English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 116849/147881 (79%)
Visitors : 63924757      Online Users : 738
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/157829
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157829


    Title: 加入自願性倡議組織對於企業減碳成效與ESG表現之探討:以RE100公司為例
    The Impact of Joining Voluntary Initiatives on Carbon Reduction and ESG Performance: The Case of RE100 Companies
    Authors: 劉晏争
    Liu, Yan-Zheng
    Contributors: 楊曉文
    Yang, Sharon
    劉晏争
    Liu, Yan-Zheng
    Keywords: RE100
    自願性環境倡議
    碳排放強度
    ESG評級
    先行者效應
    雙重差分法
    事件研究法
    RE100
    Voluntary Environmental Initiatives
    Carbon Emissions Intensity
    ESG Ratings
    First-Mover Effect
    Difference-in-Differences
    Event Study
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-07-01 15:16:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在全球邁向淨零碳排與永續轉型的趨勢下,企業參與自願性環境倡議組織已成為推動ESG布局的重要策略之一。然而,相關倡議對企業實質減碳成效與ESG評級的影響,至今仍存在諸多討論。本文以2005年至2024年間加入RE100之327家企業為樣本,運用雙重差分法、固定效果模型與事件研究法,分析企業在加入前後的碳排放強度、ESG總分與各項細部指標之變化,並進一步探討加入時點對碳排成效的影響。研究結果顯示,企業在加入RE100後整體碳排放強度顯著下降,特別是在間接排放(範疇二)方面效果最為明顯;早期加入者相較後期企業展現更顯著的減碳幅度,驗證先行者效應的存在。在ESG評分方面,環境指標於加入後呈現明顯提升,部分企業甚至於加入前即出現提前反應。本文補足目前RE100相關實證研究之缺口,並對自願性永續政策的實質影響提供具體證據與政策啟示。
    Amid the global transition toward net-zero emissions and sustainable development, corporate participation in voluntary environmental initiatives has become a key strategy for advancing ESG practices. However, the actual impact of such initiatives on corporate carbon reduction performance and ESG ratings remains subject to debate. This study examines a sample of 327 companies that joined the RE100 initiative between 2005 and 2024. Using a combination of difference-in-differences (DID) estimation, fixed effects models, and event study methodology, the research analyzes changes in carbon emissions intensity, ESG overall scores, and detailed sub-indicators before and after joining RE100. The empirical results reveal a significant decrease in overall carbon emissions intensity following participation, particularly for indirect emissions (Scope 2). Furthermore, early adopters exhibit more pronounced reductions compared to later joiners, confirming the presence of a first-mover advantage. In terms of ESG performance, environmental scores show a notable increase post-adoption, with some firms exhibiting early responses even prior to official commitment. This study fills a gap in the empirical literature on RE100 and provides concrete evidence and policy insights regarding the effectiveness of voluntary sustainability initiatives.
    Reference: Alok, S., Kumar, N., & Wermers, R. (2020). Do fund managers misestimate climatic disaster risk? The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1146-1183.
    Andersson, M., Bolton, P., & Samama, F. (2016). Hedging climate risk. Financial Analysts Journal, 72(3), 1-13.
    Aswani, J., Raghunandan, A., & Rajgopal, S. (2024). Are carbon emissions associated with stock returns? Review of Finance, 28, 75-106.
    Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517-549.
    Chen, F., Chen, Z., & Zhang, X. (2024). Belated stock returns for green innovation under carbon emissions trading market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 85, Article 102558.
    Delmas, M. A., & Montes-Sancho, M. J. (2011). An institutional perspective on the diffusion of international management system standards: The case of the environmental management standard ISO 14001. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 103–132.
    Gianfrate, G., & Peri, M. (2019). The green advantage: Exploring the convenience of issuing green bonds. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 127-135.
    Iazzolino, G., Bruni, M. E., Veltri, S., Morea, D., & Baldissarro, G. (2023). The impact of ESG factors on financial efficiency: An empirical analysis for the selection of sustainable firm portfolios. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(5), 1917–1927.
    Jalalov, M., & Bae, J. H. (2025). Exploring the motivations behind corporate participation in the RE100 initiative and its impact on financial performance. Energy Policy, 198, 114503.
    Kim, E.-H., & Lyon, T. P. (2011). Strategic environmental disclosure: Evidence from the DOE’s voluntary greenhouse gas registry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(3), 311-326.
    Kim, E.-H., & Lyon, T. P. (2014). Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure (Ross School of Business Paper No. 1266). University of Michigan.
    Kube, R., von Graevenitz, K., Löschel, A., & Massier, P. (2019). Do voluntary environmental programs reduce emissions? EMAS in the German manufacturing sector. Energy Economics, 84, Article 104558.
    Lee, J., & Koh, K. (2024). ESG performance and firm risk in the U.S. financial firms. Review of Financial Economics. Advance online publication
    Li, J., & Xu, X. (2024). Can ESG rating reduce corporate carbon emissions? – An empirical study from Chinese listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, Article 140226.
    Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014). Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 695-724.
    Monasterolo, I., & de Angelis, L. (2020). Blind to carbon risk? An analysis of stock market reaction to the Paris Agreement. Ecological Economics, 170, Article 106571.
    Park, J. (2024). Voluntary environmental initiative and ESG performance: Evidence from RE100 [Preprint]. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
    Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities' environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 745–769.
    Tang, D. Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Do shareholders benefit from green bonds? Journal of Corporate Finance, 61, Article 101427.
    Treepongkaruna, S., Au Yong, H. H., Thomsen, S., & Kyaw, K. (2024). Greenwashing, carbon emission, and ESG. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(1), 1-14.
    Wang, C., Li, J., Yi, Y., & Yang, S. (2024). Crowding in or crowding out? Executive environmental attention and ESG performance of mining listed companies. Mineral Economics. Advance online publication.
    Yuan, K., & Wu, B. (2024). The crowding-out effect of the environmental regulation on corporate sustainability. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, Article 1273278.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融學系
    112352004
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112352004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[金融學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    200401.pdf1223KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback