English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 116849/147881 (79%)
Visitors : 63502514      Online Users : 352
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157417


    Title: 價值多元主義作為方法：伯林政治思想的詮釋與應用
    Value Pluralism as Method: a Study of Isaiah Berlin's Political Thought
    Authors: 葉浩
    Contributors: 政治系
    Date: 2017-06
    Issue Date: 2025-06-19
    Abstract: 本研究計畫旨在撰寫一本關於伯林政治思想的專書。相關的研究至今習慣採取「邏輯化約」的方式來對待伯林的思想，特別他所作的消極自由與積極自由之區分，以及價值多元論。由於伯林自己相當在意政治理論的方法論，同時不斷告誡讀者必須以同情理解的方式來閱讀一個思想家，並且反對邏輯化約的詮釋方式，筆者假定伯林自己的寫作採取同樣的方法論，從而必須按其方法論來解讀其思想。於是，本專書涉及對於伯林政治思想的整體詮釋。
    隨後，筆者也將指出伯林政治思想本身的不足之處，特別是在於自由主義與價值多元論的理論證成之上。藉由援引約翰彌爾的「生活試驗」概念，本書也試圖為伯林的思想做出延伸討論與補充。此外，對於當前政治哲學領域所熱烈爭辯的方法論議題，筆者也認為伯林的思想有許多尚待發掘的意涵，並且在妥善延伸解讀之後可以回應當代政治思想家如羅爾斯等人的理論。
    本研究的第三部分將聚焦於價值多元主義如何作為一個可操作的方法之上。首先，此處的「方法」將被理解成蘊含一套政治分析的方法論，以及一套關於詮釋性規範研究的研究綱領。筆者將透過對於轉型正義、兩岸關係、東亞國際關係等議題的討論，呈現伯林式的政治分析，再以此為基礎反思所謂的「中國特色」的社會科學。最後，本文也將藉由對於環境治理議題的討論，來闡明價值多元論何以可成為一套研究綱領，同時也提出價值多元論者將如何看待環境治理以及當前的經驗性研究。
    This research project aims to produce a monograph on Isaiah Berlin’s political thought. The approach it takes follows closely his recommended method for studying a political thinker and underlying this approach is an assumption that Berlin practices what his methodology professes. The re-interpretation thus is holistic in character, as opposed to the current mainstream piecemeal approach that tends to break his works down to unrelated themes - for instance, the distinction between negative and positive liberty or value pluralism understood as a meta-ethical thesis - for rigid logical analysis. Such a logical-analytical reductionist approach is inimical to Berlin’s thought and this monograph is meant to rectify the resulted misreading.
    With a reading of Berlin in his own words in place, this monograph goes on to point out the problem with his value pluralism and then tries to solve it by a critical reconstruction of J. S. Mill’s reflections on his own life and thoughts as a doctrine of ‘experiments in living’ – which amounts to a version of political empiricism that has a great to contribute to today’s hotly debated issue concerning the methodology of political theorizing.
    Berlin’s value pluralism thus will be understood as an approach to politics, a method for political analysis, as well as a research programme which can be applied to political issues of our day, such as environmental governance, transitional justice, and international justice. The third part of this monograph will demonstrate this claim by concrete examples.
    Relation: 科技部, NSC102-2410-H004-136-MY3, 102.08-105.07
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML19View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback