政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/153291

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/153291

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50822600 線上人數 : 677

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 經濟學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/153291

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153291

題名:	台灣薪資不均度的趨勢與來源分解：區分公司間與公司內之薪資不均 Sources of Wage Inequality in Taiwan: Decomposition of Between- and Within-Firm Wage Inequality
作者:	陳褘銘 Chen, Huei-Ming
貢獻者:	黃柏鈞 Huang, Po-Chun 陳褘銘 Chen, Huei-Ming
關鍵詞:	薪資不均公司間變異公司內變異變異數分解 AKM模型分隔效應分類效應 Wage Inequality Between-Firm Variance Within-Firm Variance Variance Decomposition AKM Model Segregation Effect Sorting Effect
日期:	2024
上傳時間:	2024-09-04 14:38:25 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本文利用財政資訊中心（FIA）的資料，探討導致台灣薪資不均上升的因素，特別是比較2004年至2022年間公司間因素或是公司內因素哪一個因素影響較大。研究方法使用了變異數分解和AKM模型來探討分隔效應和分類效應。第一個發現是，從2004年至2022年間，公司間變異的增加在2010年後對總變異的增加有顯著貢獻。第二個發現是，儘管2022年產業內變異的增加值略大於產業間變異的增加值，但產業間變異的成長率高於產業內變異的成長率。第三個發現是，表示相同薪資水平的工作者趨向於一起工作的分隔效應顯著增加。相反地，表示高薪資工作者趨向於在高平均工資企業工作的分類效應大幅減少。 This paper employs data from the Fiscal Information Agency (FIA) to explore the factors contributing to rising wage inequality in Taiwan, specifically examining whether the between-firm factor or within-firm factor plays a larger role between 2004 and 2022. The methods we use are variance decomposition and the AKM model to discuss segregation and sorting effects. The first finding is that between 2004 and 2022, the increase in between-firm variance contributes significantly to the overall variance increase after 2010. The second finding is that the growth rate of between-industry variance is greater than that of within-industry variance, despite the increase in the value of within-industry variance being slightly larger than that of between-industry variance in 2022. The third finding is that the segregation effect, which represents workers of the same wage level tending to work together, has increased significantly. Conversely, the sorting effect, which represents high-wage workers tending to work in high average wage firms, has largely decreased.
參考文獻:	Abowd, J. M., Kramarz, F., and Margolis, D. N. (1999). High wage workers and high wage firms. Econometrica, 67(2):251–333. Akerman, A., Helpman, E., Itskhoki, O., Muendler, M.-A., and Redding, S. (2013). Sources of wage inequality. American Economic Review, 103(3):214–219. Antonczyk, D., DeLeire, T., and Fitzenberger, B. (2018). Polarization and rising wage inequality: comparing the us and germany. Econometrics, 6(2):20. Barrett, A., Callan, T., and Nolan, B. (1999). Rising wage inequality, returns to education and labour market institutions: Evidence from ireland. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 37(1):77–100. Barth, E., Bryson, A., Davis, J. C., and Freeman, R. (2016). It’s where you work: Increases in the dispersion of earnings across establishments and individuals in the united states. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(S2):S67–S97. Blau, F. D. and Kahn, L. M. (1994). Rising wage inequality and the us gender gap. The American Economic Review, 84(2):23–28. Burtless, G. (1995). International trade and the rise in earnings inequality. Journal of economic literature, 33(2):800–816. Card, D., Heining, J., and Kline, P. (2013). Workplace heterogeneity and the rise of west german wage inequality. The Quarterly journal of economics, 128(3):967–1015 Gernandt, J. and Pfeiffer, F. (2007). Rising wage inequality in germany. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 227(4):358–380. Haltiwanger, J. C., Hyatt, H. R., and Spletzer, J. (2022). Industries, mega firms, and increasing inequality. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research. Heathcote, J., Storesletten, K., and Violante, G. (2004). The macroeconomic implications of rising wage inequality in the us. Forthcoming in Journal of Political Economy. Song, J., Price, D. J., Guvenen, F., Bloom, N., and Von Wachter, T. (2019). Firming up inequality. The Quarterly journal of economics, 134(1):1–50. Zwysen, W. (2022). Wage inequality within and between firms: Macroeconomic and institutional drivers in europe. ETUI Research Paper-Working Paper. 葉卉軒 (2023). 學者：所得不均度惡化國內企業薪資制度有「美國化」趨勢.經濟日報. 取自https://money.udn.com/money/story/5648/7610382. 財政部統計處 (2017). 進出口貨品結構性複分類之研修. 陳素玲 and 葉卉軒 (2023). 主計總處統計 408 萬人月薪不到 4.3 萬元貧富差距擴大為4.12 倍.經濟日報. 取自https://money.udn.com/money/story/5648/7610378. 黃芳玫 and 邵紫婷 (2022). 臺灣基本工資調升對薪資不均之影響—2012–2019 實證.Taiwan Economic Forecast & Policy, 53(1).27
描述:	碩士國立政治大學經濟學系 111258018
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111258018
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[經濟學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
801801.pdf		2624Kb	Adobe PDF	0	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋