English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50794338      Online Users : 601
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153768


    Title: 背信罪立法體例之初探與比較分析──以收受回扣為例評測法國系統、英美系統與德國系統的立法模式
    Comparison of the Criminal Sanction System of Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Evaluation of French, Anglo-American and German Systems with an Example of Kickback
    Authors: 惲純良
    Yun, Chun-Liang
    Contributors: 政大法學評論
    Keywords: 背信;竊盜;詐欺;不法意圖;義務違反;財產損害;財產法益
    Breach of Trust;Theft;Fraud;Illegal Intent;Breach of Duty;Property Damage;Legal Interest in Property
    Date: 2024-03
    Issue Date: 2024-09-12 14:26:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 許多國家其實都有制裁背信行為的刑事規定。在這些以刑罰制裁背信罪的國家中，隨著不同的制裁方式，大致可以區分為法國系統、英美系統以及德國系統三大類型。傳統上，法國僅在少數的商業領域中處罰背信行為。英美早期則是將背信放在竊盜的大概念之下處理。近期來講，英國通過了新的詐欺法案用來處罰背信行為；美國則是以聯邦層級的郵電詐欺法來制裁背信行為。至於德國則有一般性處罰背信行為的規定。對於繼受德國法的臺灣來講，在對背信罪做更進一步的研究之前，對於德國系統的優劣之處，自然有必要詳加檢視。透過與法國及英美系統的比較，我們發現了德國系統的制裁穩定性的確較高，但是在判斷財產損害時，卻也有著較為模糊的缺陷。這些承襲自德國法的弱點，將會是未來我國深化背信罪研究時的首要課題。
    Most countries deem breach of Trust as a criminal offense. Such countries where breach of Trust is criminalized can be broadly divided into three different systems, namely, French, Anglo-American, and German systems. In France, breach of Trust is traditionally only punishable in a few commercial fields. Earlier in England and America, breach of Trust was considered a subset of theft. Now the new Fraud Act 2006 comes into force in England. In America, breach of Trust is sanctioned under the Mail and Wire Fraud Statute as federal fraud laws. A general sanction rule of breach of Trust is prescribed in German criminal law. Since Taiwan has adopted German law, it is necessary to examine the advantages and disadvantages of the German system in more detail. Compared to French and Anglo-American systems, the German system is more stable. However, in determining the property damage, vagueness appears as a weak point of the German system. In Taiwan, the weak points originating from German law are regarded as the main tasks in future research.
    Relation: 政大法學評論, 176, 129-216
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://dx.doi.org/10.53106/102398202024030176003
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202024030176003
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    176-3.pdf1263KbAdobe PDF33View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback