政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/153420
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50954362      線上人數 : 956
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153420


    題名: 從新管理主義探討校長領導特質與行為—一位國小校長之個案研究
    Exploring Principal Leadership Traits and Behaviors Through New Managerialism: A Case Study of an Elementary School Principal
    作者: 徐希汶
    Tsui, Hei Man
    貢獻者: 陳榮政
    Chen, Robin Jung-Cheng
    徐希汶
    Tsui, Hei Man
    關鍵詞: 新管理主義
    校長領導
    領導特質
    New-managerialism
    principal leadership
    leadership traits
    日期: 2024
    上傳時間: 2024-09-04 15:09:31 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本論文旨在探討一位國小校長的領導特質，並從新管理主義的角度進行分析。研究聚焦於該校長如何在新管理主義的框架下運用其領導特質來應對學校內外的挑戰與機遇。研究採用個案研究法，通過近身觀察和半結構式訪談收集資料，並使用質性研究分析軟體ATLAS.ti進行資料編碼與分析。
    研究結果顯示，個案校長在面對學校美學、教師發展、學生學習等方面展現出領導能力。校長運用新管理主義的策略，包括績效評估、顧客導向、資源共享和政策創新，來促進學校的整體發展。此外，校長的領導特質如同理心、觀察力和溝通能力在新管理主義的實踐中發揮了關鍵作用。
    本研究提供了對新管理主義下校長領導特質的深入理解，並對教育領導與管理領域提出了具體建議，有助於其他學校在實施新管理主義時參考和借鑒。本研究也期望能引發更多關於教育領導與管理的實證研究，進一步豐富該領域的理論與實踐。
    This thesis aims to explore the leadership traits of an elementary school principal and analyze them from the perspective of New-managerialism. The study focuses on how the principal utilizes their leadership traits within the framework of New-managerialism to address challenges and opportunities both inside and outside the school. Employing a case study methodology, data were collected through close observation and semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using the qualitative research software ATLAS.ti.
    The research findings indicate that the principal demonstrated leadership abilities in areas such as school aesthetics, teacher development, and student learning. The principal employed New-managerialism strategies, including performance evaluation, customer orientation, resource sharing, and policy innovation, to promote overall school development. Additionally, leadership traits such as empathy, observational skills, and communication abilities played a crucial role in the implementation of New-managerialism practices.
    This study provides an in-depth understanding of the principal's leadership traits within the context of New-managerialism and offers specific recommendations for the field of educational leadership and management. These insights can serve as a reference for other schools implementing New-managerialism. The study also aims to inspire further empirical research on educational leadership and management, enriching the theory and practice in this field.
    參考文獻: 壹、中文部分
    中邨章（2004）。行政学と 「ガバナンス」 の三形態。年報行政研究，39，2-25。
    丘昌泰（2014）。公共管理。智勝。
    朱敬一、戴華（1997）。教育鬆綁。遠流。
    吳百祿（2002）。願景領導的探討。學校行政，21，3-11。
    吳清山（2001）。教育發展研究。元照。
    吳清山（2005）。學校行政研究：School Administration。高等教育文化事業有限公司。
    吳清山（2011）。學校革新研究。統一。
    吳清山、蔡菁芝（2006）。英美兩國教育績效責任之比較分析及其啟示。師大學報，51（1），1-21。
    吳煥烘（2004）。學校行政領導理論與實務。五南。
    宋秋儀、沈啓聰、吳家瑞（2020）。校長遴選與臺北市中小學卓越領導人才發展方案。臺灣教育評論月刊，9（4），22-25。
    周昌柏、范熾文（2006）。國小校長轉型領導、交易領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。花蓮教育大學學報，22，255-281。
    周婉琦、陳玉娟（2022）。臺北市國民中學卓越校長領導行為之研究。台灣教育研究期刊，3 （5），205-223。
    林海清（2002）。從校長培育與專業發展看校長證照制度。現代教育論壇，6，442-448。
    林煥民、鄭彩鳳（2011）。校長專業發展之研究—指標建構。教育研究集刊，57 （4）， 81-120。
    林雍智（2010）。教育的自治，分權與學校經營改革─日本案例評析及對我國之啟示。教育行政與評鑑學刊，9，59-80。
    林雍智、吳清山（2013）。日本學校治理模式之變遷及其評析：以學校理事會為例。教育科學研究期刊，58（4），103-131。
    https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(4).04
    林雍智、吳清山（2013）。學校經營變革的日本案例分析: 學校治理、分權及學校參與. 教育論壇，16（2），93-122。
    https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982013051602004
    林鍾沂（2008）。科層官僚制的理論發展及其內在理路。探索公共行政真義：吳定教授榮退紀念學術研討會，臺北。
    邱世杰（2017）。國民小學初任校長領導行為及其影響因素之研究。（博士論文。國立屏東大學）臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ddxnjy。
    施又瑀（2014）。國民中小學校長專業發展之研究—以彰化縣為例。學校行政雙月 刊，91，092-117。
    范熾文、林加惠（2010）。國民小學校長道德領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究。市北教育學刊。
    孫本初（2011）。新公共管理。一品。
    秦夢群（2010）。教育領導理論與應用。五南。
    秦夢群（2016）。教育行政理論與模式。五南。
    張明輝（2000）。中小學校長遴選的人性化課題。學校行政，9，41-45。
    張慶勳（2001）。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。復文。
    教育部（2017）。教育部中小學教師專業發展支持系統規劃方向說明。取自
    https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/8/relfile/7844/51815/be4db826-d04a-4c5a-8820-91c7991a4cde.pdf
    許哲銘（2021）。國民小學校長領導素養、專業社群參與和學校經營效能之關係研究。國立臺北教育大學主辦「2021東亞地區校長學學術研討會」論文集，71-90，國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
    郭淑芳（2013）。我國中小學教師專業化制度指標體系建構之研究。（博士論文。臺北市立教育大學）臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ysh2he
    陳向明（2009）。對教師實踐性知識構成要素的探討。教育研究，10，66-73。
    陳建志、鐘巧如（2014）。當代分布式領導在教育領導之發展與應用。教育研究與發展期刊，10（3），1-24。
    陳振明（2002）。走向一種「新公共管理」的實踐模式-當代西方政府改革趨勢透視。廈門大學學報，142，76-84。
    陳榮政（2019）。教育行政與治理：新管理主義途徑。學富。
    湯志民（2011）。學校空間領導指標建構探析。教育研究月刊，209，68-82。
    湯志民、吳珮青（2021）。素養導向之中小學校長領導的挑戰與支持系統。教育研究月刊，325。
    黃宗顯、陳麗玉、徐吉春、劉財坤、鄭明宗、劉峰銘、郭維哲、黃建皓、商永齡（2008）。學校領導：新理論與實踐。五南。
    黃昆輝（2002）。教育行政學。東華。
    黃俊峰（2013）。願景領導理論與其實施策略之探討。學校行政，88，230-251。
    黃寶園（2021）。以校長學習為基礎之中小學校長專業發展系統建構。教育研究月刊，322，19-33。
    溫子欣、秦夢群、陳木金（2013）。校長領導之道-成功校長領導行為個案研究。教育科學期刊，12 （1），59-89。
    葉淑玲（1998）。教育代金制度之社會學分析。中等教育，49 （3），48-64。
    葉連祺（2020）。教育領導定義、取向與分析方法之研究。學校行政，128，180-262。
    葉連祺、陳羿君（1998）。大學行政人員領導能力分類模式之研究。空大行政學報，8，339-363。
    詹盛如（2010）。臺灣高等教育治理政策之改革—新管理主義的觀點。教育資料與研究，94，1-20。
    劉春榮（2019）。臺北校長學學校卓越領導人才發展方案。台灣教育，716，129–146。https://www.slhs.tp.edu.tw/training/data/20181181145187.pdf
    劉慶仁（2005）。美國新世紀教育改革。心理。
    蔡培村、武文瑛（2004）。領導學：理論，實務與研究。儷文文化。
    蔡培村、武文瑛（2013）。領導學—理論與實務。麗文。
    蔡進雄（2005）。學校領導理論研究。師大書苑。
    鄭新輝（2019）。以學習為焦點的學校領導系統：省思與回顧。教育研究月刊，302，111-132。
    戴曉霞（2002）。全球化及國家/市場關係之轉變：高等教育市場化之脈絡分析。教育研究集刊，47，301-328。
    謝文全（2012）。教育行政學。高等教育。
    謝文全（2017）。中等教育：理論與實際。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    謝文豪（2006）。校長領導之意義：國小校長的觀點。花蓮教育大學學報，24，45-75。
    謝傳崇、王瓊滿（2010）。國民小學校長分佈式領導、教師組織公民行為對學生學習表現影響之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報，28（1），35-66。
    簡禎富、彭金堂、許嘉裕（2013）。產學合作模式之研究－以科學工業園區固本精進產學合作計畫為例。管理與系統，20（1），27-54。
    魏佳卉（2020）。從國家預算看高教未來。評鑑雙月刊，87，44-47。
    羅明忠（2003）。台中市國民小學校長領導行為與教師工作滿意度相關之研究。台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。






    貳、英文部分
    Apple, M. W. (2000). Between neoliberalism and neoconservatism: Education and Conservatism in a global context. In N. C. Burbules & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp. 57-78). London, UK: Routledge.
    Bakvis, H., & Jarvis, M. D. (2012). From new public management to new political governance: Essays in honour of Peter C. Aucoin. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP.
    Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy: A new vision for management in government. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
    Bass, B. (1981). Handbook of Leadership. New York, NY: Free Press.
    Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.
    Boston, J. (1995). The state under contract. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.
    Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and Leadership in Organizations. London: Sage.
    Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
    Bush, T. (2013). Instructional leadership and leadership for learning: Global and South African perspectives. Education as Change, 1 (17), 5–20.
    Caiden, G. E. (2001). Administrative reform. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of Comparative and Development Administration (2nd ed., pp. 655-667). New York: Marcel Dekker.
    Cox-Petersen, A. (2010). Educational partnerships: Connecting schools, families, and the community. Sage Publications.
    Daresh, J. C. (2007). Mentoring for beginning principals: Revisiting the past or preparing for the future? Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 20 (4).
    Davis, R. H. (1977). Learning By Design. New directions for higher education, 17, 17-31.
    DeMatthews, D. E. (2014). Principal and teacher collaboration: An exploration of distributed leadership in professional learning communities. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 176-206.
    Ferlie, E., Ashburber, L., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The new public management in action. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill Series in Management.
    Flynn, N. (2000). Managerialism and public service: Some international trends. In Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S & McLaughlin, E. (Eds.), New managerialism, new welfare? (pp. 27-44). London: Sage.
    Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87-104). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
    Freidson, E. (1983). The Theory of profession: State of art. In R. Dingwall & P. Lewis (Eds.), The sociology of the professions: Lawyers, doctor and others (pp.19-37). London, UK: Macmillan.
    Grant, C., Gardner, K., Kajee, F., Moodley, R., & Somaroo, S. (2010). Teacher leadership: a survey analysis of KwaZulu-Natal teachers' perceptions. South African Journal of Education, 30 (3), 401-419.
    Gruening, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of new public management. International Public Management, 4, 1-25.
    Guthrie, J. T. (1996). Educational contexts for engagement in literacy. The Reading Teacher, 49 (6), 432.
    Hallinger, P. (1992). The evolving role of American principals: From managerial to intrructional to transformational leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 30 (3), 35-48.
    Halpin, A. W. (1957). Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire.
    Halpin, A., & Winer, B. (1952). The leadership behavior of the airplane commander. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Research Foundation.
    Haque, M. S. (2004). New public management: Origins, dimensions, and critical implications. In: Tummala KK (ed.) Public Administration and Public Policy. Oxford: Eolss Publishers Ltd.
    Hersey, H., & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources, 3th ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. American Psychologist, 49, 503-504.
    Holt, D. B. (2004). How brands become icons: The principles of cultural branding. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
    Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69 (1), 3-19.
    House, R. J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative science quarterly, 321-339
    Hoy, W. & Miskel, C. (2001). Educational Administration: Theory, Research and Practice (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Hughes, O. E. (2003). Public management and administration: An introduction. New York: Palgrave.
    Hyslop-Margison, E. J., & Sears, A. M. (2006). Neoliberalism, globalization and human capital learning: Reclaiming education for democratic citizenship. Dordrecht: Springer.
    Hyslop-Margison, E. J., & Sears, A. M. (2007). Neo-liberalism, globalization and human capital learning: Reclaiming education for democratic citizenship. Springer Science & Business Media.
    Isaac M. Mbiti. (2016). The Need for Accountability in Education in Developing Countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30 (3), 109–132.
    Islam, F. (2015). New Public Management (NPM) : A dominating paradigm in public sectors. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 9 (4), 141-152.
    Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50 (155), 29-45. doi: 10.111 1/1468-245 1. 00107.
    Karash, R. (1995). Why a learning organization. Navran Associates Newsletter.
    Keating, M. (2001). Public management reform and economic and social development. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 1 (2), 141-212.
    Kelley, C., & Peterson, K. D. (2007). The Jossey-bass reader on educational leader- ship (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Kettl, D. (2000). The Global Public Management Revolution. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
    Kirkpatick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Leadership: do traits matter? Academy of management perspectives, 5(2), 48-60.
    Kotter, J.P. (1990). Force for Change: How Leadership Differs From Management. The Free Press.
    Leithwood, K., & Duke, D. L. (1999). A century's quest to understand school leadership. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Administration (2nd ed., pp. 48-). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Leithwood, L., & Day, C. (2007). Starting with what we know. In C. Day & K. Leithwood (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change (pp. 1-15). Dordrecht, NED: Springer.
    Leone, S., Warnimont, C., & Zimmerman, J. (2009). New roles for the principal of the future. American Secondary Education, 86-96.
    Lewin, K., Lippit, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of Aggressive Behaviour in Experimentally Created Social Climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1939.9713366
    Lunenburg, F. C., & Irby, B. J. (2006). The principalship: Vision to action. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
    Lynch, K. (2012). On the market: Neoliberalism and new managerialism in Irish education. Social Justice Series, 12 (5), 88-102.
    Lynch, K. (2014). New managerialism, neoliberalism and ranking. Ethics, Science, Environment, Politics, 13, 141-153. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00137
    Mahlangu, V. P. (2014). Strategies for principal-teacher development: A South African perspective. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (20), 1738–1747.
    Manning, M. K. (2018). Improving learning through principal professional learning communities. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. East Carolina University.
    McCrea, N. (2014). Community Development and Venture Philanthropy in Ireland: Funding Migrants' Rights in Neoliberal Times (Doctoral dissertation, University College Dublin).
    McGough, D. J. (2003). Leaders as learners: An inquiry into the formation and transforma- tion of principals' professional perspectives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25 (4), 449-471.
    Mestry, R. (2017). Empowering principals to lead and manage public schools effectively in the 21st century. South African Journal of Education, 37 (1). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n1a1334
    Minogue, M. (1998). Changing the state: Concepts and practice in the reform of the public sector. In M. Minogue, C. Polidano, and D. Hulme (Eds.). Beyond the New Public New Management (pp. 17-37). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    Muralidharan, K., Das, J., Holla, A., & Mohpal, A. (2017). The fiscal cost of weak governance: Evidence from teacher absence in India. Journal of public economics, 145, 116-135.
    Murphy, J. (1993). Restructuring: In search of a movement. In J. Murphy & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Restructuring schooling: Learning from ongoing efforts (pp.3-22). California: Sage.
    Naidoo, P. (2019). Perceptions of teachers and school management teams of the leadership roles of public school principals. South African Journal of Education, 39(2).
    Naidoo, P., & Mestry, R. (2019). Instructional leadership development for principals: A South African context. Instructional Leadership and Leadership for Learning in Schools: Understanding Theories of Leading, 237-265.
    Naidoo, P., & Petersen, N. (2015). Towards a leadership programme for primary school principals as instructional leaders. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 5 (3), 1-8
    National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP). (2002). Selecting and developing the 21st-century principal. Retrieved from http://www.nassp.org/Portals/0/Content/26775.pdf
    National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. (2020). The effects of a principal professional development program focused on instructional leadership. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED599489.pdf
    Olssen, M. (2016). Neoliberal competition in higher education today: Research, accountability and impact. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37 (1), 129-148. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2015.1100530.
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2016). School governance, assessments, and accountability. In OECD (Ed.), PISA 2015 results: What makes schools successful? Resources, policies and practices – Volume II (pp. 107-154). Paris France: Author.doi:10.1787/9789264267510-8-en
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (Ed.). (2008). Improving school leadership: Volume 1: Policy and practice. Paris. doi:10.1787/9789264044715-en
    Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2016). School Leadership for Learning: Insights from TALIS 2013. TALIS, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264258341-en.
    Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. TALIS, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en.
    Owens, R. G. (2001). Organizational behavior in education: Instructional leadership and school reform.
    Peters, B. G. (1996). The future of governing: Four emerging models. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansus.
    Power, M. (1994). The audit explosion. London: Demos.
    Power, M. (1997). The audit society: The rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Powers, S., Rayner, S., & Gunter, H. (2001). Leadership in inclusive education: A professional development agenda for special education. British Journal of Special Education, 28 (3), 108-112.
    Pusey, M. (1991). Economic rationalism in Canberra: A nation-building state changes its Mind. Cambridge, MA: Melbourne.
    Raab, C. D. (2000). The devolved management of schools and its implications for governance. In M. A. Amott & C. D. Raab (Eds.), The governance of schooling: Comparative studies of devolved.
    Reitzug, U. C. (2002). School reform proposals: The research evidence. Professional development, 235-238.
    Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organizational behavior: concepts. Controversies, Applications, 1 (8). J.P.
    Rucker-Cortez, V., Irons, E. J., Kirk, E. E., & Stephens, L. (2012). Evaluation of a principal preparation program internship: Supervisor/mentor and student intern perceptions of effectiveness. National Social Science Journal, 38 (1), 75.
    Sashkin, M. (1986). True vision in leadership. Training & Development Journal.
    Sergiovanni, T. (1984). Leadership and excellence in schooling: Excellent schools need freedom within boundaries. Educational Leadership, 41, 4-13.
    Senge, P. M. (1990). The art and practice of the learning organization.
    Sherman Jr, W. A., Bohlander, W. G., & Chruden, J. H. (1988). Managing Human Resource, Eight Edition; South.
    Smith, M. L. (2000). Validity and accountability in high-stakes testing. Journal of Education, 51 (5), 334-345.
    Spillane, J. P. (2004). Educational leadership. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 26(2), 169-172.
    Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. Free Press.
    Stromquist, N. P. (2000). Education in a globalized world: The connectivity of economic power, technology, and knowledge. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
    Terry, L. D. (1998). Administrative leadership, neo-managerialism, and the public management movement. Public Administration Review, 194-200.
    The Wallace Foundation. (2008). Becoming a leader, preparing school principals for today’s schools (Task report). New York.
    Tingle, E., Corrales, A., & Peters, M. L. (2019). Leadership development programs: Investing in school principals. Educational Studies, 45 (1), 1-16.
    Tucker, M. S., & Codding, J. B. (2002). The principal challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Wang, H. L. (2018). Creating the Multiple Ecology of Education: Educational Policy for Rural Areas and the Transformation and Innovation of Rural Small Schools. Journal of Education Research, 287.
    Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S. M., & Carlson, J. (2010). The relative effects and equity of inquiry‐based and commonplace science teaching on students' knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47 (3), 276-301.
    World Bank. (2003). World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    Yukl, G. (2009). Leading organizational learning: Reflections on theory and research. The leadership quarterly, 20(1), 49-53.
    Yukl, G., & Lepsinger, R. (2006). Leading change: Adapting and innovating in an uncertain world. Leadership in Action: A Publication of the Center for Creative Leadership and Jossey‐Bass, 26 (2), 3-7.
    Zepeda, S., Parylo, O., & Bengtson, E. (2014). Analyzing principal professional development practices through the lens of adult learning theory. Professional Development in Education, 40 (2), 295-315.
    Zhao, H., & Akiba, M. (2009). School expectations for parental involvement and student mathematics achievement: A comparative study of middle schools in the US and South Korea. Compare, 39 (3), 411-428.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育行政與政策研究所
    110171016
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110171016
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[教育行政與政策研究所 ] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    101601.pdf3999KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋