政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/153253
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51681285      Online Users : 498
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153253


    Title: 大規模住宅綠建築標章評估系統增補研究
    Supplementary Research on the Green Building Certification System for Large-Scale Residential Projects
    Authors: 黃宇彤
    Huang, Yu-Tung
    Contributors: 孫振義
    Sun, Chen-Yi
    黃宇彤
    Huang,Yu-Tung
    Keywords: 大規模住宅
    綠建築
    評估手冊
    生態社區
    Large-scale residential buildings
    Green buildings
    evaluation manual
    ecological community
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-09-04 14:28:07 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 台灣多數大規模住宅(地面層總樓地板面積、基地面積較大之集合住宅社 區)目前多以「綠建築評估手冊-住宿類(EEWH-RS)」版本申請綠建築標章。 然而開發規模較大之住宅對於永續發展之貢獻、應負擔之責任義務及評估標準 等應有別於一般住宿類建築。是以，大規模住宅之綠建築社區，除根據「綠建 築評估手冊-住宿類(EEWH-RS)」外，亦應納入「綠建築評估手冊-社區類 (EEWH-EC)」、「美國 LEED-ND」、「日本 CASBEE-UD」及低碳(低蘊
    含碳)手冊之部分評估條件。即以住宿類升級版(EEWH-RS+)供大規模住宅申 請，方屬合理。
    本研究採用之研究方法為「文獻分析法」、「專家訪談法」及「專家問卷 法」。首先，本研究透過「文獻分析法」蒐集有關於社區及生態社區、台灣及 國外較具指標性之生態社區評估手冊與 2050 淨零碳排之低碳(低蘊含碳)手 冊，檢視當前大規模住宅申請綠建築時應有所調整及增補之評估條件;其次，透 過「專家訪談法」於綠建築相關領域之認知與經驗，建議於綠建築標章評估大 規模住宅之適用條件、現況、及可改善之方向;最後，經由「專家問卷法」得出 應納入大規模住宅申請綠建築時之新增評估條件。
    透過上述研究方法與分析，本研究篩選出除現有之 EEWH-RS 外，未來申 請綠建築標章時應增設 17 項評估項目，供基地面積一公頃以上之大規模住宅使 用，以令其符合低碳目標之路徑。亦即，可賦予大規模住宅較多減碳與環境規 劃義務，讓台灣之綠建築推動更加具體化及目標性，促使國家整體發展更符合 綠建築永續環保及 2050 淨零排放之目標。
    Currently, most large-scale residential developments in Taiwan (those with larger ground floor area and site area) apply for green building certification based on the "Green Building Evaluation Manual - Residential (EEWH-RS)." However, for such large-scale residential developments, the contribution to sustainable development, the responsibilities, and evaluation standards should differ from those of general residential buildings. Therefore, in addition to the "Green Building Evaluation Manual - Residential (EEWH-RS)," large-scale residential communities should also incorporate evaluations from the "Green Building Evaluation Manual - Community (EEWH-EC)," the"LEED-ND" from the USA, the"CASBEE-UD" from Japan , and criteria from low- carbon (low embodied carbon) manuals. An upgraded version of the residential evaluation (EEWH-RS+) for large-scale residential applications is thus considered necessary.
    The research methodology adopted in this study includes "literature analysis," "expert interviews," and "expert questionnaires." Firstly, "literature analysis" is employed to collect information on communities and ecological communities, along with key ecological community evaluation manuals from Taiwan and abroad, as well as low-carbon (low embodied carbon) manuals aimed at achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050. This helps to identify the necessary adjustments and additional evaluation criteria for large-scale residential applications. Secondly, "expert interviews" are conducted to gather insights and suggestions from professionals in the green building field regarding the applicable conditions, current status, and potential improvements for evaluating large-scale residential buildings for green building certification. Lastly, "expert questionnaires" are utilized to determine the additional evaluation criteria that should be included for large-scale residential applications for green building certification.
    Through the research methods and analysis, this study identifies 17 additional evaluation items, beyond those in the EEWH-RS, that should be included for large- scale residential developments with a site area of over one hectare to align with the low- carbon target path. This means that large-scale residential developments can be given more obligations related to carbon reduction and environmental planning, making the promotion of green buildings in Taiwan more concrete and goal-oriented, and aligning national development more closely with sustainable green building and the 2050 net zero emissions target.
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    (一)專書
    文建會，1999，『臺灣社區總體營造的軌跡』。
    內政部建築研究所，2019，『綠建築評估手冊—社區類』。
    內政部建築研究所，2022，『綠建築評估手冊—建築效能評估系統』。
    內政部建築研究所，2023，『綠建築評估手冊—住宿類』。
    內政部建築研究所，2023，『低碳(低蘊涵碳)評估手冊』。
    國家發展委員會，2022，『台灣 2050 淨零排放路徑及策略總說明』。
    (二)期刊論文
    內政部建築研究所，2023，「淨零建築路徑規劃及推動」，『春季號』，21-30。
    方俊德，2023，「台灣淨零碳排路徑初探」，『台灣經濟研究月刊 』 46(1 ): 13-20。
    王小磷、何友鋒、黃晏淨、吳靜宜，2011，「生態城市評估指標體系之研究一 以台中市為例」，『台灣建築學會建築學報』，751:115-134。
    吳桂陽、林家聖，2012，「鄉村型社區永續發展評估與規劃策略之研究—以苗 栗縣黃金小鎮為例」，『臺灣建築建築學報』，79 :25~45 。
    周偉鋒、庄貴陽，2021，「雄安新區零碳城市建設路徑」，『中國人口資源與 環境』，31(9):122-134。
    林朝欽、周新基、李桃生，2004，「營造 e 化生態社區:六龜鄉新林 業夥伴的故 事」，『台灣林業』，30(1):46-54。
    林大惠，2023，「淨零碳排的歷史觀和多元思維」，『師友雙月刊 』，640: 18-22。 孟曉蘭、劉國慶，2011，「永續的城市藍圖—「生態城市」，『中華技術期 刊』，92:46-57。
    倪進誠、林冠慧、張長義，2004，「生態社區之理念探究與城鄉新風貌的架構 初擬」，『環境與世界 』，(10):1-22 。
    徐震，1999，「臺灣社區工作的新形勢與新願景」，『社區發展季刊 』， (88):168-176。
    張珩、邢志航，2004，「生態社區理念於社區環境落實之研究 ─以台南縣鄉村 社區為例」，『建築與規劃學報』，5(1):29-47 。
    張煜權、吳吉祥，2014，「應用模糊德爾菲法評估海岸生態旅遊指標」，『農業工程學報』，60(2):10。
    黃一展，2021，「從綠建築到淨零碳排建築智慧永續的未來城市」，『臺灣能 源期刊 』，8(4): 317-328。
    游以德、呂適仲、王凱民，2003，「鄉村地區發展生態社區選址評估模式之研 究 —以苗栗縣獅潭鄉為例」，『農業經營管理年刊』，(9):132-148。
    羅健文、邱良忠，2015，「應用模糊德爾菲法與分析網路程序法建立 綠色運輸 與遊憩路線規劃指標之研究」，『台灣土地研究』，18(2):81-108。
    (三)碩、博士論文
    林尤麗，2005，「台北市芝山岩生態社區形構歷程之研究」，國立台灣大學地理環境資源學研究所碩士論文:台北。
    簡嘉伶，2021，「營運階段管理與維護隻綠建築標章評估指標研究—以辦公建 築為例」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文:台北。 林致佑，2008，「大台北地區社區型集合住宅管理費用預測模型建構之研究」， 中國文化大學建築及都市計畫研究所碩士論文:台北。
    林展緯，2017 ，「生態社區水環境永續發展-以桃米社區為例」，國立暨南國際 大學土木工程學系博士論文:南投。
    林冠汶，2018，「當代城市永續發展趨勢與主要實踐途徑研究」，國立臺灣科 技大學建築系博士論文:台北。
    陳彥安，2015，「臺灣鄉村型生態社區實踐與推動策略之研究 」，國立政治大 學地政學系碩士論文:台北。
    黃耀群，2007，「集合住宅社區型態與社會活動關係之研究-以台北縣汐止市為 例」，國立台灣大學大里環境資源學研究所碩士論文:台北。
    詹世州，2003，「探討台灣二十一世紀議程-生態理念於小區環境落實之研究— 以台南縣生態小區發展為例」，國立成功大學建築學系碩士論文:台南。
    楊靜怡，2009，「颱洪災害回復力之評估:以台中市、台中縣龍井鄉與東勢鎮 為例」，國立臺北大學不同產與城鄉環境學系碩士論文:台北。
    鄭滄濱，2001，「軟體組織提升人員能力之成熟度模糊評估模式」，陀利臺灣 科技大學資訊管理學系碩士論文:台北。
    (四)其他
    江大樹、方韻喬、張力亞，梁鎧麟，2001，「永續發展之環境治理制度設計研 究-建構生態社區網絡治理機制」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
    林憲德、蔡添璧、何東波、蘇智鋒、莊惠雯，2008，「生態社區評估系統之研 究」，內政部建築研究所委託研究報告。
    林憲德、蔡添璧、張珩、蘇智鋒、莊惠雯、簡君翰、歐瑜媜，2009，「生態社 區評估系統之研究」內政部建築研究所委託研究報告。
    張金鶚，1991，「集合住宅管理維護之研究」，內政部建築研究所研究報告。
    (五)網路資料
    BLab，2021，「全球夯投資房地產科技扭轉氣候危機」。
    低碳建築聯盟 LCBA，2023，建築產業碳足跡評估介紹，低碳建築聯盟網站。 住宅科技，2001，綠色生態住宅小區建設要點技術規則。
    二、外文文獻
    (一)期刊論文
    Ayyoob Sharifi , Akito Murayama,2015, “Viability of using global standards for neighborhood sustainability assessment: insights from a comparative case study.”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(1):1-23.
    Ahmed A. Khalifa ,Abdul-Jalil Ibrahim , Abdulkarem I. Amhamed , Muftah H. El- Naas .,2022, “Accelerating the Transition to a Circular Economy for Net-Zero Emissions by 2050: A Systematic Review. Sustainability” , 14:11656.
    Cairns,G., Wright, G. ,2019, “Making scenario interventions matter: Exploring issues of power and rationality.” Futures & Foresight Science, 1, Article e10.
    Caroline Hachem-Vermette, Francesco Guarino, Vincenzo La Rocca, Maurizio Cellura.,2019, “Towards achieving net-zero energy communities: Investigation of
    design T strategies and seasonal solar collection and storage net-zero. ”,Solar Energy,192 :169–185.
    Claire Copeland , Gordon MacKerron, Timothy J. Foxon.,2023, “Futures for Findhorn: Exploring challenges for achieving net zero in an ecological intentional community.”,Futures,149 :103155.
    Chen-Yi Sun , Te-Chuan Li , You-Yu Chen , Tsun-Chin Wu ,2018, “Smart and Ecological Community Assessment Indicator System of Taipei City. ” Journal of Architrcture, Special Issue onInnovation Low-carbon and Green Building ,106,:41-45. Hirushie Karunathilake , Kasun Hewage , Walter Me rida , Rehan Sadiq ,2019, “Renewable energy selection for net-zero energy communities: Life cycle based decision making under uncertainty.” ,Renewable Energy,130:558-573. Hoff,M.D.,1998, “Sustainable community development –Studies in economic environment and cultural revitalization. ”, New York: Lewis Publishers.
    K.R. Ullah , V. Prodanovic , G. Pignatta , A. Deletic , M. Santamouris .,2021, “Technological advancements towards the net-zero energy communities: A review on 23 case studies around the globe. ”, Solar Energy,224:1107–1126.
    Lützkendorf T. , Balouktsi M.,2019, “On net zero GHG emission targets for climate protection in cities:more questions than answers?”,IOP conference series:earth and environmental science,323:12073.
    Rogelj J , Schaeffer M , Meinshausen M. ,2015, “Zero emission targets as long⁃term global goals for climate protection. ”,Environmental research letters,10(10):105007. Robert W. Hammon Ph.D. ,2010, “Applications for Large Residential Communities: What is Net-zero Energy? ”
    U.S. Green Building Council ,2007,LEED certification for neighborhood development. Young, M. D. ,1992, “Sustainable Investment and Resource Use”, Great Britain, The Parthenon Publishing Group.
    Ya-Hsuan Wang , Stephen Siu Yu Lau,2019, “From Building to Community: The Quest of Urban Eco-Community Development. ”,Journal of Architrcture, Special Issue on Innovative Low-carbon and Green Building, 110:21~31.
    (二)研討會論文
    Carlisle, Nancy, Otto Van Geet, Shanti Pless, 2009, “Definition of a’Zero Net Energy’Community.”
    Bond,Alan,Angus Morrison-Saunders,and Richard Howitt.,2013, “ Sustainability Assessment: Pluralism, Practice and Progress. ”,The Natural and Built Environment Series.
    Dong He., Sen Huang.,Wangda Zuo.,Kaiser Raymond, 2016, “Towards to the development of the of virtual testbed for net zero energy communities. ”
    Sharifi, Ayyoob. ,2013, “Sustainability at the Neighborhood Level: Assessment Tools and the Pursuit of Sustainability.”
    (三)其他
    BRE Group,2012,BREEAM Communities Manual.
    IEA,2021, “Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector.”
    Japan Sustainable Building Consortium (JSBC) and Institute for Building Environment and Energy Conservation(IBEC),2007,CASBEE for Urban Development.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    111257020
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111257020
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Land Economics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    702001.pdf3547KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback