English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114875/145929 (79%)
Visitors : 53859349      Online Users : 923
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/156060
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/156060


    Title: 顧客工會化對供應商創新績效的影響:迴歸不連續性探討
    The Impact of Customer Unionization on Supplier Innovation Performance: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis
    Authors: 施怡安
    Shih, Yi-An
    Contributors: 李曉惠
    Lee, Hsiao-Hui
    施怡安
    Shih, Yi-An
    Keywords: 工會化
    供應鏈
    創新績效
    供應鏈合作
    Unionization
    Supply Chain
    Innovation performance
    Supply chain collaboration
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2025-03-03 15:10:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在此研究中,我們探討了供應商的創新績效是否受到客戶工會化的影響,以及與主要客戶合作年限的調節作用。本研究以美國勞工工會選舉資料為例,並採用不連續迴歸模型來檢驗因果關係。結果顯示,在客戶通過了工會選舉後的第一年及第二年,供應商的創新績效平均分別降低了26.9%及43.9%,表示主要客戶工會化確實會造成供應商採取短視管理策略,並忽略了對創新的投資。這樣的負面影響在製造業中更明顯,這可能是因為製造業的創新成本較為高昂。此外,當與主要客戶合作較長久時,工會化對其供應商創新績效的負面影響會減弱。總而言之,本研究的實證結果支持了客戶工會化會負面影響其供應商的創新績效,並指出了維持長期供應鏈夥伴關係的重要性。
    We examine whether supplier innovation performance is affected by customer unionization and the moderating role of the duration of collaborating with major customers. Using the labor union election data in the U.S., we adopt the regression discontinuity approach to investigate the causal effect. Our results show that on average, a supplier's innovation performance respectively declined by about 26.9% and 43.9%, during the first and second years following its customers' election victories, indicating that customer unionization causes suppliers to adopt myopic management and ignore the investments of innovative activities. This negative impact is more pronounced in the manufacturing industry, likely due to the greater innovation investment needed in this industry. Moreover, when the duration of a supply chain relationship is longer, the detrimental effect of unionization on its supplier's innovation performance is reduced. In sum, our empirical evidence supports that unionization of customers negatively impacts their supplier's innovation performance and highlights the importance of maintaining a long-term supply chain partnership.
    Reference: Acemoglu, D., Carvalho, V. M., Ozdaglar, A., and Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2012). The network
    origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica, 80(5):1977–2016.
    Agca, S., Babich, V., Birge, J. R., and Wu, J. (2022). Credit shock propagation along
    supply chains: Evidence from the cds market. Management Science, 68(9):6506–6538.
    Anderson, E. and Weitz, B. (1989). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial
    channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8(4):310–323.
    Baumann, J. and Kritikos, A. S. (2016). The link between r&d, innovation and productivity:
    Are micro firms different? Research Policy, 45(6):1263–1274.
    Bradley, D., Kim, I., and Tian, X. (2017). Do unions affect innovation? Management
    Science, 63(7):2251–2271.
    Bronars, S. G. and Deere, D. R. (1991). The threat of unionization, the use of debt, and the preservation of shareholder wealth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(1):231–
    254.
    Cannon, J. P. and Homburg, C. (2001). Buyer–supplier relationships and customer firm
    costs. Journal of Marketing, 65(1):29–43.
    Cao, M. and Zhang, Q. (2011). Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage
    and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3):163–180.
    Cattaneo, M. D., Idrobo, N., and Titiunik, R. (2019). A practical introduction to regression discontinuity designs: Foundations. Cambridge University Press.
    Chen, G., Judd, J. S., and Pandit, S. (2021). Firm unionization and disruptions in customer
    relationships. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(4):2951–2981.
    Chen, H. J., Kacperczyk, M., and Ortiz-Molina, H. (2011). Labor unions, operating flexibility, and the cost of equity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(1):25–58.
    Clark, K. B. (1982). Unionization and firm performance: the impact on profits, growth
    and productivity. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
    DiNardo, J. and Lee, D. S. (2004). Economic impacts of new unionization on private sector
    employers: 1984–2001. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(4):1383–1441.
    Dong, Y., Skowronski, K., Song, S., Venkataraman, S., and Zou, F. (2020). Supply base
    innovation and firm financial performance. Journal of Operations Management, 66(7-
    8):768–796.
    Ertugrul, M. and Marciukaityte, D. (2021). Labor unions and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 125:106061.
    Freeman, R. B. and Medoff, J. L. (1979). The two faces of unionism.
    Garel, A. (2017). Myopic market pricing and managerial myopia. Journal of Business
    Finance & Accounting, 44(9-10):1194–1213.
    Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., and Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of
    corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1-3):3–73.
    Gruman, J. A. and Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement.
    Human Resource Management Review, 21(2):123–136.
    Hayes, R. H. and Abernathy, W. J. (1980). Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard
    Bus. Rev.;(United States), 58(4).
    Heide, J. B. and John, G. (1990). Alliances in industrial purchasing: The determinants of
    joint action in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1):24–
    36.
    Heirman, A. and Clarysse, B. (2007). Which tangible and intangible assets matter for
    innovation speed in start-ups? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4):303–
    315.
    Hill, A. D., Johnson, S. G., Greco, L. M., O’Boyle, E. H., and Walter, S. L. (2021).
    Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro
    and macro research. Journal of Management, 47(1):105–143.
    Hirsch, B. T. (1997). Unionization and economic performance. Unions and Right-to-work
    Laws, page 35.
    Holmes, T. J. (2006). Geographic spillover of unionism.
    Imbens, G. and Kalyanaraman, K. (2012). Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression
    discontinuity estimator. The Review of Economic Studies, 79(3):933–959.
    Imbens, G. W. and Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to
    practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2):615–635.
    Inkpen, A. C. (2009). Creating knowledge through collaboration1. In Knowledge, Groupware
    and the Internet, pages 317–335. Routledge.
    Isaksson, O. H., Simeth, M., and Seifert, R. W. (2016). Knowledge spillovers in the supply
    chain: Evidence from the high tech sectors. Research Policy, 45(3):699–706.
    Klasa, S., Maxwell, W. F., and Ortiz-Molina, H. (2009). The strategic use of corporate cash
    holdings in collective bargaining with labor unions. Journal of Financial Economics,
    92(3):421–442.
    Kolay, M., Lemmon, M., and Tashjian, E. (2016). Spreading the misery? sources of
    bankruptcy spillover in the supply chain. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,
    51(6):1955–1990.
    Kotabe, M., Martin, X., and Domoto, H. (2003). Gaining from vertical partnerships:
    knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in
    the us and japanese automotive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 24(4):293–
    316.
    Lee, D. S. and Mas, A. (2012). Long-run impacts of unions on firms: New evidence from
    financial markets, 1961–1999. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1):333–378.
    Leenders, M. R. and Blenkhorn, D. L. (1988). Reverse marketing: The new buyer-supplier
    relationship. (No Title).
    Leung, W. S., Li, J., and Sun, J. (2020). Labor unionization and supply-chain partners’
    performance. Production and Operations Management, 29(5):1325–1353.
    Levinthal, D. A. and March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management
    Journal, 14(S2):95–112.
    Lu, G. and Shang, G. (2017). Impact of supply base structural complexity on financial
    performance: Roles of visible and not-so-visible characteristics. Journal of Operations
    Management, 53:23–44.
    Macey, W. H., Schneider, B., Barbera, K. M., and Young, S. A. (2011). Employee engagement:
    Tools for analysis, practice, and competitive advantage. John Wiley & Sons.
    Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., and Sawy, O. A. E. (2005). Absorptive capacity configurations in
    supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quarterly,
    pages 145–187.
    Maloni, M. J. and Benton, W. (1997). Supply chain partnerships: opportunities for operations research. European Journal of Operational Research, 101(3):419–429.
    Manthou, V., Vlachopoulou, M., and Folinas, D. (2004). Virtual e-chain (vec) model for
    supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3):241–
    250.
    Merchant, K. A. (1990). The effects of financial controls on data manipulation and management myopia. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(4):297–313.
    Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: partnership
    attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2):135–152.
    Nemlioglu, I. and Mallick, S. (2021). Effective innovation via better management of firms:
    The role of leverage in times of crisis. Research Policy, 50(7):104259.
    Park, N. K., Mezias, J. M., and Song, J. (2004). A resource-based view of strategic alliances and firm value in the electronic marketplace. Journal of Management, 30(1):7–
    27.
    Radhakrishnan, S., Wang, Z., and Zhang, Y. (2014). Customers’capital market information
    quality and suppliers’performance. Production and Operations Management, 23(10):1690–1705.
    Ramanathan, U. and Gunasekaran, A. (2014). Supply chain collaboration: Impact of
    success in long-term partnerships. International Journal of Production Economics,
    147:252–259.
    Sheu, C., Rebecca Yen, H., and Chae, B. (2006). Determinants of supplier-retailer
    collaboration: evidence from an international study. International Journal of Operations &
    Production Management, 26(1):24–49.
    Singh, K. and Mitchell, W. (1996). Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut down or form new partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1):99–
    115.
    Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal
    of Production Economics, 103(2):451–488.
    Thomas, D. J. and Griffin, P. M. (1996). Coordinated supply chain management. European
    Journal of Operational Research, 94(1):1–15.
    W. Ridge, J., Kern, D., and A. White, M. (2014). The influence of managerial myopia on
    firm strategy. Management Decision, 52(3):602–623.
    Wang, Y., Li, J., Wu, D., and Anupindi, R. (2021). When ignorance is not bliss: An empirical analysis of subtier supply network structure on firm risk. Management Science,
    67(4):2029–2048.
    Whipple, J. M., Lynch, D. F., and Nyaga, G. N. (2010). A buyer’s perspective on collaborative versus transactional relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(3):507–518.
    Zhou, H. and Benton Jr, W. (2007). Supply chain practice and information sharing. Journal
    of Operations Management, 25(6):1348–1365.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理學系
    111356017
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111356017
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[資訊管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    601701.pdf768KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback