English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114609/145646 (79%)
Visitors : 53682059      Online Users : 627
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/155768


    Title: Reasonable measures to protect software’s functionality as a trade secret in software licensing: a lesson from Turret Labs USA, Inc. v CargoSprint, LLC
    Authors: 陳秉訓
    Chen, Ping-Hsun;Tu, Pei-Chen;Wu, Shih-Wei
    Contributors: 科管智財所
    Keywords: trade secret;reasonable measures;misappropriation;software;confidentiality agreement;Defend Trade Secrets Act;United States
    Date: 2024-11
    Issue Date: 2025-02-24 15:36:41 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: In the United States, when a misappropriation case is brought in a federal district court, a plaintiff must allege enough facts in her complaint to indicate that the alleged trade secret satisfies the definition of ‘trade secret’. One element is the ‘reasonable measures’ requirement mandating a plaintiff to prove that he has taken reasonable measures to keep trade secret information secret. This article discusses an appellate court decision, Turret Labs USA, Inc. v CargoSprint, LLC, finding that the plaintiff’s trade secret did not satisfy the ‘reasonable measures’ requirement. This case is important particularly to the software industry because the plaintiff’s failure may teach other software developers a lesson of how to use a confidentiality agreement to protect software’s functionality. The decision indicates that when software is intended for end-users, to meet the ‘reasonable measures’ requirement, software’s functionality as something observable or apparent to these end-users must depend on a confidentiality agreement with an anti-reverse-engineering provision. The scope of confidentiality must cover intermediaries and end-users of a software developer.
    Relation: Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol.14, No.4, pp.477-491
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2024.04.06
    DOI: 10.4337/qmjip.2024.04.06
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback