English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51874755      Online Users : 346
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/154532


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/154532


    Title: 論行政法院對國家通訊傳播委員會行政行為的審查密度—2015-2022年案例的觀察
    A Study on Administrative Courts’ Standard of Review on Decisions of National Communications Commission: An Observation on Cases from 2015 to 2022
    Authors: 劉定基
    Liu, Ting-Chi
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 行政法院;國家通訊傳播委員會;審查密度;判斷餘地
    Administrative court;National Communications Commission;Standard of review;Administrative discretion
    Date: 2024-09
    Issue Date: 2024-11-29 14:04:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 關於行政法院對於行政機關行政行為的審查密度，學說討論累積至今，已經有相當的資料。本文希望在既有的研究上進一步展開，因此特別針對行政法院自2015年起至2022年中，審查「國家通訊傳播委員會（下稱NCC）」行政行為合法性的案件（共計96件判決）進行深入分析研究。尤其，在經過前述諸多學理有關審查密度的探討與司法院大法官解釋的推波助瀾後，行政法院在審查NCC的行政決定時，究竟是抱持著如何的審查密度？是與一般行政機關無異？或是（高度）尊重？又或是一個涉及多項考量因素的動態量尺？我們是否可以從近年來的判決中歸納整理出特定原則，或是並無規則可循？從學理反思，又有什麼可以提出檢討或建議的地方。
    The issue of administrative courts' standard of review on administrative decisions has produced abundant studies. Based on existing research, this article aims to conduct an in-depth analysis focusing on administrative courts' review on decisions of National Communications Commission (NCC). After analyzing 96 judgments, this article tries to answer the following questions: What are the standards of review adopted by the administrative courts when they decide the legality of NCC's decisions? Is it similar to that of reviewing other agencies' decisions or is it a more deferential standard? What are the factors that will affect the standard of review? In the end, this article provides several recommendations for administrative courts to decide an appropriate stand of review on different types of NCC decisions.
    Relation: 臺北大學法學論叢, No.131, pp.1-73
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML24View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback