English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 116884/147915 (79%)
Visitors : 64266676      Online Users : 581
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157432


    Title: 從國際人權法與禁止奴役論非本籍漁工處境及其救濟
    Prohibition of Slavery under International Human Rights Norms as a Remedy to Alien Fishing Workers$ Situations
    Authors: 翁燕菁
    Contributors: 政治系
    Date: 2018-12
    Issue Date: 2025-06-19 11:55:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 禁止奴隸制及販奴為絕對法，古典意涵下的奴隸制並為全球國家所廢止。然而，全球化與人員流動下，當代形式的奴隸制成為國際組織關切重心。既有之奴役與強制勞動法律概念，或可涵蓋「類似奴隸」之處境，但國際人權法相關定義似乎趨向概念的稀釋與模糊，反令司法實務上之「使人為奴罪」難以操作。歐洲人權法院近10 年奠定之解釋，或許有助於建立類似禁止酷刑條款之層級化、類型化保障。我國憲法保障人身自由與人性尊嚴，並於法律層面禁止使人為奴或以不等價之待遇交換勞務，宜納入國際人權法之奴役與強制勞動概念加以協和解釋。本研究同時以移工中處境至為邊緣之非本籍漁工為研究標的，尤其針對不適用我國勞動法規保障之境外聘僱漁工。以經濟社會權利看待或為根本之道，然涉及之諸多利益難以妥協，亦構成障礙。漁工之工作性質與生活條件，使渠等擔負更高之移動風險，離港時欠缺即時有效救濟，端賴進港時予以補救。我國應更新相關刑罰之解釋，落實禁止奴役，在程序面上克盡國家積極義務。
    Prohibition of slavery and slave trade is considered as jus cogens, while slavery, in its classical sens, has been abolished by all States in the world. However, globalisation and service mobility draws increasingly concerns about contemporary forms of slavery in international organisations. The existing legal concepts of servitude and forced labour may cover situations of “slave-alike”, but there is also a trend of concept delusion and confusion under the competing interpretation of international human rights norms, which makes application of “crime of enslavement” more difficult to be operational. A number of analysis of the European Court of Human Rights in the past ten years seem useful in establishing a categorical protection, similar to what has been constructed under the prohibition of torture clause. The right to liberty of person and human dignity enshrine in our constitutional law, and the criminal law also punishes crime of enslavement. It is time for Taiwan to incorporate concept of modern servitude into domestic law via in concordance interpretation. This research project chooses alien fishing workers as case study, for their situations are among the most peripheral and marginalised. The working conditions can be at high risk when they are recruited in foreign ports and territories and thus kept from being beneficiary to the Taiwanese labour protection standards. Approaching the problematic through economic and social rights may seem essential and indispensable, but it would therefore need a long run reconciliation between the social forces of different interests. Besides, fishing workers’ conditions of working and living put them high on the risk of mobility: they spend most of the time on board and rarely land themselves. Taiwan needs to prohibit efficiently enslavement as a posteriori remedy to their violated rights, for instance effective investigation, punishment and compensation. This also constitutes an important part of Taiwan’s positive obligations under the absolute prohibition of slavery.
    Relation: 科技部, MOST105-2410-H004-036-MY2, 105.08-107.07
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML24View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback