English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 115697/146731 (79%)
Visitors : 56215288      Online Users : 336
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/156904


    Title: 管理主義體制下,社工員平衡行政工作與個案工作的類型學分析:兼論關懷倫理的反思
    Typology Analysis of the Balance of Administrative Work and Casework among Social Workers under a Managerial Regime: Reflection from the Standpoint of the Ethics of Care
    Authors: 林宜輝;張淳麒;黃敏原
    Contributors: 社工所
    Keywords: 行政工作;個案工作;關懷倫理;管理主義體制;類型學分析
    Administrative work;Casework;Ethics of care;Managerial regime;Typology analysis
    Date: 2024-12
    Issue Date: 2025-05-09 11:05:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在管理主義正大幅支配臺灣社工實務的環境下,社工員平日除從事個案工作外,也得承擔大量的行政工作。這便使得社工如何平衡行政工作與個案工作成為一個重要的實務議題。近期國際社工界所興起的關懷倫理風潮,便試圖在此平衡中嘗試為社工爭取更多關懷個案的空間。有關本土社工目前究竟面臨何種平衡行政工作與個案工作的挑戰,仍是一個鮮少被探究的議題。因此本研究目的便在發掘本土社工所可能存在平衡行政工作與個案工作之不同模式。為達此一目的,本論文已選取全臺都會區與鄉鎮區社會福利服務中心共計24位在職社工員進行質性訪談。在對訪談資料進行類型學分析後,研究發現本土社工在平衡行政工作與個案工作上存在四種類型:「瀕臨失衡的關懷型社工」、「適度平衡的關懷型社工」、「嚴重失衡的照顧型社工」與「合理平衡的照顧型社工」。針對不同平衡類型所涉及的脈絡因素,研究也發現區域與工作組織可能具有的影響力。立基類型學的發現與關懷倫理的立場,本文最終提出有助社工更佳平衡的可行建議。
    With managerialism starting to dominate social work practices in Taiwan, local social workers must complete an avalanche of administrative work in addition to the essential casework. Balancing the two has become a pressing practice issue. Relevant to this, the emerging wave of ethics of care in the international social work arena seeks to achieve more space for casework amidst this balance. However, how Taiwanese social workers balance administrative work and casework in their everyday lives has yet to be researched in local scholarship. In order to address this shortfall, in this paper, we explore the different models among Taiwanese social workers for balancing administrative work and casework. To this end, we interviewed 24 social workers employed in social welfare service centres in metropolitan and township areas. By utilising typology analysis of interviewed data, we identified four balance models among local social workers, including: On the verge of imbalance of care-orientated social workers, the adequate balance of care-orientated social workers, the severe imbalance of caregiving-orientated social workers, and the acceptable balance of caregiving-orientated social workers. In addition, our contextual analysis has found two contextual factors (i.e., regions and working organisations) that have linkages with the balance types found above. Based on our research findings and the standpoint of ethics of care adopted, we propose some feasible policy strategies which would enable local social workers to better balance administrative work and casework.
    Relation: 社會政策與社會工作學刊, Vol.28, No.2, pp.99-143
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.202412_28(2).0003
    DOI: 10.6785/SPSW.202412_28(2).0003
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Social Administration and Social Work] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML12View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback