English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 116346/147380 (79%)
Visitors : 60770289      Online Users : 640
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/157208
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157208


    Title: 社會及治理風險與審計定價之關聯性研究
    A Study on the Relationship between Social and Governance Risks and Audit Pricing
    Authors: 韓松霖
    Han, Sung-Lin
    Contributors: 戚務君
    Chi, Wu-Chun
    韓松霖
    Han, Sung-Lin
    Keywords: 審計公費
    社會風險
    治理風險
    Audit Fees
    Social Risks
    Governance Risks
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-06-02 14:36:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 鑒於現有文獻顯示,環境因素會提高企業的審計費用。本研究探討在控制環境風險後,企業的社會與公司治理風險是否仍影響企業的審計費用。實證結果顯示,除了整體ESG風險與審計費用之間有顯著的正向關聯外,即使在控制環境風險後,企業的社會與公司治理風險仍然顯著影響審計費用。進一步將社會與公司治理風險區分為可管理風險及無法管理風險,發現影響審計公費的社會與公司治理風險,主要來自於企業無法管理風險。具體而言,本研究提供了會計師在定價審計費用時,考量客戶整體ESG風險、環境風險以及社會與治理風險的實證證據。
    Existing literature indicates that environmental factors increase a company’s audit fees. This study investigates whether firms’ social and governance risks still impact their audit fees after controlling for environmental risks. The empirical results show that, in addition to a significant positive correlation between overall ESG risk and audit fees, corporate social and governance risks continue to significantly affect audit fees even after accounting for environmental risks. Furthermore, when separating social and governance risks into manageable and unmanageable risks, the findings suggest that the primary drivers of audit fees are unmanageable risks. Specifically, this study provides empirical evidence that auditors consider clients’ overall ESG risks, environmental risks, as well as social and governance risks when determining audit fees.
    Reference: Amiraslani, H., K. V. Lins, H. Servaes, and A. Tamayo. 2023. Trust, social capital, and the bond market benefits of ESG performance. Review of Accounting Studies 28(2): 421-462.
    Asante-Appiah, B. and T. A. Lambert. 2023. The role of the external auditor in managing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reputation risk. Review of Accounting Studies 28(4): 2589-2641.
    Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. W. Collins, W. R. Kinney Jr, and R. LaFond. 2009. The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies on firm risk and cost of equity. Journal of Accounting research 47(1): 1-43.
    Association of International Certified Professional Accountants (AICPA). 2023. Consideration of ESG-related matters in an audit of financial statements.
    Association of International Certified Professional Accountants (AICPA). 2025. U.S. Auditing Standards-AICPA (Clarified) [AU-C](AU-C).
    Association of International Certified Professional Accountants (AICPA). 2023. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 145.
    Avramov, D., S. Cheng, A. Lioui, and A. Tarelli. 2022. Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics 145(2): 642-664.
    Badertscher, B. A., J. Kim, W. R. Kinney Jr, and E. Owens. 2023. Assurance level choice, CPA fees, and financial reporting benefits: Inferences from US private firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 75(2-3): 101551.
    Bae, G. S., S. U. Choi, P. T. Lamoreaux, and J. E. Lee. 2021. Auditors’ fee premiums and low‐quality internal controls. Contemporary Accounting Research 38(1): 586-620.
    Bae, S. C., K. Chang, and H. C. Yi. 2018. Corporate social responsibility, credit rating, and private debt contracting: new evidence from syndicated loan market. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 50: 261-299.
    Bell, T., R. Doogar, and I. Solomon. 2008. Audit labor usage and fees under business risk auditing. Journal of Accounting Research 46(4): 729-760.
    Berg, F., J. F. Koelbel, and R. Rigobon. 2022. Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance 26(6): 1315-1344.
    Bhuiyan, M. B. U., A. Rahman, and N. Sultana. 2020. Female tainted directors, financial reporting quality and audit fees. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics 16(2): 100189.
    Borghesi, R., J. F. Houston, and A. Naranjo. 2014. Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests. Journal of Corporate Finance 26: 164-181.
    Buchanan, B., C. X. Cao, and C. Chen. 2018. Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance 52: 73-95.
    Burke, J. J., R. Hoitash, and U. Hoitash. 2019. Auditor response to negative media coverage of client environmental, social, and governance practices. Accounting Horizons 33(3): 1-23.
    Calderon, T. G. and L. Gao. 2021. Cybersecurity risks disclosure and implied audit risks: Evidence from audit fees. International Journal of Auditing 25(1): 24-39.
    Carcello, J. V., D. R. Hermanson, T. L. Neal, and R. A. Riley Jr. 2002. Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 19(3): 365-384.
    Cesarone, F., M. L. Martino, F. Ricca, and A. Scozzari. 2024. Managing ESG ratings disagreement in sustainable portfolio selection. Computers and Operations Research 170: 106766.
    Chang, H., L. J. Ho, Z. Liu, and B. Ouyang. 2021. Income smoothing and audit fees. Advances in Accounting 54: 100547.
    Chi, W., H. Huang, Y. Liao, and H. Xie. 2009. Mandatory audit partner rotation, audit quality, and market perception: Evidence from Taiwan. Contemporary Accounting Research 26(2): 359-391.
    Cho, M., S. Y. Kwon, and G. V. Krishnan. 2021. Audit fee lowballing: Determinants, recovery, and future audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 40(4): 106787.
    Clarkson, P. M., Y. Li, G. D. Richardson, and F. P. Vasvari. 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33(4-5): 303-327.
    Cohen, G. 2023. The impact of ESG risks on corporate value. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 60(4): 1451-1468.
    De Martinis, M. and K. Houghton. 2019. The business risk audit approach and audit production efficiency. Abacus 55(4): 734-782.
    Dechow, P. M., W. Ge, C. R. Larson, and R. G. Sloan. 2011. Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research 28(1): 17-82.
    Dikolli, S. S., T. Keusch, W. J. Mayew, and T. D. Steffen. 2020. CEO behavioral integrity, auditor responses, and firm outcomes. The Accounting Review 95(2): 61-88.
    Du, S., X. Xu, and K. Yu. 2020. Does corporate social responsibility affect auditor-client contracting? Evidence from auditor selection and audit fees. Advances in Accounting 51: 100499.
    Eierle, B., S. Hartlieb, D. C. Hay, L. Niemi, and H. Ojala. 2022. External factors and the pricing of audit services: A systematic review of the archival literature using a PESTLE analysis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 41(3): 95-119.
    El Ghoul, S., O. Guedhami, C. C. Kwok, and D. R. Mishra. 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance 35(9): 2388-2406.
    European Banking Authority (EBA) 2020. EBA discussion paper on management and supervision of ESG risks for credit institutions and investment firms: Technical report.
    Ferrell, A., H. Liang, and L. Renneboog. 2016. Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics 122(3): 585-606.
    Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 2021. FASB Staff Educational Paper: Intersection of Environmental Social and Governance Matters with Financial Accounting Standards.
    Financial Stability Board (FSB). 2017. Recommendations of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures.
    Flammer, C. 2021. Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 142(2): 499-516.
    Freeman, R. E. 2010. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
    Gao, L. and J. H. Zhang. 2015. Firms’ earnings smoothing, corporate social responsibility, and valuation. Journal of Corporate Finance 32: 108-127.
    Ghosh, A. and D. Moon. 2005. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review 80(2): 585-612.
    Gillan, S. L., A. Koch, and L. T. Starks. 2021. Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance 66, 101889.
    Giuli, A. D. and L. Kostovetsky. 2014. Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics 111(1): 158-180.
    Goss, A. and G. S. Roberts. 2011. The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking and Finance 35(7): 1794-1810.
    Guo, F., C. Lin, A. Masli, and M. S. Wilkins. 2021. Auditor responses to shareholder activism. Contemporary Accounting Research 38(1): 63-95.
    Guo, F., L. L. Lisic, J. Pittman, T. A. Seidel, M. Zhou, and Y. Zhou. 2022. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me: The long‐term impact of Arthur Andersen’s demise on partners’ audit quality. Contemporary Accounting Research 39(3): 1986-2022.
    Hackenbrack, K. E., N. T. Jenkins, and M. Pevzner. 2014. Relevant but delayed information in negotiated audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 33 (4): 95-117.
    Hallman, N. J., A. Kartapanis, and J. J. Schmidt. 2022. How do auditors respond to competition? Evidence from the bidding process. Journal of Accounting and Economics 73(2-3): 101475.
    Hansen, J. C., L. L. Lisic, T. A. Seidel, and M. S. Wilkins. 2021. Audit committee accounting expertise and the mitigation of strategic auditor behavior. The Accounting Review 96(4): 289-314.
    Hartlieb, S. and B. Eierle. 2022. Do auditors respond to clients’ climate change-related external risks? Evidence from audit fees. European Accounting Review 33(3): 1075-1103.
    Hay, D. C., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A meta‐analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research 23(1): 141-191.
    He, Y., J. B. Kim, B. Li, and Z. Liu. 2023. Auditors’ Technological Proximity Knowledge. The Accounting Review 98(5): 323-351.
    Hoepner, A. G., I. Oikonomou, Z. Sautner, L. T.Starks, and X. Y. Zhou. 2024. ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk. Review of Finance 28(2): 483-510.
    Hogan, C. E. and M. S. Wilkins. 2008. Evidence on the audit risk model: Do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies? Contemporary Accounting Research 25(1): 219-242.
    Hong, H. and M. Kacperczyk. 2009. The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics 93(1): 15-36.
    Houston, J. F. and H. Shan. 2022. Corporate ESG profiles and banking relationships. The Review of Financial Studies 35(7): 3373-3417.
    Hsieh, T. S., J. B. Kim, R. R. Wang, and Z. Wang. 2020. Seeing is believing? Executives’ facial trustworthiness, auditor tenure, and audit fees. Journal of Accounting and Economics 69(1): 101260.
    Hua, M. and P. Alam. 2021. Audit quality and environment, social, and governance risks. International Journal of Business Research and Management 12(2): 50-76.
    International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (IFRS Foundation). 2023. IFRS S1 general requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information.
    International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (IFRS Foundation). 2023. IFRS S2 climate-related disclosures.
    International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (IFRS Foundation). 2020. Effects of climate-related matters on financial statements.
    Jensen, M. C. 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2): 235-256.
    Jha, A. and Y. Chen. 2015. Audit fees and social capital. The Accounting Review 90(2): 611-639.
    Jha, A., M. Kulchania, and J. Smith. 2021. US political corruption and audit fees. The Accounting Review 96(1): 299-324.
    Jiraporn, P., N. Jiraporn, A. Boeprasert, and K. Chang. 2014. Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) improve credit ratings? Evidence from geographic identification. Financial Management 43(3): 505-531.
    Johnstone, K. 2000. Client-acceptance decisions: Simultaneous effects of client business risk, audit risk, auditor business risk, and risk adaptation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 19(1): 1-25.
    Kang, J. K., C. Lennox, and V. Pandey. 2022. Client concerns about information spillovers from sharing audit partners. Journal of Accounting and Economics 73(1): 101434.
    Khan, M., G. Serafeim, and A. Yoon. 2016. Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review 91(6): 1697-1724.
    Krishnan, G. and G. Visvanathan. 2009. Do auditors price audit committee’s expertise? The case of accounting versus nonaccounting financial experts. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 24(1): 115-144.
    Kuang, Y. F., G. Lee, and B. Qin. 2021. Whistleblowing allegations, audit fees, and internal control deficiencies. Contemporary Accounting Research 38(1): 32-62.
    Larcker, D. F. and E. M. Watts. 2020. Where’s the greenium? Journal of Accounting and Economics 69(2-3): 101312.
    Li, H., W. G. No, and J. E. Boritz. 2020. Are external auditors concerned about cyber incidents? Evidence from audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 39(1): 151-171.
    Lins, K. V., H. Servaes, and A. Tamayo. 2017. Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance 72(4): 1785-1824.
    LópezPuertas‐Lamy, M., K. Desender, and M. Epure. 2017. Corporate social responsibility and the assessment by auditors of the risk of material misstatement. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 44(9-10): 1276-1314.
    Martin, P. R. and D. V. Moser. 2016. Managers’ green investment disclosures and investors’ reaction. Journal of Accounting and Economics 61(1): 239-254.
    Murthy, U. S., J. C. Park, T. Smith, and J. Whitworth. 2023. Audit efficiency and effectiveness consequences of accounting system homogeneity across audit clients: A new form of knowledge spillover? The Accounting Review 98(2): 389-418.
    Naiker, V., D. Sharma, and V. Sharma. 2013. Do former audit firm partners on audit committees procure greater nonaudit services from the auditor? The Accounting Review 88(1): 297-326.
    Niemi, L., W. R. Knechel, H. Ojala, and J. Collis. 2018. Responsiveness of auditors to the audit risk standards: Unique evidence from Big 4 audit firms. Accounting in Europe 15(1): 33-54.
    Pástor, Ľ., R. F. Stambaugh, and L. A. Taylor. 2021. Sustainable investing in equilibrium. Journal of Financial Economics 142(2): 550-571.
    Pástor, Ľ., R. F. Stambaugh, and L. A. Taylor. 2022. Dissecting green returns. Journal of Financial Economics 146(2): 403-424.
    Pham, M. H., Y. Merkoulova, and C. Veld. 2023. Credit risk assessment and executives’ legal expertise. Review of Accounting Studies 28(4): 2361-2400.
    Pittman, J., S. E. Stein, and D. F. Valentine. 2023. The importance of audit partners’ risk tolerance to audit quality. Contemporary Accounting Research 40(4): 2512-2546.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2023. Amendments to PCAOB auditing standards related to a company’s noncompliance with laws and regulations.
    Ranasinghe, T., L. Yi, and L. Zhou. 2023. Do auditors charge a client business risk premium? Evidence from audit fees and derivative hedging in the US oil and gas industry. Review of Accounting Studies 28(2): 1107-1139.
    Seltzer, L., L. T. Starks, Q. Zhu. 2020. Climate regulatory risk and corporate bonds. Unpublished working paper.
    Sharfman, M. P. and C. S. Fernando. 2008. Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal 29(6): 569-592.
    Sharma, D. S., V. D. Sharma, and B. A. Litt. 2018. Environmental responsibility, external assurance, and firm valuation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 37(4): 207-233.
    Simunic, D. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18(1): 161-190.
    Song, Y., H. Wu, and Y. Ma. 2023. Does ESG performance affect audit pricing? Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis 90: 102890.
    Stanley, J. 2011. Is the audit fee disclosure a leading indicator of clients’ business risk? Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 30(3): 157-179.
    Steffen T. 2024. Why the E from ESG is far from Easy. Osmosis Investment Management. Retrieved from: https://www.osmosisim.com/why-the-e-from-esg-is-far-from-easy/
    Tsui, J. S., B. Jaggi, and F. A. Gul. 2001. CEO domination, growth opportunities, and their impact on audit fees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 16(3): 189-208.
    United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2024. The enhancement and standardization of climate-related disclosures for investors.
    Yao, S., L. Pan, and Z. Zhang. 2019. Does environmental disclosure have an auditing effect? Managerial Auditing Journal 35(1): 43-66.
    Zerbib, O. D. 2019. The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. Journal of Banking and Finance 98: 39-60.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    110353502
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110353502
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    350201.pdf2076KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback