政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/155462
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 114400/145431 (79%)
造访人次 : 53071814      在线人数 : 674
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/155462


    题名: 國家認同與民主鞏固：台灣案例研究
    National Identity and Democratic Consolidation: A Case Study of Taiwan
    作者: 嚴伯樂
    Broese, Jan
    贡献者: 游清鑫
    Yu, Ching-Hsin
    嚴伯樂
    Broese, Jan
    关键词: 臺灣
    國家認同
    族群認同
    公民認同
    民主鞏固
    民主支持
    民主滿意
    Taiwan
    National identity
    Civic identity
    Ethnic identity
    Democratic support
    Democratic satisfaction
    Democratic Consolidation
    日期: 2024
    上传时间: 2025-02-04 15:50:08 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 臺灣民主轉型的故事持續受到眾多學者與決策者的矚目。的確，在經濟現代化與政治民主化雙重成就之下，臺灣已經成為全球發展研究的一個模範。但是，在這樣的故事背後，有關臺灣民眾的國家認同問題，以及這問題如何影響臺灣的民主鞏固仍舊是一項待釐清的謎題，尤其是有關民眾的國家認同問題如何影響臺灣邁向民主鞏固的問題， 仍有眾多的辯論。因此，本論文旨在檢驗臺灣民眾國家認同的複雜性、動態性及其影響，透過對 2016 年和 2020 年的臺灣選舉與民主化調查研究的資料進行量化分析，從微觀層面研究民眾的國家認同及其對臺灣民主鞏固進程的影響。本研究將民眾的國家認同操作化為族群認同和公民認同，而民主鞏固則被操作化為民主支持和滿意度，分析後發現，雖然族群認同的差異仍舊普遍存在，但對於民主體制作為一種政治支持的公民認同則是支撐台灣邁向民主鞏固的重要依據。透過對既有民主體制的高度支持，有利減輕因為對實際民主表現失望所帶來的風險。在此同時，本論文的研究結果也有助於理解臺灣民眾的國家認同是否集中於公民概念，以及 對於“分裂” 的國家認同是否會阻礙民主鞏固的辯論中，提供一些有用的參考。
    The story of Taiwan’s democratic transition has attracted a vast of scholars and policy-makers in recent decades. Indeed, given its successful economic modernization and political democratization, the dual-achievement has enabled Taiwan as a model of development globally. Nonetheless, in the story of Taiwan’s development, the evolution of national identity and its effect on democratic consolidation remain a puzzle. There are continuous debates about the impacts of contending national identities on its route to democratic consolidation. It is thus the objective of the study to capture the complexity, dynamic and implication of national identity in Taiwan. This essay examines national identity on a micro-level aspect and its impact on the process of democratic consolidation in Taiwan through the quantitative data collected by the TEDS in 2016 and 2020. National identity is operationalized as ethnic identity and civic identity, while democratic consolidation is operationalized as democratic support and satisfaction. This essay concludes that, though ethnic identity remains strong, the existence of a considerably strong civic identity among the Taiwanese has ensured the prospect of democratic consolidation in Taiwan. It is people’s high support for the belief of democracy that has effectively reduced the risks generated by unsatisfactory performance of democracy. Meanwhile, the findings have contributed to the knowledge about whether Taiwan’s national identity has concentrated around the civic concepts, and whether a “divided” identity has impeded democratic consolidation.
    參考文獻: Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y. M., Johnston, A. I., & McDermott, R. (Editor). (2009). Measuring Identity: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press. ttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810909.
    Achen, C., & Wang, T. Y. (2017). The Taiwan Voter. University of Michigan Press. ttps://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9375036.
    Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt183pnr2.
    Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
    Anderson, Christopher J., Blais, André, Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd and Ola Listhaug (2005). Individual Differences in Losers' Consent', Losers' Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy, Comparative Politics (Oxford Academic, 14 July 2005), https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1093/0199276382.003.0005.
    Baçová, V. (1998). The Construction of National Identity—On Primordialism and Instrumentalism. Human Affairs, 8(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-1998-080104.
    Barrington, L. W. (1997). “Nation” and “Nationalism”: The Misuse of Key Concepts in Political Science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 30(4), 712–716. https://doi.org/10.2307/420397.
    Bein, S. (2023). Identität und Demokratie: Polarisierung und Ausgleich im Spannungsfeld von Liberalismus und Republikanismus. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. German Language. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42773-3.
    Berg, L., & Hjerm, M. (2010). National Identity and Political Trust. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 11(4), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2010.524403.
    Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who Is This “We”? Levels of Collective Identity and Self-Representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
    Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge University Press. ttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558764.
    Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond “Identity”. Theory and Society, 29(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007068714468.
    Cabestan, J.-P. (2017). Changing Identities in Taiwan under Ma Ying-jeou. In L. Dittmer (Ed.), Taiwan and China: Fitful Embrace. University of California Press, 42–60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1w76wpm.6.
    Chang, H.-C. H., & Fang, Y. S. (2024). The 2024 Taiwanese Presidential Election on Social Media: Identity, Policy, and Affective Virality. PNAS Nexus, 3(4), page130. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae130.
    Chang, M. (2003). On the Origins and Transformation of Taiwanese National Identity. In P. R. Katz & M. A. Rubinstein (Editor), Religion and the Formation of Taiwanese Identities, 23–58. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403981738_2.
    Chen, R.-L. (2013). Taiwan’s Identity in Formation: In Reaction to a Democratizing Taiwan and a Rising China. Asian Ethnicity, 14(2), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2012.722446.
    Chen, W.-C. (1997). National Identity and Democratic Consolidation in Taiwan: A Study of the Problem of Democratization in a Divided Country. Issues & Studies, 33 (4), 1–44. https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=116328&locale=zh_TW#.
    Chou, W. (2022). A century of colonial education by Japan and the KMTROC party-state, 1898-1997: A comparative study of the problems of Taiwans National Identity. In P. C. Y. Chow (Hrsg.), A Century of Development in Taiwan. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800880160.00023.
    Chu, Y., & Diamond, L. (1999). Taiwan’s 1998 elections: Implications for democratic consolidation. Asian Survey, 39 (5), 808–822. https://doi.org/10.2307/3021169.
    Chull Shin, D. (2021). Democratic deconsolidation in east asia: Exploring system realignments in japan, korea, and taiwan. Democratization, 28(1), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1826438.
    Damm, J., & Kaeding, M.P. (2011). Identity Formation in Taiwan and Hong Kong – How Much Difference, How Many Similarities? In G. Schubert & J. Damm (Editor), Taiwanese Identity in the 21st Century: Domestic, Regional and Global Perspectives, 258-279. Routledge: London.
    Demes, D., & Krumbein, F. (2024). Taiwan. Asiens Erstaunliche Demokratie. Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung. German Language. https://www.bpb.de/system/files/dokument_pdf/bpb_SR_Taiwan_online_BF.pdf.
    Diamond, L. (1994). Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 5(3), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0041.
    Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801860140.
    Di Palma, Giuseppe. (1990). To Craft Democracies: An Essay On Democratic Transitions. Berkeley, University of California Press.
    Easton, D. (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
    Erikson, E. H. (1994). Identity and the Life Cycle. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
    Fearon, J. D. (1999). What Is Identity (As We Now Use the Word)? California: Stanford University. http://www.stanford.edu/~jfearon/papers/iden1v2.pdf.
    Gaber, R. (2006). National Identity and Democratic Consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Sociology, 36(3), 35–69. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659360302.
    Gabrielsson, D. (2021). The Role of Actual Democracy in the Link between National Identity and Support for Democracy. Comparative Sociology, 20(4), 473–500. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-bja10042.
    Gleason, P. (1983). Identifying Identity: A Semantic History. The Journal of American History, 69(4), 910. https://doi.org/10.2307/1901196.
    Greenfield, L. (1999) 'Is Nation Unavoidable? Is Nation Unavoidable Today', in Kriesi, H., Armingeon, K., Siegrist,. & Wimmer, A. (Editor). (1999) Nation and National Identity. The European Experience in Perspective (Zürich, Rüegger), 37-54.
    Gunther, R., Diamandouros, N. P., & Puhle, H.-J. (Editor). (1995). The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Hobsbawm, E. J. (1992). Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality (2. Edition). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521439612.
    Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic Groups in Conflict. University of California Press.
    Hua, Y.-F. (2021). Universal Values and Democratic Consolidation in Taiwan’s Civil Society. American Journal of Chinese Studies, 28(1), 31–49. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45377130.
    Huntington, S. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press.
    Jones, F. L., & Smith, P. (2001). Individual and Societal Bases of National Identity: A Comparative Multi-Level Analysis. European Sociological Review, 17(2), 103–118. https://www.jstor.org/stable/522889.
    Kitschelt, H., Mansfeldova, Z., Markowski, R., & Toka, G. (1999). Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175173.
    Kohn, H. (1944). The Idea of Nationalism: A Study in its Origins and Background. New York: Macmillan.
    Kolpashnikova, K. (2019). Taiwan: Formation of National Identity and its Effect on Political Engagement. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/wh4ts.
    Korostelina, K. V. (2007). Social Identity and Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230605671.
    Lawler, S. (2014). Identity: Sociological Perspectives (2nd Edition). Polity Press.
    Lenard, P., & Miller, D. (2018). Trust and National Ientity (E. Uslaner, Ed.; 57–74. Oxford University Press.
    Lin, T.-J. (1999). In Search of a Homeland: National Identity Issues and Taiwan’s Democratization. Theses and Dissertations Available from ProQuest, 1–220. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dissertations/AAI9952130.
    Linz, J. J. (1990). Transitions to Democracy. The Washington Quarterly, 13(3), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/01636609009445400.
    Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. C. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Liu, Q., & Turner, D. (2018). Identity and National Identity. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(12), 1080–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1434076.
    Merkel, W. (2010). Gegen Alle Theorie? Die Konsolidierung der Demokratie in Ostmitteleuropa. In K. H. Schrenk & M. Soldner (Editor), Analyse demokratischer Regierungssysteme, 545–562. German Language. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91955-3_32.
    Mainwaring, S., O’Donnell, G. A., & Valenzuela, J. S. (1992). Issues in Democratic Consolidation: the New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective. Published for the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies by University of Notre Dame Press.
    Miller, D. (1995). On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198293569.001.0001.
    Miller, D., & Ali, S. (2014). Testing the National Identity Argument. European Political Science Review, 6(2), 237–259. doi:10.1017/S1755773913000088.
    Moore, M. (2001). The Ethics of Nationalism. In M. Moore, The Ethics of Nationalism. 1-22. Oxford University Press Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297467.003.0001.
    Muyard, F. (2012). The Formation of Taiwan’s New National Identity since the End of the 1980s. in David Blundell, ed., Taiwan Since Martial Law: Society, Culture, Politics, Economy, Taipei, National Taiwan University Press, 2012, 297-366.
    Muyard, F. (2018). The Role of Democracy in the Rise of the Taiwanese National Identity. In Jonathan Sullivan & Chun-yi Lee, eds., A New Era in Democratic Taiwan: Trajectories and Turning Points in Politics and Cross-Strait Relations, London, Routledge, 2018, 35-62.
    Park, C.-M. (2007). Democratic Consolidation in East Asia. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 8(3), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S146810990700268X.
    Pickel, S., & Pickel, G. (2006). Politische Kultur- und Demokratieforschung. German Language. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90021-6.
    Pridham, G. (1995). Transitions to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives from Southern Europe, Latin America and eastern Europe. Dartmouth.
    Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139172493.
    Renan, Ernest. (1990). "What is a Nation?" In Nation and Narration, Homi K. Bhabha (Editor). London: Routledge.
    Reuters, S. (2024, Mai 17). Fight Breaks Out in Taiwanese Parliament over Chamber Reforms – Video. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2024/may/17/fight-breaks-out-in-taiwanese-parliament-over-chamber-reforms-video.
    Rigger, S. (1999). Social Science and National Identity: A Critique. Pacific Affairs, 72(4), 537. https://doi.org/10.2307/2672396.
    Rustow, D. A. (1970). Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model. Comparative Politics, 2(3), 337. https://doi.org/10.2307/421307.
    Schubert, G. (2022). Towards the End of a Long Journey. Asien, 8: 26-44. https://doi.org/10.11588/ASIEN.2006.98.19490.
    Shen, S. (2013). Democracy and Nation Formation: National Identity Change and Dual Identity in Taiwan, 1991-2011. Columbia University ProQuest Dissertations & These.
    Shen, S. (2022). Identity in Formation and Transformation: Dynamics of National Identity Change after Taiwan’s Democratization. In P. C. Y. Chow (Editor), A Century of Development in Taiwan. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800880160.00016
    Shen, S., & Wu, N. (2008). Ethnic and Civic Nationalisms: Two Roads to the Formation of a Taiwanese Nation. In P. C. Y. Chow (Editor), The “One China” Dilemma,117–143. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230611931_7.
    Shin, D. C., & Wells, J. (2005). Challenge and change in east asia: Is democracy the only game in town? Journal of Democracy, 16(2), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2005.0036.
    Shulman, S. (2002). Challenging the Civic/Ethnic and West/East Dichotomies in the Study of Nationalism. Comparative Political Studies, 35(5), 554–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035005003.
    Shyu, H. (2010). Trust in Institutions and the Democratic Consolidation in Taiwan. In W.-C. Lee, Taiwan’s Politics in the 21st Century (S. 69–100). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814289092_0004.
    Smith, A. D. (1991). National Identity. University of Nevada Press.
    Smith, A. D. (1995). Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era. Polity Press.
    Smith, A. D. (2002). When is a Nation. Geopolitics, 7(2), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000928.
    Snyder, J. L. (2000). From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: Norton.
    Taipei Times. (2024). “Taiwan’s Democracy Stays Top in Asia—Taipei Times.” 2024, February 17. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2024/02/17/2003813680. Assessed date: 2024, 25 April.
    Taiwan’s Election and Democratization Study (2017). Taiwan’s Election and Democratization Study, 2012-2016 (IV): The Survey of Presidential and Legislative Elections, 2016. National Chengchi University, 21 February 2017, http://nesstar.nccu.edu.tw/webview/index.jsp?object=http://nesstar.nccu.edu.tw:80/obj/fCatalog/Catalog288.
    Taiwan’s Election and Democratization Study (2021). Taiwan’s Election and Democratization Study, 2016-2020 (IV): The Survey of Presidential and Legislative Elections, 2020. National Chengchi University, 21 Aug. 2021, http://nesstar.nccu.edu.tw/webview/index.jsp?object=http://nesstar.nccu.edu.tw:80/obj/fCatalog/Catalog288.
    Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Tamir, Y. (1995). The Enigma of Nationalism. World Politics, 47(3), 418–440. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2950694.
    Theiss-Morse, E. (2009). Who Counts as an American?: The Boundaries of National Identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750717.
    Thorkildsen, D. (2014). Norwegian National Myths and Nation Building. Kirchliche Zeitgeschichte, 27(2), 263–276. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24329829.
    Tudor, M. (2022). Why Every Nation Should Nurture (A Thick and Inclusive) Nationalism. In L. Orgad & R. Koopmans (Editor), Majorities, Minorities, and the Future of Nationhood, 225–246. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009233378.010.
    Wang, T. Y. (2017). Changing Boundaries: The Development of the Taiwan Voters’ Identity. In T. Y. Wang & C. H. Achen (Eds.), The Taiwan Voter, 45–70. University of Michigan Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvndv9z7.6.
    Wimmer, A. (2013). Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power, Networks. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199927371.001.0001.
    Windari, T. (2021). National Identity Attachment and Its Variables. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 22(3), 81–95. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol22/iss3/9.
    Wong, T. K. (2001). From Ethnic to Civic Nationalism: The Formation and Changing Nature of Taiwanese Identity. Asian Perspective, 25(3), 175–206. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2001.0017.
    Wu, C.-Y., & Wu, C. (2022). Regime Types and Winner-loser Gaps in Support for Democracy in East Asia. Democratization, 29(6), 1157–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2022.2036721.
    Wu, N. (2002). Identity Conflict and Political Trust: The Core Issue of Ethnic Politics in Taiwan. Taiwanese Sociology, (4),75–118.
    Wu, N. (2005). Romance and Bread: A Preliminary Study of the Identity Change in Taiwan. Taiwanese Political Science Review, 9(2), 5–40 (in Chinese).
    Zhong, Y. (2016). Explaining National Identity Shift in Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(99), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1104866.
    黃信豪, Huang H.-H. (2011). 民主態度的類型：台灣民眾二次政黨輪替後的分析. 選舉研究, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.6612/tjes.2011.18.01.01-34.
    林聰吉 Lin, Tsong-Jyi. (2007). 解析台灣的民主政治：以民主支持度與滿意度為觀察指標. 選舉研究, 14(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.6612/tjes.2007.14.01.61-84.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
    110926055
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110926055
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS)] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    605501.pdf1328KbAdobe PDF0检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈