English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50937138      Online Users : 959
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/15406
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/15406


    Title: 教師課程決定自主性之研究
    Other Titles: A Study of Teachers` Autonomy in Curriculum Decision-Making
    Authors: 王素芸
    Keywords: 課程決定 ; 專業自主;Curriculum decision-making ; Professional autonomy
    Date: 2000-12
    Issue Date: 2008-12-17 10:17:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文針對我國中學教師之課程決定自主性問題進行概念分析與實證性的調查探究,探討重點包括教師課程決定自主性的應然層面、實然層面、自主類型,以及內外在影響因素等。主要研究發現包括:1.我國中學教師均認為其本身應具備課程決定自主性,但事實上所擁有的課程決定自主性卻是不甚充分的,落差最大的項目是「選擇教科用書」;2.絕大多數的教師其課程決定自主類型屬於「調適型」;3.影響教師課程決定自主性內在因素有二類,包括「學養能力因素」與「意識意願因素」,外在因素有四類,包括「社會—地區因素」、「學校—法令因素」、「課程教材因素」以及「學生因素」等,其中內在影響因素的重要性高於外在影響因素。基於研究發現,本研究建議教育當局應重視教師課程決定自主性有所落差的事實,鼓勵教師關切並從事課程決定相關事項,並應透過教師職前與在職教育,加強有關課程的目標、組織、設計、實施、評鑑等議題的研討。而教師本身亦應積極配合教科書陸續開放,開始重視及提升教科書評選相關知能,有關課程決定自主類型方面則應進一步擴大調適型之範圍,並朝向創造型方向發展。 The purpose of this study is to explore the teachers’ autonomy in curriculum decision-making. In this study, I analyze the concept of the teachers’ autonomy in curriculum decision-making. Furthermore I used a questionnaire to investigate the teachers’ autonomy in curriculum decision-making in middle schools and high schools in Taiwan. According to the results of empirical investigation, I find there is a wide gap between the real situation and the “ought to” situation of the teachers’ autonomy in curriculum decision-making. The type of teachers’ autonomy in curriculum decision-making is the “adaptive type” primary. The factors that influence the teachers’ autonomy in curriculum decision-making include internal factors and external factors. The internal factors include teachers’ knowledge and skill, and teachers’ consciousness and aspiration. The external factors include social—local situation, school—law regulations, curriculum—instructional materials, and student’s attitude and ability. Finally, I provide several suggestions to authorities in education and school teachers.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究 23(2),235-254
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 期刊論文
    [教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    281.pdf1135KbAdobe PDF21137View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback