 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 116376/147410 (79%)
Visitors : 60915439
Online Users : 1045
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157418
|
| Title: | 伯林與鄂蘭的隱匿對話——邁向一個政治和解的理論
The Hidden Dialogue between Isaiah Berlin and Hannah Arendt - towards a Theory of Political Reconciliation |
| Authors: | 葉浩 |
| Contributors: | 政治系 |
| Keywords: | 伯林;鄂蘭;隱匿對話;多元主義;政治和解;希望政治
Isaiah Berlin;Hannah Arendt;hidden dialogue;pluralism;political reconciliation;politics of hope |
| Date: | 2018-04 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-06-19 |
| Abstract: | 伯林與鄂蘭是兩位二十世紀公認的重要政治思想家，皆來自於猶太背景，並以探索極權主義的起源為學術的主要關懷，且各自提出了多元主義理論作為回應。然而，截至目前為止，尚未有關於兩人思想的比較研究。本研究計畫以伯林與鄂蘭關於艾希曼耶路撒冷大審的爭議為線索，循路釐清兩人對此案件的不同判斷與他們各自對於極權主義的理解之關係，並試圖截長補短，藉此重建一個關於此一議題的完整理解。以此為基礎，本研究計畫將進一步探索兩者的多元主義基礎，一方面凸顯他們所共享的形上學預設，一方面嘗試整合兩者在方法論洞見與政治想像，並以此對照與批判羅爾斯試圖解決價值多元的策略。隨後，本研究將以轉型正義議題來檢視整合後的理論是否完善，首先將伯林、鄂蘭與羅爾斯三人的理論理解為「悲劇衝突的肯認」、「原諒與承諾」以及「反思平衡」三種讓人與他人及社會和解的策略，再進一步分析三種策略的各自優缺以及互補可能性，最後提出一個鑲嵌於「希望政治」之內的和解理論。
Isaiah Berlin and Hannah Arendt are widely regarded as two great twentieth-century political
thinkers, who, both of Jewish background, made their debut into academia by trying to trace the
origins of totalitarianism and each proposed a theory of pluralism. However, a serious comparison
between their political thoughts is yet to be made.
This research proposes to address this issue by taking the disputes between Berlin and Arendt over
the trial of Adolf Eichman in Jerusalem as a clue to unraveling their different understanding of the
event and the attendant seemingly irreconcilable judgments. And the goal is to arrive at a fuller
grasp of totalitarianism by way of a reconstruction of their hidden dialogues. With this in place, it
will go on to analyse the metaphysical foundations of their pluralism, and special efforts will be
made to reconcile both thinkers’ methodological insights and visions of politics.
The result will be a theory of reconciliation embedded in a politics of hope. First of all, Berlin,
Arendt, and Rawls will be understood to be proposing different strategies to reconcile oneself with
the society, that is, “recognizing the tragic nature of conflicts”, “forgiving and promising”, and
“reflective equilibrium” respectively. Secondly, it will be argued that Rawls’ strategy cannot do the
work needed by a divided society. And finally, the insights and strategies found in Berlin and
Arendt will be combined into a theory of political hope that could really meets such demands. |
| Relation: | 科技部, MOST105-2410-H004-030, 105.08-106.07 |
| Data Type: | report |
| Appears in Collections: | [政治學系] 國科會研究計畫
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 16 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
