English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51671274      Online Users : 107
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/15412


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/15412


    Title: 美國身心障礙教育立法與判例之分析研究
    Other Titles: The Legal Guideline of Education for Disabled Students: An Analysis of Legislation and Court Cases in America
    Authors: 秦夢群
    Keywords: 美國教育 ; 身心障礙教育 ; 特殊教育 ; 美國法院判例;Special education ; American education ; Education for disabled students
    Date: 2004-06
    Issue Date: 2008-12-17 10:18:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 二次大戰前，身心障礙學生之受教權受到長期忽視。美國自1970年代，經由各種相關立法與法院之判決，確立身心障礙學生教育的政策與執行程序。然而由於財政等種種因素，學校與家長在處理身心障礙教育相關議題時有爭議，此時法院之判決即極為重要。基於此，本文首先探討美國自1970年代以來推行的身心障礙法案，次就歷年爭議之議題，分析相關法院的見解與影響。議題如何謂免費之適當教育、其他服務之範圍、身心障礙學生之停學、零拒絕政策、單方面安置之補助、回歸主流等，均對身心障礙教育之推行有顯著影響。本研究希望藉著對美國政府與法院在解決身心障礙教育各項爭議做法之探討，提供我國未來推行特殊教育之參考。 Historically, children with physical or mental disabilities were denied the right to a free and appropriate education by being excluded from schools. However, through a series of litigation and legislation, starting from the 1970s, addressed the rights of disabled children, states and local school districts have been required to provide needed educational services to children with disabilities to guarantee them the right to a proper education. Focusing the courts’ consistent interpretations of federal legislation protecting the rights of children with disabilities, this paper aims to examine the main policy changes for education provided for children with disabilities. Court cases related to comprehensive individual testing, individual education program, least restrictive environment, free appropriate education, exclusion of special education students, zero reject, and reimbursement for the costs of unilateral parental placement have been reviewed. It is found that the legal guideline emerged from the court cases mandates, with regard to disabled students, that equality of opportunity may require a different and more extensive program be offered.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究 27(2),231-254
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 期刊論文
    [教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML21180View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback