English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118291/149328 (79%)
Visitors : 77824916      Online Users : 441
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/158661
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158661


    Title: 顧客集中度對台灣上市櫃公司ESG爭議之影響:兼論總經理異動的調節效果
    The Impact of Customer Concentration on ESG Controversies of Taiwanese Listed Companies: The Moderating Effect of CEO Turnover
    Authors: 李欣蕙
    Li, Shin-Huei
    Contributors: 李佳玲
    李欣蕙
    Li, Shin-Huei
    Keywords: ESG
    供應商ESG爭議
    顧客集中度
    CEO異動
    ESG
    ESG Controversies
    Customer Concentration
    CEO Turnover
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-08-04 14:51:54 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以2018年至2022年間台灣非金融業之上市櫃公司為研究對象,探討顧客集中度對供應商ESG爭議的影響,並進一步分析CEO異動是否對此關係具調節效果。本文以TESG永續事件雷達資料庫為基礎,衡量公司所涉ESG爭議之強度,並採用OLS迴歸進行實證分析。研究結果顯示,顧客集中度越高的供應商,發生ESG爭議的嚴重程度亦越高,顯示依賴少數大客戶的公司反而可能因成本壓力或談判劣勢,而減少對社會責任的投入。另外也發現總經理短期內異動次數越高,會進一步強化顧客集中度對ESG爭議的正向關聯性,突顯總經理穩定性對公司ESG爭議管理的重要性。本文有助於公司與利害關係人理解顧客關係管理與內部治理對ESG爭議的潛在影響。
    This study discusses the impact of customer concentration on ESG controversies among suppliers, based on non-financial listed firms in Taiwan-listed companies from 2018 to 2022. Besides, this study also examines whether CEO turnover moderates this relationship. Based on the data from the TESG Sustainable Event Radar database which measures the severity of ESG controversies, this study use OLS regression to conduct empirical analysis. The results indicate that suppliers with higher customer concentration tend to experience more severe ESG controversies, suggesting that firms heavily reliant on a few major customers may compromise social responsibility due to cost pressures or weaker bargaining power. Furthermore, frequent CEO turnover within a short period further strengthens the positive relationship between customer concentration and ESG controversy severity, highlighting the critical role of managerial stability in managing ESG-related risks. This study contributes to a deeper understanding for companies and stakeholders on how customer relationship management and internal governance affect ESG controversies.
    Reference: Aouadi, A. Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 1027–1047
    Bachnik, K., & Nowacki, R. (2018). How to build consumer trust: Socially responsible or controversial advertising. Sustainability, 10(7), 2173.
    Baker, T., & Griffith, S. J. (2007). The missing monitor in corporate governance: The directors’ and officers’ liability insurer. Georgetown Law Journal, 95: 1795-1842.
    Ballinger, G. A., & Marcel, J. J. (2010). The use of an interim CEO during succession episodes and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 262–283.
    Banerjee, S., Dasgupta, S., & Kim, Y. (2008). Buyer–supplier relationships and the stakeholder theory of capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 63(5), 2507–2552.
    Bejou, D., Ennew, C. T., & Palmer, A. (1998). Trust, ethics and relationship satisfaction. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 16(4), 170-175.
    Bennett, V. M., Pierce, L., Snyder, J. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2013). Customer-driven misconduct: How competition corrupts business practices. Management Science, 59(8), 1725–1742.
    Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer–company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76–88.
    Boeker, W. (1992). Power and managerial dismissal: Scapegoating at the top. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 400–421.
    Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435–455.
    Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Jarrell, G. (1997). Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and Chairman of the Board. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3(3), 189–220.
    Budianto, A. (2019). Customer loyalty: Quality of service. Journal of Management Review, 3(1), 299–305.
    Campello, M., & Gao, J. (2016). Customer concentration and loan contract terms. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(1), 108–136.
    Chang, H., Hall, C. M., & Paz, M. T. (2021). Suppliers’ product market competition, customer concentration, and cost structure. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 33(3), 9–27.
    Chen, C. Y., Hung, M., & Wang, Y. (2022). Media, reputational risk, and bank loan contracting. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 50, 100969.
    Chen, J., Su, X., Tian, X., Xu, B., & Zuo, L. (2024). Do major corporate customers deter corporate misconduct? Journal of Accounting and Economics. Advance online publication.
    Chintrakarn, P., Jiraporn, P., Kim, J.-C., & Kim, Y. S. (2016). The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 45(1), 102–123.
    Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1995). CEO and director turnover in failing firms: An illusion of change? Strategic Management Journal, 16(5), 393–400.
    de Franco, C. (2020). ESG controversies and their impact on performance. The Journal of Investing, 29(2), 33–45.
    Dhaliwal, D., Michas, P. N., Naiker, V., & Sharma, D. (2019). Greater reliance on major customers and auditor going concern opinions. Contemporary Accounting Research.
    Doe, J., & Smith, A. (2022). Innovations in logistics and supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Innovations, 18(2), 45-60.
    Eccles, R. G., Newquist, S. C., & Schatz, R. (2007). Reputation and its risks. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 104–114.
    Eriksson, T., Madsen, E. S., Dilling-Hansen, M., & Smith, V. (2001). Determinants of CEO and board turnover. Empirica, 28(3), 243–257.
    Fee, C. E., Hadlock, C. J., & Thomas, S. (2006). Corporate equity ownership and the governance of product market relationships. The Journal of Finance, 61(3), 1217–1251.
    Feng, H., & Xiao, J. Z. (2022). Board change and firm risk: Do new directors mean unstable corporate policies? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 30(2), 212–231.
    Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit. The New York Times Magazine (September 13): 122-126.
    Haque, F., & Ntim, C. G. (2020). Executive compensation, sustainable compensation policy, carbon performance and market value. British Journal of Management, 31, no. 3: 525–546.
    Helgesen, Ø. (2006). Are loyal customers profitable? Customer satisfaction, customer (action) loyalty and customer profitability at the individual level. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(3-4), 245-266.
    Hu, W.-Q. (2024). Customer ESG performance and supplier greenwashing behaviour: evidence from China. Applied Economics Letters.
    Huang, H. H., Lobo, G. J., Wang, C., & Xie, H. (2016). Customer concentration and corporate tax avoidance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 72, 184–200.
    Hui, K. W., Liang, C., & Yeung, P. E. (2019). The effect of major customer concentration on firm profitability: Competitive or collaborative?. Review of Accounting Studies, 24, 189–229
    Issa, A., & Hanaysha, J. R. (2023). Breaking the glass ceiling for a sustainable future: The power of women on corporate boards in reducing ESG controversies. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 31(4), 623–646.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305-360.
    Jin, G., Jiang, Q., & Li, X. (2022). Customer concentration, managerial ability, and corporate performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 814646.
    Jiraporn, P., Jiraporn, N., Boeprasert, A., & Chang, K. (2014). Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) improve credit ratings? evidence from geographic identification. Financial Management, 43, no. 3: 505–531.
    Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, no. 1: 53–72.
    Joseph, K., & Richardson, V. J. (2002). Free cash flow, agency costs, and the affordability method of advertising budgeting. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 94–107
    Kadapakkam, P. R., & Oliveira, M. (2021). Binding ties in the supply chain and supplier capital structure. Journal of Banking & Finance, 130, 106183.
    Kesner, I. F., & Dalton, D. R. (1994). Top management turnover and CEO succession: An investigation of the effects of turnover on performance. Journal of Management Studies, 31(5), 701–713.
    Khadka, K., & Maharjan, S. (2017). Customer satisfaction and customer loyalty (Bachelor's thesis). Centria University of Applied Sciences, Pietarsaari, Finland.
    Kim, Y., Jeong, S. S., Yiu, D. W., & Moon, J. (2021). Frequent CEO turnover and firm performance: The resilience effect of workforce diversity. Journal of Business Ethics, 173, 185–203.
    Kolbel, ¨ J. F., Busch, T., & Jancso, L. M. (2017). How media coverage of corporate social irresponsibility increases financial risk. Strategic Management Journal, 38(11), 2266–2284.
    Krause, R., Semadeni, M., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2014). CEO Duality: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 40(1), 256–286.
    Li, C. Y., & Fang, Y. H. (2022). The more we get together, the more we can save? A transaction cost perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 62, 102434.
    Li, G., & Zhong, M. (2024). How do CEO’s green characteristics affect ESG performance? Applied Economics Letters. Advance online publication.
    Li, J., Haider, Z. A., Jin, X., & Yuan, W. (2019). Corporate controversy, social responsibility and market performance: International evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 60, 1–18.
    Li, N., Li, G., & Xue, J. (2025). Does ESG protect firms equally during crises? The role of supply chain concentration. Omega, 130, 103171.
    Liang, D., & Pan, Y. (2025). The spillover effect of ESG disclosure quality: evidence from major customers. Applied Economics.
    Lin, H., Lin, J., & Wang, F. (2022). An innovative machine learning model for supply chain management. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100276.
    Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., & Maon, F. (2009). Introduction: Corporate social responsibility implementation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 251–256.
    Liu, E. X., Zhou, S., & Mi, J. (2025). Diversity breeds strength: CEO functional experience diversity and corporate ESG performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(4).
    McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.
    Meng, Q., Wang, S., & Zhong, Z. (2024). The effect of directors' and officers' liabilities insurance on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 103, 103176.
    Miller, D. (1993). Some organizational consequences of CEO succession. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 644–659.
    Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1984). Organizations: A Quantum View, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Min, H., & Zhou, G. (2002). Supply Chain Modeling: Past, Present and Future. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 43, 231-249.
    Morgan, N. A., & Rego, L. L. (2006). The value of different customer satisfaction and loyalty metrics in predicting business performance. Marketing Science, 25(5), 426–439.
    Mousavi, S., & Thimm, C. (2023). Social media disclosure and reputational damage: Empirical evidence from the LIBOR scandal. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting.
    Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company's financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120341.
    Niu, Z., Zhu, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhong, M. (2024). CEO turnover and ESG greenwashing: Evidence from China. Applied Economics Letters.
    Park-Poaps, H., & Rees, K. (2010). Stakeholder forces of socially responsible supply chain management orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 305–322.
    Patatoukas, P. N. (2012). Customer-base concentration: Implications for firm performance and capital markets. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 363–392.
    Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
    Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
    Roberts, S. (2003). Supply chain specific? Understanding the patchy success of ethical sourcing initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 159–170.
    Schepker, D. J., Kim, Y., Patel, P. C., Thatcher, M. B. T., & Campion, M. C. (2017). CEO succession, strategic change, and post-succession performance: A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(6), 701–720.
    Schwieterman, M. A., Goldsby, T. J., & Croxton, K. L. (2018). Customer and supplier portfolios: Can credit risks be managed through supply chain relationships? Journal of Business Logistics, 39(2), 123–137
    Shen, W., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2002). Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: The impacts of successor type, postsuccession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 717–733.
    Simsek, Z. (2007). CEO tenure and organizational performance: An intervening model. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 653–662.
    Snyder, C. M. (1996). A dynamic theory of countervailing power. RAND Journal of Economics, 27(4), 747–769.
    Sun, W., Kou, M., Zhang, X., Cui, Y., & Chen, S. (2024). How Does a Major Corporate Customer’s ESG Performance Drive the Supplier’s Green Innovation? Sustainability, 16(17), 7770.
    Ulrich, D., & Barney, J. B. (1984). Perspectives in organizations: Resource dependence, efficiency, and population. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 471–481.
    Wen, W., Ke, Y., & Liu, X. (2021). Customer concentration and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 46, 100755.
    Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. New York: Free Press.
    Yang, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2024). The impact of suppliers' CSR controversies on buyers' market value: The moderating role of social capital. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 30(1), 100904.
    Yang, Z. (2017). Customer concentration, relationship, and debt contracting. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(2), 185–207.
    Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Hubbard, T. D. (2012). Reputation as a benefit and a burden? How stakeholders’ organizational identification affects the role of reputation following a negative event. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 360–383.
    Zheng, S., Zhang, Q., & Zhang, P. (2023). Can customer concentration affect corporate ESG performance? Finance Research Letters, 58, 104432.
    Zhu, M., Yeung, A. C. L., & Zhou, H. (2021). Diversify or concentrate: The impact of customer concentration on corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Production Economics, 240, 108214.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    112353027
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112353027
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    302701.pdf2415KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback