政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/154579
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113483/144470 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51372584      線上人數 : 780
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/154579


    題名: 自主的選擇？探究臺灣女性的凍卵經驗與生育價值觀
    Freezing as Freedom? Examining Oocyte Cryopreservation and Reproductive Values among Young Taiwanese Women
    作者: 高皓慈
    Kao, Hao-Tzu
    貢獻者: 王淑美
    Wang, Su-Mei
    高皓慈
    Kao, Hao-Tzu
    關鍵詞: 人工輔助生殖技術
    凍卵
    生育保存
    延遲生育
    臺灣年輕女性
    Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Social Egg Freezing
    Fertility Preservation
    Delayed Childbearing
    Taiwan Young Women
    日期: 2024
    上傳時間: 2024-12-02 11:25:17 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 目前關於台灣育齡女性進行社會性凍卵的相關研究仍然相對稀少。在台灣，隨著女性初婚年齡和生育年齡不斷延後，以及生殖技術的發展與普及，凍卵逐漸成為許多育齡女性考慮的選項。本研究以台灣年輕女性為研究對象，透過深度訪談法輔以網路二手資料，探討其實踐經驗。
    研究著重於三個議題：第一，台灣女性選擇凍卵的動機及其在療程中的感受；第二，凍卵女性對於未來生育的態度、想法、擔憂及隱含的生育價值觀；第三，探討她們在選擇凍卵與考慮成為母親時，如何協調生育決策與自我認知。
    本研究得出三項主要發現：首先，凍卵成為育齡女性面對人生不確定性的一種應對策略，許多女性因缺乏合適伴侶而選擇凍卵。她們在做出此決策時，會考量生活情境、感情狀況及家庭背景等因素，而生理時鐘的壓力促使她們透過凍卵延遲生育力，從而減少年齡增長所帶來的焦慮與社會壓力。她們透過凍卵保存生育能力，一方面延續生育的可能性，另一方面也努力追求自我。
    其次，研究揭示女性在凍卵療程中經歷的不適遠高於預期，且網路平台的貼文與生殖中心的廣告，對凍卵風險的揭露仍不充分，常片面強調好處，療程中的不適和潛在風險經常被輕描淡寫。最後，這些女性在面對生育決策時，經常需要平衡自我實現與社會期望，使得她們在面對生育相關問題上充滿矛盾。
    總結來說，台灣女性選擇凍卵反映了她們延遲生育的願望，也揭示了在生育力隨著年齡下降的情況下，她們所面臨的個人與社會壓力。這些女性透過凍卵進行自我管理，掌控自己的生育時間，對抗生理與社會文化的壓力，展現出對未來的高度負責與積極提升自我的態度。
    Research on social egg freezing among women of reproductive age in Taiwan remains relatively scarce. In Taiwan, as the age of first marriage and childbearing continues to be delayed, and with the development and popularization of reproductive technologies, egg freezing is gradually becoming an option considered by many women of reproductive age. This study focuses on young women in Taiwan, using in-depth interviews supplemented by online secondary data to explore their experiences with social egg freezing.
    The research emphasizes three main topics: first, the motivations of Taiwanese women for choosing egg freezing and their feelings during the procedure; second, their attitudes, thoughts, concerns, and underlying fertility values regarding future childbirth; and third, how they reconcile their reproductive decisions with their self-perceptions when choosing egg freezing and considering motherhood.
    Three key finding emerge from this study: first, egg freezing has become a strategy for women of reproductive age to cope with life uncertainties, with many choosing it due to the lack of a suitable partner. In making this decision, they take into account various factors such as life circumstances relationship status, and family background. The pressure of biological clock drives them to freeze their eggs as a way to preserve fertility, thereby reducing anxiety and societal pressure associated with aging. By freezing their eggs, they both extend the possibility of future childbirth and pursue personal goal. Second, the study reveals that the discomfort experienced during the egg freezing process far exceeds women’s expectations. Additionally, online social media posts and advertisements from reproductive center inadequately disclose the risks, often emphasizing the benefits while downplaying the discomfort and potential risks involved. Finally, these women often face the dilemma between self-fulfillment and societal expectations when making reproductive decision, leading to conflicting feelings about fertility-related issues.
    In conclusion, Taiwanese women’s choice to freeze their eggs reflects their desire to delay childbirth while also highlighting the personal and societal pressures they face as their fertility declines with age. Through egg freezing, these women try hard to take control of their fertility timeline, resisting both biological and sociocultural pressures. This demonstrates a high level of responsibility and proactive self-development in planning for their future.
    參考文獻: 中文部分
    104職場力（2023年11月16日）。〈疫後工作價值首重「安定」！經濟報酬仍居心佔熱區〉，《104職場力》。https://blog.104.com.tw/104data-1023ceo-workvalue/
    MyVideo影音隨看（2020年 12月 30日）。〈未來媽媽EP5精華 凍卵是世界上唯一的後悔藥？如果有了孩子 我哪有現在職場的這個位置？〉【影音】。https://youtu.be/fD1KSaH8-SI?si=oP5rwxEX6aaa_MqR
    人工生殖法（2018年修正）。
    中研院人社中心調查研究專題中心（2023年9月20日）。〈想生或不想生？「家庭動態調查」資料對已婚者生育意願的初步觀察，《中研院調查研究專題中心》。https://survey.sinica.edu.tw/?p=14678&lang=zh
    內政部統計年報（1997-2023）。【十五歲以上人口教育程度】。未出版之統計數據。
    內政部統計年報（2000-2023）。【出生人數－按生母年齡】。未出版之統計數據。
    王亮堯（2014）。《掙脫全民健保總額制度枷鎖－－醫院自費市場選擇》。國立清華大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
    王美音譯（2024）。《事業與家庭 : 女性追求平等的百年之旅》。台北市：閱樂國際文化。（原書 Goldin, C. [2021]. Career and family: Women’s century-long journey toward equity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.）
    台灣女人連線（2023年 5月 25日）。〈2023凍卵／凍精意向調查〉【報告】。https://twl.twh.org.tw/article/quan-gao-2023-luan-jingyixiang-zha
    台灣生殖醫學會（2018年2月2日）。〈台灣生殖醫學會冷凍卵子指引〉【公告】。http://www.tsrm.org.tw/news/content.asp?id=45
    石計生（2006）。《社會學理論—從古典到當代之後》。臺北市：三民。
    立法院（2017年6月1日）。〈研議緩解我國少子女化國安危機〉【議題研析】。https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=85529
    伊慶春（2014）。〈台灣家庭代間關係的持續與改變：資源與規範的交互作用〉，《社會學研究》，3(170)，頁189-215。
    行政院主計總處（2016年6月）。〈婦女婚育與就業調查報告〉。臺北市：行政院主計總處。https://ws.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/771217174890v10w9i.pdf
    行政院主計總處（2022）。《人力資源調查統計年報》。行政院主計總處。https://ws.dgbas.gov.tw/001/Upload/463/relfile/11516/231112/c265bca6-9ba5-4ce2-925d-0c0f36511316.pdf
    利翠珊（2012）。〈夫妻關係間的忍與婚姻滿意度之關連〉，《中華心理衛生學刊》，25(3)，頁447-475。
    吳明燁、伊慶春（2003）。「婚姻其實不只是婚姻：家庭因素對於婚姻滿意度的影響」，《人口學刊》，26，頁71-95。
    吳嘉苓（2000）。〈生殖自主篇〉，陳美華、吳嘉苓、胡淑雯、彭渰雯編《一九九九台灣女權報告》，頁93-103。財團法人婦女新知基金會。
    吳嘉苓（2002）。〈台灣的新生殖科技與性別政治，1950-2000〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，45，頁1-67。
    吳聰賢（1976）。〈台灣的人口〉。《人口問題與研究》。台灣大學人口研究中心。
    李淑玲（2004）。〈人工生殖—女性主義的看法〉，《應用倫理研究通訊》，32，頁43-51。
    兒童福利聯盟（2019年5月）。〈2019年台灣女性生育意願和育兒現況調查報告〉【報告】。https://www.children.org.tw/publication_research/research_report/727
    林定立（2002）。〈消費文化中「資訊崇拜」的意義〉，《資訊社會研究》，3，頁63-84。
    林彥妏（2009）。《「生」與「不生」的矛盾：現代女性生育行為之探究》。東吳大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
    林淑貞譯（1994）。《母親與女兒的戰爭》。聯經。（原書Linda, Sunshine. [1994]. How not to turn into your mother. KCMO, US: Andrews McMeel Publishing.）
    林霖、紀駿輝、李卓倫、陳文意、洪錦墩（2011）。《建構民眾自費對全民健康保險就醫利用影響之評估模式》。（行政院衛生署委託科技研究計畫）。衛生福利部疾病管署。
    邵冰如（2023年6月29日）。〈青出於藍而勝於藍。楊友仕，醫學傳承的真義〉，《醫學有故事》。https://www.mhustory.com/archives/13019
    侯俐安（2023年9月25日）。〈救少子化！侯友宜三政見：凍卵補助3萬、留職停薪全薪〉，《聯合新聞網》。https://udn.com/news/story/123307/7463756
    俞彥娟（2005）。〈女性主義對母親角色研究的影響：以美國婦女史為例〉，《女學學誌：婦女與性別研究》，20，頁1-40。
    施麗雯（2019）〈孕產照護邏輯：台灣女性的新生育選擇與共同修補〉，《女學學誌》，44，頁1-46。
    洪琴宣、藍婉甄、陳德倫、曹馥年（2024年3月27日）。〈《人工生殖法》十問：為何代孕吵30年沒結論？單身女、女同志可否做試管嬰兒？〉，《報導者》。https://www.twreporter.org/a/assisted-reproduction-act-amendment-qa
    胡幼慧、姚美華（1996）。〈一些質性研究方法上的思考：信度與效度？如何抽樣？如何搜集資料、登錄與分析？〉，胡幼慧主編《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》，頁141-158。巨流。
    胡正文（2006）。〈從消費現象論台灣社會趨勢與價值觀的變遷〉，《實踐通識學報》，6，頁31-66。
    茂盛醫院生殖醫學中心（2023年10月17日）。〈凍卵手術流程與費用說明，冷凍卵子推薦你先了解這3件事〉，《茂盛醫院生殖醫學中心》。https://www.ivftaiwan.com/treatment-detail/26/
    唐文慧（2011）。〈為何職業婦女決定離職？結構限制下的母職認同與實踐〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，85，頁201-265。
    夏傳位（2014）。〈新自由主義是什麼？三種理論觀點的比較研究〉，《台灣社會學》，27，頁141-166。
    徐美苓（2005）。〈新聞乎？廣告乎？醫療風險資訊的媒體再現與反思〉，《新聞學研究》，83，頁83-125。
    徐美苓、熊培伶、吳姿嫺、施馨堯、賴若函（2010）。〈臺灣人口「問題」的建構：以少子化新聞框架為例〉，《新聞學研究》，103，頁43-82。
    高旭繁、陸洛（2006）。夫妻傳統性／現代性的契合與婚姻適應之關聯。本土心理學研究，(25)，頁47-100。
    張君玫譯（2003）。《母職的再生產：心理分析與性別社會學》。群學。（原書 Chodorow, J. [1978]. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.）
    許夢芸譯（2008）。《文化研究：民族誌方法與生活文化》。韋伯。（原書 Gary, A. [2003]. Research practice for cultural studies: Ethnographic methods and lived cultures. London: Sage Publications.）
    陳玉華（2012）。〈「孩子－是我們最好的傳家寶」！？子女價值觀與生育行為的代間傳承〉，《人文與社會科學簡訊》，13(4)，頁29-37。
    陳玉華、陳信木（2012）。〈初婚年齡的變動趨勢：出生世代、教育程度與省籍背景之間的差異〉，伊慶春、章英華主編《臺灣的社會變遷1985 ~ 2005：家庭與婚姻》，頁229-275。中央研究院社會學研究所。
    陳佳雯、陸洛、王煜榕（2013）。〈為自己出征？台灣年輕女性外派決策中的自我展現〉，《本土心理學研究》，39，頁65-116。
    陳彥勻、吳佳燕、林家五（2017）。〈國際志工經驗對自我概念轉換及展現的影響〉，《本土心理學研究》，47，頁233-304。
    陳美華（1996）。〈婦女墮胎權－論露對威德案〉，《東吳政治學報》，5，頁51-75。
    陳婷玉（2012）。〈傳播新聞教育如何影響閱聽人解讀－以愛滋病新聞為例〉，《長榮大學學報》，16(2)，頁35-59。
    陸洛（2003）。〈人我關係之界定－折衷自我的現身〉，《本土心理學研究》，20，頁139-207。
    陸洛、楊國樞（2005）。〈社會取向與個人取向的自我實現觀：概念分析與實徵初探〉，《本土心理學研究》，23，頁3-69。
    勞動部勞工保險局（2023年12月19日）。〈育嬰留職停薪〉【公告】。https://www.bli.gov.tw/0022925.html
    游美惠（2000）。〈多元文化女性主義〉，《婦女與兩性研究通訊》，3(54)，頁30-36。
    黃宗堅、李佳儒、張勻銘（2010）。〈代間關係中的親職化經驗之發展與自我轉化：以成年初期女性為例〉，《本土心理學研究》，頁59-106。
    楊明暐（2019年3月25日）。〈台灣少子化嚴重 全球吊車尾 平均每位婦女只生下1.218個小孩〉，《中時新聞網》。https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20190325000459-260115?chdtv
    楊美惠譯（1994）。《第二性（第二卷：處境）》。台北市：志文。（原書 Beauvoir, S. [1949]. Le Deuxième Sexe . Paris, FR: Gallimard.）
    楊儒晟（2022）。〈醫學倫理在醫療商品化下的挑戰〉。《台灣醫學人文學刊》，23(1&2)，頁52-57。
    楊靜利、李大正、陳寬政（2006）。〈台灣傳統婚配空間的變化與婚姻行為之變遷〉，《人口學刊》，33，頁1-32。
    劉亮雅（1999）。〈第二波女性主義與性意識〉，《聯合文學》，172，頁102-104。
    劉品言官方專屬頻道 Esth（2022年 3月 14日）。〈30+之後，我做了個重大決定！〉【影音】。https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5Kkm5BCtMs
    劉彥秀（2008）。〈保費收入低於醫療支出，是目前臺灣健保最大的挑戰--購買「人人有保、免於因病而貧、就醫便利」：他國經驗談全民健康保險〉，《全民健康保險雙月刊》，74，頁18-19。
    劉梅君（2008）。〈走向商品化的醫療服務〉，成令方主編《醫療與社會共舞》，頁152-158。群學。
    劉毓秀（2019）。〈探測陽具的版圖——精神分析女性主義〉，顧燕翎主編《女性主義理論與流變》，頁222-266。貓頭鷹。
    劉燦宏、任文瑗、趙嘉成、崔岡、邱文達（2004）。〈以顧客關係管理觀點探討自費醫療服務〉，《醫務管理期刊》，5(3)，頁304-321。
    潘淑滿（2005）。〈台灣母職圖像〉，《女學學誌：婦女與性別研究》，20，頁41-91。
    潘淑滿（2022）。《質性研究:理論與應用》。心理。
    蔡明璋（2004）。〈台灣夫妻的家務工作時間：親密關係的影響〉，《台灣社會學》，8，頁99-131。
    衛生福利部國民健康署（2023年7月28日）。〈試管嬰兒補助申請踴躍 機構代辦線上申請省時又便利〉【新聞稿】。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-5018-62444-1.html
    鄧桂芬（2019年3月25日）。〈2019全球出生率排名 台灣再吊車尾〉，《今周刊》。https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80392/post/201903250010/
    鄭雁馨（2022年1月）。〈為何孩子越生越少？人口學家鄭雁馨談少子化困境〉，《研之有物》。https://research.sinica.edu.tw/low-fertility-rate-raise-children/
    鄭雁馨、許宸豪（2019年3月）。〈臺灣超低生育率的迷思與現實〉，《巷子口社會學》。https://twstreetcorner.org/2019/03/31/chengyenhsinhsuchenhao/
    鄭雁馨、許宸豪（2019年3月31日）。〈臺灣超低生育率的迷思與現實〉，《巷子口社會學》。https://twstreetcorner.org/2019/03/31/chengyenhsinhsuchenhao/
    蕭崑杉（1975）。〈影響子女價值與生育力差異的社會心理因子研究〉。《農業推廣學報》，1，頁241-273。
    駱明慶（2007）。〈台灣總生育率下降的表象與實際〉，《研究台灣》，3，頁37-60。
    薛承泰（2020）。〈要提升生育先落實適齡結婚〉，《臺灣公共衛生雜誌》，39(5)，頁465-468。
    藍毓仁譯（2008）。《質性研究方法》。巨流。（原書J Ritchie, J Lewis. [2003]. Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage Publications.）
    蘇峰山、魏書娥、陳雅馨譯（2014）。《愛情的正常性混亂：一場浪漫的社會謀反》。立緒。（原書 Ulrich Beck &Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim [1990]. Das Ganz Normale Chaos der Liebe. Frankfurt am Main, Germany : Suhrkamp.）
    龔文翎（2019）。〈「新生殖科技與全球組裝：亞洲比較觀點」會議側記〉，《婦研縱橫》，111，頁82-97。
    英文部分
    Aassve, A., Fuochi, G., Mencarini, L., & Mendola, D. (2015). What is your couple type? Gender ideology, housework-sharing, and babies. Demographic Research, 32, 835-858.
    Ahn, N., & Mira, P. (2002). A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries. Journal of Population Economics,15, 667-682.
    Amir, M. (2006). Bio-temporality and social regulation: The emergence of the biological clock. Polygraph: An International Journal of Culture and Politics, 18, 47-72.
    Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7(2-3), 295-310.
    Arnold, F., Bulatao, R. A., Buripakdi, C., Chung, B., Fawcett, J., Iritani, T., Lee, S. J., & Wu, T. S. (1975). The Value of Children. A Cross National Study: Introduction and Comparative Analysis. Honolulu: E-W Pop. Inst.
    Baldwin, K. (2017). ‘I Suppose I Think to Myself, That’s the Best Way to Be a Mother’: How Ideologies of Parenthood Shape Women’s Use of Social Egg Freezing Technology. Sociological Research Online, 22(2), 20-34.
    Baldwin, K. (2018). Conceptualizing women's motivations for social egg freezing and experience of reproductive delay. Social Health Illness, 40, 859-873.
    Baldwin, K., Culley, L., Hudson, N., & Mitchell, H. (2019). Running out of time: exploring women’s motivations for social egg freezing. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 40(2), 166-173.
    Baldwin, K., Culley, L., Hudson, N., Mitchell, H., & Lavery, S. (2015). Oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons: demographic profile and disposal intentions of UK users. Reproductive biomedicine online, 31(2), 239-245.
    Becker, G. S. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy,101(3), 385-409.
    Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), S279–S288.
    Bell, A. V. (2010). Beyond (financial) accessibility: inequalities within the medicalization of infertility. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(4), 631-646.
    Bell, A.V. (2019). “Trying to Have your Own First; It’s What you Do”: The Relationship Between Adoption and Medicalized Infertility. Qual Social, 42, 479-498.
    Bernstein S, Wiesemann C. (2014). Should Postponing Motherhood via “Social Freezing” Be Legally Banned? An Ethical Analysis Laws, 3(2), 282-300.
    Bishop, K. (2022, Aug 18). The sharp rise in egg freezing. BBC News. Retries from https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20220816-the-sharp-rise-in-egg-freezing
    Bozzaro C. (2018). Is egg freezing a good response to socioeconomic and cultural factors that lead women to postpone motherhood? Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 36(5), 594-603.
    Brown, E., & Patrick, M. (2018). Time, anticipation, and the life course: egg freezing as temporarily disentangling romance and reproduction. American Sociological Review, 83(5), 959-982.
    Browne, J. (2018). Technology, Fertility and Public Policy: A Structural Perspective on Human Egg Freezing and Gender Equality. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 25(2), 149-168.
    Buhr, P., & Huinink, J.(2014). Fertility analysis from a life course perspective, Advances In Life Course Research, 21, 1-9.
    Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research In Nursing, 25(8), 652-661.
    Carroll, K., & Kroløkke, C. (2018). Freezing for love: enacting 'responsible' reproductive citizenship through egg freezing. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 20(9), 992-1005.
    Cayari, C. (2011). The YouTube effect : How YouTube has provided new ways to consume, create, and share music. International Journal Of Education & The Arts, 12(6), 1-28.
    Chen, Y. C. C., & Li, J. C. A. (2014). Family change in East Asia. In Treas, J., Scott, J. & Richards, M. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families (pp. 61-82). John Wiley & Sons.
    Cheng, Y.H., & Hsu, C.H. (2020). No More Babies without Help for Whom? Education, Division of Labor, and Fertility Intentions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(4), 1270-1285.
    Chiang, Y. L., & Park, H. (2021). Three decades of gender and education differentials in attitudes toward divorce in Taiwan, 1985-2015. Asian Population Studies, 19(1), 22-39.
    Cobo, A., García-Velasco, J., Domingo, J., Pellicer, A., & Remohí, J. (2018). Elective and Onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes. Human Reproduction 33(12), 2222-2231.
    Communication of Science and Technology (185-198), New York: Routledge
    Cunningham, M. (2005). Gender in Cohabitation and Marriage: The Influence of Gender Ideology on Housework Allocation Over the Life Course. Journal of Family Issues, 26(8), 1037-1061.
    Davies, W. (2016). The limits of neoliberalism: Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition. Goldsmith, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    De Proost, M., & Coene, G. (2019). Emancipation on thin ice. Women’s autonomy, reproductive justice and social egg freezing. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 22(4), 357-371.
    De Proost, M., & Paton, A. (2022). Medical versus social egg freezing: the importance of future choice for women’s decision-making. Monash Bioethics Review, 40(2), 145-156.
    Elliott, S., Powell, R., & Brenton, J. (2015). Being a good mom: Low-income, Black single mothers negotiate intensive mothering. Journal of Family Issues, 36(3), 351-370.
    England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149-166.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2018). Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 110(6), 1022-1028.
    Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex: the case for feminist revolution. New York, NY: Quill.
    Friedman, D. (2014, Oct 14). Perk Up: Facebook and Apple Now Pay for Women to Freeze Eggs. NBC News. Retries from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/perk-facebook-apple-now-pay-women-freeze-eggs-n225011
    Gavey, N. (1989). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: contribution to feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13(4), 459-475.
    Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2002). The Power of the Pill: Oral Contraceptives and Women’s Career and Marriage Decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 110(4), 730-770.
    Greil, A. L., McQuillan, J., & Slauson-Blevins, K. S. (2011). The social construction of infertility. Sociology Compass, 5(8), 736-746.
    Hardey, M. (2001). 'E-health': the internet and the transformation of patients into consumers and producers of health knowledge. Information, Communication & Society, 4(3), 388-405.
    Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
    Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Hesse, B. W., Nelson, D. E., Kreps, G. L., Croyle, R. T., Arora, N. K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (2005). Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165(22), 2618-2624.
    Hoffman, L., & Hoffman, M. (1973). The Value of Children to Parents. In: Fawcett, J.T., Ed., Psychological Perspectives on Population (pp.19-79). New York Basic Books.
    Hoffmann, T.C., Légaré, F., Simmons, M.B., McNamara, K., McCaffery, K., Trevena, L.J., Hudson, B., Glasziou, P.P., & Del Mar, C.B. (2014). Shared decision making: what do clinicians need to know and why should they bother? Medical Journal of Australia, 201, 35-39.
    Hook, E. B. (1981). Rates of chromosome abnormalities at different maternal ages. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 58(3), 282-285.
    Jaggar, A. M. (1983) Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld.
    Jarosz, E., Matysiak, A. & Osiewalska, B. (2023). Maternal Free Time: A Missing Element in Fertility Studies. Population and Development Review, 49, 801-828.
    Kılıç, A., & Göçmen, İ. (2018). Fate, morals and rational calculations: Freezing eggs for non-medical reasons in Turkey. Social Science & Medicine, 203, 19-27.
    Koert, E., & Daniluk, J. C. (2017). When time runs out: reconciling permanent childlessness after delayed childbearing. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 35(4), 342-352.
    Marvel, S. (2021). Speculative egg freezing and oocyte markets: Translating metaphors of body and bank. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 47(2), 187-205.
    Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Virginia, VA: Sage Publications, Inc.
    McDonald, E. (2022). Moral agency in the reproductive marketplace: Social Egg Freezing in the united states. Journal of Religious Ethics, 50(4), 696-716.
    McQuillan, J., Greil, A. L., Shreffler, K. M., & Tichenor, V. (2008). The importance of motherhood among women in the contemporary United States. Gender & Society, 22(4), 477-496.
    McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism : gender, culture and social change. UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    Mertes, H., & Pennings, G. (2011). Social egg freezing: for better, not for worse. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 23(7), 824-829.
    Minter, H. (2014, Oct 15). By offering to freeze their employees’ eggs, Apple and Facebook make it clear they don’t know what women want. The Guardian. Retries from https://www.theguardian.com/women-in-leadership/2014/oct/15/apple-facebook-egg-freezing-employee-perk
    Mogi, R., Raymo, J., Iwasawa, M., & Yoda, S. (2023). An alternative version of the second demographic transition? Changing pathways to first marriage in Japan. Demographic Research, 49, 423-464.
    Nicolette, A.L. (2016). Empty Benefits: Employer-Sponsored Oocyte Cryopreservation and Potential for Employment Discrimination. Hastings Women's Law Journal, 27, 341.
    OpenAI。（2024）。展示現代女性多方掙扎的圖像。OpenAI DALL-E 工具。
    Paton A. (2018). About time: how time influences and facilitates patient autonomy in the clinical encounter. Monash Bioethics Review, 36(1-4), 68-85.
    Petchesky, R. P. (1980). Reproductive Freedom: Beyond" A Woman's Right to Choose", Journal of Women In Culture and Society, 5(4), 661-685.
    Pennings, G. (2013). Ethical aspects of social freezing. Gynecologie, Obstetrique & Fertilite, 41(9), 521-523.
    Pergament, D. (2022). Jennifer Aniston has nothing to hide. Allure. Retries from https://www.allure.com/story/jennifer-aniston-december-2022-cover-interview
    Polyakov, A., & Rozen, G. (2021). Social egg freezing and donation: waste not, want not. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(12), e73-e73.
    Prescott, J., & Mackie, L. (2017). "You Sort of Go Down a Rabbit Hole...You're Just Going to Keep on Searching": A Qualitative Study of Searching Online for Pregnancy-Related Information During Pregnancy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), e194.

    Rimon-Zarfaty, N., Kostenzer, J., Sismuth, L. K., & de Bont, A. (2021). Between “medical” and “social” egg freezing: A comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks in Austria, Germany, Israel, and the Netherlands. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 18, 683-699.
    Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25-41.
    Romain, T. (2011). Freezing life, buying time: Consuming cryopreservation services in the United States, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Standford, California
    Rottenberg, C. (2014). The rise of neoliberal feminism. Cultural Studies, 28(3), 418-437.
    Rottenberg, C. (2017). Neoliberal feminism and the future of human capital. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 42(2), 329-348.
    Shavelson, R.J., Hubner, J.J., & Stanton, G.C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
    Shkedi-Rafid, S., & Hashiloni-Dolev, Y. (2011). Egg freezing for age-related fertility decline: preventive medicine or a further medicalization of reproduction? Analyzing the new Israeli policy. Fertility and Sterility, 96(2), 291-294.
    Trench, B. (2008). Turning science communication inside-out. In M. Bucchi, & B. Trench (Eds.), Handbook of public.
    Trommsdorff, G. (2002). Value of Children and Intergenerational Relations: A Cross-Cultural Psychological Study. Ikatan Psikologi Perkembangan Indonesia Bulletin, 1, 6-14.
    Turkdogan, T. (2021). Intergenerational Transmission of Perceived Parental Acceptance–Rejection and Psychological Adjustment: Grandmothers, Mothers, and Adult-Granddaughters, Journal of Child and Family Studies, 30(5), 1327-1341.
    Van de Wiel, L. (2020). The speculative turn in IVF: egg freezing and the financialization of fertility. New Genetics and Society, 39(3), 306-326.
    Vega, E., Pérez Zepeda, M., Lome Gutierrez, E., Martinez, M., Gomez Gomez, S., & Caldera, S. (2023). Internet Health Information on Patient’s Decision-Making: Implications, Opportunities and Challenges. Medical Research Archives, 11(7), 1-9.
    Waldby, C. (2015). 'Banking time': egg freezing and the negotiation of future fertility. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 470-482.
    Waldby, C. (2015). The oocyte market and social egg freezing: From scarcity to singularity. Journal of Cultural Economy, 8(3), 275-291.
    Wennberg, A. L., Schildauer, K., & Brännström, M. (2019). Elective oocyte freezing for nonmedical reasons: a 6-year report on utilization and in vitro fertilization results from a Swedish center. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 98(11), 1429-1434.
    Wilkes, K. (2015). Colluding with neo-liberalism: post-feminist subjectivities, whiteness and expressions of entitlement. Feminist Review,110(1), 18-33.
    Yang, I. J., Wu, M. Y., Chao, K. H., Wei, S. Y., Tsai, Y. Y., Huang, T. C., & Chen, S. U. (2022). Usage and cost-effectiveness of elective oocyte freezing: a retrospective observational study. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 20(1), 1-11.
    Yi, C.C., Chang, C.F. & Chang, Y.H. (2004). The Intergenerational Transmission of Family Values: A Comparison between Teenagers and Their Parents in Taiwan. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 35, 523-545.
    Yi, C.C., Lin, W.H., & Ma, K.H. (2019). Marital satisfaction among Taiwanese young married couples: The effects of resources and traditional norms. Journal of Family Issues, 40(14), 2015-2043.
    Yi, C.C., Pan, E.L., Chang, Y.H. & Chan, C.W. (2006). Grandparents, Adolescents, and Parents: Intergenera
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
    110464033
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110464033
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    403301.pdf9917KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋