English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113485/144472 (79%)
Visitors : 51390096      Online Users : 390
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153839


    Title: Why Have IPO Auctions Lost Market Share to Fixed-price Offers? Evidence from Taiwan
    為何競價拍賣失去市場佔有率？
    Authors: 徐政義
    Shiu, Cheng-Yi;Hung, Chung-Wen;Hsu, Yen-Shan
    Contributors: 國貿系
    Keywords: IPOs;Under-pricing;Fixed-price offers;Hybrid auctions
    首次公開發行;價格低估;公開申購;混合型競價拍賣
    Date: 2009-09
    Issue Date: 2024-10-04
    Abstract: This paper proposes three hypotheses based on stock market conditions to explain how Taiwanese issuer' choice over IPQ auctions or fixed-price offers: the risk-averse issuer hypothesis, the pricing conflict hypothesis, and the demand inelasticity of stocks hypothesis. The risk-averse issuer hypothesis asserts that the relative risk level of auctions increases as the market becomes more volatile, and so risk-averse issuers will avoid an auction. We find support for this hypothesis. The pricing conflict hypothesis posits that Taiwanese WO auctions sometimes serve as a mechanism to resolve the pricing conflict between issuers and underwriters. We argue that a pricing conflict likely arises when the initial returns of recent IPOs have increased and/or the market returns have remained unchanged or have declined. We find some weak support for this hypothesis. The demand inelasticity of stocks hypothesis predicts that large IPQs are more likely to be floated with an IPO auction so as to reduce under-pricing pressure. We find strong support for this hypothesis.
    本研究提出三種假說來檢定為何競價拍賣制度在臺灣的IPO市場失去市場佔有率。發行者風險規避假說認為，由於市場風險高峙，採取競價拍賣的風險會提高，因此發行公司會傾向選擇公開承銷。訂價衝突假說主張當次級市場的走勢與發行市場平均的折價幅度不一致時，發行公司與承銷商之間對於承銷價格的訂定有不同的看法，此時，競價拍賣會被用來作為解決彼此訂價衝突的依據。證券需求負斜率假說預測，由於競價拍賣會有較低的折價，發行金額愈大的IPO愈有可能選擇競價拍賣來降低發行的成本。我們的實證結果強烈地支持發行者風險規避假說以及證券需求負斜率假說，而訂價衝突假說亦獲得實證上的支持。
    Relation: Journal of Financial Studies (財務金融學刊), Vol.17, No.3, pp.1-36
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6545/JFS.2009.17(3).1
    DOI: 10.6545/JFS.2009.17(3).1
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML64View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback