English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50794351      Online Users : 614
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153550


    Title: 透過故事敘述地方:喀爾巴阡山脈的神話與口述歷史
    Telling about places through stories: myths and oral history in the Carpathian Mountains
    Authors: 方宇恆
    Pepel, Julianna Maria
    Contributors: 吳考甯
    Work, Courtney
    方宇恆
    Pepel, Julianna Maria
    Keywords: 結構分析
    神話
    主權
    景觀
    特蘭西瓦尼亞
    地方史
    structural analysis
    myth
    sovereignty
    landscape
    Transylvania
    local history
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-09-04 16:02:45 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文運用結構分析法來檢視與羅馬尼亞特蘭西瓦尼亚的巴爾瓦尤斯堡壘相關的神
    話與敘事。這項分析發現了這些故事中相同的結構和重複出現的單元,揭示出地方
    神話--通常被歷史學家認為缺乏重要的歷史價值--實際上提供了對社會政治狀況的
    寶貴洞察力,並有可能挑戰以國家的民族敘述為中心的主權敘述。神話揭示了家譜、
    社會政治轉型、資源開採,以及擁有土地的貴族家族為維護權威所做的努力等關鍵
    層面,這些元素可能會被征服者的敘述排除或重新詮釋。此外,藉由將這些發現與
    官方歷史所呈現的敘述並列,本論文指出神話作為歷史知識來源的重要性,尤其是
    當書面記錄缺失或相互矛盾時。因此,神話提供了挑戰主流國家歷史論述的方法,
    並透過地方歷史的鏡頭,審視從權威地位提出的主權主張。
    This thesis employs structural analysis to examine the myths and narratives associated with
    the Fortress of Balvanyos in Transylvania, Romania. The analysis uncovers identical
    structures and recurring units within these stories, revealing that local myths—often
    dismissed by historians as lacking significant historical value—actually offer valuable
    insights into socio-political conditions, and have the potential to challenge dominant
    narratives of sovereignty, centered in national narratives of the state. Myths illuminate key
    aspects of genealogy, socio-political transitions, resource extraction, and the efforts of
    land-owning noble families to assert authority, elements which may be excluded or
    reinterpreted by conquering narratives. Furthermore, by juxtaposing these findings with
    the narratives presented by official history, the thesis suggests the importance of myths as
    sources of historical knowledge, especially when written records are absent or
    contradictory. Consequently, myths provide a means to challenge dominant national
    historical discourses and interrogate sovereignty claims made from positions of authority
    through the lens of local histories.
    Reference: Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.
    Armstrong, J. A. (1982). Nations before nationalism. University of North Carolina Press.
    Székely oklevéltár I-VIII. [Székely Document Collection I-VIII.] (1872–1934). edited by Szabó Károly, Szádeczky Lajos, Barabás Samu. Kolozsvár–Budapest.
    Basso, K. H. (1996). Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language Among the Western Apache. UNM Press.
    Balogh J. (2005). A székely nemesség kialakulásának folyamata a 17. század első felében. [Formation of the Székely Nobility in the First Half of the 17th Century.] Kolozsvár.
    Benedek, E. (1926). Erdélyi népmondák. [Folk Tales of Transylvania.]
    Benkő, E. & Székely, A. (2008). Középkori udvarház és nemesség a Székelyföldön.[ Medieval Manor Houses and Nobility in Székely Land]
    Benkő, E. (2012). A középkori Székelyföld 1-2.[The Medieval Székely Land 1-2.]
    Benkő, J. (2014). Erdély. [Transylvania.]
    Bender, B. (2002). Time and Landscape. Current Anthropology, 43(S4), S103–S112. https://doi.org/10.1086/339561
    Blomqvist, A., Iordachi, C., & Trencsenyi, B. (2013). Hungary and Romania Beyond National Narratives: Comparisons and Entanglements. Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften.
    Botar, I. (2012). Vármegyei enklávék, magánbirtokok, mezőváros a középkori Csíkban. [Enclaves, Private Estates, Market Town in Medieval Csík] Székelyföld (16), 97-118.
    Botar, I. (2019). Havasok kebelén rejtőző szép Csík. A Csíkimedence középkori település története.[ "Beautiful Csík Hidden in the Bosom of the Snowy Mountains. The Medieval Settlement History of the Csík Basin] Opitz Archeologica (250).
    Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism reframed: Nationhood and the national question in the New Europe. Cambridge University Press.
    Bözödi, B. (1939). Székely bánja.[Szekler regrets] Budapest.
    Connert, J. (1901). A székelyek intézményei.[Institutions of the Szekler] Kolozsvár.
    Descola, P. (2013). Beyond Nature and Culture (L. Janet, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
    Demeny, L. (1976). Székely felkelések a XVI. Század második felében. [Szekler uprising in the second half of the XVI.] CenturyBukarest.
    Elekes, T. Sepsi, Kezdi and Orbai seat in 1567. Adatbank. Erdelyi Magyar Elektronikus Konyvtar.
    https://elekes.adatbank.ro/?terkep=35
    Erőss, J. (1929). Háromszék telepedési története. [The Settlement History of Háromszék ] In Emlékkönyv a Székely Nemzeti Múzeum ötvenéves jubileumára. Sepsiszentgyörgy.
    Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. Basil Blackwell.
    Gohain, S. (2023). Toponymic Tales: Myth, Memory, and Place-Making in Monyul. In Myths and Places. Routledge India.
    Graeber, D., & Sahlins, M. (2017). On Kings. HAU.
    Hermann, A. (1893). A hegyek kultusza Erdély népeinél. [he Cult of the Mountains among the People of Transylvania]
    Iczkovits, E. (1939). Az erdélyi Fehér megye a középkorban. [The Transylvanian Feher county in the Middle Ages] Budapest.
    Jako, Zs. (1997). Erdélyi okmánytár I. (1023-1300). [Transylvanian Document Collection I. (1023-1300).]
    Jókai, M. (1883). Bálványosvár.[The fortress of Balvanyos]
    Klaniczay, G., Pócs, E., Rouse, A. C., & Kis-Halas, J. (2017). Witchcraft and demonology in Hungary and Transylvania (A. Klaniczay, Trans.). Palgrave Macmillan.
    Komáromi, T. (2009). Rontás és Társadalom Aranyosszéken. [Witchcraft and Society in Aranyosszék.] Kriza János Néprajzi Társaság.
    Köpeczi, B., Makkai, L., & Mócsy, A. (1986). Erdély története. [The history of Transylvania] Akadémiai Kiadó.
    Kemplen, B. (1931). Magyar főrangú családok. [Hungarian noble families]
    Kőváry, L. (1854). Erdély nevezetesebb családai. Czimerekkel és leszármazási táblákkal.[ Notable Transylvanian families. With coats of arms and genealogy tables.]
    Kőváry, L. (1852). Erdély régiségei.[Antiquities of Transylvania] Pest.
    Kruppa, T. (2015). Tradíció és propaganda keresztútján. Fejezetek Báthory Zsigmond udvarának kultúrájából—Humanizmus és Reformáció. [Crossroads of Tradition and Propaganda: Chapters from the Culture of Sigismund Báthory's Court—Humanism and the Reformation]
    Kürti, L. (2001). The Remote Borderland: Transylvania in the Hungarian Imagination. State University of New York Press.
    Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963). The Structural Study of Myth. In Structural Anthropology (pp. 206–231).
    Lévi-Strauss, C. (1978). Structuralism and ecology. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 7 (2):153-178.
    Lévi-Strauss, C. (2001). When Myth Becomes History. In Myth and Meaning.(Routledge)
    Magyar, Z. (2018). A mitikus előidők teremtményei (Óriásokról szóló mondák a magyar folklórban) [Legends about Giants in Hungarian Folklore.] Erdelyi Muzeum, 80(2).
    Magyar, Z. (2021). Erdélyi magyar hiedelemmonda katalógus 1-4. [Catalog of Transylvanian Hungarian Folk Beliefs 1-4.]
    Mihálycsa, Sz. (1975). Bálványosvár legendája.[The legend of Balvanyos fortress]
    Miskolcy, A. (2004). Határjárás a román-magyar közös múltban [Border Patrol in the Common Romanian-Hungarian Past.] (Budapest).
    Miskolczy, A. (2018). Erdély a román nemzettudatban. [Transylvania in Romanian National Consciousness.] Magyar Szemle, 27(11–12).
    Nagy, I. (1857). Magyarország családai czimerekkel és nemzékrendi táblákkal. [Families of Hungary, with coat of arms and geneaology tables] Pest
    Orbán, B. (1868). A Székelyföld leírása történelmi, régészeti, természetrajzi s népismereti szempontból. [Description of Székely Land from Historical, Archaeological, Naturalistic, and Ethnographic Perspectives.]
    Rácz, T. A. (2006). Középkori leletek Bálványosvárról (Băile Balvanyoş) és Torjáról (Turia, Románia).[ Medieval Archeological Findings from Bálványosvár (Băile Balvanyoş) and Torja (Turia, Romania)] Archaeologiai Értesítő 131, 115–143.
    Rácz, T. A. (2003). Háromszék első telepesei és a határvédelem. [The first settlers of Háromszék and border defense] Erdélyi Múzeum 65(1-2). 1-15.
    Pál-Antal, S. (2002). A Székely önkormányzat-történet. [History of Szekler Self-Government.]
    Pócs, É. (1989). Fairies and witches at the boundary of south-eastern and Central Europe. Academia scientiarum Fennica.
    Pócs, É. (2009). Tündéres and the order of St Ilona or, did the Hungarians have fairy magicians? Acta Ethnographica Hungarica, 54(2), 379–396.
    Pócs, É. (2017). Small gods, small demons: Remnants of an archaic fairy cult in Central and south-Eastern Europe. Fairies, Demons, and Nature Spirits, 255–276.
    Seres, A. (1981). Erdők, vizek csodás lényei Háromszéken és a környező vidékeken.[Wonderful creatures of forests and waters in Háromszék and the surrounding countryside] Népismereti Dolgozatok. 185–196.
    Szádeczky Kardoss, L. (1927). A székely nemzet története és alkotmánya.[The history and constitution of the Szekler nation]. Budapest
    Scott, J. C. (2009). The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland southeast Asia. Yale University Press.
    Sahlins, M. (2017). The Original Political Society. In On Kings (pp. 23–65). HAU Books.
    Tatar, M. M. (2007). The Myth of Macha in Eastern Europe. The Journal of the Indo-European Studies, 35(3–4).
    Van de Vyver, G. The importance of historical myths for the ethnic consciousness of Romanians and ethnic Hungarians in Transylvania. Dialect Anthropology 21, 381–398 (1996).
    Wimmer, A., & Schiller, N. G. (2003). Methodological Nationalism, the Social Sciences, and the Study of Migration: An Essay in Historical Epistemology. The International Migration Review, 37(3), 576–610.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
    111461024
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111461024
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際傳播英語碩士學程] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    102401.pdf924KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback