English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118590/149640 (79%)
Visitors : 79638884      Online Users : 402
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158271


    Title: 台灣穩定房市政策對房價之影響
    The Impact of Taiwan’s Housing Market Stabilization Policies on Housing Prices
    Authors: 洪嘉潁
    Hong, Jia-Ying
    Contributors: 洪福聲
    Hung, Fu-Sheng
    洪嘉潁
    Hong, Jia-Ying
    Keywords: 局部投影法
    貸款成數
    住宅市場
    房地合一稅
    貨幣政策
    房價
    Local Projection Method
    LTV
    Housing market
    Capital gains tax
    Monetary Policy
    Housing Prices
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-08-04 12:50:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討台灣自 2010 年起實施之房市調控政策對房價的動態影響,聚焦於利率政策、選擇性信用管制、稅制改革與購屋補貼等工具,並運用 Jordà(2005)所提出之局部投影法(local projection method),結合 2001 年第 1 季至 2024 年第 4 季之季資料進行實證估計。結果顯示,升息將在兩年內使房價下跌約 1% 至 2%。雖然升息對房價具一定抑制效果,但利率作為總體性政策工具,其影響範圍涵蓋整體經濟,過度依賴升息可能衍生負面外部性。因此,政府更傾向透過具針對性的選擇性信用管制,聚焦於特定購屋族群或房地產交易行為,以達成更精準且副作用較小的市場干預目的。在信貸政策方面,第二戶限貸政策抑制房價最為有效且顯著,下調貸款成數一成可使房價下跌 6% 至 8%。相較之下,第三戶限貸與高價住宅限貸之效果較為遞延或不顯著。房地產稅制本研究僅採納房地合一稅1.0與2.0,由於奢侈稅已於 2016 年併入房地合一稅,故未另納入;囤房稅 2.0 則因樣本期數不足,僅採用囤房稅 1.0 作為穩健性檢查依據。結果顯示房地合一稅雖呈現負向影響,但統計上未達顯著水準;新青安購屋貸款政策則推升房價近 10%。為檢驗信貸政策估計結果之穩健性,本文將基準模型替換控制變數與增列變數。結果顯示主要政策效果方向一致,第二戶限貸效果最具穩健性。整體而言,具針對性之信貸管制相較利率政策更具抑價效果,信貸政策設計與涵蓋對象之精準性對於政策成效具有關鍵意涵。
    This study analyzes the dynamic effects of Taiwan’s housing market regulations since 2010, focusing on interest rate policy, selective credit controls, tax reforms, and housing subsidies. Using Jordà’s (2005) Local Projection Method and quarterly data from 2001Q1 to 2024Q4, results show that a 25-basis-point rate hike reduces house prices by 1–2% within two years. The loan-to-value limit on second-home purchases proves most effective, with a 10% reduction linked to a 6–8% price drop. In contrast, the loan-to-value limit on third-home purchases and the loan-to-value limit on high-priced housing loans show weaker or delayed effects. Only the consolidated housing and land taxes (1.0 and 2.0) are considered; the luxury tax is excluded due to its merger in 2016, and the vacant home tax 2.0 due to limited data. Vacant home tax 1.0 is used for robustness checks. Replacing the rediscount rate with the secured loan rate confirms result robest. While interest rates affect house prices, their broad economic impact prompts governments to favor credit tools for more targeted housing interventions.
    Reference: 王泓仁、陳南光與林姿妤 (2017),「房貸成數 (LTV) 對臺灣房地產價格與授信之影響」,中央銀行季刊,39(3),5-39。

    王聖東 (2017),「貸款利率、成數與住宅價格關聯性之研究 ── 以台北市及新北市為例」,國立政治大學地政學研究所碩士論文。

    江佳玟 (2017),「購屋貸款變數與住宅市場關聯性之研究」,國立政治大學地政學研究所碩士論文。

    許鉛厚 (2022),「總體審慎政策的成本-以台灣貸款成數政策為例」,國立成功大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。

    陳柏如 (2018),「總體審慎政策工具與臺灣房價的關係 ── 特定目標信用工具與房市相關租稅工具的影響」,經濟研究(Taipei Economic Inquiry),54(2),287–330。

    陳隆麒與李文雄 (1998),「臺灣地區房價, 股價, 利率互動關係之研究-聯立方程模型與向量自我迴歸模型之應用」,中國財務學刊,5(4),51-71。

    黃名義、許育純與蔡嘉哲(2023),「房地合一稅制 1.0 和 2.0 實施後的成效檢視:從總體和個體資料分析」,不動產研究,(2),62-78。

    彭思瑾 (2017),「貸款成數、加碼利率與房價的動態調整」,國立政治大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。

    蔡明諺 (2022),「探討總體經建環境對台灣房價的影響」,政治大學企業管理研究所 (MBA 學位學程) 碩士論文。

    Ahuja, A., & Nabar, M. (2011). Safeguarding banks and containing property booms: cross- country evidence on macroprudential policies and lessons from Hong Kong SAR. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/wp11284.pdf

    Akinci, Ö., & Olmstead-Rumsey, J. (2018). How effective are macroprudential policies? an empirical investigation. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 33, 33–57. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jfi.2017.04.001

    Andrews, D., Sánchez, A. C., & Johansson, Å. (2011). Housing markets and structural policies in OECD countries. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kgk8t2k9vf3-en

    Bernanke, B. S., Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1999). The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework. Handbook of macroeconomics, 1, 1341–1393. https://doi. org/10.1016/S1574-0048(99)10034-X

    Bloor, C., & McDonald, C. (2013). ”Estimating the impacts of restrictions on high LVR lending” (Analytical Note No. AN2013/05). Reserve Bank of New Zealand. http://www.rbnz. govt.nz/-/media/ReserveBank/Files/Publications/Analytical%20notes/2013/an2013- 05.pdf

    Chen, C. (2021). Research on the impact of monetary policy on real estate prices [Doctoral Dissertation]. Geneva Finance Research Institute.

    Claessens, S., Kose, M. A., & Terrones, M. E. (2011). Financial cycles: What? how? when? NBER international seminar on macroeconomics, 7(1), 303–344. https://www.journals. uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/658308

    Del Negro, M., & Otrok, C. (2007). 99 Luftballons: Monetary policy and the house price boom across U.S. states. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(7), 1962–1985. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.11.003

    Demary, M., & Voigtländer, M. (2009). The inflation hedging properties of real estate: A comparison between direct investments and equity returns. ERES Conference 2009. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228707799

    Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427– 431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531

    Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 1912517

    Enders, W. (2014). Applied Econometric Time Series (4th). John Wiley & Sons.
    Gindelsky, M., Moulton, J., Wentland, K., & Wentland, S. (2023). Returns to homeownership and inequality: Evidence from the first-time homebuyer tax credit. https://www.aeaweb. org/conference/2023/program/paper/h2if8fNs

    Glaeser, E. L., Gottlieb, J. D., & Gyourko, J. (2012). Can cheap credit explain the housing boom? In Housing and the financial crisis (pp. 301–359). University of Chicago Press. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c12622/c12622.pdf

    Grebler, L., & Mittelbach, F. (1979). The inflation of house prices, its extent, causes, and consequences. Lexington Books. https : / / books . google . com . tw / books ? id = _E - OAAAAIAAJ

    Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press.

    Iacoviello, M. (2005). House prices, borrowing constraints, and monetary policy in the business cycle. American Economic Review, 95(3), 739–764. https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1257 / 0002828054201477

    Iacoviello, M., & Neri, S. (2010). Housing Market Spillovers: Evidence from an Estimated DSGE Model. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(2), 125–164. https ://doi.org/10.1257/mac.2.2.125

    Igan, M. D., & Kang, M. H. (2011). Do loan-to-value and debt-to-income limits work? Evidence from Korea. International Monetary Fund. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm? abstractid=1974849

    Jordà, Ò. (2005). Estimation and Inference of Impulse Responses by Local Projections.American Economic Review, 95(1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828518

    Kau, J. B., & Keenan, D. (1981). On the theory of interest rates, consumer durables, and the demand for housing. Journal of Urban Economics, 10(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10. 1016/0094-1190(81)90014-0

    Kent, R. J. (1984). Housing tenure choice: Evidence from time series. Journal of Urban Economics, 15(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(84)90014-7

    Kuttner, K., & Shim, I. (2012). Taming the real estate beast. The Effects of Monetary and Macroprudential Policies on House Prices and Credit. Preliminary Conference Draft. Reserve Bank of Australia ja Bank for International Settlements.

    Kuttner, K. N., & Shim, I. (2013). Can non-interest rate policies stabilise housing markets.Evidence from a panel of , 57.

    McDonald, C. (2015, March). When is macroprudential policy effective? (BIS Working Papers No. 496). Bank for International Settlements. Monetary, Economic Department. https://www.bis.org/publ/work496.pdf

    Montiel Olea, J. L., & Plagborg-Møller, M. (2021). Local Projection Inference Is Simpler and More Robust Than You Think. Econometrica, 89(4), 1789–1823. https://doi.org/10. 3982/ECTA17434

    Perron, P. (1989). The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis.Econometrica, 57(6), 1361–1401. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913712

    Phillips, P. C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.

    Poterba, J. M. (1984). Tax Subsidies to Owner-Occupied Housing: An Asset-Market Approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99(4), 729–752. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883123

    Ramey, V. A. (2016). Macroeconomic Shocks and Their Propagation (J. B. Taylor & H. Uhlig, Eds.). Handbook of Macroeconomics, 2, 71–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.03.002

    Ramey, V. A., & Zubairy, S. (2018). Government spending multipliers in good times and in bad: Evidence from US historical data. Journal of Political Economy, 126(2), 850–901. https://doi.org/10.1086/696277

    Salisu, A. A., Raheem, I. D., & Ndako, U. B. (2020). The inflation hedging properties of gold, stocks and real estate: A comparative analysis. Resources Policy, 66, 101605. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101605

    Skaburskis, A., & Tomalty, R. (1997). Land Value Taxation and Development Activity: The Reaction of Toronto and Ottawa Developers, Planners, Municipal Finance Officials. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 20(3), 401–418. https://idjs.ca/images/ rcsr / archives/V20N3-Skaburskis-Tomalty.pdf

    Summers, L. H. (1980). Inflation, the stock market, and owner-occupied housing (NBER Working Paper No. w0606). National Bureau of Economic Research. https : / / www . nber.org/papers/w0606

    White, H. (1980). A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 1912934

    Wong, Y. C., Ooi, J. T. L., & Le, T. T. (2022). The effectiveness of macroprudential housing policies: Evidence from singapore. Journal of Housing Economics, 56, 101847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2022.101847

    Xie, S. (2024). Monetary policy shocks and local housing prices. Available at SSRN 4193924. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4193924
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經濟學系
    112258012
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112258012
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[經濟學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    801201.pdf1346KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback