Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157998
|
| Title: | 都市更新案例申請綠建築標章指標項目與成本之分析 |
| Authors: | 孫振義 |
| Contributors: | 地政系 |
| Keywords: | 綠建築;都市更新;造價成本
green building;urban renewal;cost of construction |
| Date: | 2019-12 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-07-14 11:09:41 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 由於都市的發展是一動態的過程，都市中許多地區隨著時間的遷移而會經歷經濟功能與物質功能之衰退。為了解決這些老舊地區衍生出的經濟問題與社會秩序問題，在過去到現在二十年之間，臺灣主要應對的方法為使用「都市更新」手段，以促進都市土地有計畫之再開發利用、整頓原有品質低落的都市景觀、提升民眾居住環境與品質。並且，期望透過都市更新可以達到復甦都市機能、增進公共利益等目的。
執行「都市更新」過程所使用的手段主要可以分成三種：重建、整建、維護，此三個手段處理的主體對象皆為建築，代表建築在都市更新計畫中扮演著舉足輕重的角色。因此，為了讓都市更新的效益更大化，並且能夠呼應現在環保風潮、促進永續都市的發展，在許多都市更新計畫中也常被鼓勵興建更為環保之綠建築。基此，臺灣政府於2008年將「綠建築標章」納入「都市更新容積獎勵項目」之中，以促使更多的都市更新計畫的申請者追求更高等級「綠建築標章」之意願。
因此，許多「都市更新計畫」在建築造價成本中提列「綠建築成本」，並且將此預算運用於提升綠建築性能與等級。然而，若沒有經過適當地評估精算，而只是一眛地外加「綠建築成本」，便會產生「成本疊加效應」，並會誤導大眾認為「綠建築必然昂貴」。反之，若是能夠基於綠建築之理念，透過善用基地條件、配合建築物座向、隔熱、遮陽、通風、植栽及誘導式設計等建築設計手法的運用，便能夠達到建築物節能等效益。建築物亦能夠輕易地通過評估計算取得「綠建築標章」，並不必然會增加建築物之建造費用。
因此，為提供社會大眾與開發商對於取得「綠建築標章指標」之成本精準資訊，本研究將針對實際核准(及審議中)之都市更新計畫案例分析。透過實際案例之研究，經過公允之分析與計算，方可證實「綠建築珍貴而不貴」的真實情況。基此，本研究重要的研究內容如下：
(一)蒐集分析都市更新計畫常見申請之綠建築指標項目及其所提列之成本。
(二)蒐集分析各案例綠建築之合理成本，並羅列不應提列於「綠建築成本」之樣態。
(三)進行綠建築成本、整體營建成本與容積獎勵值之試算，並分析比較現行都市更新綠建築容積獎勵值之條件誘因。
本研究預期成果及效益如下：
(一)完成都市更新計畫中具「減量效益」之具體可行綠建築規劃設計手法之彙整。
(二)統計都市更新案例中較常列舉於供同負擔之綠建築標章指標項目與成本，並分析綠建築成本與綠建築容積獎勵值之比例關係。
(三)提出現行都市更新綠建築容積獎勵值之合理性分析與政策建議。
Since urban development is a dynamic process, many parts of the city will experience a decline in economic and material functions over time. In order to solve the economic problems and social order problems arising from these old areas, Taiwan’s main response in the past two decades is to use the “urban renewal” approach to promote the redevelopment of urban land projects to renovate the original low-quality urban landscape and to enhance the living environment and quality of the people. Moreover, it is expected that urban renewal can achieve the goal of reviving urban functions and enhancing public interests.
The means used in the implementation of the "urban renewal" process can be divided into three main types: reconstruction, rehabilitation, and maintenance. The main objects handled by these three methods are buildings, and the representative buildings play a pivotal role in the urban renewal plan. Therefore, in order to make the benefits of urban renewal more effective, and to respond to the current environmental protection trend and promote the development of sustainable cities, it is often encouraged to build more environmentally friendly green buildings in many urban renewal projects. Based on this, the Taiwan government incorporated the “Green Building Mark” into the “Urban Renewal Burk Award Project” in 2008 to encourage more urban renewal applicants to pursue the higher level of “Green Building Mark”.
As a result, many Urban Renewal Projects provide “green building costs” in the cost of construction costs and apply this budget to improve the performance and grade of green buildings. However, if the actuarial calculations are not properly assessed and the "green construction costs" are added, the "cost superposition effect" will be generated and the public will be misled into thinking that "green buildings are inevitably expensive". On the other hand, if it is based on the concept of green building, the use of building design techniques such as building base conditions, building orientation, heat insulation, shading, ventilation, planting and passive design can achieve the benefits of building energy conservation. Buildings can also easily obtain the "Green Building Mark" through evaluation and calculation, which does not necessarily increase the construction cost of the building.
Therefore, in order to provide the public and developers with accurate information on the cost of obtaining the “Green Building Marking Indicators”, this study will focus on the actual approved (and under review) urban renewal project case analysis. Through the study of actual cases, after a fair analysis and calculation, the true situation of "green buildings are precious and not expensive" can be confirmed. Based on this, the important research contents of this study are as follows:
(1) Analyze the “Green Building Indicators Project” frequently applied for in the Urban Renewal Plan and the costs it proposes.
(2) Analysis of the reasonable cost of green buildings and the list of costs that should not be included in the "green building costs".
(3) Calculate and analyze the relationship between "green building cost", "overall construction cost" and "volume reward" and analyze the incentives of the existing incentive system.
The expected results and benefits of this study are as follows:
(1) Consolidation of the “Green Building Planning and Design Techniques” with “cost reduction benefits” in the urban renewal plan.
(2) Analyze the “green building costs” listed in the “Urban Renewal Cases” and analyze the relationship between green building costs and reward values.
(3) Proposed amendments to the "Green Building Award" for the "Urban Renewal Promotion Policy". |
| Relation: | 內政部建築研究所, 108301070000G0021, 108.01-108.12 |
| Data Type: | report |
| Appears in Collections: | [地政學系] 研究報告
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 13 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
