Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/155526
|
| Title: | 美國的安全承諾程度對臺灣人民獨立立場的影響
The Influence of U.S. Security Commitments on Taiwanese Independence Stance |
| Authors: | 陳靖雯
Chen, Ching-Wen |
| Contributors: | 吳崇涵
Wu, Chong-Han
陳靖雯
Chen, Ching-Wen |
| Keywords: | 階級制度
扈從
軍售
台灣關係法
台灣獨立
Hierarchy
Bandwagoning
Arms sales
Taiwan Relation Act
Taiwan independence |
| Date: | 2024 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-02-04 16:18:09 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 台灣與中國之間的關係長期以來極為複雜。由於政治因素考量，美國在1971年與中華民國（即台灣）斷交。1979年，美國通過《台灣關係法》（TRA），承諾保障台灣的安全。作為全球超級大國，美國在東亞地區扮演著至關重要的角色，美國的安全保證對於台海穩定具有重大意義。近年來，美國日益增強的安全承諾使台灣在推動獨立的過程中更加自信。此外，北京在該地區的侵略性行為以及在人權和疫情等問題上的負面形象，進一步助長了台灣對於彰顯其獨立地位的渴望。
本論文將利用國際層級體系分析強權國家如何影響弱勢國家的決策，並通過政策分析比較不同行政時期美國安全承諾的數量與頻率。通過分析，本論文得出以下結論：美國在經濟與軍事上的相對優勢使其安全承諾對於台灣及中國而言意義重大。此外，近年來美國對台灣安全承諾的質量與數量的增加，促成了台灣民眾支持獨立傾向的上升。
The connection between Taiwan and China has been highly complicated for a long time. Due to political concerns, the United States (U.S.) cut the diplomatic relations with the
Republic of China (namely ROC, Taiwan) in 1971. The Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) was released in 1979 to commit to Taiwan’s security. The United States has been a superpower in the world for decades and has a crucial role in East Asia; the assurances from the U.S. could be significant for the stability of the Taiwan Strait. In recent years, the growing security commitments from the U.S. have given Taiwan greater confidence in its push for independence. Additionally, Beijing's aggressive actions in the region, coupled with its negative image on issues such as human rights and the pandemic, have further fueled Taiwan's desire to assert its independence. The thesis will use the international hierarchy system to analyze how a country with more power shapes a weaker country in its decision-making and compare the amount and frequency of U.S. commitments in the different periods by policy analysis. Through analysis, this thesis draws those conclusions. The relative economic and military power dominance of the United States, leading the security commitments from the U.S. are very meaningful for Taiwan as well as China. Moreover, the increased quality and quantity of U.S. security commitments in recent years has contributed to a rise in Taiwanese public opinion favoring independence. |
| Reference: | Benson, B. V., & Niou, E. M. (2000). Comprehending strategic ambiguity: US policy toward the Taiwan Strait security issue. Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, Duke University.
Benson, B. V., & Niou, E. M. (2002). The US Security Commitment to Taiwan Should Remain Ambiguous. The Rise of China in Asia: Security Implications.
Bosco, J. (2023). US ‘strategic ambiguity’ invites war over Taiwan The Hill. https://thehill.com/opinion/international/4222702-us-strategic-ambiguity-invites-war-over-taiwan/
Brown University (n.d.). U.S.-China Joint Communiqués: 1972, 1979, 1982. . China on the World Stage: Weighing the U.S. Response. https://www.choices.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/choices-china-US-china.pdf
Bush, R., & Rigger, S. (2019). The Taiwan issue and the normalization of US-China relations. Brookings, 16, 14-17.
Cabestan, J.-P. (2010). Nancy Bernkopf Tucker, Strait Talk: United States-Taiwan Relations and The Crisis with China. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.5293
Chan, S. (2022). Rumbles of Thunder: Power Shifts and the Danger of Sino-American War.
Chen, P.-K., Kastner, S. L., & Reed, W. L. (2017). A Farewell to Arms?
Chu, Y.-h., & Lin, J.-w. (2001). Political development in 20th-century Taiwan: State-building, regime transformation and the construction of national identity. The China Quarterly, 165, 102-129.
Clark, C. (2010). The Taiwan Relations Act and the US balancing role in cross-strait relations. American Journal of Chinese Studies, 3-18.
Dunne, T. (2003). Society and hierarchy in international relations. International Relations, 17(3), 303-320.
Educators, A. F. (n.d.). Taiwan and U.S.-China Relations. http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/special/china_1950_taiwan.htm
Feldman, H. (2007). The Taiwan Status Quo "As We Define It". The Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/the-taiwan-status-quo-we-define-it
Grzegorzewski, F. (2022). Strategic Ambiguity in US-Taiwan Relations During the Donald Trump Administration. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 51(1), 59-74.
Hsiao, R. (2022). President Biden and Incremental Clarity on US Commitment to Taiwan’s
Defense. Global Taiwan Brief, 7(11). https://globaltaiwan.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/GTB-7.11-PDF.pdf
Hsieh, F.S. (2020). Continuity and change in the US–China–Taiwan Relations. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 55(2), 187-200.
Zhao, J.G. (2010). Study on the Us-Taiwan military sales program during president George W. Bush terms - case of submarine acquisition National ChengChi University]. https://indsr.org.tw/respublicationcon?uid=16&resid=1932&pid=3636
Kagan, R. (1999). Pressuring Taiwan, Appeasing Beijing. https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/1999/08/pressuring-taiwan-appeasing-beijing?lang=en
Kan, S. A. (2002). Taiwan: Major U.S. Arms Sales Since 1990 https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA472831
Kang, D. C. (2010). Hierarchy and legitimacy in international systems: The tribute system in early modern East Asia. Security Studies, 19(4), 591-622.
Keene, E. (2007). A case study of the construction of international hierarchy: British treaty-making against the slave trade in the early nineteenth century. International Organization, 61(2), 311-339.
Krasner, S. D. (2001). Organized hypocrisy in nineteenth‐century East Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 1(2), 173-197.
Lake, D. A. (2007). Escape from the state of nature: Authority and hierarchy in world politics. International Security, 32(1), 47-79.
Lake, D. A. (2011). Hierarchy in international relations. Cornell University Press.
Lendon, B. (2020). US finalizes sale of 66 F-16 fighters to Taiwan as China tensions escalate. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/08/17/asia/taiwan-us-f-16-fighter-purchase-intl-hnk-scli/index.html
Lijun, S. (2002). China and Taiwan: cross-strait relations under Chen Shui-bian (Vol. 3). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Lin, C. Y. (2011). A Status Quo with Different Interpretations: Taiwan, China, the United States, and Security in the Taiwan Strait. In The Future of United States, China, and Taiwan Relations (pp. 71-100). Springer.
Michael, J., & Pacherie, E. (2014). On commitments and other uncertainty reduction devices. J. Soc. Ontol, 2014, 1-34.
Organization, N. A. T. (2024). Deterrence and defence. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_133127.htm
Pelley, S. (2022). President Joe Biden: The 2022 60 Minutes Interview. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/president-joe-biden-60-minutes-interview-transcript-2022-09-18/
Porch, D. (1999). The Taiwan strait crisis of 1996: Strategic implications for the United States navy. Naval War College Review, 52(3), 15-48.
Press, A. (2001). Taiwanese Leader Urges U.S. Arms Sale. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/15/world/taiwanese-leader-urges-us-arms-sale.html
Qimao, C. (1996). The Taiwan Strait crisis: its crux and solutions. Asian Survey, 36(11), 1055-1066.
Rigger, S. (2019). The Taiwan relations act: Past, present, future. Asia Policy, 14(4), 11-17.
Shirk, S. L., & Shirk, S. L. (2022a). 1C0Prologue: How China Lost the West. In Overreach: How China Derailed Its Peaceful Rise (pp. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190068516.003.0001
Shirk, S. L., & Shirk, S. L. (2022b). 14C1The Origins of Overreach. In Overreach: How China Derailed Its Peaceful Rise (pp. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190068516.003.0002
Snyder, G. H. (1990). Alliance theory: A neorealist first cut. Journal of International Affairs, 103-123.
Streefkerk, R. (2019). Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research | Differences, Examples & Methods. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-quantitative-research/
Tseng, H. Y. (2013). US-Taiwan Relations under Ma Ying-Jeou. In East Asia: Developments and Challenges (pp. 151-164). World Scientific.
Twomey, C. (2022). The Fourth Taiwan Strait Crisis is Just Starting. War on the Rocks, 22.
Twomey, C. P. (2022). The Fourth Taiwan Strait Crisis Is Just Starting. War On The Rocks. https://warontherocks.com/2022/08/the-fourth-taiwan-strait-crisis-is-just-starting/
US Security Relations with Taiwan and the Prospects for Stability in the Taiwan Strait. In L. Dittmer (Ed.), Taiwan and China (1 ed., pp. 221-238). University of California Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1w76wpm.15
Wang, T., & Tan, A. C. (2021). Balancing, bandwagoning or hedging: Taiwan’s strategic choices in the era of a rising China. Political Science, 73(1), 66-84.
Wang, W. C. (2016). Prospects for U.S.-Taiwan Relations https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2016.08.004
Weinstein, F. B. (1969). The concept of a commitment in international relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 13(1), 39-56. https://www.thenewslens.com/article/171131
Wingfield-Hayes, R. (2023). The US is quietly arming Taiwan to the teeth. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-67282107
Wu, C. H. (2016). Taiwan's Hedging against China. The Strategic Implications of Ma Ying-Jeou's Mainland Policy. Asian Survey, 56(3), 466-487. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26364369
Wu, C. H. (2021). The end of Washington’s strategic ambiguity? The debate over US policy toward Taiwan. China Review, 21(2), 177-202.
Wu, C. H. (2022). The Taiwan Policy Act and the Future of U.S.-Taiwan Relations. STIMSON. https://www.stimson.org/2022/the-taiwan-policy-act-and-the-future-of-u-s-taiwan-relations/
Wu, C. H., & Hsieh, J. F.-S. (2016). Alliance Commitment and the Maintenance of the Status Quo. Asian Perspective, 40(2), 197-221. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44074778
Xue, Y. (2021). What Does “The Status Quo” Mean in Tsai Ing-wen’s Double Tenth Day Speech? Australian Institute of International Affairs. https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/what-does-the-status-quo-mean-in-tsai-ing-wens-double-tenth-day-speech/
Yu, M. (2022). America’s strategic clarity in defense of Taiwan: The dangerous illusion of strategic ambiguity. Taipei Times. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2022/10/31/2003787992
大陸委員會. (2022). 「民眾對當前兩岸關係之看法」例行民調結果配布表 https://www.mac.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=B383123AEADAEE52&s=3D6FCA64264786C8&sms=2B7F1AE4AC63A181
王宏恩 (2021)。民調解讀：美國「戰略清晰」會導致台獨，還是更能維持現狀？ https://www.thenewslens.com/article/153553。
余如婕 (2017)。二戰結束後台灣該歸誰？拋開統獨，歷史老師用史料解密台灣主權核心問題。Up Media。 https://buzzorange.com/citiorange/2017/06/30/taiwan-or
吳旻洲與李怡欣 (2023)。臺美重大突破斷交後臺外長首次進美國華府。大紀元。
林正義 (2010)。台美關係：F-16 C/D個案觀察 變動中的亞太局勢與台灣的戰略地位。https://www.taiwanncf.org.tw/ttforum/52/52-15.pdf
范世平 (2023)。拜登上台後的 2021年美，中，台三邊關係之研究。全球政治評論(82)，111-141。
柯永森 (2023)。美國重啟對台軍援之研析。國防安全研究院。https://indsr.org.tw/focus?uid=11&pid=2663&typeid=28
美國台灣觀測站 (2021)。為什麼我們要在意美國？從外交、制度、重大議題全面解析台美關係。聯經出版公司。
陳一偉 (2006)。 析論我國軍購政策 (1979-2005)。復興崗學報(88)，207-232。
陳方隅、葉耀元、王宏恩與吳冠昇 (2018)。美國的安全承諾，會影響台灣人自我防衛的決心嗎？ The News Lens。 https://www.thenewslens.com/feature/2018-2020/111000
陳欣之 (2007)。國際體系層級的建構與霸權統治。(46(2))，23-52。 https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.200704_46(2).0002
張五岳 (2004)。兩岸關係的回顧與展望。展望與探索，2(2)。 https://www.mjib.gov.tw/FileUploads/eBooks/99464bf0742a40e3b58148ae9ce118c5/Book_file/942c2386af1146fab858cffed8b08b4a.pdf
賴麗瑩 (2005)。海外台灣僑民國家認同的世代差異-以多倫多地區僑社為例(1971-2004) National Taiwan Normal University.
劉世忠 (2010)。歷史的糾結── 台美關係的戰略合作與分歧 (2000-2008)。台灣國際研究季刊，6(4)，177-195。
鍾辰芳 (2018)。北京對台再發警告美稱反對片面改變現狀。美國之音。https://www.voachinese.com/a/china-taiwan-independence-20180425/4364873.html |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS)
111862007 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111862007 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [國際研究英語碩士學位學程] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 200701.pdf | | 2438Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
