Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/156464
|
| Title: | 工作壓力、組織認同與組織文化對國軍官兵偏差行為之影響
The Influence of Work Pressure, Organizational Identification and Organizational Culture on The Deviant Behavior of R.O.C. Military Members |
| Authors: | 鄭康澤
Cheng, Kang-Tse |
| Contributors: | 連賢明
Lien, Hsien-Ming
鄭康澤
Cheng, Kang-Tse |
| Keywords: | 工作壓力
組織認同
組織文化
偏差行為
Work Stress
Organizational Identification
Organizational Culture
Deviant Behavior |
| Date: | 2025 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-04-01 11:43:19 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 軍以戰為主，國軍則為守護國土安全的重要力量，而軍隊內的每一位官兵都是每一場戰役重要的成員。在戰場上需要透過統一指揮、聯合作戰的標準，以形成強大戰力。在上述的要求下，國軍的每位官兵軍需服從指揮、遵守紀律規定。當國軍官兵在單位中產生負面情緒、進而產生偏差行為，便會開始影響單位運作效能，更嚴重可能導致降低作戰能力、影響戰局。
本研究透過個人、組織、環境三個面向分析偏差行為。個人方面，國軍的工作環境與外界不同，除了工時長、生活管理嚴格、組織環境封閉，近年隨著軍的編制縮減與任務繁重，官兵所承受的工作壓力逐漸增加。組織方面，則著重於官兵對單位的認知，若個體對組織抱有敵意或負面的情緒，其在工作上發生偏差行為機率就會升高，故藉個體對組織的組織認同程度分析偏差行為產生的組織面向。在環境方面，則取決於單位整體所呈現的氛圍，無論是白紙黑字頒布的規定與規範、或是不成文的慣例，一個組織所型塑的文化都會大大影響個體在工作上偏差行為的產生。
本研究主要在探討「工作壓力、組織認同、組織文化對國軍官兵之偏差行為的影響」，透過量化的方式分析前三者與國軍官兵偏差行為的關係。本研究正式問卷以國軍官兵為研究對象，共蒐集有效問卷計229份，經SPSS統計軟體分析發現：
一、工作壓力對偏差行為具顯著正向影響。
二、組織認同對偏差行為具顯著負向影響。
三、組織文化對偏差行為具顯著負向影響，其中層級型文化程度對組織偏差行為具顯著抑制效果、共識型文化對人際偏差行為具顯著抑制效果。
四、將工作壓力、組織認同、組織文化同時置入時，工作壓力仍維持顯著正向影響、組織認同影響下降為不顯著、組織文化維持顯著負向影響。
最終根據研究結果，提供國軍幹部對於部隊管理之實務建議，期透過調整組部隊運作方式及管理方向進行改善，降低國軍官兵偏差行為發生機率，維持部隊戰力。
The military prioritizes readiness for warfare, and the armed forces play a critical role in safeguarding national security. Every member of the military is an essential part of each battle. On the battlefield, unified command and joint operational standards are necessary to create strong combat effectiveness. Under these requirements, every soldier in the armed forces must obey orders and follow disciplinary regulations. When military personnel experience negative emotions and engage in deviant behavior, it can impact unit operational efficiency, and in severe cases, reduce combat capabilities and influence the outcome of battles.
This study analyzes deviant behavior through three dimensions: individual, organizational, and environmental. On the individual level, the working environment in the military differs significantly from the civilian world. In addition to long working hours, strict lifestyle management, and a closed organizational environment, the recent downsizing of military personnel and increased workload have gradually intensified the stress experienced by service members. On the organizational level, the focus is on soldiers' perceptions of their units. If an individual harbors hostility or negative emotions toward the organization, the likelihood of deviant behavior increases. Therefore, this study examines deviant behavior from the organizational perspective through the lens of organizational identification. On the environmental level, the atmosphere of a unit plays a crucial role. Whether through formal regulations or unwritten norms, the culture shaped by the organization significantly influences the occurrence of deviant behavior in the workplace.
This study primarily explores the influence of work stress, organizational identification, and organizational culture on deviant behavior among ROC military personnel. A quantitative research approach was employed to analyze the relationships between these three factors and deviant behavior. The formal questionnaire survey targeted ROC military personnel, yielding 229 valid responses. Analysis using SPSS statistical software produced the following key findings:
1. Work stress has a significant positive impact on deviant behavior.
2. Organizational identification has a significant negative impact on deviant behavior.
3. Organizational culture has a significant negative impact on deviant behavior. Specifically :
iii
(1) Hierarchical culture significantly suppresses organizational deviant behavior.
(2) Consensus-based culture significantly suppresses interpersonal deviant behavior.
4. When work stress, organizational identification, and organizational culture were analyzed together:
(1) Work stress maintained a significant positive impact on deviant behavior.
(2) The impact of organizational identification on deviant behavior became insignificant.
(3) Organizational culture continued to have a significant negative impact on deviant behavior.
Based on these findings, this study provides practical recommendations for ROC military leaders regarding unit management. By adjusting unit operations and refining management strategies, the aim is to reduce the occurrence of deviant behavior among military personnel and maintain combat effectiveness. |
| Reference: | (一 ) 中文參考文獻
1. 吳明順 (2002)。 國民中學主任工作壓力與因應策略之研究 。 國立彰化師範大學教育研究所 碩士論文 ，未出版，彰化市 。
2. 林信安（2010)。 國民中學學務主任工作壓力及其因應策略之研究 。 國立臺灣師範大學 碩士論文 ，未出版，臺北市 。
3. 林姿葶、廖元希、黃雅娟、楊建銘(2023) 。 魚與熊掌必然不可兼得？多工時間觀對工作壓力、工作與生活平衡、身心健康間耗損關係的緩減效果 。 中華心理衛生學刊， 36(2)， 121-156。
4. 洪錦德 (2021) 。 國軍政戰軍官時間管理與工作壓力相關性之研究 。 國防大學政治作戰學院心理及社會工作學系社會工作碩士班，碩士論文 ，未出版，臺北市 。
5. 孫瑞霙 (2002) 。 競值架構下領導型態、組織文化與組織效能之研究 -以台灣地區技術學院為例 。 臺北大學企業管理學系，博士論文，頁 13 ，未出版，新北市 。
6. 徐瑋伶、鄭柏壎 (2002) 組織認同：理論與本質之初步探索分析 ，中山管理評論，頁 50。
7. 張秋蘭、黃敏雯 (2014) 。 個人特質、組織偏差行為與員工協助方案需求的影響關係 。 勞動與就業關係學術研討會論文集，頁 313-336。
8. 陸洛 (1997) 。 工作壓力之歷程理論與研究的對話 。 中華心理衛生學刊 10(4)，頁 19-51。
9. 陸洛、高淑芳 (1999) 。 主管工作壓力的族群差異背景、工作與職 業因素。中華心理衛生學刊 。 12(2)， 頁 23-66。
10. 張睿紘 (2023) 。 領導風格如何形塑組織文化與影響組織氣候以創造價值？亞吉斯工程公司之單一個案研究 。 國立臺南大學經營與管理學系科技管理碩士班，碩士論文，頁 20，未出版，臺南市 。
11. 張寶仁（1999)。 勞工之人格特質與工作壓力知覺及工作壓力反應之相關研究：以某公司製糖工人為例 。 國立台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市，未出版，臺北市。
12. 劉文鴻（2010）。臺北市公立國民中學訓導人員工作壓力與因應策略之研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士在職專班，碩士論文，未出版，新北市。
13. 陳蓮妃(2003)。國民中學訓導主任工作壓力與職業倦怠關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所，碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
(二) 英文參考文獻
1. Aquino, K., Lewis, M. U., & Bradfield, M. (1999). Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: A proposed model and empirical test, Journal of Organizational Behavior.
2. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization, Academy of Management Review.
3. Brewer, E. W., & McMahan, J. (2003). Job Stress and Burnout among Industrial and Technical Teacher Educators, Journal of Vocational Education Research, 28 (2), 125-140.
4. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework , San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Cary L . Cooper(1983). Identifying Stressors at Work：： Recent Research Developments, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Vol. 27, NO. 5, pp. 369-376.
6. Cary L. Cooper, Stephen Williams, Stephen J. Sloan(1988). Occupational stress indicator management guide, NFER-Nelson, Windsor.
7. Cheney, G. (1983). The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication, Quarterly journal of speech, 69(2), 143-158.
8. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational Images and Member Identification, Administrative Science Quarterly.
9. Glynn, M. A. (1998). Working Together: How Organizational Culture and Structure Affect Organizational Identification, Academy of Management Review.
10. Goff, S. J., Mount, M. K., & Jamison, R. L. (1990). Employer supported child care, work/family conflict, and absenteeism: A field study, Personnel Psychology, 43, 793-809.
11. Harquail, C. V. (1999). Organizational Identification and Organizational Image: A Review and Future Directions, Research in Organizational Behavior.
12. Hinkle, L. E.Jr(1973). The Concept of ‘Stress’ In The Biological and Social Sciences, Sci Med Man 1973; 1:page 31-48.
13. Lazarus S, Folkman S.(1984). Stress, appraisal and coping, New York: Springer.
14. Lewis, M. U. (1985). Employee deviance and organizational behavior, Journal of Business and Psychology.
15. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1989). The Identification of Organizations: An Examination of the Interrelationships between Organizational Identification and Organizational Commitment, Journal of Applied Psychology.
16. Marcus, B., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2007). Personality dimensions explaining relationships between integrity tests and counterproductive behavior: Big five, or one in addition? , Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 1–34.
17. Mazni Alias, Roziah Mohd Rasdi and Al-Mansor Abu Said(2012). The Impact of Negative Affectivity, Job Satisfaction and Interpersonal Justice on Workplace Deviance in the Private Organizations, Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities 20(3):829-845.
18. Miller, V. D., Allen, N. J., Casey, M. C., & Johnson, P. D. (2000). Examining the Relationship between Organizational Identification and Organizational Commitment, Journal of Organizational Behavior.
19. Mount, M., Ilies, R., & Johnson, E. (2006). Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction , Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 591–622.
20. O'Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment, In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews, Vol. 18, pp. 157–200.
21. Pablo Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara(2010), Do unfair procedures predict employees’ ethical behavior by deactivating formal regulations?, Journal of Business Ethic, Vol.94,pp 411-425.
22. Patchen, M. (1970). Discussions and Reviews: Models of cooperation and conflict: a critical review, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 14(3), 389-407.
23. Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. E. (2005). Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The moderating role of negative affectivity, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 777–796.
24. Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study, Academy of Management Journal.
25. Robinson, S. L., & O'Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees, Academy of Management Journal.
26. Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance, Journal of Applied Psychology.
27. Schein, E. H. (1987). The clinical perspective in fieldwork, Sage Publications, Inc.
28. Schein, E.H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd Edition, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
29. Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The stressor-emotion model of counterproductive work behavior, Human Resource Management Review.
30. Susan Michie(2002). Cause and Management Stress at Work, Occupational and Environmental Medicine 59(1):67-72.
31. Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P. (2010). Do unfair procedures predict employees’ ethical behavior by deactivating formal regulations? , Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 411–425.
(三)網路參考資料（中文文獻在前，英文文獻在後）
1. 曾文煌(2019年)。近年國軍官兵因違法犯紀而遭勒令退伍之人數逐年增加，審計部亦屢就軍紀案件提出審核意見，國防部允妥謀改善對策，國防部108年度單位決算評估報告。(https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=44166&pid=202913)
2. 青年日報(2024)。落實性別平等，建構友善和諧環境，社論(https://www.ydn.com.tw/news/newsInsidePage?chapterID=1692561&type=forum) |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
112921322 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112921322 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 132201.pdf | | 4533Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
