English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114875/145929 (79%)
Visitors : 53860796      Online Users : 340
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/155987


    Title: AI寫作工具應用於社群行銷內容對消費者行為之影響
    The Impact of AI Writing Tools Applied to Social Media Marketing Content on Consumer Behavior
    Authors: 韋馨媛
    Wei, Xin-Yuan
    Contributors: 邱志聖
    韋馨媛
    Wei, Xin-Yuan
    Keywords: ChatGPT
    AI
    社群行銷
    產品評價
    產品喜好度
    興趣
    ChatGPT
    AI
    social media marketing
    product evaluation
    product likability
    interest
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2025-03-03 14:27:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來,隨著人工智慧(AI)工具的蓬勃發展,不僅個人開始將AI工具(例如ChatGPT)作為個人助理使用,越來越多企業也將AI技術融入其業務流程中。在這些應用中,以行銷領域最為普遍。因此,本研究專注於探討社群行銷內容,了解人類與AI工具所撰寫的社群文案對消費者的影響及AI寫作工具在行銷不同類型產品時的適用時機。
    本研究透過人類與 AI 工具(ChatGPT 及專以行銷寫作目的為主的 Rytr)分別針對科技產品及快速消費品撰寫社群文案。研究採用了3(ChatGPT、Rytr、人類)× 2(科技產品、快速消費品)的實驗設計,旨在探討不同的文案生成方式應用於不同類型產品的社群行銷文案時,對消費者的產品評價、喜好程度、興趣和信任程度的影響。
    針對人類與AI工具所撰寫的社群文案對消費者的影響,研究結果顯示在產品評價、喜好程度、興趣和信任程度上,人類與AI工具所生成的社群文案沒有顯著差異。而AI寫作工具在行銷不同類型產品時的適用時機,研究結果則得出相較於科技產品文案,Rytr應用於消費品社群文案上能更有效提升消費者對產品的評價、喜好程度和興趣;ChatGPT僅在興趣構面上,在消費品社群文案中有顯著影響;至於信任程度,兩種AI工具在不同類型產品上的應用沒有顯著差異。
    In recent years, with the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, not only have individuals begun to use AI tools (such as ChatGPT) as personal assistants, but more and more businesses are also integrating AI technology into their business processes. Among these applications, marketing is the most prevalent field. Therefore, this study focuses on exploring social media marketing content, examining the impact of social media copy written by humans and AI tools on consumers, and identifying the appropriate occasions for using AI writing tools when marketing different types of products.

    In this study, social media copy for technology products and fast-moving consumer goods was written by both humans and AI tools (ChatGPT and Rytr, which is specifically designed for marketing writing purposes). The research employed a 3 (ChatGPT, Rytr, human) × 2 (technology products, fast-moving consumer goods) experimental design to investigate the impact of different copywriting methods applied to different types of products on consumers' product evaluations, preferences, interest, and trust.

    Regarding the impact of social media copy written by humans and AI tools on consumers, the results showed no significant difference in product evaluations, preferences, interest, and trust between human-generated and AI-generated social media copy. As for the appropriate occasions for using AI writing tools when marketing different types of products, the findings revealed that compared to technology product copy, Rytr was more effective in enhancing consumers' product evaluations, preferences, and interest in social media copy for consumer goods. ChatGPT only showed a significant impact on the interest dimension in consumer goods social media copy. In terms of trust, there was no significant difference in the application of the two AI tools across different types of products.
    Reference: 中文部分
    1. 邱志聖 (2020)。策略行銷分析:架構與實務應用 (5版 )。台北市 智勝文化
    2. ChatGPT. (2024, June 25). Retrieved from 維基百科, 自由的百科全書: https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ChatGPT&oldid=83163075
    3. 吳鑫(2023)。ChatGPT是什麼? ChatGPT 付費版與免費版差異?Retrieved from  https://shinphotos.com/chatgpt-3/ 

    英文部分
    1. Ahn, J., and Back, K.J. (2018). Influence of brand relationship on customer attitude toward integrated resort brands: a cognitive, affective, and conative perspective. Journal of Traveling &Tourism Marketing, 35(4), 449-60.
    2. Ajzen, I. (2005), Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
    3. Ali, Z., Shabbir, MA., Rauf, M. & Hussain, A. (2016). To Assess the Impact of Social Media Marketing on Consumer Perception. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences. 6, 69-77.
    4. Alwitt, L. F. (1987). Components of the Likeability of Advertising. In Presentation to the Stellner Symposium on Uses of Cognitive Psychology in Advertising and Marketing, University of Illinois.
    5. Aydin, G., Uray, N., Silahtaroglu, G. (2021). How to Engage Consumers through Effective Social Media Use—Guidelines for Consumer Goods Companies from an Emerging Market. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(4), 768-790.
    Behaviour. E3S Web Conf. 135 04022 (2019), 1-9.
    6. Bronner, F., & de Hoog, R. (2014). Social media and consumer choice. International Journal of Market Research, 56(1), 51-71.
    7. Cascella, M., Montomoli, J., Bellini, V., & Bignami, E. (2023). Evaluating the feasibility of ChatGPT in healthcare: An analysis of multiple clinical and research scenarios. Journal of Medical Systems, 47(1), 1–5.
    8. ChatGPT (2024, June 26). Get answers. Find inspiration. Be more productive. Retrieved from https://openai.com/chatgpt/
    9. Chatterjee. S., and Kar. AK. (2020). Why do small and medium enterprises use social media marketing and what is the impact: Empirical insights from India. International Journal of Information Management, 2-7.
    10. Chui, M., Roberts, R., & Yee, L. (2022, December 20). Generative AI is Here: How Tools Like ChatGpt Could Change Your Business. Quantum Black AI by McKinsey. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/generative-ai-is-here-how-tools-like-chatgpt-could-change-your-business#/
    11. Dunn, D.T. Jr, Friar, J.H. and Thomas, C.A. (1991). An approach to selling high‐tech solutions. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 20, 149‐59.
    12. Gardner, D.M., Johnson, F., Lee, M. and Wilkinson, I. (2000). A contingency approach to marketing high technology products. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 34 No. 9/10, 1053-1077.
    13. Hee, O. C. (2014). Validity and Reliability of the Customer-Oriented Behaviour Scale in the Health Tourism Hospitals in Malaysia. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 7(3), 771-775.
    14. Houde, S., Liao, Q.V., Martino, J., Muller, M.J., Piorkowski, D., Richards, J.T., Weisz, J.D., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Business (mis)Use Cases of Generative AI. ArXiv, abs/2003.07679.
    15. Huschens, M., Briesch, M., Sobania, D., & Rothlauf, F. (2023). Do You Trust ChatGPT? - Perceived Credibility of Human and AI-Generated Content. ArXiv, abs/2309.02524.
    16. King, M.R. & chatGPT (2023). A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 16, 1-2.
    17. Lutz, R.J. (1985). Affective and Cognitive Antecedents of Attitude Toward the Ad : A Conceptual Framework. Psychological Processes and Advertising Effects, 45-64.
    18. MacInnis, D. J., & de Mello, G. E. (2005). The Concept of Hope and its Relevance to Product Evaluation and Choice. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 1-14.
    19. Moore, O.( 2023,September 13). How Are Consumers Using Generative AI? Retrieved from https://a16z.com/how-are-consumers-using-generative-ai/
    20. Mukherjee, A., & Hoyer, W. D. (2001). The Effect of Novel Attributes on Product Evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 462–472.
    21. Nah, F., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K. & Chen, L. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 25:3, 277-304.
    22. Nesterenko, V., & Olefirenko, O. (2023). The impact of AI development on the development of marketing communications. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 169-181.
    23. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Communication and Persuasion.
    24. Reysen, S. (2005). Construction of a new scale: The Reysen likeability scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality , 33 ( 2 ), 201–208.
    25. Rosen, D. E., Schroeder, J. E., & Purinton, E. F. (1998). Marketing high tech products: Lessons in customer focus from the marketplace. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 6, 1-17.
    26. Rossiter, J.R. & Percy, L. (1997), Advertising and Promotion Management, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.
    27. Rudolph J., Tan, S., Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, Vol. 6 No. 1, 342-363.
    28. Rytr (2023, June 19). Introducing Rytr – your AI writing assistant! Retrieved from https://rytr.me/blog/what-is-rytr/
    29. Schiefele, H., Krapp, A., Prenzel, M., Heiland, A., & Kasten, H. (1983). Principles of an educational theory of interest. Paper presented at the 7th biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Munich.
    30. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, Learning, and Motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26:3-4, 299-323.
    31. Schivinski, B. & Dabrowski, D. (2016). The effect of social media communication on consumer perceptions of brands, Journal of Marketing Communications, 22:2, 189-214.
    32. Van Dis, E.A.M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., Van Rooij, R. and Bockting, C.L. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, Vol. 614 No. 7947, 224-226.
    33. Wahid, R., Mero, J. and Ritala, P. (2023). Editorial: Written by ChatGPT, illustrated by Midjourney: generative AI for content marketing. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 35 No. 8, 1813-1822.
    34. Walsh, M., & Lipinski, J. (2009). The role of the marketing function in small and medium sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16(4), 569–585.
    35. Wibowo, A., Chen, S.-C., Wiangin, U., Ma, Y., Ruangkanjanases, A.(2020). Customer Behavior as an Outcome of Social Media Marketing: The Role of Social Media Marketing Activity and Customer Experience. Sustainability 2021, 13, 189.
    36. Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q., and Tang, Y. (2023). A Brief Overview of ChatGPT: The History, Status Quo and Potential Future Development. Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 10, no. 5, 1122-1136.
    37. Zhang, Y., and Gosline, R. (2023). Human Favoritism, Not AI Aversion: People’s Perceptions (and Bias) Toward Generative AI, Human Experts, and Human-GAI Collaboration in Persuasive Content Generation. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=4453958
    38. Ziyadin. S., Doszhan. R., Borodin. A., Omarova. A., and Ilyas. A. (2019). The role of social media marketing in consumer
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    111351021
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111351021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    102101.pdf6884KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback