Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157227
|
Title: | 宗教型非營利組織與無家者協助之探究:以救世軍台北街友關懷中心為例 The Support of Religious Nonprofit Organizations in Homeless Services: A Case Study of the Salvation Army’s Caring Center in Taipei |
Authors: | 林晏竹 Lin, Yen-Chu |
Contributors: | 江明修 Chiang, Min-Hsiu 林晏竹 Lin, Yen-Chu |
Keywords: | 無家者 救世軍 宗教型非營利組織 社會支持 汙名 Homelessness The Salvation Army Religious Nonprofit Organizations Social Support Stigma |
Date: | 2025 |
Issue Date: | 2025-06-02 14:44:02 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 本研究探討宗教型非營利組織在無家者服務中所扮演的角色與所面臨之挑戰,選擇救世軍台北街友關懷中心為研究個案。研究以社會支持理論與污名理論為分析框架,運用半結構式深度訪談與文件分析方法,深入瞭解救世軍台北街友關懷中心的服務模式、資源運用、信仰融入及賦權實踐,並剖析服務過程中的困境與限制。研究發現,救世軍透過多元且整合性的社會支持措施,有效協助無家者滿足基本生理需求與安全感,透過情感陪伴與靈性關懷提升其自尊與自我價值,減輕污名帶來的心理壓力與社會排斥;部分無家者更透過參與服務轉變角色,由被動受助者成為主動貢獻者。然而救世軍亦面臨來自社區排斥(鄰避效應)、資源與人力短缺、財務不穩及組織內部決策保守等多重結構性挑戰,導致服務效能與持續性受限,甚至最終關閉服務據點,對協助之對象帶來衝擊。本研究透過深入解析這些議題,闡明宗教型非營利組織的服務貢獻與制度困境,建議未來需強化資源永續、跨部門合作、社區溝通與污名消除策略,方能真正協助無家者有效回歸社會。 This qualitative case study examines the roles and challenges of religious nonprofit organizations in serving people experiencing homelessness, focusing specifically on The Salvation Army’s Taipei Homeless Caring Center. Guided by social support and stigma theories, this research employs semi-structured interviews and document analysis to explore the center’s service delivery practices, resource management strategies, religious integration, empowerment methods, and associated operational barriers. Findings reveal that The Salvation Army implemented diverse, integrated social support mechanisms addressing the multidimensional needs of homeless individuals, encompassing basic physiological necessities as well as emotional and spiritual well-being. This holistic service model enhanced participants' self-esteem, alleviated stigma-related psychological distress, and facilitated transformative role shifts, enabling some individuals to evolve from passive recipients of aid into active community contributors. However, the organization also faced significant structural challenges, including community resistance (NIMBYism), limited human and financial resources, and conservative internal governance practices. These barriers ultimately led to the center’s closure, adversely impacting the individual’s receiving assistance. By highlighting these operational contributions and systemic constraints, this study underscores critical implications for ensuring sustainable resource allocation, strengthening cross-sector collaboration, enhancing community engagement, and reducing social stigma. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and nonprofit practitioners committed to improving homelessness services and advancing social inclusion. |
Reference: | 一、中文 Leonard, Herman Dutch (2016)。慈濟,組織管理與領導的典範。慈濟月刊,599, 54-63。 王順民(1999)。宗教福利。台北: 亞太圖書出版社。 王順民(2009)。非營利部門: 組織與運作(第2版)。台北: 巨流圖書。 方孝鼎(2011)。遊民身體與習性的自我照顧與社會規訓-臺灣遊民服務的觀察筆記。文化研究學會2011年會,新北市。 司徒達賢(1999)。 非營利組織的經營管理。台北: 天下文化。 江明修(2009)。研究方法論。台北:智勝文化。 何翠怡(2006)。宗教與充權?以香港南亞裔社群的工作為例。輔仁宗教研究,14,97-125。 吳雅婷(2013)。「都市遊民」社會現象及心理需求之質性研究。國立臺灣師範大學。未出版,台北。 姚昱伶(2019)。資源依賴下非營利組織的生存策略與能力建構--以高雄地區從事長期照顧之組織為例。社會發展研究學刊,2019.09(24),88-122 李淑容 (2015)。 社會排除下的遊民:處境與對策,東吳社會工作學報,29,149–171。 李星璇(2020)。無家者關懷的社會探究-以「基督教救世軍台北街友關懷中心」個案為例。東吳大學。未出版,台北。 林淑馨(2016)。非營利組織概論,台北:巨流圖書。 林萬億(2010)。社會福利,台北:五南出版社。 林萬億、陳東升(1995)。遊民問題之調查分析,行政院研考會。 社團法人台灣芒草心慈善協會(2019)。臺北市政府社會局-108年度補助辦理「台北市遊民生活狀況調查」報告。 徐敏雄 (2014)。臺北市萬華社區大學融入式課程實踐歷程之研究(2008-2012)。教育與發展期刊,11(2). https://doi.org/10.3966/181665042015061102004 高寶華(2006)。非營利組織經營策略與管理。台北: 華立圖書。 郭仲珈 (2012)。遊民使用社會福利服務之經驗與轉變:以大臺北地區為例。國立臺灣大學社會工作學研究所,未出版,台北。 陳燕禎(2011)。遊民問題與管理之探討分析。社區發展季刊,134,441-457。 鄭麗珍 & 張宏哲 (2004)。遊民問題調查、分析與對策研究。行政院內政部社會司委託研究報告。 謝翰昕 (2016)。反覆脫遊入遊之歷程探討—以新北市街友為例。天主教輔仁大學社會工作研究所。未出版,台北。 謝瑜真(2021)。特別企劃-強風吹不斷的韌草——社團法人台灣芒草心慈善協會專訪。社區發展季刊。取自:https://cdj.sfaa.gov.tw/HTML/Refer_HtmlNewsReport_Menu?t=2&no=62 黃克先 (2021)。台灣遊民社會福利體制的運作及效果:從基層官僚治理取徑切入。 台灣社會學, 2021(41), 51–94。 劉珠利(2007)。協助受創傷女性復原的新潮流著重宗教與靈性的社會工作實務。社區發展季刊,2007(117),98-129。 盧俊義(2004)。我所知道的活水泉教會。新使者雜誌,2004(80),35-38。
二、英文 Caplan, G. (1974) Support systems and Community mental health. New York: Basic Book. Cassel, J. (1976). The contribution of the social environment to host resistance. American Journal of Epidemiology, 104(2), 107–123. Cobb, S. (1976) Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38, 300-314. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. Cnaan, R. A., Wineburg, R. J., &Boddie, S. C. (1999). The newer deal: Social work and religion in partnership. Columbia University Press. Carpenter, D., & Lewis, D. E. (2004). Political learning from rare events: Poisson inference, fiscal constraints, and the lifetime of bureaus. Political Analysis, 12(2), 201-232. Corrigan, P. W., & Rao, D. (2012). On the self-stigma of mental illness: Stages, disclosure, and strategies for change. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 57(8), 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371205700804 Dennis, D., Locke, G., & Khadduri, J. (2007). Toward understanding homelessness: The 2007 National Symposium on Homelessness Research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability In Practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. House, J. S. (1981). Work Stress and Social Support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Kahl, S. (2005). The religious roots of modern poverty policy: Catholic, Lutheran, and Reformed Protestant traditions compared. European Journal of Sociology, 46(1), 91–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975605000046 Kidd, S. A. (2007). Youth homelessness and social stigma. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(3), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9091-0 Kotler, P., & Andreasen, A. R. (1996). Strategic marketing for nonprofit organizations (5th ed.). Prentice Hall. Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). "Conceptualizing Stigma." Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363-385. Padgett, D. K., Henwood, B. F., & Tsemberis, S. J. (2016). Housing First: Ending homelessness, transforming systems, and changing lives. New York: Oxford University Press. Snow, D. A., & Anderson, L. (1993). Down on Their Luck: A Study of Homeless Street People. University of California Press. Sumerlin, J. R. (1995). Adaptation to homelessness: Self-actualization, loneliness, and depression in street homeless men. Psychological Reports, 77, 295–314. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.77.1.295 Tsemberis, S. (2010). Housing First: The Pathways Model to End Homelessness for People with Mental Illness and Addiction. Center City, MN: Hazelden. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2023). The 2023 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress. kilpatrick, J. (2023). TRAUMA-INFORMED CARE & DESIGN. Weingart. https://www.weingart.org/weingart-blog/trauma-informed Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599.
三、網路資料 人生百味文化建構協會。https://doyouaflavor.tw/ 天主教聖母聖心會-平安居。https://cicm.org.tw/modules/tinyd0/index.php?id=46 台北市社會局-街友服務(2025)。取自:https://dosw.gov.taipei/Content_List.aspx?n=BF0EB1931993077A 台灣芒草心慈善協會。https://www.homelesstaiwan.org/ 台灣當代漂泊協會(2011)。工作窮人與遊民一線間-台北車站遊民調查報告。苦勞網。取自: https://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/56885 台灣救世軍。https://www.salvationarmy.org.tw/ 台灣夢想城鄉營造協會。https://www.dreamcitybuilding.org/ 基督教恩友中心。https://good119.org/ 簡錫堦(2023)。【貧困觀測站12】貧困者成為詐騙集團工具的雙重創傷。財團法人法律扶助基金會。取自:https://www.laf.org.tw/edu-detail/53 黃國彥。文件分析法。國家教育研究院教育大辭書。取自:https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/0f69aaa0e3f09ad8238d80e037c52b40/?seq=1 張檉(1992)。道教概況及宮觀傳度制度。天帝教教訊,99。取自:https://magazine.tienti.org/book/tdmagz-099/099-04-01/ 張獻忠 (2016)。赤貧的租屋者,下一步也許就成街友/《無家者:從未想過我有這麼一天》推薦序。NPOst公益交流站。取自:https://npost.tw/archives/30603 杜震華(2022)。時論廣場》野有凍死殍的社會。中時新聞網。取自:https://www.chinatimes.com/opinion/20220225004368-262104?chdtv 社團法人社區大學全國促進會(2013)。「街道上的城市藝術家」成果發表會報導。取自: https://www.napcu.org.tw/album/news/51fb63e4a4116.pdf 財團法人人安社會福利慈善事業基金會。https://homeless.org.tw/ 謝孟穎(2020)。風傳媒。取自:https://www.storm.mg/articles/125858 葉靜倫(2021)。多多益善。【無家十年 2019-2021】有房的街友,與無根的租客。取自: https://rightplus.org/2021/11/25/homeless-ten-years-3/ |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 行政管理碩士學程 112921055 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112921055 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
105501.pdf | | 4040Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|