Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158271
|
Title: | 台灣穩定房市政策對房價之影響 The Impact of Taiwan’s Housing Market Stabilization Policies on Housing Prices |
Authors: | 洪嘉潁 Hong, Jia-Ying |
Contributors: | 洪福聲 Hung, Fu-Sheng 洪嘉潁 Hong, Jia-Ying |
Keywords: | 局部投影法 貸款成數 住宅市場 房地合一稅 貨幣政策 房價 Local Projection Method LTV Housing market Capital gains tax Monetary Policy Housing Prices |
Date: | 2025 |
Issue Date: | 2025-08-04 12:50:00 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 本研究探討台灣自 2010 年起實施之房市調控政策對房價的動態影響,聚焦於利率政策、選擇性信用管制、稅制改革與購屋補貼等工具,並運用 Jordà(2005)所提出之局部投影法(local projection method),結合 2001 年第 1 季至 2024 年第 4 季之季資料進行實證估計。結果顯示,升息將在兩年內使房價下跌約 1% 至 2%。雖然升息對房價具一定抑制效果,但利率作為總體性政策工具,其影響範圍涵蓋整體經濟,過度依賴升息可能衍生負面外部性。因此,政府更傾向透過具針對性的選擇性信用管制,聚焦於特定購屋族群或房地產交易行為,以達成更精準且副作用較小的市場干預目的。在信貸政策方面,第二戶限貸政策抑制房價最為有效且顯著,下調貸款成數一成可使房價下跌 6% 至 8%。相較之下,第三戶限貸與高價住宅限貸之效果較為遞延或不顯著。房地產稅制本研究僅採納房地合一稅1.0與2.0,由於奢侈稅已於 2016 年併入房地合一稅,故未另納入;囤房稅 2.0 則因樣本期數不足,僅採用囤房稅 1.0 作為穩健性檢查依據。結果顯示房地合一稅雖呈現負向影響,但統計上未達顯著水準;新青安購屋貸款政策則推升房價近 10%。為檢驗信貸政策估計結果之穩健性,本文將基準模型替換控制變數與增列變數。結果顯示主要政策效果方向一致,第二戶限貸效果最具穩健性。整體而言,具針對性之信貸管制相較利率政策更具抑價效果,信貸政策設計與涵蓋對象之精準性對於政策成效具有關鍵意涵。 This study analyzes the dynamic effects of Taiwan’s housing market regulations since 2010, focusing on interest rate policy, selective credit controls, tax reforms, and housing subsidies. Using Jordà’s (2005) Local Projection Method and quarterly data from 2001Q1 to 2024Q4, results show that a 25-basis-point rate hike reduces house prices by 1–2% within two years. The loan-to-value limit on second-home purchases proves most effective, with a 10% reduction linked to a 6–8% price drop. In contrast, the loan-to-value limit on third-home purchases and the loan-to-value limit on high-priced housing loans show weaker or delayed effects. Only the consolidated housing and land taxes (1.0 and 2.0) are considered; the luxury tax is excluded due to its merger in 2016, and the vacant home tax 2.0 due to limited data. Vacant home tax 1.0 is used for robustness checks. Replacing the rediscount rate with the secured loan rate confirms result robest. While interest rates affect house prices, their broad economic impact prompts governments to favor credit tools for more targeted housing interventions. |
Reference: | 王泓仁、陳南光與林姿妤 (2017),「房貸成數 (LTV) 對臺灣房地產價格與授信之影響」,中央銀行季刊,39(3),5-39。
王聖東 (2017),「貸款利率、成數與住宅價格關聯性之研究 ── 以台北市及新北市為例」,國立政治大學地政學研究所碩士論文。
江佳玟 (2017),「購屋貸款變數與住宅市場關聯性之研究」,國立政治大學地政學研究所碩士論文。
許鉛厚 (2022),「總體審慎政策的成本-以台灣貸款成數政策為例」,國立成功大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
陳柏如 (2018),「總體審慎政策工具與臺灣房價的關係 ── 特定目標信用工具與房市相關租稅工具的影響」,經濟研究(Taipei Economic Inquiry),54(2),287–330。
陳隆麒與李文雄 (1998),「臺灣地區房價, 股價, 利率互動關係之研究-聯立方程模型與向量自我迴歸模型之應用」,中國財務學刊,5(4),51-71。
黃名義、許育純與蔡嘉哲(2023),「房地合一稅制 1.0 和 2.0 實施後的成效檢視:從總體和個體資料分析」,不動產研究,(2),62-78。
彭思瑾 (2017),「貸款成數、加碼利率與房價的動態調整」,國立政治大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
蔡明諺 (2022),「探討總體經建環境對台灣房價的影響」,政治大學企業管理研究所 (MBA 學位學程) 碩士論文。
Ahuja, A., & Nabar, M. (2011). Safeguarding banks and containing property booms: cross- country evidence on macroprudential policies and lessons from Hong Kong SAR. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/wp11284.pdf
Akinci, Ö., & Olmstead-Rumsey, J. (2018). How effective are macroprudential policies? an empirical investigation. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 33, 33–57. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jfi.2017.04.001
Andrews, D., Sánchez, A. C., & Johansson, Å. (2011). Housing markets and structural policies in OECD countries. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kgk8t2k9vf3-en
Bernanke, B. S., Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1999). The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework. Handbook of macroeconomics, 1, 1341–1393. https://doi. org/10.1016/S1574-0048(99)10034-X
Bloor, C., & McDonald, C. (2013). ”Estimating the impacts of restrictions on high LVR lending” (Analytical Note No. AN2013/05). Reserve Bank of New Zealand. http://www.rbnz. govt.nz/-/media/ReserveBank/Files/Publications/Analytical%20notes/2013/an2013- 05.pdf
Chen, C. (2021). Research on the impact of monetary policy on real estate prices [Doctoral Dissertation]. Geneva Finance Research Institute.
Claessens, S., Kose, M. A., & Terrones, M. E. (2011). Financial cycles: What? how? when? NBER international seminar on macroeconomics, 7(1), 303–344. https://www.journals. uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/658308
Del Negro, M., & Otrok, C. (2007). 99 Luftballons: Monetary policy and the house price boom across U.S. states. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(7), 1962–1985. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.11.003
Demary, M., & Voigtländer, M. (2009). The inflation hedging properties of real estate: A comparison between direct investments and equity returns. ERES Conference 2009. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228707799
Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427– 431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531
Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 1912517
Enders, W. (2014). Applied Econometric Time Series (4th). John Wiley & Sons. Gindelsky, M., Moulton, J., Wentland, K., & Wentland, S. (2023). Returns to homeownership and inequality: Evidence from the first-time homebuyer tax credit. https://www.aeaweb. org/conference/2023/program/paper/h2if8fNs
Glaeser, E. L., Gottlieb, J. D., & Gyourko, J. (2012). Can cheap credit explain the housing boom? In Housing and the financial crisis (pp. 301–359). University of Chicago Press. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c12622/c12622.pdf
Grebler, L., & Mittelbach, F. (1979). The inflation of house prices, its extent, causes, and consequences. Lexington Books. https : / / books . google . com . tw / books ? id = _E - OAAAAIAAJ
Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press.
Iacoviello, M. (2005). House prices, borrowing constraints, and monetary policy in the business cycle. American Economic Review, 95(3), 739–764. https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1257 / 0002828054201477
Iacoviello, M., & Neri, S. (2010). Housing Market Spillovers: Evidence from an Estimated DSGE Model. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(2), 125–164. https ://doi.org/10.1257/mac.2.2.125
Igan, M. D., & Kang, M. H. (2011). Do loan-to-value and debt-to-income limits work? Evidence from Korea. International Monetary Fund. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm? abstractid=1974849
Jordà, Ò. (2005). Estimation and Inference of Impulse Responses by Local Projections.American Economic Review, 95(1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828518
Kau, J. B., & Keenan, D. (1981). On the theory of interest rates, consumer durables, and the demand for housing. Journal of Urban Economics, 10(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10. 1016/0094-1190(81)90014-0
Kent, R. J. (1984). Housing tenure choice: Evidence from time series. Journal of Urban Economics, 15(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(84)90014-7
Kuttner, K., & Shim, I. (2012). Taming the real estate beast. The Effects of Monetary and Macroprudential Policies on House Prices and Credit. Preliminary Conference Draft. Reserve Bank of Australia ja Bank for International Settlements.
Kuttner, K. N., & Shim, I. (2013). Can non-interest rate policies stabilise housing markets.Evidence from a panel of , 57.
McDonald, C. (2015, March). When is macroprudential policy effective? (BIS Working Papers No. 496). Bank for International Settlements. Monetary, Economic Department. https://www.bis.org/publ/work496.pdf
Montiel Olea, J. L., & Plagborg-Møller, M. (2021). Local Projection Inference Is Simpler and More Robust Than You Think. Econometrica, 89(4), 1789–1823. https://doi.org/10. 3982/ECTA17434
Perron, P. (1989). The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis.Econometrica, 57(6), 1361–1401. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913712
Phillips, P. C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.
Poterba, J. M. (1984). Tax Subsidies to Owner-Occupied Housing: An Asset-Market Approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99(4), 729–752. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883123
Ramey, V. A. (2016). Macroeconomic Shocks and Their Propagation (J. B. Taylor & H. Uhlig, Eds.). Handbook of Macroeconomics, 2, 71–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.03.002
Ramey, V. A., & Zubairy, S. (2018). Government spending multipliers in good times and in bad: Evidence from US historical data. Journal of Political Economy, 126(2), 850–901. https://doi.org/10.1086/696277
Salisu, A. A., Raheem, I. D., & Ndako, U. B. (2020). The inflation hedging properties of gold, stocks and real estate: A comparative analysis. Resources Policy, 66, 101605. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101605
Skaburskis, A., & Tomalty, R. (1997). Land Value Taxation and Development Activity: The Reaction of Toronto and Ottawa Developers, Planners, Municipal Finance Officials. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 20(3), 401–418. https://idjs.ca/images/ rcsr / archives/V20N3-Skaburskis-Tomalty.pdf
Summers, L. H. (1980). Inflation, the stock market, and owner-occupied housing (NBER Working Paper No. w0606). National Bureau of Economic Research. https : / / www . nber.org/papers/w0606
White, H. (1980). A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 1912934
Wong, Y. C., Ooi, J. T. L., & Le, T. T. (2022). The effectiveness of macroprudential housing policies: Evidence from singapore. Journal of Housing Economics, 56, 101847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2022.101847
Xie, S. (2024). Monetary policy shocks and local housing prices. Available at SSRN 4193924. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4193924 |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 經濟學系 112258012 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112258012 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [經濟學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
801201.pdf | | 1346Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|