政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/153767
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51579584      線上人數 : 1036
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153767


    題名: 「秘密」搜索扣押第三方業者數位證據──鬆動最高法院Hibox案基準
    “Secret”Searches and Detains Digital Evidence from Third-Party Providers: Loosening the Benchmark in the Supreme Court’s Hibox Case
    作者: 王士帆
    Wang, Shih-Fan
    貢獻者: 政大法學評論
    關鍵詞: 秘密通訊自由;搜索;扣押;在場;訴訟權
    Freedom of Confidential Communication;Search;Seizure;Presence;Right of Remedy
    日期: 2024-03
    上傳時間: 2024-09-12 14:26:16 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 現代人手機不離身，暴露大量足跡於網際網路已屬常態，對偵查機關而言，掌握數位證據將提高犯罪追訴效率，具有高度調取價值。是以，傳統強制處分搜索扣押正面臨數位轉型，逐步從公開執行局部轉為秘密偵查。針對偵查機關於第三方業者處搜索扣押被告數位證據，最高法院106年度臺非字第259號刑事判決肯認被告之隱私權受到侵害，且將秘密通訊自由保障範圍限於過去已結束的通訊內容，對於調取通訊已結束之郵件內容，應適用搜索扣押規定。然而，依現行法規定，被告原則上有搜索在場權及受通知權，國家倘逕行「秘密」搜索扣押，將鬆動Hibox案判決基準。展望未來立法芻議，法規主管機關應兼顧保障被告救濟權與國家追訴犯罪之憲法任務，參酌比較法例，審慎思辨第三人受搜索扣押時的暫緩通知被告規定。
    With the increasing attachment to mobile devices in modern times, it has become a norm for the public to expose a significant amount of footprints on the Internet. For the investigating authorities, the availability of digital evidence will increase the efficiency of crime prosecution and have a high value for investigation. As a result, traditional compulsory search and seizure is undergoing a digital transformation, gradually moving from public enforcement to covert investigation. Regarding the search and seizure of digital evidence by investigating agencies from third parties, the Supreme Court, in its 106th Judgment No. 259, affirmed that the defendant’s right to privacy had been violated and limited the scope of the protection of the freedom of secret communication to the contents of past communications and that the search and seizure requirement should apply to the retrieval of the contents of closed emails. However, under the current law, the defendant has the right to search in the presence and to be notified of the search in principle, and if the state should seize the“secret”search, it would loosen the basis of the Hibox decision. In the future, the authorities should consider the constitutional mandate to protect the defendant’s right to remedy and the state’s right to prosecute crimes, and carefully consider the provision of a temporary stay of notice to the defendant in the event of a search and seizure of a third party, taking into account comparative legislation.
    關聯: 政大法學評論, 176, 89-127
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://dx.doi.org/10.53106/102398202024030176002
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202024030176002
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    176-2.pdf1130KbAdobe PDF45檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋