Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158205
|
| Title: | 台德公私協力裁判評析及比較研究
The Judgment Review and Comparative Research of the Public-Private Partnership between Taiwan and Germany |
| Authors: | 詹鎮榮 |
| Contributors: | 法律系 |
| Keywords: | 公私協力;民營化;公辦民營;BOT;訴訟權;法院審判權;法院裁判 |
| Date: | 2015-10 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-07-31 15:48:36 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 公、私部門合作完成公共行政任務——亦即公私協力（PPP），為世界各國政府一九七○年代後行政革新方案之一項重要策略，旨在借重民間之專業知識與資金，以解決國家財政拮据之窘境，或是更有效率及效能地達成行政任務。我國亦乘此風潮，多年來在法制建置及行政作業實務上已累積不少成效。縱然如此，有鑑於公私協力非屬傳統之行政任務執行方式，我國在導入此等機制時，或因對制度陌生，或因法制未盡周延，或因公、私部門對於合作動機及目標認知不同，故在實務上，同時也衍生出不少之公私協力爭議案件。其中，提起訴訟，並經法院裁判者，亦不再少數。例如在促參領域之高速公路ETC 案及澎湖馬公海水淡化廠BOT 案等，皆是著名之公私協力訴訟案件。類似情形，即使是在公法學甚為發達的德國，自從推行公私協力制度後，在行政法院及普通法院仍累積有相當數量之裁判涉及公私協力爭議案件。此等法院裁判，不僅對於訴訟當事人權益有直接之形塑效果，即使是對公私協力感興趣之一般公、私部門以及學術界而言，亦是意義非凡。在公私協力法制作業實務及學理研究上，誠屬不可或缺之基本素材。有鑑於此，本研究計畫擬就我國行政法院歷年來公私協力相關裁判進行搜尋、整理及評析。研究之範圍，採廣義之公私協力概念理解；不限於BOT 案件之裁判，尚包括實質民營化、公辦民營及公民合資事業等範疇。而爭議之性質，從前端之法容許性及合作對象之徵選，到合作契約之締結及履約，乃至於後端之違約及國家擔保等問題，皆有所涵蓋。又由於公私協力部分法律關係之訴訟審判權歸屬於普通法院，故本計畫亦擇選其若干具代表性或重要性裁判，納入研究之客體。除我國法院裁判外，本研究亦擬將視野擴及至實體及訴訟法律體系與我國極為近似之德國，同樣整理彼邦行政法院及普通法院之公私協力相關裁判進行評析，並進而嘗試與我國法院之類似裁判作比較法上之研究，俾能拓展本研究計畫之廣度及深度，提升學術價值。至於研究成果，則是預計以出版「專書」之形式產出。
The cooperation between the public sector and private sector in order to achieve public administrative duties, also known as the Public-Private Partnership (PPP), is one of the most important administrative strategies for governments worldwide after the 1970’s. This strategy allows the state to acquire professional knowledge and capital from the folk. In this way, the state could reduce its capital burden and achieve administrative duties more efficiently. In recent years, Taiwan has reached numerous results on the legal system establishments and administrative tasks by executing the Public-Private Partnership. However, the Public-Private Partnership is not a traditional method to execute administrative duties. Accordingly, some controversial issues occurred on legal practices due to the unaccustomed and incomplete of the legal system on PPP. Some of the controversial issues have been filed charges, and the courts made verdicts. For instance, the Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects (PPIP) on the freeway ETC case and the Penghu-Magong desalting plants BOT case are well known litigations. Countries with highly developed public law like Germany has been facing similar cases mentioned above when they started to carry out the PPP system. Ever since then, the administrative courts and regular courts in Germany have accumulated many cases and verdicts related to the PPP controversial issues. These cases not only have great influence on both parties, but also offer significant values to those public or private sectors that are interested in PPP. It is a vital issue in the public law academic circle as well. The practicing and theories of PPP are no doubt a fundamental material in the public law field. Consequently, this research project will mainly focus on the searching, analyzing, and evaluating of the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) related administrative courts’ judgments throughout these years in Taiwan. The range of this project will cover the general concept related to PPP issues. For example, issues like BOT case judgments, substantial privatization of government-owned enterprises, and public-owned private sectors will be part of this project. The general process and issues of PPP, from the beginning of the legal permissibility and private partner’s audition to the conclusion of a cooperating treaty and honoring the treaty, also the breach of the treaty, will be covered by this project. In Taiwan, some of the legal issues of the Public-Private Partnership’s jurisdictions belong to regular courts, therefore, several important regular courts’ judgments will be included to this project for further research. In addition to Taiwan’s court judgments, this project will also focus on Germany’s court judgment due to the similarity of either country’s legal system. Judgment reviews related to PPP issues of Germany’s federal courts and regular courts would be included as well. This project will attempt to compare Germany’s judgments with Taiwan’s judgments as a method of studying comparative law. In this way, the whole project would be enriched and widened on academic values. As for the results of this project, it will be published into a selected book. |
| Relation: | 科技部, NSC101-2410-H004-034-MY3, 101.08-104.07 |
| Data Type: | report |
| Appears in Collections: | [法律學系] 國科會研究計畫
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 11 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
