English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118252/149288 (79%)
Visitors : 75347121      Online Users : 862
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158273


    Title: 石油價格與匯率的動態調整
    Dynamic Adjustments of Oil Prices and Exchange Rates
    Authors: 王雅玲
    Wang, Ya-Ling
    Contributors: 賴景昌
    Lai, Ching-Chong
    王雅玲
    Wang, Ya-Ling
    Keywords: 匯率
    石油
    碳稅
    動態調整
    資產替代性
    Exchange Rate
    Oil
    Carbon Tax
    Dynamic Adjustment
    Asset Substitutability
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-08-04 12:50:22 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究建構一個以 Dornbusch(1976)匯率動態調整模型為基礎,結合Frankel(1986)與 Lai、Hu and Fan(2005)納入農產品市場的擴充架構,應用於石油市場,並將石油視為兼具商品與資產屬性的前瞻性投資標的,以探討貨幣政策與碳稅政策宣告對石油價格與匯率動態調整的影響。結果顯示,恆常性擴張的貨幣政策即使尚未實施,僅宣告,民眾的預期行為即造成匯率單調貶值與石油價格持續上漲。相較之下,碳稅政策對石油價格的影響,則受到資產替代性與政策宣告至實施時間差的影響。當替代性較高時,市場快速反映對未來報酬下降的預期,石油價格呈現單調下跌;當替代性較低且政策實施時間離宣告時刻尚遠時,石油因相對穩定性及商品需求尚存吸引部分資金短暫流入,價格出現先漲後跌的「錯向調整」;若實施時點略近,則價格可能於宣告當下短暫跳升後迅速下跌,形成「錯向跳動」。僅當政策即將實施時,石油價格才回歸與高資產替代程度相同的單調下跌的路徑。相對而言,匯率對碳稅政策宣告的反應一致,無論資產替代性或政策時點為何,皆呈現單調貶值趨勢,反映市場對長期經濟前景惡化的預期。本文補足文獻中對石油資產特性之討論,並分析政策預期如何影響油價與匯率的調整動態。
    This study builds on the Dornbusch (1976) exchange rate adjustment model, integrating extensions from Frankel (1986) and Lai, Hu, and Fan (2005) to include agricultural markets, and applies it to the oil market. Oil is treated as a forward-looking asset with both commodity and financial characteristics. The analysis explores how announcements of monetary and carbon tax policies affect the dynamic adjustment of oil prices and exchange rates.Results show that even before implementation, an announced permanent expansionary monetary policy can influence expectations, leading to capital reallocation, currency depreciation, and rising oil prices. In contrast, the effect of a carbon tax announcement on oil prices depends on asset substitutability and the time gap between announcement and implementation. With high substitutability, oil prices fall steadily after the announcement. With low substitutability and a longer interval before implementation, oil’s relative stability attracts temporary capital inflows, causing a short-term rise followed by a drop—termed “misadjustment.” If implementation is imminent, prices may briefly jump at the announcement and then quickly decline, showing a “misjump.” Only when the policy is about to take effect do oil prices follow a consistent downward path.In comparison, exchange rates respond uniformly to the carbon tax announcement, showing a steady depreciation regardless of substitutability or timing, reflecting expectations of a weaker economic outlook. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the dual nature of oil and analyzing how policy expectations shape oil and exchange rate dynamics.
    Reference: 賴景昌(2007)。《國際金融理論:基礎篇》。台北市:華泰圖書有限公司
    賴景昌(1994),《國際金融理論:進階篇》,台北市:茂昌圖書有限公司
    Adams, Z., & Kartsakli, M. (2017). Has crude oil become a financial asset? Evidence from ten years of financialization (Working Paper No. 1710),University of St. Gallen, School of Finance.
    Aoki, M. (1985). Misadjustment to anticipated shocks: An example of exchange-rate response. Journal of International Money and Finance, 4(3), 415–420.
    Barsky, R. B., & Kilian, L. (2004). Oil and the macroeconomy since the 1970s. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(4), 115–134.
    Bodenstein, M., Erceg, C. J., & Guerrieri, L. (2011). Oil shocks and external adjustment. Journal of International Economics, 83, 168–184.
    Cheng, I.-H., & Xiong, W. (2014). The financialization of commodity markets. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 6(1), 419–441.
    Frankel, J. A. (1986). Expectations and commodity price dynamics: The overshooting model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(2), 344–348
    Gaete, M., Herrera, R. (2023). Diversification benefits of commodities in portfolio allocation: A dynamic factor copula approach. Journal of Commodity Markets,32,100363.
    Golub, S. S. (1983). Oil prices and exchange rates. The Economic Journal, 93(371), 576–593.
    Hamilton, J. D. (2009). Causes and consequences of the oil shock of 2007–08. FRB Atlanta CQER Working Paper No. 09-02.
    Kaufmann, R. (2009). Oil prices, speculation, and fundamentals: Interpreting causal relations among spot and futures prices. Energy Economics , 31(4), 550–558.
    Krichene, N. (2006). World crude oil markets: Monetary policy and the recent oil shock.( IMF Working Paper No. 2006/062), International Monetary Fund.
    Lai, C. C., Hu, S. W., & Fan, C. P. (2005). The overshooting hypothesis of agricultural prices: The role of asset substitutability. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 30(1), 1–23.
    Macaluso, N., Tuladhar, S., Woollacott, J., McFarland, J. R., Creason, J., & Cole, J.(2018). The impact of carbon taxation and revenue recycling on U.S. industries.Climate Change Economic, 9(1), 1-41.
    Masters, M. W. (2008). Testimony of Michael W. Masters, Managing Member / Portfolio Manager, Masters Capital Management, LLC. Testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
    Rivers, N., & Schaufele, B. (2015). Salience of carbon taxes in the gasoline market. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 74, 23–36.
    Schubert, S. F. (2014). Dynamic effects of oil price shocks and their impact on the current account. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 18(2), 316–337.
    Schubert, S. F. , &Turnovsky, S. J. (2011). The impact of oil prices on an oil-importing developing economy. Journal of Development Economics, 94(1), 18–29.
    Yoshino, N., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Otsuka, M., & Nakahigashi, M. (2021). Economic impacts of carbon tax in a general equilibrium framework: Empirical study of Japan. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 23(1/2), 1–25.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經濟學系
    112258014
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112258014
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[經濟學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    801401.pdf851KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback