English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 116849/147881 (79%)
Visitors : 63825769      Online Users : 287
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/157669
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157669


    Title: 財報可比性與融資決策
    Financial Statement Comparability and Financing Decisions
    Authors: 李佳蓉
    Lee, Chia-Jung
    Contributors: 金成隆
    Chin, Chen-Lung
    李佳蓉
    Lee, Chia-Jung
    Keywords: 財報可比性
    債權集中度
    融資決策
    Comparability
    Debt concentration
    Financing decisions
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-07-01 14:16:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 公司在選擇融資方式時,往往面臨資訊不對稱問題,而財務報表可比性作為提升財務資訊品質的重要因素,將影響公司融資決策。基於此觀點,本文旨在探討財務報表可比性對企業融資決策的影響。採用美國上市公司為樣本,實證結果顯示,較低的可比性使企業更傾向於選擇債務融資而非股權融資,並採取較集中的債務結構。本研究橫斷面分析進一步發現,低可比性但具有高研發投資之企業為避免被收取資訊壟斷租,反而會降低債務融資傾向,並擁有更加集中的債務結構。此外,對於高違約風險或低清算價值的公司,由於可比性能提升債權人協調效率,並減少低效清算的可能性,故可比性和債權集中度之間的關係更為顯著。整體而言,本研究凸顯財報可比性在企業融資決策中的關鍵作用,為企業管理層、投資者及政策制定者提供重要啟示。
    This study investigates the impact of financial statement comparability on firms' financing decisions. Using a sample of publicly listed U.S. firms, the findings reveal that lower comparability leads firms to prefer debt financing over equity and to adopt more concentrated debt structures. Cross-sectional analyses further show that among R&D-intensive firms, low comparability increases reliance on concentrated debt structures while reducing the likelihood of debt financing, likely to avoid information monopoly rents imposed by debtholders. Additionally, the relationship between comparability and debt concentration is stronger for firms with higher default risk and lower liquidation values. This is consistent with the notion that creditor coordination failure is a more significant concern for these firms. These findings highlight the critical role of financial statement comparability in shaping financing decisions.
    Reference: Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609.
    Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., Lang, M., & Williams, C. (2012). Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(1), 68-93.
    Berger, P. G., Ofek, E., & Swary, I. (1996). Investor valuation of the abandonment option. Journal of Financial Economics, 42(2), 259-287.
    Bharath, S. T., Sunder, J., & Sunder, S. V. (2008). Accounting quality and debt contracting. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 1-28.
    Blanco, B., Dhole, S., & Gul, F. A. (2023). Financial statement comparability and accounting fraud. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 50(7-8), 1166-1205.
    Bordeman, A., Shane, P. B., Smith, D. B., & Zhang, S. (2024). Accounting comparability and underpricing seasoned equity offerings. (Working paper). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2372965
    Chang, X., Dasgupta, S., & Hilary, G. (2009). The effect of auditor quality on financing decisions. The Accounting Review, 84(4), 1085-1117.
    Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Lo, A. K. (2013). Accounting restatements and external financing choices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(2), 750-779.
    Chen, Y., Saffar, W., & Srinidhi, B. (2021). Does Audit Quality Affect Firms’ Debt Structure? China Accounting and Finance Review, 23(1), 34-69.
    Cheng, C. A., Wang, K., Xu, Y., & Zhang, N. (2020). The impact of revealing auditor partner quality: evidence from a long panel. Review of Accounting Studies, 25, 1475-1506.
    Choi, J. H., Choi, S., Myers, L. A., & Ziebart, D. (2019). Financial statement comparability and the informativeness of stock prices about future earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(1), 389-417.
    Colla, P., Ippolito, F., & Li, K. (2013). Debt specialization. The Journal of Finance, 68(5), 2117-2141.
    De Franco, G., Kothari, S. P., & Verdi, R. S. (2011). The benefits of financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting research, 49(4), 895-931.
    De Franco, G., Hou, Y., & Ma, M. (2023). Do firms mimic industry leaders’ accounting? Evidence from financial statement comparability. The Accounting Review, 98(6), 125-148
    Fang, X., Li, Y., Xin, B., & Zhang, W. (2016). Financial statement comparability and debt contracting: Evidence from the syndicated loan market. Accounting Horizons, 30(2), 277-303.
    Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (1980). Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
    Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2010). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
    Francis, J. R., Pinnuck, M. L., & Watanabe, O. (2014). Auditor style and financial statement comparability. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 605-633.
    International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2010). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. London: IASB
    Goh, B. W., Lim, C. Y., Lobo, G. J., & Tong, Y. H. (2017). Conditional conservatism and debt versus equity financing. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(1), 216-251.
    Gong, G., Li, L. Y., & Zhou, L. (2013). Earnings non‐synchronicity and voluntary disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1560-1589.
    Griffin, P. A., Hong, H. A., & Ryou, J. W. (2022). Proprietary costs: Why do R&D-active firms choose single-lender financing? The Accounting Review, 97(6), 263-296.
    Houston, J., & James, C. (1996). Bank information monopolies and the mix of private and public debt claims. Journal of Finance, 51, 1863-1889.
    Hovakimian, A., Kayhan, A., & Titman, S. (2012). Are corporate default probabilities consistent with the static trade-off theory? The Review of Financial Studies, 25(2), 315-340.
    Imhof, M. J., Seavey, S. E., & Smith, D. B. (2017). Comparability and cost of equity capital. Accounting Horizons, 31(2), 125-138.
    Kim, J. B., Li, L., Lu, L. Y., & Yu, Y. (2016). Financial statement comparability and expected crash risk. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(2-3), 294-312.
    Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A., & Stoffman, N. (2024). KPSS2017 / Technological-Innovation-Resource-Allocation-and-Growth-Extended-Data. Github. https://github.com/KPSS2017/Technological-Innovation-Resource-Allocation-and-Growth-Extended-Data
    Li, N., Lou, Y., Otto, C. A., & Wittenberg-Moerman, R. (2021). Accounting quality and debt concentration. The Accounting Review, 96(1), 377-400.
    Lobo, G. J., Neel, M., & Rhodes, A. (2018). Accounting comparability and relative performance evaluation in CEO compensation. Review of Accounting Studies, 23, 1137-1176.
    Lou, Y., & Otto, C. A. (2020). Debt heterogeneity and covenants. Management Science, 66(1), 70-92.
    Majeed, M. A., & Yan, C. (2021). Financial statement comparability, state ownership, and the cost of debt: Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 58, 101497.
    Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of financial economics, 13(2), 187-221.
    Nam, J. S., and R. Thompson. (2023). Does financial statement comparability facilitate SEC oversight? Contemporary Accounting Research 40(2):1315-1349.
    Petacchi, R. (2015). Information asymmetry and capital structure: Evidence from regulation FD. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 59(2-3), 143-162.
    Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435-480.
    Platikanova, P., & Soonawalla, K. (2020). Who monitors opaque borrowers? Debt specialisation, institutional ownership, and information opacity. Accounting & Finance, 60(2), 1867-1904.
    Robb, A., & Seamans, R. (2014). The role of R&D in entrepreneurial finance and performance. Finance and Strategy, 31, 341-373.
    Sufi, A. (2007). Information asymmetry and financing arrangements: Evidence from syndicated loans. The Journal of Finance, 62(2), 629-668.
    Thompson, S. B. (2011). Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(1), 1-10.
    Wang, Y., Feng, Y., Zhu, Z., Liu, J., & Li, Y. (2024). Financial statement comparability and expected default risk. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, 103302.
    Winton, A., & Yerramilli, V. (2008). Entrepreneurial finance: Banks versus venture capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(1), 51-79.
    Zhang, J. H. (2018). Accounting comparability, audit effort, and audit outcomes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(1), 245-276.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    110353501
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110353501
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    350101.pdf1003KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback