English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51269978      Online Users : 839
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153286


    Title: 補貼對專利新穎性與研發能力的影響-以HORIZON 2020為例
    The Impact of Subsidies on Patent Novelty and R&D Capability: A Case of Horizon 2020
    Authors: 朱妍儒
    Chu, Yen-Ju
    Contributors: 李浩仲
    李文傑

    Li, Hao-Chung
    Lee, Wen-Chieh

    朱妍儒
    Chu, Yen-Ju
    Keywords: 專利技術重組的新穎性
    專利技術知識起源的新穎性
    專利分析
    技術重組能力
    地理距離
    合作夥伴
    Novelty of Recombination
    Novelty of Technological Origin
    Patent Analysis
    Technological Recombination Capabilities
    Geographical Distance
    Collaboration Partners
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-09-04 14:37:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討了參與歐盟展望2020(H2020)計畫對於專利品質的影響,H2020計畫為歐盟迄今最大規模的研究補助計畫。本文主要透過專利技術重組的新穎性(Novelty of Recombination, NR)和專利技術知識起源的新穎性(Novelty of Technological Origin, NTO)來衡量專利品質。研究問題包括:由H2020計畫產出的專利是否具有更高品質、參與H2020計畫是否能提高參與者的研發能力,特別關注地理距離、技術重組能力及不同合作對象對專利新穎性的影響。研究結果顯示,H2020計畫補貼對於專利新穎性具有顯著正向的影響,並且能提升參與者的研發能力。
    This study examines the impact of participation in the Horizon 2020(H2020) program on patent quality. The H2020 program is the largest research funding program ever launched by the European Union. This paper primarily measures patent quality through the Novelty of Recombination(NR)and the Novelty of Technological Origin (NTO). The research questions include: whether patents produced under the H2020 program exhibit higher quality and whether participation in the H2020 program can enhance the research and development capabilities of the participants. Special attention is given to the influence of geographical distance, technological recombination ability, and different collaboration partners on patent novelty. The results show that the H2020 program funding has a significant positive impact on patent novelty and can enhance the research and development capabilities of the participants.
    Reference: Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630-640.
    Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J. S., Li, D., & Sampat, B. N. (2019). Public R&D investments and private-sector patenting: evidence from NIH funding rules. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(1), 117-152.
    Bloom, N., Schankerman, M., & Van Reenen, J. (2013). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica, 81(4), 1347-1393.
    Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J., & Williams, H. (2019). A toolkit of policies to promote innovation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(3), 163-184.
    Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74.
    Chu, Y., Tian, X., & Wang, W. (2019). Corporate innovation along the supply chain. Management Science, 65(6), 2445-2466.
    Czarnitzki, D., & Licht, G. (2006). Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy: the case of Eastern Germany. Economics of Transition, 14(1), 101-131.
    Dang, J., & Motohashi, K. (2015). Patent statistics: A good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality. China Economic Review, 35, 137-155.
    Dimos, C., & Pugh, G. (2016). The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature. Research Policy, 45(4), 797-815.
    Drejer, I., & Vinding, A. L. (2007). Searching near and far: determinants of innovative firms' propensity to collaborate across geographical distance. Industry and Innovation, 14(3), 259-275.
    Ernst, H. (1997). The use of patent data for technological forecasting: the diffusion of CNC-technology in the machine tool industry. Small Business Economics, 9, 361-381.
    Falvey, R., Foster, N., & Greenaway, D. (2006). Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Review of Development Economics, 10(4), 700-719.
    Gould, D. M., & Gruben, W. C. (1996). The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 48(2), 323-350.
    Griliches, Z. (1958). Research costs and social returns: Hybrid corn and related innovations. Journal of Political Economy, 66(5), 419-431.
    Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., & Hoisl, K. (2013). Knowledge recombination across technological boundaries: Scientists vs. engineers. Management Science, 59(4), 837-851.
    Hirshleifer, D., Hsu, P.-H., & Li, D. (2013). Innovative efficiency and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 107(3), 632-654.
    Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2011). The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9-10), 1168-1177.
    Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. the Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598.
    Jones, C. I. (2016). The facts of economic growth. In Handbook of Macroeconomics (Vol. 2, pp. 3-69). Elsevier.
    Katila, R. (2000). Using patent data to measure innovation performance. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 2(1-3), 180-193.
    Li, X. (2012). Behind the recent surge of Chinese patenting: An institutional view. Research Policy, 41(1), 236-249.
    Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), 297-306.
    Nooteboom, B. (1999). Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy. Research Policy, 28(8), 793-805.
    Popp, D. (2002). Induced innovation and energy prices. American Economic Review, 92(1), 160-180.
    Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Harvard University Press.
    Van Reenen, J., & Steinwender, C. (2019). The intellectual spoils of war? Defense R&D, productivity and international spillovers.
    Verhoeven, D., Bakker, J., & Veugelers, R. (2016). Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators. Research Policy, 45(3), 707-723.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經濟學系
    111258011
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111258011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[經濟學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    801101.pdf595KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback