政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/153417
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50941337      Online Users : 968
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153417


    Title: 公立國民小學新管理主義校務治理指標與權重體系建構之研究
    Constructing the Indicators and Weight System of New Managerialism on Elementary School Governance
    Authors: 連育瑩
    Lien, Yu-Ying
    Contributors: 陳榮政
    連育瑩
    Lien, Yu-Ying
    Keywords: 新管理主義校務治理
    模糊理論
    模糊德懷術
    模糊層級分析法
    New Managerialism on school governance
    Fuzzy theory
    Fuzzy Delphi method
    Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-09-04 15:08:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在應用模糊理論之模糊德懷術與模糊層級分析法，建構公立國民小學新管理主義校務治理指標與權重體系。為編製具信效度與代表性的指標，先經文件分析法，逐層釐清概念內涵、理論與原理原則；再循PRISMA 2020檢索流程進行系統性文獻回顧，將658篇研究納入文獻計量分析，以VOSviewer軟體匯出可視化知識圖譜，成為指標建構書目指引。進一步按前述探討的知識結構，完成高層、基層與低層指標初構，作為三階段問卷調查的先備基礎。

    第一階段專家問卷調查，確保指標具良好內容效度，能測得新管理主義校務治理構念特質。第二階段模糊德懷術問卷調查，函請12名領域權威學者、校務治理者與教育行政機關人員審評；統整各指標三角模糊數輸入至Fuzzy Delphi 1.0授權軟體運算，並使用Lin等人(2020) α-截集決斷規準篩選出共識性指標。第三階段相對權重問卷調查，將評比結果登錄Expert Choice 11.5軟體檢定一致性，續由Microsoft Excel 2021 Mac版試算表計算權重值，以建構本指標權重體系。

    茲據研究調查與統計分析結果，歸納核心結論如下：

    ㄧ、公立國民小學新管理主義校務治理指標為三階層，由高層二個主構面，基
    層六個次構面與低層35個指標組成。
    二、高層主構面，依權重大小排序為：績效責任(70.04%)，扁平式網絡(29.96%)。
    三、基層次構面，分別隸屬二個主構面，依權重大小排序為：
    （一）績效責任：辦學效能與效率(52.23%)，工作課責與回應(27.80%)，
    校際與校內競爭(19.96%)。
    （二）扁平式網絡：組織授權與自治(53.79%)，水平參與及協作(30.30%)，
    程序資訊彈性與透明(15.91%)。
    四、低層指標，節錄隸屬六個次構面權重最大者 ：
    （一）辦學效能與效率：校務治理團隊能將願景目轉化為具體行動方案(34.91%)。
    （二）工作課責與回應：品質保證機制能定期監控「成果-目標」達成情形(32.97%)。
    （三）校際與校內競爭：校務治理團隊能確保整體學生基本學力有所精進(38.47%)。
    （四）組織授權與自治：校長能採納校內利害關係人的專業意見(24.69%)。
    （五）水平參與及協作：校長能擴大校務發展決策的參與者(28.15%)。
    （六）程序資訊彈性與透明：校務行政行為能遵循公開民主程序(31.19%)。

    承此，提出建議，供公立國民小學校務治理者、教育行政機關與後續研究參考。
    The research applied the Fuzzy theory of Fuzzy Delphi method and Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to construct the indicators and weight system of New Managerialism on elementary school governance. To develop reliability, validity, and representative indicators, that adopted the document analysis and defined clearly the concepts, dimensions, theories, and generalizations level by level. Then, it followed PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams to carry on a systematic review and included 658 literature to use Vosviewer software by bibliometrics that exported the knowledge mapping of New Managerialism on elementary school governance to be the guideline of indicators. Further, it’s based on the knowledge structure as aforementioned to construct the superordinate, basic level, and subordinate indicators preliminarily as a basis for questionnaires of three stages.

    The expert questionnaire of the first stage to ensure the content validity about measuring the construct of New Managerialism on elementary school governance. The Fuzzy Delphi method questionnaire of the second stage invited twelve scholars, principals, and education administration authority staff to rate the indicators and calculate the triangular fuzzy number into Fuzzy Delphi 1.0 software for statistical treatment and then screened the indicators of consensus by α-cuts level of Lin et al. (2020). The relative weight questionnaire of the third stage to input data to Expert Choice 11.5 software to check the consistence index, and calculate a relative weight by Microsoft Excel 2021 Mac spreadsheets and data analysis to construct the indicators and weight system of New Managerialism on elementary school governance.

    According to the findings of the investigation and statistical analysis, to conclude as follows:

    1.The indicators of New Managerialism on elementary school governance are three stages, which include two dimensions of superordinate, six sub-dimensions of basic level, and thirty-five indicators of subordinate.
    2.The dimension of superordinate about the ranking of relative weight are accountability(70.04%), and flatting network(29.96%).
    3.The sub-dimension of the basic level that is affiliated to two dimensions about the ranking of relative weight as below:
    (1)Accountability: effectiveness and efficiency of steering(52.23%), faculty work accountability and responsibility(27.80%), competition of inter-school and intra-school(19.96%).
    (2)Flatting network: delegation and autonomy(53.79%), horizontal participation and collaboration(30.30%), flexibility and transparency(15.91%).
    4. The indicators of the subordinate that are affiliated to six sub-dimensions about the top ranking of relative weight as below:
    (1)Effectiveness and efficiency of steering: School governing body could put vision into practice(34.91%).
    (2)Faculty work accountability and responsibility: School quality assurance mechanism could audit “performance-goal” regularly(32.97%).
    (3)Competition of inter-school and intra-school: School governing body could ensure improvement of the basic competence for all students(38.47%).
    (4)Delegation and autonomy: Principal could accept professional advice of internal stakeholders(faculty and students)(24.69%).
    (5)Horizontal participation and collaboration: Principal could expand participants for decision-making of school development planning(28.15%).
    (6)Flexibility and transparency: School administrative actions could follow the democratic process(31.19%).

    Finally, based on the research results, provides suggestions for principal, education administration authority, and future research.
    Reference: 壹、中文文獻
    王文中（2004）。Rasch 測量模式與其在教育與心理之應用。教育與心理研究，27（4），637-694。
    王文方（ 2020 ） 。堆垛悖論。載於王ㄧ 奇（ 編） ， 華文哲學百科。http://mephilosophy.ccu.edu.tw/entry.php?entry_name=堆垛悖論
    王佳琪、鄭英耀、劉昆夏、何曉琪（2011）。以Rasch 分析檢驗「多向度幽默感量表」之信效度。測驗學刊，58（4），691-713。
    王紹光（2018）。治理研究：正本清源。開放時代，278（2），153-176。
    王麗雲（2005）。地方權力與教育治理關係之研究（科技部計畫成果編號：NSC94-2413-H003-018）。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。
    王麗雲（2007）。地方教育治理模式分析。教育政策論壇，10（1），189-228。
    王麗雲（2020）。 臺灣教育的展望：2020 後的重要教育課題。臺灣教育研究期刊，1（4），1-10。
    王麗雲（2022a）。教育治理的意義與科層治理的重塑。載於潘慧玲、王麗雲（編），教育治理理論與實務（20-34 頁）。高等教育。
    王麗雲（2022b）。教育領域資料治理的作法與挑戰。載於潘慧玲、王麗雲（編），教育治理理論與實務（236-256 頁）。高等教育。
    王麗雲、潘慧玲（2002）。種子與土壤：校長與教師在學校革新中的角色與作法。
    載於潘慧玲（主編），學校革新：理念與實踐（頁101-137）。學富。
    丘昌泰（2022）。公共管理。智勝文化。
    行政程序法（民國110 年1 月20 日）修正公布。
    https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=A0030055
    朱林方（2015）。 敘事、情境與隱喻——《理想國》開篇的寫法與讀法。 文藝理論研究，35（6），129-141。
    阮孝齊、潘慧玲（2022）。新公共治理的興起與網絡治理。載於潘慧玲、王麗雲（編），教育治理理論與實務（20-34 頁）。高等教育。
    余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS 的應用。高等教育。
    余民寧、陳柏霖、陳玉樺（2017）。量表長度簡化研究：「簡式中小學教師主觀幸福感量表」修訂。教育研究與發展期刊，13（4），27-56。
    余民寧（2020）。量表編製與發展—Rasch 測量模型的應用。心理。
    余民寧（2021）。心理與教育統計學。三民。
    余民寧（2022）。教育測驗與評量—成就測驗與教學評量。心理。
    呂育誠（2005）。地方治理意涵及其制度建立策略之研究－兼論我國縣市推動地方治理的問題與前景。公共行政學報，14，1-38。
    邱兆偉（1993）。美國教育改革研究。師大書苑。
    李安明（2004）。美國績效責任制度與模式及其對我國實施教育績效責任制度
    之啟示。第一屆亞太教育論壇，國立成功大學社會科學􄬀教育研究所。
    *李安明（2013）。發展賦權當責與群眾外包的教學領導團隊。教育研究月刊，181，29-41。
    *李柏諭（2005）。公私協力與社區治理的理論與實務：我國社區大學與政府經驗。公共行政學報，16，59-106。
    吳秀光、許立一（2008）。公共治理。空中大學。
    吳庚（1993）。韋伯的政治理論及其哲學基礎。聯經。
    吳英明、張其祿（2006）。全球化下的公共管理。商鼎文化。
    吳政達（1995）。階層分析法(AHP)與模糊評估法(FEM)在學前教育指標系統之應用[碩士論文，國立政治大學]。國立政治大學博碩士論文全文影像系統。
    吳政達（1998）。國民小學教師評鑑指標體系建構之研究：模糊德菲術、模糊
    層級分析法與模糊綜合評估法之應用（系統編號：087NCCU0332004） [博
    士論文，國立政治大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
    吳政達（2005）。我國地方政府層級教育課責系統建構之評估：模糊德菲法之應用。教育心理與研究，28（4），645-665。
    吳政達（2008）。教育政策分析：概念、方法與應用。高等教育。
    吳彥明（2011）。治理「文化治理」：傅柯、班奈特與王志弘。臺灣社會研究季刊，82，171-204。
    吳清山（2000）。學校績效責任的理念與策略。學校行政雙月刊，6，3-13。
    吳清山（2004）。學校經營理念與策略。教師天地，128，30-44。
    吳清山（2008）。解讀臺灣教育改革。心理。
    吳清山（2020a）。建立中小學「教與學為核心」的品質保證機制之探究。教育研究月刊，315，4-23。
    吳清山（2020b）。新冠肺炎疫情時代教育治理之探究 。教育行政與評鑑學刊，27，1-28。
    吳清山、林天祐（2009）。教育治理。教育研究月刊，180，128-129。
    吳清山、蔡菁芝（2006）。英美兩國教育績效責任之比較分析及啟示。師大學報，51（1），1-21。
    吳麗珍、黃惠滿、李浩銑（2014）。方便取樣與立意取樣之比較。護理雜誌，61（3），105-111。
    林明地（2002）。助長學校內部社區感，塑造學校內部社區。教育研究月刊，
    95，70-78。
    林明地（2006）教育領導的核心。教育研究集刊，52（2），155-163。
    林信志（2014）。高級中學教科書性別偏見檢視規準之建構：德懷術與層級分析法之應用。課程與教學，17（3），119-146。
    林原宏（2002）。模糊語意問卷的語意模糊數建構演算實證分析。調查研究，11，31-71。
    林原宏（2003）。量表語意模糊數演算及其計分比較分析。臺中師􄬀學報，17（2），279-304。
    林素卿、陳億玲、邱俊杰（2021）。美國「讓每個學生成功法案」下師資培育改革之內涵及其啟示。臺灣教育研究期刊，2（1），275-291。
    林逢祺（2002）。教材選擇的知識判準。教育研究集刊，48（1），1-33。
    林斌（2013）。英國防制校園霸凌法治之研究：教育治理之觀點。教育經營與管理研究集刊，9，1-29。
    林湘霖（2023 年11 月16 日）。層級分析法範例實作1 [影片]。Youtube。https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDTW_KUrcdc
    林湘霖（2023 年11 月22 日）。模糊層級分析法範例實作2 [影片]。Youtube。https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxKaa99Ydwo
    林湘霖、王貞淑（2015）。結合模糊層級分析法與關聯法則建構數位學習系統活動流程評估準則。管理與系統，22（1），125-147。
    林進財（2020）。國小實施基本學力檢測與教學實踐之間的關連議題與對策：學科教學與學習知識的視野。臺灣教育，722，1-10。
    林進財、林香河（2022）。多元與卓越：一位百年小學校長學校願景形塑的實踐經驗。臺灣教育研究期刊，3（3），19-45。
    林雍智（2018）。國民小學學校治理之研究（系統編號：106UT005778004） [博士論文，臺北市立大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
    *林雍智、吳清山（2013）。日本學校治理模式之變遷及其評析：以學校理事會為例。教育科學研究期刊，58（4），103-131。
    林雍智、吳清山（2018）。中小學學校治理：運作機制、實施困境與改進策略。教育研究月刊，290，4-18。
    林寶山（譯）（1984）。國家在危機之中—美國的教育改革計畫。復文。
    侯世昌（2002）。國民小學家長教育期望、參與學校教育與學校效能之研究（系統編號：090NTNU0331016）[博士論文，國立臺灣師範大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
    范熾文（2007）。國民中學校長績效責任領導困境與策略之研究：質性分析取徑。教育科學研究期刊，62（3），57-93。
    施能傑（1996）。政府組織變革的時代性—從機關組織結構彈性化觀點探討省府組織再造。臺灣省政府組織再造省政業務研討會專刊，1-31。
    屏東縣三地門鄉青山國小（2024）。理念學校。https://www.chses.ptc.edu.tw/nss/p/about
    *姜添輝（2015）。臺灣高等教育政策依循新自由主義的現象與缺失。臺灣教育社會學研究，12（5），131-165。
    徐宗林、周愚文（2005/2022）。教育史。五南。
    秦夢群（2023）。教育行政理論與模式。五南。
    秦夢群、吳政達（2006）。我國國民教育階段學校行政績效責任指標體系建 構之研究。國立教育資料館。
    秦夢群、溫子欣（2015）。後教改的教育革新與發展。載於湯志民(主編)，後教改時代之教育趨勢議題，1-30。學富文化。
    桃園市桃園區同德國民小學（2024）。辦學目標、學校經營的理念與策略。https://www.tdes.tyc.edu.tw/modules/tadnews/page.php?ncsn=17&nsn=32
    孫本初、李明寰（2005）。治理概念之初探。人事月刊，40（6），6-19。
    孫本初、鍾京佑（2005）。治理理論之初探：政府、市場與社會治理架構。
    公共行政學報，16，107-135。
    孫本初（2010）。公共管理。智勝文化。
    孫志麟（1988）。國民教育指標體系的建構與應用（系統編號：087NCCU6331100）[博士論文，國立政治大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
    孫志麟（2002）。專業發展學校：理念、實務與啟示。國立臺北師範學􄬀學報：教育類，15，557-584。
    孫志麟（2009）。大學與中小學夥伴關係發展的評析。教育實踐與研究，22（2），151-179。
    曹俊漢（2009）。全球化與全球治理：理論發展的建構與詮釋。韋伯文化。
    *莫家豪、羅浩俊（2001）。市場化與大學治理模式變遷：香港與臺灣比較研究。教育研究集刊，47，329-361。
    張文權、范熾文、陳成宏（2017）。國民中學校長績效責任領導困境與策略之研究：質性分析取徑。教育科學研究期刊，62（3），57-93。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(3).03
    *張世強、張世澤（2007）。美國高等教育治理當中委員會角色之評析。思與言，45（4），139-177
    張素貞、李俊湖（2014）。教師專業發展評鑑方案成效評估之研究。教育資料與研究，114，95-124。
    張紹勳（2012）。模糊多準則評估法及統計。五南。
    張鈿富（1999）。臺灣地區教育指標建構之研究。行政􄬀國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（編號：NCE 84-2413-h-0040002）。
    張鈿富、蔡金田（2012）。教育公平理論與指標建構之整合研究，子計畫三：國民中學教育公平指標之運用研究報告[計畫編號：NAER-100-14-C-1-01-03-
    2-04]。國家教育研究􄬀。
    張嘉伊（2002）。法律原則、法律體系與法概念論—Robert Alexy 法律原則理論初探。輔仁法學，24，1-48。
    張慶勳（2019）。教育、文化與產業三位一體的學校治理：以創新實驗教育為取向。臺灣教育評論月刊，8（1），23-27。
    張鴻章、蔡金田（2020）。學校願景具象化的實踐—以共融式遊具校訂課程為例。臺灣教育評論月刊，9（8），12-21。
    教育部（2020）。校園社區化改造計畫。https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/86A5380450338BC
    教育部（2020）。教育部因材網。https://adl.edu.tw/HomePage/home/
    教育部（2024）。業務概況報告。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/3/relfile/8723/94766/9bd2320c-7056-43f4-bc9f-cd68f406c105.pdf
    教育部校長領導卓越獎評選及獎勵要點(民國111 年5 月18 日)修正公布。
    https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL034792&kw=校長領導
    教育部統計處（2023）。國民小學學校基本統計資訊。
    https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/News_Content.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96&s=8A351A43EC0708BF
    教育部教學卓越獎評選及獎勵要點(民國111 年2 月17 日)修正公布。
    https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL030158
    教育部國民及學前教育署（2017）。 教育階段學生學習精進計畫總表。
    https://www.gmes.tyc.edu.tw/sites/default/files/_129.pdf
    教育部國語推行委員會 （2024）。教育部臺灣閩南語常用詞辭典。2024 年7 月22 日取自https://sutian.moe.edu.tw/zh-hant/su/5836/
    教育部駐美國代表教育組（2016）。美國新版教育法案「讓每個學生成功法
    案」重點。https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://teric.naer.edu.tw/wSite/DoDownload%3FxmlId%3D1842076%26fileName%3D1454659897503%26format%3Dpdf&ved=2ahUKEwjS7v6GzJGIAxX4ma8BHdJEIh4QFnoECBMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1R16aNcgQ9u6sdjZIeE6xx
    教育部駐英國代表教育組（2020）。英國發布「升級白皮書」縮減教育資源地域差距。https://teric.naer.edu.tw/wSite/PDFReader?xmlId=2059252&fileName=1651752651525&format=pdf
    陳文彥（2007）。學校權力結構之研究：新制度論的觀點（系統編號：096NTNU5332087）[博士論文，國立臺灣師範大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識
    加值系統。
    陳文彥（2010）。學校權力結構鉅觀制度變遷之研究。屏東教育大學學報，35，125-154。
    陳文彥（2022）。分散式領導與學校治理。載於潘慧玲、王麗雲（編），教育治理理論與實務（75-92 頁）。高等教育。
    陳志瑋（2004）。行政課責與地方治理能力的提升。政策研究學報，4，23-45。
    陳幸仁、范慶鐘（2011）。在教育改革中校園微觀政治行為的研究。香港教師中心學報，10，61-74。
    *陳怡如（2004）。我國國小教育及幼兒教育改革初探－行政干預與市場機制之比較觀點。新竹師􄬀學報，19，89-112。
    陳佩英、卯靜儒（2010）。落實教育品質和平等的績效責任制：美國《NCLB 法》的挑戰與回應。當代教育研究季刊，18（3），1-47。
    陳坤德（1996）。德懷術在研究上的應用。國立彰化師範大學商業教育學報，22，34-50。
    *陳盈宏（2017）。國小課後照顧班公私協力治理議題之探討。教育行政論壇，9，96-115。
    陳國川（1993）。地理教材設計的理論與實踐。師大書苑。
    陳敏（1994）。行政法總論。神州圖書。
    陳敦源（2000）。誰掌控官僚體系？：從代理人理論看臺灣官僚體系的政治控制問題。公共行政學報，4，99-130。
    陳敦源、張世杰（2010）。公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭。文官制度，2（3），17-71。
    https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20210507001-201007-202106090009-202106090009-17-71
    陳榮政（2017）。由新管理主義分析我國之教育行政變革與施為。學富文化。
    陳榮政（2019）。教育行政與治理：新管理主義途徑。學富文化。
    陳榮政（2021a）。偏鄉地區學校校務治理、組織氣氛與教師流動之研究。教育行政研究，10（1），1-30。
    陳榮政（2021b）。新管理主義下的公辦民營學實驗教育學校治理：委託代理人理論的視角（科技部計畫成果：MOST109-2410-H004-055） 。國立政治大學。
    陳榮政（2022）。公私協力之學校經營探討與政策反饋分析（科技部計畫成果編號：110-2410-H-004 -129 -）。國立政治大學。
    陳毅文（2017）。層級分析法與模糊層級分析法之探究與應用（系統編號：105NKNU0479008）[博士論文，國立高雄師範大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
    *陳顯榮（2020）。國民教育階段校長法律責任之探討：新管理主義觀點（系統編號：109UT005778018）。臺北市立大學。
    郭伯臣（2022）。臺灣中小學數位學習的過去、現在與未來。教育傳播與科技研究，128，1-6。
    游自達（2000）。中小學教育指標建構之研究。國民教育研究集刊，8，33-35。
    *曾大千、陳榮政（2022）。偏遠及小型中小學區域治理模式整合研究總計畫（科技部計畫編號：NAER-2022-022-E-1-1-A6-00） 。國家教育研究􄬀。
    湯志民（1991）。台北市國民小學學校建築規畫,環境知覺與學生行為之相關研究（系統編號：079NCCU2331003） [博士論文，國立政治大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
    雲林縣土庫鎮後埔國民小學（2024）。學校願景與辦學理念。https://hpps.ylc.edu.tw/cp.aspx?n=67239
    彭富源（2009）。台灣初等教育改革與省思。教育資料集刊，41，1-24。
    黃乃熒（2002）。學校權力生態重建的理念與策略：以中小學教評會為例。載於潘慧玲（主編），學校革新：理念與實踐（頁51-100）。學富。
    黃昭勳（2019）。學校評鑑實施之我見。臺灣教育評論月刊，8（4），120-126。
    黃俊儒（2020）。教學實踐研究計畫：翻轉臺灣高等教育的新里程碑。評鑑雙月刊，83，9-12。https://www.heeact.edu.tw/media/15307/83p09-12.pdf
    黃漢邦（2012）。模糊集合基本運算。載於李允中、王小璠、蘇木春（編），模糊理論及其應用。全華科技。
    *黃嘉雄（1999）。英格蘭及威爾斯學校自主管理政策之研究（科技部計畫編號：NSC88-2413-H152-005）。國立臺北師範學􄬀。
    黃榮護（1998）。公共管理。商鼎文化。
    傅遠智、秦夢群（2020）。臺灣高等教育實施績效責任制度的困境與突破：代理人理論的應用。教育研究與發展期刊，16（3），1-30。
    詹中原（編）（1999）。新公共管理：政府再造的理論與實務。五南。
    詹中原、楊聖怡（2000）。企業公共關係組織管理初探，人力發展，82，46-51。
    詹志禹（1988）。後設分析：量化的文獻探討法。思與言，26（4），311-325。
    *詹盛如（2008）。大學治理模式之轉變及其對經營效率之意涵—臺灣與英國之比較（科技部計畫編號：NSC98-2410-H194-110）。國立嘉義大學。
    *詹盛如（2010）。我國大學教授治校之研究—以校務會議與各種委員會為例。（科技部計畫編號：NSC99-2410-H194-060 ）。國立嘉義大學。
    *詹盛如（2010）。臺灣高等教育治理政策之改革—新管理主義的觀點。教育資料研究雙月刊，94，1-20。
    楊啟棟（1985）。美國教育改革藍皮書。載於中國教育學會（編），迎接二十一世紀的教育改革。臺灣書店。
    葉晉嘉、翁興利、吳濟華（2007）。德菲法與模糊德菲法之比較研究。調查研究—方法與應用，21，31-58。
    新北市三重區修德國民小學（2024）。教育理念。https://www.sude.ntpc.edu.tw/p/405-1000-3921,c707.php
    新北市中和區光復國民小學（2024）。校務願景與實踐。https://sites.google.com/site/hsuyiping/Home?authuser=0
    新竹市東區新竹國民小學（2024）。學校經營理念。https://www.hsps.hc.edu.tw/nss/s/main/p/principal
    臺中市南區國光國民小學（2024）。教育理念。https://kkes.tc.edu.tw/p/426-1177-23.php
    臺北市內湖區明湖國民小學（2024）。校長經營理念。http://mhups-teachers.mhups.tp.edu.tw/eweb/module/system_modules/index.php?home=ew00000000089&sn=872&sn_ids=855&free_ids=872
    臺北市立大學師資培育及職涯發展中心（2024）。全國學校經營與教學創新Besteducation-KDP 國際認證獎https://cte.utaipei.edu.tw/p/406-1013-
    111077,r779.php?Lang=zh-tw
    臺北市立大學教育行政與評鑑研究所（2017）。臺北市102 至106 學年度公私立國民小學校務評鑑標準https://adeva.utaipei.edu.tw/var/file/61/1061/img/1272/364778318.pdf
    臺北市政府教育局（2023）。臺北市政府教育局112 學年度中小學教育品質保
    證實施計畫。https://qafe.tp.edu.tw/QaulitySubsidy/NEWT01/DownLoad?NEWS_ID=01da816e4de0428ab7edcd1f1515dcd2&FILE_NAME=臺北市中小學教育品質保證實施計畫%28 國小版%291120925 修訂.pdf
    臺北市政府教育局（2024）。臺北市第25 屆中小學及幼兒園教育專業創新與
    行動研究徵件實施計畫—國小組實施計畫。https://eiar.tp.edu.tw/AnnFile/國
    小組(1130319).pdf
    臺北市教師研習中心（2022a）。臺北市107-112 年度優質學校評選向度指標
    (4.1 版)。https://www-s.gov.taipei/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvNDM2L3JlbGZpbGUvMC82NjcxNi9kNzQxNWRlNS0wZTQ5LTQ1ZjUtYTQ5Ny0zZGRmYTJiNzZmNzkucGRm&n=5YSq6LOq5a245qCh6KmV6YG45ZCR5bqm5oyH5qiZNC4x54mIX%2bWlieaguC5wZGY%3d&icon=..pdf
    臺北市教師研習中心（2022b）。臺北教育111 標竿學校評選及獎勵要點。
    https://www-ws.gov.taipei/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvNDM2L3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xMDU1MzEvMmQ4ODAyYjUtNGRlMC00MWFhLWEzNmQtN2JmMWQ0YmM4Y2MzLnBkZg%3d%3d&n=MTEw5bm05bqm6Ie65YyX5pWZ6IKyMTEx5qiZ56u%2f5a245qCh6KmV6YG455Sz6KuL5Y%2bD6ICD5oyH5byVLnBkZg%3d%3d&icon=..pdf
    褚宏啟（2014）。教育治理：以共治求善治。 教育研究， 35（10），4-11。
    甄曉蘭（2002）。學校本位課程發展的理念與實務策略。載於潘慧玲（主編），學校革新：理念與實踐（頁141-171）。臺北：學富。
    劉坤億（1996）。官僚體制革新之研究—企業型官僚體制理論及其評估。[碩士論文，國立政治大學]。國立政治大學博碩士論文全文影像系統。
    劉振寧（2019）。學校教育課責從他律到自律的困境與策進作為。教育研究月刊，299，112-124。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602019030299007
    蔡進雄（2014）。國家教育政策對學校教育的影響。國家教育研究􄬀電子報。
    https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?eg_name=研究紀要&edm_no=100&content_no=2383
    蔡進雄（2019）。偏鄉小校跨校課程策略聯盟運作模式之研究。國家教育研究研究計畫成果報告(NAER-109-12-C-2-12-00-1-12)。國家教育研究􄬀。
    鄧振源、曾國雄（1989）。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與運用。中國統計學報，27（7），495-542。
    潘慧玲（2002）。緒論：學校革新的脈動。載於潘慧玲（主編），學校革新： 理念與實踐（1-47 頁）。學富文化。
    潘慧玲（2002 年12 月20-21 日）。學校革新經驗的回顧與展望 [論文發表]。2002 年全球化：教育變革新領域國際研討會，香港。
    潘慧玲（2022）。協作治理及其在課程變革上的應用。載於潘慧玲、王麗雲（編），教育治理理論與實務（20-34 頁）。高等教育。
    *潘慧玲、王麗雲（編）（2022）。教育治理：理論與實務。高等教育。
    潘慧玲、王麗雲、謝卓君（2022）。緒論：多元取徑下的教育治理。載於潘慧玲、王麗雲（編），教育治理理論與實務（20-34 頁）。高等教育。
    賴彥全、王麗雲（2014）。地方政府教育課責系統現況與成效探究。教育科學研究期刊，59（3），97-132。
    盧建旭（1995）。公共企業精神：公共企業家的角色與批判。空大行政學報， 4，131-174。
    謝卓君（2022）。新公共治理的興起與教育治理轉向。載於潘慧玲、王麗雲（主編），教育治理（36-52 頁）。高等教育。
    謝卓君、閔詩紜（2022）。臺灣閱讀教育治理之城鄉差異探究。教育科學研究期刊，67（4），73-104。
    謝傳崇（2007）。國民中小學創新經營效能指標之研究－模糊德懷術與模糊階層分析程序法之應用。教育產業經營與管理學術研討會(頁265-295)，元智大學師資培育中心。
    謝寶梅（2003）。臺灣教師參與行動研究之趨勢與評析。教育資料集刊，28，389-405。
    *顏秀如（2003）。論新公共管理(NPM)及其對臺灣中小學教育改革之啟示。教育政策論壇，6（1），93-109。
    顏佩如（2019）。政府、師培單位、師培生「師培生核心素養」協作策略之探究。臺灣教育評論月刊，8（12），38-42。
    蘇永欽（2002）。政府再造：政府角色功能的新定位。新臺灣人文教基金會。
    蘇彩足、施能傑（1998）。各國行政革新策略及措施比較分析。行政􄬀研究發展考核委員會委託研究。
    Blunch, N. J. (2015)。結構方程模式：IBM SPSS 與AMOS 的應用 [吳政達譯] 。高等教育。（原著出版年：2013）
    Hughes, O. E. (2003)。公共管理的世界 [林鐘沂、林文斌譯，2003 重譯本]。
    韋伯文化。（原著出版年：1998）
    Pasquino, P. (1978). 福柯治理術 [趙曉力譯]。北大法律資訊網（原著出版年：1978）
    Plato. (2009). 理想國 [郭斌和、張竹明譯]。商務。（原著出版年：c.375 B.C.）
    備註：*表示此為文件分析法之相關研究分析書目之ㄧ
    貳、西文文獻
    Ainley, J., & McKenzie, P. (2000). School governance: Research on educational and management issues. International Education Journal, 1(3), 139-151.
    Ajayan, S., & Balasubramanian, S. (2020). New managerialism in higher education: The case of United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 22(2), 47-168. https://doi.org/10. 1108/IJCED-11-2019-0054
    Apple, M. (2000). Between Neoliberalism and Neoconservatism: Education and Conservatism in a global context. In N. C. Burbules & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp. 57-78). Routledge. Association of Independent School ACT. (2021). School governance guiding principles: A guide to promote good governance. https://ais.act.edu.au/wpcontent/ uploads/Governance-Checklist-V2.1.pdf
    Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2020). Measurement framework for schooling in Australia 2020.
    https://dataandreporting.blob.core.windows.net/anrdataportal/ANRDocuments/Measurement%20Framework%20for%20Schooling%20in%20Australia%202023.pdf
    Australian Department of Education. (2023). The National School Reform Agreement. https://www.education.gov.au/recurrent-funding-schools/national-school-reformagreement
    Ball, S. (2006). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society. In H. Lauder, P. Brown, J. Dillabough, & A. Halsey (Eds.), Education, globalization & social change (pp. 692-701).
    Ball, S. J. (2009). The governance turn! Journal of Education Policy, 24 (5), 537-538.
    *Ball, S. J. (2015). Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers. Journalof Education Policy, 30(3), 299-301.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1013271
    Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press.
    Barzelay, M., A., & Armajani, B. J. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy: A new vision for management in government. University of California Press.
    Berkovich, I. (2019). Educational governance transition in a social democratic country: A process-tracing analysis. Journal of Educational Change, 20(1), 103-219.
    Berry, Y., Tehan, H. D., Mitchell, H. S., Uibo, H. S., Grace, H. G., Gardner, H. J., Rockliff, H. J., Merlino, H. J., & Ellery, H. S. (2019). Alice Springs (Mparntwe) Education Declaration. Education Council.
    https://www.education.gov.au/download/4816/alice-springs-mparntweeducation-declaration/7180/alice-springs-mparntwe-education-declaration/pdf
    Biersteker, T. J. (2011). Global governance. In P. P. Maduro & L. Miguel (Eds.), An EU agenda for global governance (p. 9-12). RSCAS Policy Paper.
    Blaikie, N. (1993). Approaches to social enquiry. Willey.
    Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (1997). Introduction. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy. The MIT Press.
    Booth, W. C. (1961) The rhetoric of fiction. University of Chicago Press.
    Bovens, M. (1998). The quest for responsibility-accountability and citizenship in complex organizations. Cambridge University Press.
    Bovens, M., Robert, E. G., & Schillemans, T. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford University Press.
    Bozeman, B. (1993). Public management: The state of the art. Jassey-Bass
    Publishers.
    Bretz, R. D., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career Success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32-54.
    Brodsgaard, K. E. (2023). The party-directed Chinese governance model: How to explain the China puzzle. In B. Luethje (Ed.), Civilization and governance: The Western and non-Western World (pp. 213-240). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811256158 0010
    Browder, L. (1973). An administrator’s handbook on educational accountability. America Association of school administrators.
    Buchanan, J. M. (1978). The economics of politics. Institute of Economic Affairs.
    Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 233-247.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
    Caiden, G. (1969). Administrative Reform. Chicago.
    Caiden, G. E. (1991). Administrative Reform Comes of the Age. Walter de Gruyter.
    Caiden, G. E. (2001). Corruption and governance. In G. E. Caiden, O. P. Dwivedi, & J. G. Jabbra (Eds.), Where corruption lives (pp. 1537). Kumarian Press.
    Caldwell, B. J., & Harris, J. (2008). Why not the best schools? ACER Press.
    Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Cambridge dictionary. Retrieved Jan 30. 2023,
    from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english-chinesetraditional/regulate
    Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2013). Conceptual definition of two key terms:Governance and higher education. In D. F. Campbell & E. G. Carayannis (Eds.), Epistemic governance in higher education: Quality enhancement of universities for development (pp. 3-13). Springer.
    Capano, G., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2015). Bringing governments back in: Governance and governing in comparative policy analysis. Journal of
    Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 17(4), 311-321.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1031977
    Capano, G., Zito, A. R., Toth, F., & Rayner, J. (2022). Introduction: The state and public policy after the neoliberal wave—Instruments and governance dynamics. In G. Peters & P. Zittoun (Eds.), Trajectories of governance. International series on public policy (pp. 1-43). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07457-8_1
    Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649-655.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
    Chang, I. S, Tsujimura, Y., Gen, M., & Tozawa, T. (1995). An efficient approach for large scale project planning based on Fuzzy Delphi method. Fuzzy Set and Systems, 76, 277-288.
    Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4
    Chen, S. M. (1996). Evaluation weapon system by AHP using Fuzzy arithmetic operation. Fuzzy Set and Systems, 77, 265-276.
    Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Bookings.
    *Clair, R., & Belzer, A. (2007). In the market for ideas: How reforms in the political. economy of educational research in the US and UK promote market managerialism. Comparative Education, 43(4), 471-488.
    Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, New Series, 4(16), 386-405.
    *Cohen, P. A. et al. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312019002237
    Corson, J. J. (1960). Governance of colleges and universities. McGraw-Hill.
    Couch, J. F., Shughart, W. F., & Williams, A. L. (1993). Private school enrollment and public school performance. Public Choice, 76(4), 301-312.
    Cuttance, P. F. (1991). Monitoring educational quality through performance indicators for school practice. Paper presented at the Annual meeting American Educational Research Associtation.
    Dalkey, N. (1969). An experimental study of group opinion: The Delphi method. Futures, 1, 408-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(69)80025-X
    Davies, B. (2007). Developing Sustainable Leadership. Paul Chapman Publishing.
    DeCaroli, S. (2021). Foucault's milieu. Ex-position, 45, 117-140, http://
    doi.10.6153/EXP.202106_(45).0008
    Dee, T. S. (1988). Competition and the quality of public schools. Economics of Education Review, 17(4), 419-427.
    De Grauwe, A. (2005). Improving the quality of education through schoolbased management: Learning from international experiences. International Review of Education, 51(4), 269–287.
    Denhardt, R. (1993). Theories of public organization. Wadsworth, Belmont.
    Dent, B., Forbes, S., & Stuart, B. (2004). Review of human decomposition processes in. soil. Environmental Geology, 45(4): 576-585.
    Department for Education. (2011). Programs for department. DfE.
    Department for Education. (2018, March 6). Education policy. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dfid-education-policy-2018-get-children-learning/dfid-education-policy#fn:46
    Department for Education. (2020). The governance handbook. DfE.
    Deutsch, K. W. (1980). Politics and government: How people decide their fate. Houghton Mifflin.
    Dinesen, I. (2024). Study finds Wisconsin public school systems among best in country.
    https://www.wkow.com/news/study-finds-wisconsin-public-school-systemsamong-best-in-country/article_66ffd777-c935-5023-ad67-67b8482ef828.html
    Dodl, N. R., & Schalock, H. D. (1973). Competency based teacher preparation. In Dans. Andersen, D. W. et al. (Eds.), Competency based teacher education. Book one: Problems and prospects for the decade ahead (pp. 45-52). Berkeley.
    Downs, A. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy. Little, Brown & Company.
    Dubnick, M. J. (1998). Clarifying accountability: An ethical theory framework. In C. Sampford, N. Preston, & C. A. Bois (Eds.), Public sector ethics: Finding and Implementing. Routledge.
    Dubois, D. & Prad, H. (1980). Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. Academic Press.
    Dunleavy, P. (1986). Explaining the privatization boom: Public choice versus radical approaches. Public Administration, 64, 13-34.
    Dunleavy, P., & O’ Leary, B. (1987). Theories of the state: The politics of liberal democracy. The Macmillan Press.
    Dunleavy, P. and Hood, C. (1994) From old public administration to New
    Public Management. Public Money and Management, 14, 9-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540969409387823
    Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.
    Eithun, N. (2022). School district of Jefferson's Sullivan elementary recognized as a National Blue Ribbon School for 2022.
    https://www.dailyunion.com/news/jefferson_county_area/school-district-ofjeffersons-sullivan-elementary-recognized-as-a-national-blue-ribbon-school-for-2022/article_b4839bee-35ff-11ed-a0be-77b81cfd4984.html
    Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 22, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
    Emrouznejad, A., & Marra, M. (2017). The state of the art development of AHP (1979-2017): A literature review with a social network analysis. International Journal. of Production Research, 55, 6653-6675.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1334976
    Evers, W. M., & Walberg, H. J. (2002). School accountability. Hoover Institution Press.
    Ewalt, G. (2001). Theories of governance and New Public Management: Links to understanding welfare policy implementation. A Second Draft. A Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the American Society for Public Administration.
    Ezebuiro, A. U., Anichebe, O., & Ogbodo, I. I. (2021). Moral education in Aristotle: Implications for political leadership, governance, Nation-building and development in Africa. Bassey Andah Journal, 14, 233-249.
    https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811256158 0010
    Fazil, T., & Hayat, M. (2019). Modern concept of good governance in Islamic perspective. Peshawar Islamicus, 10(2), 39-44.
    Ferlie, E., Ashburber, L., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The new public management in action. Oxford University Press.
    Flynn, N. (2000). Managerialism and public service: Some international trends. In J. Clarke, S. Gewirtz & E. McLaughlin (Eds.), New managerialism, new welfare? (pp. 27-44). Sage.
    Fortescue, J. (1855). The difference between an absolute and a limited monarchy. In C. Plummer (Ed.), The governance of England. Oxford University Press.
    Foucault, M. (1978). History of sexuality I: The will to know. Random House.
    Foucault, M. (1993). About the beginning of the hermeneutics of the self: Two lectures at Dartmouth. Political Theory, 21(2),198-227.
    Foucault, M. (1997). Subjectivity and truth. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth(pp.87-92). The New Press.
    *Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and other writings. Pantheon.
    Frankel, J. R. (1980). Helping Students Think and Value Strategies for teaching the social studies. Prentice-Hall.
    Fuentes, D. D., Clifton, J., & Alonso, J. M. (2013). Did new public management matter? An empirical analysis of the outsourcing and decentralization effects on public sector size. Public Management Review, 17(5), 3-40. https://doi.org/.10.1080/14719037.2013.822532
    Garry, P. M. (2011). Liberalism and American identity. The Kent State University. Press.
    Giddens, A. (2002). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives? Profile.
    Greany, T., & Higham, R. (2018). Hierarchy, markets and networks: Analysing the selfimproving school-led system agenda in England and the implications for schools. UCL Institute of Education Press.
    Greene, K. V., & Kang, B. G. (2004). The effect of public and private competition on school outputs in New York State. Economics of Education Review, 23, 497-506.
    Geller, D. A., Doyle, R., Shaw, D., Mullin, B., Coffey, B., Petty, C., Vivas, F., & Biederman, J. (2006). A quick and reliable screening measure for OCD in youth: Reliability and validity of the obsessive compulsive scale of the Child Behavior Checklist. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 47, 234-240.
    Gerrard, J., & Savage, G. C. (2022). Policy translations of citizen participation and new public governance: The case of school governing bodies. Critical Policy Studies, 17(3), 484-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2022.2153071
    Gordon, A. E. (1969). On the origins of the Latin alphabet: Modern views. California Studies in Classical Antiquity, 2, 157-170.
    Gray, J. (1993). Beyond the new right: Markets, government and the common environment. Routledge.
    Gulliksen, H. (1987). Theory of mental test. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Hale, S. J. (1996). Achieving high performance in public organizations. In J. L. Perry (Ed), Handbook of public administration (pp. 136-150). Jossey-Bass.
    *Hall, V. J. (2020). Reclaiming student voice(s): Constituted through process or. embedded in practice? Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 125-144.
    Hamid, H., Haming, M., Semmaila, B., & Bijang, J. (2020). A mediation effect of new public management on the relationship between intelligence, leadership, HR quality and performance of local government employees in Indonesia. Management Science Letters, 10, 1401-1408. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.12.028
    Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1992). Reengineering Corporation. Harper Collins.
    Hammer, M., & Stanton, S. (1995). The reengineering revolution. Harper Collins.
    Hammerschmid, G., Walle, S. V., Andrews, R., & Mostafa, A. M. S. (2018). New public management reforms in Europe their effects: Findings from a 20-country. top executive survey. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 399-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523177551632
    Haque, M. S. (2004). The myths of economic growth (GNP). In G. Mudacumura, & M. S. Haque (Eds.), Handbook of Development Policy Studies (pp. 1-24). Marcel Dekker.
    Harman, G. (1991). Report of the Australian college of education, colloquium on restructuring education departments. Unpublished.
    Harper, D. (n.d.). Etymology of government. online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved Jan 27, 2023, from https://www.etymonline.com/word/government
    Helmy, S. E., Eladl, G. H. & Eisa, M. (2021). Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. (FAHP) using geometric mean method to select best processing framework adequate to big data. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 99(1), 207-226.
    Henry, G. T. (1990). Practical Sampling. Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412985451
    Heyneman, S. (2009). International perspectives on school choice. Routledge
    Higham, T, (2014) The timing and spatiotemporal patterning of neanderthal. disappearance. Nature, 512, 306-309. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13621
    Hood, C. (1991). A Public management and administration: An introduction. Palgrave.
    Hopkins, D., & Leask, M. (1989). Performance indicators and school development. School Organization, 9(1), 3-20.
    Hsieh, C. T., & Urquiola. M. (2006). The effects of generalized school choice on achievement and stratification: Evidence from Chile’s voucher program. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8-9), 1477-503.
    Huddleston, T. (2007). From student voice to shared responsibility: Effective practice in democratic school governance in European schools. Council Conseil of Europe.
    Hughes, O. E. (1998). Public management and administration: An introduction. St. Martin’s Press.
    Hwang, C. L., & Lin, M. J. (1987). Group decision making under multiple criteria: methods and applications. Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61580-1
    Hyndman, N., & McDonnell, P. (2009). Governance and charities: An exploration of. key themes and the development of a research agenda. Financial Accountability & Management, 25(1), 5-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00463.x
    International Bureau of Education-United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural. Organization.(2012). General Education Quality Analysis Diagnosis Framework (GEQAF). https://www.ibe.unesco.org/sites/default/files/resources/geqaf-2012_eng.pdf
    Ishida, Y., & Okitsu, T. (2022). Capacity development in education governance and improvement in school-based management: The Japanese approaches. In N. Kayashima, K. Kuroda, & Y. Kitamura (Eds.), Japan’s International cooperation in education (pp. 125-146). History and Prospects.
    https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-16-6815-9_6
    Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, T., Tamizawa, G., Totsuta, R. & Mieno, H. (1993). The maxmin Delphi method and Fuzzy Delphi method via Fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55, 241-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(93)90251-C
    Islam, F. (2015). New public management (NPM): A dominating paradigm in public sectors. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 9(4), 114-152.
    Ismara, K. I., Khurniawan, A. W., Soeharto, Andayani, S., Supriadi, D., & Prianto, E. (2020). Improving the vocational school performance through the good school governance. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 13(5), 57-71.
    Istianto, B., & Wahyurudhanto, A. (2022). The Role of Good governance in Transmitting the Influence of New Public Management and Leadership in Public Servants’ Performance. Journal of Government and Politics, 13(2), 263-280.
    https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.v13i2.14447
    James, C., Brammer, B., & Fertig, M. (2011). International perspectives on school governing under pressure. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 39(4), 394-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143211404953.
    *Jeong, D. W., & Luschei, T. F. (2018). Are teachers losing control of the classroom? Global changes in school governance and teacher responsibilities, 2000-2015. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 289-301.
    Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risk of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29-45.
    http://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00107
    Johanningmeier, E. V. (2010). “A Nation at Risk” and “Sputnik”: Compared and Reconsidered. American Educational History Journal, 37(2), 347-365.
    Johnson, M. (2016). The Every Student Succeeds Act: Opportunities and responsibilities. re: vision. The Hunt Institute’s, 1-16.
    Jones, L. R., Thompson, F., & Zumeta, W. (2001). Public management for the new millennium: Developing relevant and integrated professional curricula. International Public Management Review, 2(2), 19-38.
    Kamal, D. M., & Batool, D. S. (2021). Institutional failure: A challenge to good governance in Pakistan. South Asian Studies, 35(1), 101-118.
    Kamarck, E. C. (2000). Globalization and Public Administration Reform. In J. S. Nye & J. D. Donahue (Eds.), Governance in a Globalizing World. Brookings Institution Press.
    Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1988). Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science. Elsevier Science Publishers.
    Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & McKenna, H. P. (2001). A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 38(2), 195-200.
    Kettl, D. F. (1994). What will new governance mean for the federal government? Public Administration Review, 54(2), 170-175.
    Khodary, Y. (2015). Good governance in basic education in Egypt: Paradoxical or self explanatory? International Journal of Political Science and Development, 3(9), 400-411.
    Khurniawan, A. W., Muljono, P., Maarif, M. S., Saillah, I., & Indriyanto, B. (2020).Analysis of the effect of school governance and total quality management on the Effectiveness of vocational school-based entreprise in Indonesia. International Journal of Management, 11(9), 297-306.
    https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.11.9.2020.029
    Kickert, W. J. M. (1993). Autopolesis and the science of public administration. Organization Studies, 4, 261-278.
    Kickert, W. (1995). Steering at a distance: A new paradigm of public governance in Dutch higher education. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 8(1), 135-157.
    Klikauer, T. (2015). What is Managerialism? Critical Sociology, 41(7-8), 1103-1119.
    http://doi.org.10.1177/0896920513501351
    Klir, G. J., & Folger, T. A. (1988). Fuzzy sets, uncertainty, and information. Prentice Hall.
    Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. Sage.
    Kosko, B. (1993). Fuzzy thinking: The new science of fuzzy logic. Hyperion.
    Lan, Z., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (1992). Public administration in transition. Public Administration Review, 52(6), 535-537.
    Lane, J. E. (1993). The public sector: Concepts, models and approach. Sage.
    Leechman, G., McCulla, N., & Field, L. (2019). Local school governance and school leadership: Practices, processes and pillars. International Journal of Education Management, 33(7), 1641-1652.
    Levi-Faur, D., Ansell, C., & Trondal, J. (2016). An organizational-Institutional approach to governance. In C. K. Ansell, J. Trondal & M. Ogard (Eds.), Governance in turbulent times (pp. 27-54). Oxford University Press.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739517.003.0002
    Lewis, E. (1980). Public entrepreneurship: Toward a theory of bureaucratic. Political Power. Indiana University Press.
    Lin, H. C., Lai, W., & Wu, B. (2020). How to determine the critical ratios for Fuzzy Delphi method? International Journal of Intelligent Technologies and Applied Statistics, 13(3), 257-266.
    Lincht, A. N. (2014). Culture and law in corporate governance. Electronic Journal, p1-48. https:// 10.2139/ssrn.2405538
    Lindblad, S., Johannesson, I. A., & Simola, H. (2002). Education governance in transition: An Introduction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,46(3), 237-245.
    Lingard, B., Hayes, D., & Mills, M. (2002). Developments in school- based
    management: The specific case of Queensland, Australia. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(1), 6-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210415625
    *Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as Numbers: Ac/Counting for Educational Research. Australian Educational Researcher, 38(4), 355-382.
    Lingard, B., Martino, W., & Rezi-Rashti, G. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 539-556.
    Linstone, H., & Turoff, M. (2002). Introduction. In H. A. Linstone & M. Turoff (Eds.), The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Journal of Marketing(pp. 3-12). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
    http://www.foresight.pl/assets/downloads/publications/Turoff_Linstone.pdfLiu, Z., Wong, H., & Liu, J. (2023). Why do social workers leave? A moderated mediation of professionalism, job satisfaction, and managerialism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthm, 20(230), 1-16.
    Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010230
    Lopez, M. (2022). The effect of sampling mode on response rate and bias in elite surveys. Quality & Quantity, 57, 1301-1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01406-9
    Luschei, T. F., & Jeong, D. W. (2021). School Governance and Student Achievement: Cross-National Evidence From the 2015 PISA. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(3), 331-371.
    Lynch, K. (2014). New managerialism: The impact on education. Concept, 5(3), 1-11.
    Marcuse, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced. Industrial Society. Routledge
    Meyer, J. W. (1977). The effects of education as an institution. American Journal of. Sociology, 83(1), 55-77.
    Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks. Sage.
    Mills, C. W. (1959) The Sociological Imagination. Oxford University Press
    Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on. our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
    *Mincu, M., & Davies, P. (2021). The governance of a school network and implications for initial teacher education. Journal of Education Policy, 36(3), 436-453.
    Moe, T. M. (1984). The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 739-777.
    Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
    Morris, V. C., & Pai, Y. (1976). Philosophy and the American School Second. University Press Of America
    Mueller, D. C. (1989). Public choice II: A revised edition. Cambridge University Press.
    Muller, D. C. (1979). Public Choice. Cambridge University Press.
    Murray, J. A. H., & Burchfield, R. W. (Eds.). (1971). The Compact Edition of The Oxford English Dictionary, Complete Text Reproduced Micrographically (Vol.1). Oxford University Press.
    Murray, J. (2013). Critical issues facing school leaders concerning data-informed decision-making. School Leadership & Management, 33(2), 169-177.
    Mwanjelwa, M. M. (2019). Assessment of how school governance influences performance in primary schools in Tanzania: A case of government primary schools under the mbeya city [Unpublishes doctoral dissertation]. Tanzania University.
    National Blue Ribbons School. (2022). Current Awardees. https://nationalblueribbonschools.ed.gov
    National Governance Association. (2019). School governance 2020.
    https://www.nga.org.uk/media/1wphywzl/school-governance-2020-full-reportseptember-2020-final.pdf
    Newman, J. (2001). Modernising Governance. Sage.
    Offe, C. (2009). Governance: An “empty signifier” ?. Constellations, 16(4), 550-562.
    Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills.(2023). School. inspection handbook. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/schoolinspection-handbook-eif/school-inspection-handbook-for-september-2023
    Office of the secretary-general of the European schools. (2019). Common framework. for whole school inspections in primary and secondary cycles.
    https://www.eursc.eu/BasicTexts/2019-09-D-24-en-5.pdf
    Olssen, M., Codd, J., & O’Neill, A. (2004). Education policy: Globalization,
    citizenship and democracy. Sage.
    *Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313-345.
    Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Sampling designs in qualitative research: Making the sampling process more public. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 238-254. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1636
    Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1995). Governance in transition: Public management reforms in OECD countries.
    Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 results: What makes schools successful (Volume IV). https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264201156-en.pdf?expires=1724596844&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=E6076B09763292F2755E3261A1046143
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (Ed.). (2020a). Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. Talis 2018 results-Volume II. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (Ed.). (2020b). Education in Saudi Arabia. Review of National Policies for Education.
    https://doi.org/10.1787/76df15a2-en
    Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Penguin Books.
    Ostroff, F. (1999). The horizontal organization: What the organization of the future actually looks like and how it delivers value to customers. Oxford University Press.
    Overman, E. S., & Boyd, K. J. (1994). Best practice research and post bureaucratic reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 4(1), 67-83.
    Oxford University Press (n.d.). Oxford languages. Retrieved Jan. 31, 2023, from
    https://www.google.com/search?q=governance+dictionary&client=safari&bih=696&biw=1 043&hl=zh-TW&ei=nQ3YY-WWCIaZ-AbRvoqIAQ&oq=governance+dict&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAQARgAMgUIABCA
    *Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self‐evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930902733121
    Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hrobjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A.,
    Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The
    PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews, Plos Medicine, 18(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pmed.1003583
    Parsons, W. (1995). Public policy: An introduction to theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing Company.
    Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage.
    Peralta, X., & Morquecho, W. (2022, March 7-8). Critical governance dimensions of public higher education institutions comparision in Ecuador, A retro perspective. [Paper presentation]. 16th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Online conference. http:/doi.org/10.21125/inted.2022.2395
    Peters, R. S. (1966). Ethics and education. Allen & Unwin.
    Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 223-243. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024379
    Peters, B. G. (1999). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. Pinter. Edward Elgar.
    Peterson, P. E., & West, M. R. (2003). No Child Left Behind? The politics and practice of accountability. Brookings.
    Plato. (1888). The Republic of Plato. (B. Jowett, Trans.). Oxford at the Clarendon Press. (Original work published c.375 B.C.)
    Plato. (1894a). Plato’s republic. The Greek text. Vol.I (B. Jowett, & L. Campbell. Trans.). Clarendon press. (Original work published c.375 B.C.)
    Plato. (1894b). Plato’s republic. The Greek text. Vol.III (B. Jowett, & L. Campbell.Trans.). Clarendon press. (Original work published c.375 B.C.)
    Plato. (1991). The Republic of Plato. (A. Bloom, Trans.). Basic Books Press.
    (Original work published c.375 B.C.)
    Pollitt, C. (1993). Managerialism and the public services. Blackwell.
    Power, M. (1994). The audit society: The rituals of verification. Oxford University. Press.
    Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. Macmillan.
    Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics. Journal of.
    Documentation, 25, 348-349.
    *Ramiel, H., & Lefstein, A. (2022). Bottom-up governance: Discourse, practices and the duality of the state. Cambridge Journal of Education, 52(2), 217-233.
    Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic model for some intelligence and achievement tests. University of Chicago Press.
    *Ravitch, D. (2010). The Death and Life of the Great American School System. Basic Books.
    Reza, K., & Vassilis, S. M. (1988). Delphi hierarchy process (DHP): A methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi method and analytical hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 137, 347-354.
    Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44, 652-667.
    Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability. Open University Press.
    Risteska, M., Mickovskall, A., & Kraja, M. (2010). Good governance in education case studies: Municipalities of Kisela Voda, Kriva Palanka, Vrapchishte, Bitola, Strumica, Shtip, Kicevo and Veles. Shqipe Gerguri - SEEU.
    Roberts, N. C. (1992). Public entrepreneurship and innovation. Policy Studies Review, 11, 55-74.
    Robertson, S., Bonal, X., & Dale, R. (2006). GATS and the education service
    industry: The politics of scale and global reterritorialization. In H. Lauder, P.
    Brown, J. Dillabough, & A. Halsey (Eds.), Education, globalization & social
    change (pp. 228-246). Oxford University Press.
    Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Braem, P. (1976). Basic Objects in Natural Categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382-439.
    Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal's problem. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 134-139.
    Roubelat, A. M., & Roubelat, F. (2011). The Delphi method as a ritual: Inquiring the Delphi oracle. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1491-1499.
    Roy, T. K., & Garai, A. (2012). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Delphi method: More realistic and interactive forecasting tool. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 18(2), 37-50.
    Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
    Saaty, T. L. (1994). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. interfaces, 24, 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.24.6.19
    Saaty, T. L. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector. necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 85-89.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8
    Sadeghi, B.(2023). Zadeh, Lotfi A. In encyclopedia of mathematical geosciences (pp.1643-1644). Springer International Publishing.
    Safian, M., Ezwan, E., & Nawawi, A. H. (2011). The evolution of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) as a decision making tool in property sectors. International Conference on Management and Artificial Intelligence, 6, 28-31.
    Sandel, M. J. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge University Press.
    Satha-Anand, C. (2010). The Ship and the stranger: A metaphorical approach to governance and Islam. Islam and Civilisational Renewal, 2(1), 46-59, 225.
    Schott, C., van Roekel, H., & Tummers, L. G. (2020). Teacher leadership: A
    systematic review, methodological quality assessment and conceptual
    framework. Educational Research Review, 31, 100352.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100352
    Schumacher, T. (2024). New study finds Wisconsin public schools are some of. The best in the U.S. https://wsau.com/2024/07/25/new-study-finds-wisconsin-publicschools-are-some-of-the-best-in-the-u-s/
    Self, P. (1993). Government by the market: The politics of public choice. Macmillan.
    *Sellar, S. & Lingard, B. (2014). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 917-936.
    Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principal ship: A reflective practice perspective. Allyn & Bacon.
    Shafritz, J. M. (Ed.) (1998). International encyclopedia of public policy and
    administration. Westview Press.
    Shelton, K., & Creghan, K. A. (2015). Demystifying the Delphi Method. Handbook of Research on Scholarly Publishing and Research Methods.
    Shields, J., & Evans, B. M. (1998). Shrinking the state: Globalization and public administration “reform.” Hignell Book Printing.
    Shilbury, D., & Ferkins, L. (2011). Professionalisation, sport governance and strategic capability. Managing Leisure, 16(2), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2011.559090
    Shin, K. Y. (2015). Governance. In L. Disch & M. Hawkesworth (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory (pp. 304-325). Oxford Handbooks.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.013.16
    Smeenk, S., Teelken, C., Eisinga, R., & Doorewaard, H. (2009). Managerialism, organizational commitment, and quality of job performances among European University Employees. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 589-607.
    *Smikins, T., Coldron, J., Crawford, M., & Maxwell, B. (2018). Emerging schooling landscapes in England: How primary system leaders are responding to new school groupings. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(3), 331-348.
    Smith, M. L. (2000). Validity and accountability in high-stakes testing, Journal of Education, 51(5), 334-345.
    Stedman, L. C., & Smith, M. (1983). Recent reform proposals for American education. Contemporary Education Review, 2, 85-104.
    Stigler, G. (1975). The citizen and state. University of Chicago Press.
    Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00106
    Stokey, E., & Zeckhauser, R. (1978). A Primer for Policy Analysis. W. W. Norton & Company.
    *Sturrock, P. A. (2022) Neutrino-flux variability, nuclear-decay variability, and their. apparent relationship. Space Science Reviews, 218(23), 22-23.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-022-00878-3
    Suken, A., Sanrattana, W., Suwannoi, P. (2020). Indicators of good governance for. administrators of the primary educational service area office. International Education Studies, 13(4), 84-93.
    Sullivan elementary school. (2024a). Student Handbook. https://www.sdoj.org/cms_files/resources/2024-25%20Elementary%20School%20Student%20Handbook.pdf
    Sullivan elementary school. (2024b). 2017-2024 Strategic plan. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VA1UMLw2lxliloIoWfyNrLBXPDzRx5Sp/view
    Supriadi, D., Usman, H., Jabar, A., Widyastuti, I. (2021). Good school governance: An approach to principal’s decision-making quality in Indonesian vocational school. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 6(4),796-831.
    Tansey, O. (2007). Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling. Political Science & Politics, 40(4), 765–72.
    Tao, C. Y. H. (2020). A comparative study of higher of higher education governance in greater China. International Dialogue on Education, 7(1), 162-180.
    The Commission on Global Governance. (1995). Our Global Neighborhood. Oxford University Press.
    The Education Review Office. (2016). School evaluation indicators. https://ero.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2021-04/School%20Evaluation%20Indicators%202016_0.pdf
    The National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Education Reform. United State.
    Tight, M. (2019). Documentary research in the social sciences. Sage.
    Tommaso, A. (2011). How competition affects schools’ performances: Does. specification matter? Economics Letters, 110(3), 259-261.
    Turnbull, B. J. (1985). Using governance and support systems to advance school. improvement. Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.1086/461409
    Tyndale, W. (1528). The obedience of a Christian man and Christian rulers ought to govern. Benediction Books.
    UChicago Impact (2019). The 5 Essentials Framework. https://uchicagoimpact.org/sites/default/files/5eframework_outreach%26marketing%20%281%29.pdf
    United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Pacific. (2009). What is good governance. Retrieved from https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf
    U. S. Department of Education. (2007). State and local implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, Volume II.
    https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/teaching/nclb/execsum.html
    U. S. Department of Education. (2020). Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).
    https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/index.html
    U. S. Department of Education. (2022). Secretary Miguel Cardona Announces 2024 Back to School Bus Tour. https://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/secretary-miguel-cardona-announces-2024-back-school-bus-tour
    U. S. Department of Education. (2024). National Blue Ribbon School Program Awards. https://www2.ed.gov/programs/nclbbrs/2022/index.html
    Usman, Y. D. (2016). Accountability in education: An imperative for service delivery in Nigerian school systems. Akwanga Journal of Education and Research, 1(1), 264-272.
    United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2009). What Is Good Governance? https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/goodgovernance.pdf
    Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229-241.
    Vargas-Hernandez, J. G., & Vargas-Gonzalez, O. C. (2022). Participatory governance for institutional transformation. In J. E. Howard (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Transforming Government, Nonprofits, and Healthcare in a Post-Pandemic Era (pp. 131-149). IGI Global.
    Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2019). Reforming governance through policy instruments: How and to what extent standards, tests and accountability in education spread worldwide. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40, 248-270.
    Vickers, J., & Yarrow, G. (1988). Privatisation: An economic analysis. MIT Press.
    Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Meiri, S. (2008). New public management values and Person-Organization Fit: A socio-psychological approach and empirical examination among public sector personnel. Public Administration, 86(1), 111-131.
    https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00703.x
    Voskoglou, M. G. (2020). A philosophical treatise and educational aspects on Fuzzy control. WSEAS Transactions on Systems, 19, 295-300.
    Vries, J. (2010). In new public management really dead? OECD Journal on
    Budgeting, 1, 1-5.
    Wagner, S. M. (2006). A firm’s responses to deficient suppliers and competitive. advantage. Journal of Business Research, 59 (6), 686–695.
    Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis. Duke University Press.
    Walsh, K. (1995). Public services and market mechanisms: Competition, contracting and the new public management. Macmillan.
    Wallace, M. (1987). A historical review of action research: Some implications for the education of teachers in their managerial role. Journal of Education for Teaching, 13(2), 97-115.
    Webster, J. and Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26, 13-23.
    Wilkins, A., Collet- Sabe, J., Gobby, Brad., & Hangartner, J. (2019). Translations of new public management: A decentred approach to school governance in four OECD countries. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 17(2), 147-160.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2019.1588102
    Williamson, O. E. (1981). The modern corporation: Origins, evolution, attributes. journal of economic literature. New York University Press.
    Williamson, O. E. (1986). Economic organization: Firms, markets, and policy control. New York University Press.
    Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus-Logico-Philosophicus. The Edinburgh Press.
    Woolever, R. M., & Scott, K. P. (1988). Active Learning in Social Studies: Promoting Cognitive and Social Growth. Scott Foresman & Co.
    World Bank (1992). Governance and development. Word Bank.
    World Bank (1994). Governance. The world Bank experience. Word Bank.
    Yuner, B., & Burgaz, B. (2019). Evaluation of the relationship between school governance and school climate. Education and Science, 44(199), 373-390.
    Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information Control, 8, 338-353.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
    Zadeh, L. A. (1973). Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems. and decision processes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3, 28-44. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1973.5408575
    Zadeh, L. A. (1975a). Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning: In memory of Grigore Moisil. Synthese, 30, 407-428.
    Zadeh, L. A. (1975b). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-II. Information sciences, 8(4), 301-357.
    Zadeh, L. A. (2023). Fuzzy logic. In Granular, Fuzzy, and Soft Computing (pp. 19-49). Springer US.
    Zimmermann, H. J. (2010). Fuzzy set theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(3), 317-332.
    備註：*表示此為文獻計量分析書目之一__
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育行政與政策研究所
    109171004
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109171004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Educational Administration and Policy] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    100401.pdf13586KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback