM) have become critical. This study applies a utility-based model using 2019–2025 data to evaluate the effects of supervisory interventions on policyholder utility, default risk, and asset allocation. The model incorporates liability structure, risk premiums, asset correlations, and currency differences, optimizing the certainty equivalent payoff per unit of liability (ce/L) under regulatory default constraints.
    Results show that stricter supervision improves policyholder utility and reduces default risk, with capital injections more effective than limiting risky investments. The currency of subordinated debt has minimal impact, while regulatory strength and investment strategy are key. Stable markets and longer policy durations further enhance utility. The findings support strengthened capital, improved hedging, and balanced regulatory approaches to ensure insurer stability and policyholder protection.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    王睿為 (2023),台灣壽險業發行次順位債之風險與效益,國立政治大學風險管理與保險學系碩士論文,台灣台北。
    孟欣樺 (2022),壽險業資本監理及監管干預之有效性分析,國立政治大學風險管理與保險學系碩士論文,台灣台北。
    英文文獻
    Asimit, A. V., Badescu, A. M., Siu, T. K., & Zinchenko, Y. (2015). Capital requirements and optimal investment with solvency probability constraints. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics., 26(4), 345–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpt029
    Briys, E., & de Varenne, F. (1994). Life Insurance in a Contingent Claim Framework: Pricing and Regulatory Implications. The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review., 19(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112014
    Briys, E., & de Varenne, F. (1997). On the Risk of Insurance Liabilities: Debunking Some Common Pitfalls. The Journal of Risk and Insurance., 64(4), 673–694. https://doi.org/10.2307/253891
    Chang, S. C., Hsuan, W., Lee, Y. K., & Tzeng, Y. Y. (2024). Evaluating the Efficiency of Capital Enhancement and Investment Constraints in Life Insurance Supervision. Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, 18(2), 115-141. https://doi.org/10.1515/apjri-2023-0052
    Chen, A., & Hieber, P. (2016). Optimal Asset Allocation In Life Insurance: The Impact Of Regulation. ASTIN Bulletin., 46(3), 605–626. https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2016.12
    Chen, A., & Suchanecki, M. (2007). Default risk, bankruptcy procedures and the market value of life insurance liabilities. Insurance, Mathematics & Economics., 40(2), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.04.005
    Chen, A., Hieber, P., & Lämmlein, L. (2020). Regulatory measures for distressed insurance undertakings: a comparative study. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal., 2020(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2019.1633395
    Grosen, A., & Jørgensen, P. L. (2002). Life Insurance Liabilities at Market Value: An Analysis of Insolvency Risk, Bonus Policy, and Regulatory Intervention Rules in a Barrier Option Framework. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 69(1), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6975.00005
    Huang, F. W. (2020). A simple model of financial grey rhino under insurer capital regulation. Applied Economics., 52(46), 5088–5097. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1752905
    Hwang, Y. W., Chang, S. C., & Wu, Y. C. (2015). Capital forbearance, ex ante life insurance guaranty schemes, and interest rate uncertainty. North American Actuarial Journal, 19(2), 94-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2014.1001911
    Jeanblanc, M., Yor, M., & Chesney, M. (2009). Mathematical methods for financial markets. Springer, London.
    Jensen, B. A., & Sørensen, C. (2001). Paying for Minimum Interest Rate Guarantees: Who Should Compensate Who? European Financial Management : The Journal of the European Financial Management Association, 7(2), 183–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-036X.00152
    Lin, J. H., Chang, C. P., & Chen, S. (2021). A simple model of financial grey rhino under insurer capital regulation: an extension. Applied Economics Letters., 28(21), 1872–1876. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1854655
    Schmeiser, H., & Wagner, J. (2015). A Proposal on How the Regulator Should Set Minimum Interest Rate Guarantees in Participating Life Insurance Contracts. The Journal of Risk and Insurance., 82(3), 659–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12036
    Tu, C. Y. , & Chang, S. C. (2022). Optimal Insurance Solvency Regulatory Schemes under the Early Warning SystemSelecting Optimal Insurance Regulatory Schemes, Bank of Taiwan Quarterly, 73(4), 18-38.
    Zhang, T., & Cao, J. (2023). Impact of regulatory policy adjustments on insurance company costs and cost efficiency. Finance Research Letters., 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104611
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    風險管理與保險學系
    112358029
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112358029
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[風險管理與保險學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    802901.pdf1915KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback