English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112704/143671 (78%)
Visitors : 49771933      Online Users : 466
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/153331
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153331


    Title: 企業ESG表現與租稅規避之關聯性探討
    The Association between ESG Performance and Tax Avoidance Behavior
    Authors: 楊絲婷
    Yang, Ssu-Ting
    Contributors: 許崇源
    Hsu, Chung-Yuan
    楊絲婷
    Yang, Ssu-Ting
    Keywords: ESG
    租稅規避
    有效稅率
    財稅差異
    ESG
    Tax avoidance
    Effective tax rate
    Book-tax differences
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-09-04 14:47:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討 2020 至 2023 年臺灣上市櫃公司之 ESG 表現與避稅行為間的關聯性,並以有效稅率和財稅差異作為衡量企業避稅程度的代理變數;ESG 的相關資料則取自台灣經濟新報資料庫(TEJ)中 TESG 永續發展指標對於環境構面(E)、社會構面(S)及公司治理構面(G)的綜合及個別績效評分,分數由低至高,範圍介於 0 到 100 分。
    假說一之實證結果顯示,企業之 ESG 綜合績效評分與企業避稅行為存在顯著關聯性,其中與有效稅率呈現顯著負向關係,與財稅差異則呈現顯著正向關係,意即在兩者不同衡量企業避稅程度的代理變數的情況下, ESG 綜合表現愈佳之企業,可能從事愈多的避稅行為,避稅程度愈高。假說二之實證結果顯示,社會構面(S)及公司治理構面(G)與企業避稅行為存在顯著關聯性,與有效稅率呈現顯著負向關係,與財稅差異則呈現顯著正向關係,而環境構面(E)則與企業避稅行為在使用有效稅率衡量下無顯著關聯,使用財稅差異則呈現顯著負向關係。此外,為提升本研究之準確性,在敏感性分析章節,本研究考慮租稅優惠可能對實證結果產生之影響,因此以是否享有較多租稅優惠將樣本區分為兩組重新進行驗證假說一,其結果與實證結果一致。在額外測試章節,本研究使用不同有效稅率的計算方式作為企業避稅程度的代理變數,結果亦與實證結果一致。
    This study investigates the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and tax avoidance behavior of listed companies in Taiwan from 2020 to 2023. The proxies for measuring the degree of tax avoidance are the effective tax rate and book-tax differences. ESG scores are obtained from the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) database, which assesses companies on environmental (E), social (S), and governance (G) dimensions. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicate better performance.
    The empirical results for Hypothesis 1 indicate a significant correlation between a company's overall ESG performance and its tax avoidance behavior, with a significant negative relationship to the effective tax rate and a significant positive relationship to the book-tax difference. This suggests that companies with better ESG performance may engage in more tax avoidance behavior. Furthermore, empirical results for Hypothesis 2 indicate that the social (S) and governance (G) dimensions significantly correlate with tax avoidance, showing a negative relationship with the effective tax rate and a positive relationship with the book-tax difference. However, the environmental (E) dimension lacks significant correlation with tax avoidance when measured by the effective tax rate, but it exhibits a significant negative relationship when measured by book-tax differences.
    In order to enhance accuracy, the study's sensitivity analysis considers the impact of tax incentives, dividing the sample based on the extent of tax incentives received, and revalidates Hypothesis 1, finding consistent results. Additional tests using different methods to calculate the effective tax rate also yield consistent findings.
    Reference: 王肇蘭、蔡怡徵(2016),企業社會責任與財稅差異之關聯,會計審計論叢,第 6 卷第 1 期:1-22。
    汪瑞芝與李佳駿(2019),企業社會責任對避稅行為之影響,證券市場發展季刊,第 1 卷第 1 期:47-86。
    呂倩如、蘇淑慧、李念萍(2019),營運相關及非營運相關之企業社會責任與避稅行為之關聯性,中華會計學刊,15(2):287-327。
    侯啟娉、蔡玉琴、倪伯煌與李子文(2017),財務績效、公司稅與企業社會責任揭露,商管科技季刊,第 18 卷第 1 期:75-100。
    Adhikari, A., Derashid, C., & Zhang, H. (2006). Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public policy, 25(5), 574-595.
    Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial analysts journal, 74(3), 87-103.
    Bankman, J. (1998). The new market in corporate tax shelters. Available at SSRN 103348.
    Baldenius, T., Melumad, N. D., & Reichelstein, S. (2004). Integrating managerial and tax objectives in transfer pricing. The accounting review, 79(3), 591-615.
    Bankman, J. (2004). An academic’s view of the tax shelter battle. The crisis in tax administration, 9-37.
    Bauer, A. M. (2016). Tax avoidance and the implications of weak internal controls. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(2), 449-486.
    Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344.
    Bird, R., & Davis-Nozemack, K. (2018). Tax Avoidance as a Sustainability Problem. Journal of Business Ethics 151, 1009–1025.
    Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.
    Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & society, 38(3), 268-295.
    Carroll, A. B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices.
    Carroll, A. B. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: Perspectives on the CSR construct’s development and future. Business & Society, 60(6), 1258-1278.
    Chatterji, A. K., Durand, R., Levine, D. I., & Touboul, S. (2016). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic management journal, 37(8), 1597-1614.
    Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?. Journal of financial economics, 95(1), 41-61.
    Christians, A. (2013). How Starbucks lost its social license—And paid£ 20 million to get it back. Tax Notes International, 71(7).
    Chih-Wen Mao (2019). Effect of corporate social responsibility on corporate tax avoidance: evidence from a matching approach. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(1), 49-67.
    Davis, A. K., Guenther, D. A., Krull, L. K., & Williams, B. M. (2016). Do socially responsible firms pay more taxes?. The accounting review, 91(1), 47-68.
    Desai, M. A., Foley, C. F., & Hines Jr, J. R. (2006). The demand for tax haven operations. Journal of Public economics, 90(3), 513-531.
    Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of financial Economics, 79(1), 145-179.
    Djankov, S., Ganser, T., McLiesh, C., Ramalho, R., & Shleifer, A. (2010). The effect of corporate taxes on investment and entrepreneurship. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(3), 31-64.
    Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2008). Long‐run corporate tax avoidance. The accounting review, 83(1), 61-82.
    Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2010). The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. The accounting review, 85(4), 1163-1189.
    Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). The impact of a corporate culture of sustainability on corporate behavior and performance (Vol. 17950, No. 1, pp. 2835-2857). Cambridge, MA, USA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Eva López‐González, Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero, & Emma García‐Meca (2019). Does corporate social responsibility affect tax avoidance: Evidence from family firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), 819-831.
    Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
    Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The accounting review, 84(2), 467-496.
    Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management science, 61(11), 2549-2568.
    Ferriani, F., & Natoli, F. (2020). ESG risks in times of Covid-19. Applied Economics Letters, 28(18), 1537-1541.
    Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Barnett, M. L. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and society review, 105(1).
    Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889.
    Graham, J. R., & Tucker, A. L. (2006). Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of financial economics, 81(3), 563-594.
    Graetz, M. J., & Doud, R. (2013). Technological innovation, international competition, and the challenges of international income taxation. Colum. L. Rev., 113, 347.
    Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic management journal, 30(4), 425-445.
    Gupta, S., & Newberry, K. (1997). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of accounting and public policy, 16(1), 1-34.
    Hanlon, M. (2005). The persistence and pricing of earnings, accruals, and cash flows when firms have large book‐tax differences. The accounting review, 80(1), 137-166.
    Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127-178.
    Hartzmark, S. M., & Sussman, A. B. (2019). Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2789-2837.
    Hoi, C. K., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2013). Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) associated with tax avoidance? Evidence from irresponsible CSR activities. The accounting review, 88(6), 2025-2059.
    Huseynov, F., Sardarli, S., & Zhang, W. (2017). Does index addition affect corporate tax avoidance?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 241-259.
    Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In Corporate governance (pp. 77-132). Gower.
    Laguir, I., Staglianò, R., & Elbaz, J. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility affect corporate tax aggressiveness?. Journal of cleaner production, 107, 662-675.
    Lev, B., & Nissim, D. (2004). Taxable income, future earnings, and equity values. The accounting review, 79(4), 1039-1074.
    Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2011). The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of accounting and Public Policy, 30(1), 50-70.
    Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: a test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(1), 75-100.
    Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public policy, 31(1), 86-108.
    Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2015). Is corporate social responsibility performance associated with tax avoidance?. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 439-457.
    Lanis, R., & G. Richardson. (2018). Outside directors, corporate social responsibility performance, and corporate tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance, 33(2), 228-251.
    Li, T. T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D. (2021). ESG: Research progress and future prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), 11663.
    Li, Y., Mao, J., Chen, S., & Yang, D. (2022). Tax-reducing incentive and corporate green performance: What we learn from China. Renewable Energy, 199, 791-802.
    Loebbecke, J. K., Eining, M. M., & Willingham, J. J. (1989). Auditors' Experience with Material Irregularities: Frequency, Nature, and Detectability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9(1).
    López-González, E., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Meca, E. (2019). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A contingency approach. Journal of cleaner production, 211, 1044-1064.
    Low, M. P. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and the evolution of internal corporate social responsibility in 21st century. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 3(1), 56-74.
    Khurana, I. K., & Moser, W. J. (2013). Institutional shareholders’ investment horizons and tax avoidance. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 35 (1), 111-134.
    Kanagaretnam, K., Lee, J., Lim, C. Y., & Lobo, G. J. (2016). Relation between auditor quality and tax aggressiveness: Implications of cross-country institutional differences. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(4), 105-135.
    Kovermann, J., & Velte, P. (2019). The impact of corporate governance on corporate tax avoidance—A literature review. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 36, 100270.
    Kubick, T. R., Lynch, D. P., Mayberry, M. A., & Omer, T. C. (2015). Product market power and tax avoidance: Market leaders, mimicking strategies, and stock returns. The Accounting Review, 90(2), 675-702.
    Manzon Jr, G. B., & Plesko, G. A. (2001). The relation between financial and tax reporting measures of income. Tax L. Rev., 55, 175.
    Menicacci, L., & Simoni, L. (2024). Negative media coverage of ESG issues and corporate tax avoidance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(7), 1-33.
    Mills, L. F. (1998). Book-tax differences and Internal Revenue Service adjustments. Journal of Accounting research, 36(2), 343-356.
    Mills, L., Erickson, M. M., & Maydew, E. L. (1998). Investments in tax planning. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 20(1), 1.
    Neuman, S. S., Omer, T. C., & Schmidt, A. P. (2020). Assessing tax risk: Practitioner perspectives. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(3), 1788-1827.
    Ortas, E., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2020). Bridging the gap between corporate social responsibility performance and tax aggressiveness: The moderating role of national culture. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 33 (4), 825-855.
    Prebble, Z. M., & Prebble, J. (2010). The morality of tax avoidance. Creighton Law Review, 43(3), 693–745.
    Rego, S. O. (2003). Tax‐avoidance activities of US multinational corporations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(4), 805-833.
    Rego, S. O., & Wilson, R. (2009). Executive compensation, tax reporting aggressiveness, and future firm performance. Research Gate.
    Schipper, K. (1989). Earnings management. Accounting horizons, 3(4), 91.
    Scholes, K., Johnson, G., & Whittington, R. (2002). Exploring corporate strategy. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
    Seele, P., & Lock, I. (2015). Instrumental and/or deliberative? A typology of CSR communication tools. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 401-414.
    Slemrod, J., & Yitzhaki, S. (2002). Tax avoidance, evasion, and administration. In Handbook of public economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1423-1470). Elsevier.
    Weisbach, D. A. (2002). Ten truths about tax shelters. Tax Law Review, 55 (2), 215-253.
    Wilson, R. J. (2009). An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. The accounting review, 84(3), 969-999.
    Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Cho, J. H. (2021). The effect of ESG performance on tax avoidance—Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 13(12), 6729.
    Zhang, C., Zhang, S., Lu, P., & Yan, J. (2021). ESG Ratings and Corporate Tax Avoidance--An Analysis based on Chinese A-share Listed Companies. Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research Volume, 3(12).
    Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Taxes and firm size. Journal of accounting and economics, 5, 119-149.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    111353020
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111353020
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    302001.pdf1453KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback