政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/153235
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 51064648      在线人数 : 966
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153235


    题名: 捷運建設計畫納入土地價值獲取方案之審議制度研究
    A Study on the Review System to Incorporate Land Value Capture Program in Mass Rapid Transit Construction Projects
    作者: 蘇偉強
    Su, Wei-Chiang
    贡献者: 賴宗裕
    Lai, Tsung-Yu
    蘇偉強
    Su, Wei-Chiang
    关键词: 捷運建設
    土地價值獲取方案
    自償率
    道德危機
    良善治理
    Mass Rapid Transit
    Land Value Capture
    Self-Liquidation Ratio
    Moral Hazard
    Good Governance
    日期: 2024
    上传时间: 2024-09-04 14:24:43 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 捷運建設計畫經費龐大，地方財政難以獨立負擔，爰得依法向中央主管機關申請計畫型補助，惟卻也形成地方依賴心態。因此，中央自2011年訂定相關制度，要求地方政府於申請捷運建設計畫補助時，須應用土地價值獲取方案（Land Value Capture, LVC）回收捷運建設周邊可能衍生之自償性收益，如土地開發收入、租稅增額、增額容積價金等挹注至計畫當中，並據以計算財務自償率，作為補助與否及補助比例之審議標準，以紓緩財政補助壓力。
    此應用LVC並以自償率作為審議標準之審議制度，雖有助於增加計畫財務自償能力，但同時也成為地方爭取計畫補助的關鍵。本研究認為中央、地方政府及民眾間在捷運建設推動上因具有雙重委託－代理關係，導致具有政治自利動機的地方政府，為配合中央審議要求，恐投機地利用LVC將財務自償率美化至獲取最高補助額度。為證實此結果，本研究進一步就中央與地方政府於審議過程之互動關係，建構完全資訊動態賽局，並利用逆向歸納法求出雙方最終均衡點確實落在地方政府研提符合最高補助門檻之自償率。進而以臺北捷運南北環線為例，最終均衡路徑確實符合本研究之賽局模型分析結果。
    由於這些自償性收益屬未來預期而具高度不確定性，在缺乏公共治理的情形下，無法避免地方政府為核定計畫而誇大與美化財務，將可能的公共債務風險交由未來世代承擔，形成道德危機，呈現財政不永續之問題。爰此，本研究利用公共治理理論之良善治理目標，歸納並研擬財政健康永續之審議制度所需的善治面向與策略，進而利用模糊德爾菲法獲取專家共識，確立應有7大關鍵面向（策略願景、效能、法制化、透明化、回應力、公平性、課責性）及其下20項策略，再藉由層級分析法評定各相對權重及排序關係，最終分析結果顯示「明確財務收益之可實現性」、「確認財政健康及永續性」、「建立明確審查標準以篩選不可行計畫」為前3項重要之策略，凸顯應優先著重審議階段對不可行計畫之篩選。
    最後，為促使政府相關決策更負責、更透明、更具公益性，以建立財政健康、財務永續的捷運建設計畫審議制度，本研究根據善治面向與策略分析結果，提出5項審議制度目標，分別為「避免地方財務美化行為」、「維持地方財政健康」、「確認計畫有效需求」、「確保財務執行績效」及「落實永續營運及管理」，並針對不同審議階段提出應有之10項審議內容，以及相關配套與修法建議，以期能真正達成LVC之目的與功能，並落實地方財政自主與捷運永續營運之目標。
    Mass Rapid Transit projects need massive funding, which local governments are struggling to meet on their own. An application for project grants is required by law to be filed with the central competent authority, but this has also fostered a sense of dependence among local governments. As a result, the central government has established review systems since 2011, requiring local governments to use land value capture (LVC) program to recover self-liquidating income generated by Mass Rapid Transit peripherals when applying for mass rapid transit project grants. For example, income from land development, tax increment, zoning bonuses, and so on is injected into projects, and self-liquidation ratios are calculated as a review criterion for whether or not to offer grants and grant ratios to relieve pressure from financial grants.
    This study concludes that because the central government, local governments, and the general public have a dual principal-agent relationship in the promotion of Mass Rapid Transit, local governments with political self-interest motives are likely to opportunistically use LVC program to exaggerate self-liquidation ratios in order to obtain the maximum grant quota in accordance with the central government’s review requirements. To verify this finding, this study created a game with complete information based on the interaction between central and local governments during the review process. Furthermore, backward induction was used to determine both parties’ final equilibrium points, which coincided with the self-liquidation ratio of the maximum subsidy threshold proposed by the local government. Using the Taipei MRT Circular Line North & South Section as an example, the final equilibrium path was consistent with the game model analysis results from this study.
    Because of the highly uncertain nature of these self-liquidating incomes, local governments will invariably embellish and exaggerate their financial statements in order to approve plans. Future generations will bear the risk of possible public debt, creating a moral hazard and presenting the issue of lacking financial sustainability. In light of this, the aspects and strategies of good governance were summarized and formulated using public governance theories. The fuzzy Delphi method was then used to obtain expert consensus, and the seven key aspects (strategic vision, effectiveness and efficiency, rule of law, transparency, responsiveness, equity, and accountability) were established, along with 20 strategies under each of these aspects. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was subsequently applied to evaluate the relative weights and order relations. The final analysis results indicate that the three most important strategies are to make clear whether finance income is feasible, to verify financial health and sustainability, and to set explicit review criteria to screen projects that are not feasible. They also emphasize prioritizing the screening of projects that are not feasible during the review stages.
    To summarize, five review system objectives were proposed based on the aspects of good governance and strategic analysis results to promote more responsible, transparent, and welfare-based government decisions, as well as to establish a review system for mass rapid transit projects that demonstrate financial robustness and financial sustainability. These objectives include: avoiding exaggerating local finances, maintaining the financial robustness of local governments, confirming the effective requirements of projects, ensuring financial implementation performance, and implementing sustainable operations and management. Furthermore, ten review content items, as well as relevant supporting packages and law amendment recommendations, were proposed to address various review stages. This was done in the hope of substantially achieving LVC objectives and functions, as well as meeting the goals of local government financial autonomy and the sustainable operations of mass rapid transit.
    參考文獻: 一、中文文獻
    Lepage, Henri著、夏道平等譯，1988，自由經濟的魅力：明日資本主義，台北：天下文化。
    Pierre, J. and Peters, B. G.、孫本初等譯，2002，治理、政治與國家，台北：智勝文化。
    王小璘、何友鋒、黃晏淨、吳靜宜，2011，「生態城市評估指標體系之研究－以台中市為例」，建築學報，第75期：115-134。
    王志鋒，2010，城市治理的經濟學分析，北京：北京大學出版社。
    王穆衡、張贊育、張世龍、陳一平，2012，交通建設財務評估之研析，交通部運輸研究所：台北。
    朱景鵬、朱鎮明，2013，「公共治理思潮下之我國地方治理」，公共治理季刊，第1卷，第1期：84-98。
    朱鎮明，2010，「競爭型計畫與臺灣府際夥伴關係的實踐」，公共行政學報，第37期：71-110。
    朱鎮明，2017，「府際關係與跨域治理中｢跨域性」之研究－以『跨域加值公共建設財務規劃方案』為核心」，競爭力評論，第20期：13-41。
    江岷欽、劉坤億，1999，企業型政府：理念、實務、省思，台北：智勝文化。
    行政院，2010，國土空間發展策略計畫(核定本)。
    行政院，2012，跨域加值公共建設財務規劃方案(核定本)。
    吳秀光、吳宗憲，2008，「台北市政府促進民間參與公共建設政策之研究」，政策研究學報，第8期：23-75。
    吳偉寧，2005，「財政規範與平衡預算之研究—以臺灣控制預算赤字的經驗為例」，國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文：新北。
    呂育誠，2007，「地方治理意涵及其制度建立策略之研究－兼論我國縣市推動地方治理的問題與前景」，公共行政學報，第14期：1-38。
    宋餘俠、胡雅芳，2013，「公共治理與行政院組織體制及職能調整」，公共治理季刊，第1卷，第1期：61-72。
    李宜臻，2023，「自償性公共建設之探討－以新北市捷運建設計畫為例」，國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文：新北。
    李武育，2012，「行政院組織改造之成果及挑戰」，研考雙月刊，第36卷，第6期：34-41。
    李顯峰、林育君，2006，「台灣地方財政之結構性因素分析」，財稅研究，第38卷，第5期：17-43。
    周治邦，2017，賽局理論，台北：華泰文化。
    林宏儒，2017，「公共建設過度產出之研究－公共選擇觀點」，國立臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系碩士論文：新北。
    林谷蓉，2005，中央與地方權限衝突，台北：五南出版。
    林明鏘，2017，「國家與地方自治團體之關係」，東吳公法論叢，第10卷：207-240。
    林恭正，2018，「地方財政狀況評估介紹」，主計月刊，第745期：50-55。
    林恭正、姚名鴻、黃崇哲、蘇建榮，2015，「直轄市及縣（市）政府財政指標建置之初探」，財稅研究，第44卷，第1期：1-27。
    林恭正、劉品柔，2015，「地方政府財政永續性之實證研究」，財稅研究，第44卷，第3期：71-93。
    林健次、蔡吉源，1999，「財政賽局：零和？正和？負和？論統籌分配稅款及財政收支劃分法」，財稅研究，第31卷，第3期：1-11。
    林健次、蔡吉源，2003，「地方財政自我負責機制與財政收支劃分」，公共行政學報，第9期：1-33。
    林慶隆，2013，「政府審計在公共治理之角色與功能」，公共治理季刊，第1卷，第3期：58-73。
    林錫俊，1998，地方財政管理，高雄：復文圖書。
    俞可平，2000，治理與善治，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。
    姚名鴻，2011，「我國地方財政赤字之理論與實證分析」，公共行政學報，第39期：37-70。
    姚名鴻，2012，「我國一般性與計畫型補助款分配之政治經濟分析」，臺灣民主季刊，第9卷，第4期：191-225。
    姚名鴻、林倩如，2014，「我國地方財政努力及其影響因素之實證研究」，財稅研究，第43卷，第4期：43-71。
    柯于璋，2013，「政府委託研究案代理問題之探討：一個結合賽局理論與代理人理論的研究取向」，行政暨政策學報，第57期：1-35。
    紀俊臣、黃絲梅，2016，「臺灣地方自有財源的開拓策略與政策合法化：財政收支劃分法與地方稅法通則之修正取向」，中國地方自治，第69卷，第6期：3-35。
    孫本初，2013，新公共管理，第五版，台北：一品文化。
    徐仁輝，1995，「新制度經濟學與公共行政」，世新學報，第5期：273-288。
    徐仁輝，1996，「制度與官僚的預算行為」，空大行政學報，第5期：43-66。
    徐仁輝，2001，「地方政府支出預算決策的研究」，公共行政學報，第5期：1-17。
    徐仁輝，2006，「當代預算改革的成效－新制度經濟學的觀點」，財稅研究，第38卷，第3期：83-96。
    徐仁輝，2015，「六都後中央與地方財政關係的探討」，財稅研究，第44卷，第2期：1-16。
    財政部國庫署，2010，98年度國庫署年報，台北：財政部國庫署編印。
    馬祖琦，2011，「公共投資的溢價回收模式及其分配機制」，城市問題，第3期：2-9。
    高美莉，2006，「中央與地方府際衝突之研究」，國立政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所博士論文：台北。
    康照宗、馮正民、陳佑昇，2019，「交通建設計畫之價值回饋與財務自償及風險分析研究：以租稅增額融資為例」，運輸計劃季刊，第48卷，第3期：219-252。
    康照宗、馮正民、彭怡翠、陳佑昇，2024，「以土地開發與租稅增額融資機制挹注於捷運建設計畫財務及風險分析」，都市與計劃，第51卷，第1期：52-92。
    張四明、胡龍騰，2013，「後新公共管理時期政府績效管理的公共價值意涵」，公共治理季刊，第1卷，第1期：73-83。
    張李淑容，2007，「我國財政制度對地方發展影響之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系博士論文：台北。
    張李淑容、劉小蘭，2010，「我國地方財政制度對地方經濟成長之影響分析」，台灣土地研究，第13卷，第1期：69-94。
    張紹勳，2012，模糊多準則評估法及統計，台北：五南出版。
    張維迎，2004，博弈論與信息經濟學，上海：上海人民出版社。
    張魁峯，2017，Super Decisions軟體操作手册：以ANP突破AHP的硏究限制，二版，台北：鼎茂圖書。
    許竹筌、黃金樹，2005，「中國中央政府與地方政府之間財政行為的賽局分析」，育達學院學報，第9期：207-222。
    許義忠、廖君華、廖素玉，2011，「財政自主與地方經濟發展之研究」，財稅研究，第47卷，第4期：73-96。
    郭昱瑩，2008，「財政職能與財政政策之析論」，研考雙月刊，第32卷，第2期：30-40。
    郭昱瑩、洪綾君，2012，「行政及政策類委託研究計畫適用政府採購法問題之探討：代理人理論觀點」，競爭力評論，第15期：7-40。
    郭翡玉、宋玉珍，2014，「整合中央補助型計畫資源 提升公共建設效能」，公共治理季刊，第2卷，第4期：91-95。
    郭銘峰、蔣林秀、黃心怡，2023，「妥協的集體與貪婪的個人：透明、課責與反貪的交織效果」，人文及社會科學集刊，第35卷，第2期：209-261。
    陳天賜、徐榮崇，1995，「我國交通建設之財務自償率探究」，臺灣銀行季刊，46(1)：1-14。
    陳抗、Hillman, A. L.、顧清揚，2002，「財政集權與地方政府行為變化-從援助之手到攫取之手」，經濟學季刊，第2卷，第1期：111-130。
    陳武正，2010，研析軌道建設計畫經費補助方案，行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究案：台北。
    陳金貴，2013，「治理之理論與發展」，公共治理季刊，第1卷，第1期：25-36。
    陳海雄，2005，「中央計畫型補助制度執行力之探討」，研考雙月刊，第29卷，第2期：61-72。
    陳敦源，2000，「誰掌控官僚體系？從代理人理論看台灣官僚體系的政治控制問題」，公共行政學報，第4期：99-130。
    陳廣勝，2007，走向善治：中國地方政府的模式創新，杭州：浙江大學出版社。
    陳慧君，2012，「論國內捷運建設之制度變遷與代理問題」，土地問題研究季刊，第11卷，第1期：64-79。
    陳慧君，2013，「捷運建設制度及其補助模式之代理問題分析」，土地經濟年刊，第24期：33-62。
    陳耀茂，2011，決策方法與應用，台北：鼎茂圖書。
    傅彥凱，2003，「選舉與財政政策制定－臺灣政治預算循環之實證分析」，國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系博士論文：新北。
    曾巨威，2008，如何透過中央統籌分配稅款及補助款之分配激勵地方政府開闢財源，台北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。
    曾佑文，2012，「我國中央政府公共建設決策研究初探」，國立成功大學建築學系碩士論文：台南。
    曾偉豪，2007，「鐵路地下化預算規劃之交易成本政治學分析」，政治科學論叢，第33期：43-82。
    馮正民，2012，「『跨域加值公共建設財務規劃方案』之評析」，台灣經濟論衡，第10卷，第8期：39-44。
    黃彥斌，2001，「政府預算制度與政策的形成─理性或是權力」，國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策研究所碩士論文：台北。
    黃勝傑，2010，「河濱型自行車道之環境評估─以臺北縣市為例」，國立臺北教育大學教育學院社會與區域發展學系碩士論文：台北。
    葉晉嘉、翁興利、吳濟華，2007，「德菲法與模糊德菲法之比較研究」，調查研究－方法與應用，第21期：31-58。
    廖坤榮，2005，「台灣農會信用部經營管理的道德危險研究」，公共行政學報，第17期：83-112。
    廖唯傑，2016，「影響台灣地方政府債務的財政與政治因素之探討」，國立臺灣大學公共事務研究所：台北。
    廖欽福，2019，「中央與地方『交通』權限劃分與財政分配－從台中山手線鐵路到高雄二期輕軌捷運之爭議談起」，台灣法學雜誌，第364期：1-10。
    廖麗娟、林芳如、謝叔芳，2012，「優質公共治理發展趨勢與我國推動作法」，公共治理與審計，第32卷，第2期：26-42。
    廖麗琴，2010，「公共政治經濟學之回顧」，亞太經濟管理評論，第14卷，第1期：113-131。
    劉其昌，1995，財政學，台北：五南出版。
    劉坤億，2003，「地方治理與地方政府角色職能的轉變」，空大行政學報，第13期：233-267。
    劉淑妍，2010，公眾參與導向的城市治理：利益相關者分析視角，上海：同濟大學出版社。
    樊沁萍，2023，賽局理論，台北：雙葉書廊。
    蔡美娜，2008，「中央政府財政資訊透明度之研究」，國立臺灣大學政治學系碩士論文：台北。
    蔡茂寅，2015，「財政收支劃分之制度與法理（下）」，月旦法學教室，第158期：39-50。
    蔡智強，2007，「我國地方政府預算決策過程之研究－新制度經濟學中代理人理論的運用」，國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文：高雄。
    蔡馨芳，2015，「臺灣財政失衡下之預算決策分析：政治經濟學之詮釋」，民主與治理，第2卷，第2期：83-114。
    鄧振源，2012，多準則決策分析方法與應用，台北：鼎茂圖書。
    鄭淳方，2015，「捷運建設財務規劃管考機制之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文：台北。
    賴宗裕，2011，捷運建設自償率門檻值、補助比例、補助項目及標準等分析建議，中興工程顧問股份有限公司：台北。
    賴宗裕、蘇偉強，2013，「跨域加值公共建設財務規劃方案問題之探討」，公共行政學報，第45期：41-74。
    賴宗裕、蘇偉強、簡龍鳳，2012，「稅收增額融資（TIF）納入捷運建設計畫審查制度之財務分析」，運輸計劃季刊，第41卷，第1期：33-53。
    謝文盛、歐俊男，2003，「台灣地區政黨政治對地方政府補助收入影響之研究」，問題與研究，第42卷，第6期：97-111。
    簡龍鳳，2004，「論中央主政捷運建設暨土地開發規定之妥適性」，土地問題研究季刊，第3卷，第3期：75-81。
    簡龍鳳，2008，「民間參與捷運場站土地開發模式之制度經濟分析」，國立政治大學地政學系博士論文：台北。
    簡龍鳳、徐國城，2019，「以賽局理論建立捷運車站開發審議之協議機制」，都市與計劃，第46卷，第4期：249-270。
    簡龍鳳、賴宗裕，2006，「以代理理論觀點探討民間參與區段徵收開發之規模」，都市與計劃，第33卷，第3期：169-188。
    簡龍鳳、賴宗裕，2010，「以賽局觀點探討私有土地參與捷運場站開發制度之研究」，都市與計劃，第37卷，第4期：455-479。
    簡龍鳳、賴宗裕，2012，「民間參與捷運場站土地開發制度之委託代理分析」，東吳政治學報，第30卷，第1期：134-187。
    蘇文樹、蘇煥文，2014，「中央各部會對地方計畫型補助款之探討」，主計月刊，第706期：28-34。
    蘇偉強，2024，「應用土地價值獲取方案籌措大眾捷運建設計畫資金之中央與地方政府賽局分析」，土地經濟年刊，第35期：已接受。
    蘇彩足，2013，「我國公共治理之挑戰與因應」，公共治理季刊，第1卷，第1期：52-60。

    二、外文文獻
    Agere, S., 2000, Promoting Good Governance: Principles, Practices and Perspectives, London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
    Aldrete, R., Salgad, D., Bishop T., and Natzke, S., 2022, Assessing Value Capture Risks: A Primer. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
    Alterman, R., 2012, “Land Use Regulations and Property Values: the “Windfalls Capture” Idea,” pp. 755-786 in The Oxford Handbook of Urban Economics and Planning, edited by Brooks, N., Donaghy, K., and Knaap, G.-J., New York: Oxford University Press.
    Aveline-Dubach, N. and Blandeau, G., 2019, “The Political Economy of Transit Value Capture: The Changing Business Model of the MTRC in Hong Kong,” Urban Studies, 56(16): 3415-3431.
    Bahl, R. W., Linn, J. F., and Wetzel, D. L., 2013, “Governing and Financing Metropolitan Areas in the Developing World,” pp. 85-106 in Financing Metropolitan Governments in Developing Countries, edited by Bahl, R. W., Linn, J. F., and Wetzel, D. L., Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
    Beswick, J. and Penny, J., 2018, “Demolishing the Present to Sell off the Future? The Emergence of “Financialized Municipal Entrepreneurialism” in London,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(4): 612-632.
    Bevir, M., 2009, Key Concepts in Governance, London: SAGE Publications.
    Bhagwan, V., 2007, “Corruption & Good Governance,” The Indian Journal of Political Science, 68(4): 727-738.
    Bland, R. and Overton, M., 2016, “Assessing the Contributions of Collaborators in Public–Private Partnerships: Evidence from Tax Increment Financing,” The American Review of Public Administration, 46(4): 418-435.
    Bosselmann, K., Engel, R., and Taylor, P., 2008, Governance for Sustainability: Issues, Challenges, Successes, Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature.
    Briffault, R., 2010, “The Most Popular Tool: Tax Increment Financing and the Political Economy of Local Government,” The University of Chicago Law Review, 77(1): 65-95.
    Cervero, R. and Murakami, J., 2009, “Rail and Property Development in Hong Kong: Experiences and Extensions,” Urban Studies, 46(10): 2019-2043.
    Cervero, R., 2004, “Effects of Light and Commuter Rail Transit on Land Prices: Experiences in San Diego County,” Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, 43(1): 121-138.
    Chapman, J. I. and Gorina, E., 2012, “Municipal Fiscal Stress and the Use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF),” The Town Planning Review, 83(2): 195-203.
    Debrezion, G., Pels, E., and Rietveld, P., 2007, “The Impact of Railway Stations on Residential and Commercial Property Value: A Meta-Analysis,” The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 35: 161-180.
    Debrezion, G., Pels, E., and Rietveld, P., 2011, “The Impact of Rail Transport on Real Estate Prices: An Empirical Analysis of the Dutch Housing Market,” Urban Studies, 48(5), 997-1015.
    Doherty, M., 2004, Funding Public Transport Development through Land Value Capture Programs, Technical Report, Sydney: The Institute for Sustainable Futures.
    Downs, A., 1957, “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy,” Journal of Political Economy, 65(2): 135-150.
    Du, H. and Mulley, C., 2007, “The Short-Term Land Value Impacts of Urban Rail Transit; Quantitative Evidence from Sunderland, UK,” Land Use Policy, 24: 223-233.
    Du, H. and Mulley, C., 2012, “Understanding Spatial Variations in the Impact of Accessibility on Land Value Using Geographically Weighted Regression,” Journal of Transport and Land Use, 5(2): 46-59.
    Dye, R.F., and Merriman, D.F., 2000, “The effects of tax increment financing on economic development,” Journal of Urban Economics, 47(2): 306-328.
    El-Nagdy, M. and Ibrahim, A., 2019, “Land Value Capture as a New Sustainable Financing Mechanism for Public Transit Development in New Cities: Borg El-Arab New City as a Case Study,” pp. 71-100 in New Cities and Community Extensions in Egypt and the Middle East: Visions and Challenges, edited by Attia, S., Shafik, Z., and Ibrahim, A., United States: Springer.
    Fainstein, S., 2012, “Land Value Capture and Justice,” pp. 21-40 in Value Capture and Land Policies, edited by Ingram, G. and Hong, Y., Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
    Fetter, J., 2023, “Does Tax Increment Financing Lead to Gentrification? A Spatial Regression Analysis of Saint Louis, Missouri,” Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University, Missouri.
    Fisher, B., Leite, F., and Weber, R., 2023, “Value Creation, Capture, and Destruction,” Journal of the American Planning Association, 89(1): 134-145.
    Forouhar, A. and Hasankhani, M., 2018, “The Effect of Tehran Metro Rail System on Residential Property Values: A Comparative Analysis between High-Income and Low-Income Neighbourhoods,” Urban Studies, 55(16): 3503-3524.
    Forouhar, A. and van Lierop, D., 2021, “If You Build It, They Will Change: Evaluating the Impact of Commuter Rail Stations on Real Estate Values and Neighborhood Composition in the Rotterdam - The Hague Metropolitan Area, the Netherlands,” Journal of Transport and Land Use, 14(1), 949-973.
    Fox, J., 2007, “The Uncertain Relationship between Transparency and Accountability,” Development in Practice, 17: 663-671.
    Green, K., 2005, “Decentralization and Good Governance: The Case of Indonesia,” MPRA Paper 18097, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Greenbaum, R. T. and Landers, J., 2014, “The Tiff Over TIF: A Review of the Literature Examining the Effectiveness of the Tax Increment Financing,” National Tax Journal, 67(3): 655-674.
    Grengs, J., 2005, “The Abandoned Social Goals of Public Transit in the Neoliberal City of the USA,” City, 9(1): 51-66.
    Guo, R., 2018, Cross-Border Resource Management, Third Edition, Elsevier: Netherlands, 109-137.
    Haggard, S. and Simmons, B. A., 1987, “Theories of International Regimes,” International Organization 41(3): 491-517.
    Holzhacker, R. L., Wittek, R., and Woltjer, J., 2015, “Decentralization and Governance for Sustainable Society in Indonesia,” pp. 3-29 in Decentralization and Governance in Indonesia, edited by Holzhacker, R. L., Wittek, R., and Woltjer, J., Switzerland: Springer.
    Hubaib, F., Pujiastuti, N., Ghufron, Bazarah, J., and Rachman, M., 2023, Implementation Of Good Governance In Public Services, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 12(1): 41-49.
    Huston, S. H. and Lahbash, E., 2018, “Land Value Capture and Tax Increment Financing: Overview and Considerations for Sustainable Urban Investment,” European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2(3): 1-9.
    Hwang, J. and Akdede, S. H., 2011, “The Influence of Governance on Public Sector Efficiency: A Cross-Country Analysis,” The Social Science Journal, 48(4): 735-738.
    Infrastructure Victoria, 2016, Value capture－Options, Challenges and Opportunities for Victoria: Policy Paper, Melbourne: Infrastructure Victoria.
    Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H., 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
    Jessop, B., 1998, “The Rise of Governance and the Risks of Failure: The Case of Economic Development,” International Social Science Journal, 50(155): 29-45.
    Kapoor, S. S. and Brar, T. S, 2022, “Land Value Capture and Transit Oriented Development (TOD): A Comparative Review of Indian TOD Policies Measures,” International Journal of Management and Humanities, 8(7): 1-7.
    Kardos, M., 2012, “The Reflection of Good Governance in Sustainable Development Strategies,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58: 1166-1173.
    Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M., 2010, The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430.
    Keping, Y, 2018, “Governance and Good Governance: A New Framework for Political Analysis,” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11: 1-8.
    Kerth, R. and Meiffren, C., 2012, Cleaning up Tax Increment Financing: Rethinking Chicago’s Troubled Redevelopment Program, Illinois: Illinois PIRG Education Fund.
    Kim, M., 2020, “Upzoning and Value Capture: How US Local Governments Use Land Use Regulation Power to Create and Capture Value from Real Estate Developments,” Land Use Policy, 95: 1-12.
    Kjær, S. M., 2004, Governance, Cambridge UK: Polity Press.
    Kraan, D. J., 1996, Budgetary Decisions: A Public Choice Approach, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Kresse, K., Kang, M., Kim, S.-I., and van der Krabben, E., 2020, “Value Capture Ideals and Practice: Development Stages and the Evolution of Value Capture Policies,” Cities, 106: 1-20.
    Kyriacou, A. P., Muinelo-Gallo, L., and Roca-Sagalés, O., 2015, “Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Disparities: The Importance of Good Governance,” Papers in Regional Science, 94: 89-107.
    Lefcoe, G., 2011, “Competing for the Next Hundred Million Americans: The Uses and Abuses of Tax Increment Financing,” Urban Lawyer, 43: 427-482.
    Lenferink, S., Samsura D. A., and Van der Krabben, E., 2014, “Tax Increment Financing as a Tool for Public Infrastructure Development: Findings from a Simulation Experiment,” Paper presented at the XXV FIG International Congress: Engaging the Challenges, Enhancing the Relevance, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, June 16-21.
    Lester, T. W., 2014, “Does Chicago’s Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Programme Pass the “But-for” Test? Job Creation and Economic Development Impacts Using Time-series Data,” Urban Studies, 51(4): 655-674.
    Li, X., Love, P. E. D., Luo, H., and Fang, W., 2022, “A Systemic Model for Implementing Land Value Capture to Support Urban Rail Transit Infrastructure Projects,” Transportation Research Part A, 156: 90-112.
    Lieberherr-Gardiol, F., 2008, “Urban Sustainability and Governance: Issues for the Twenty-First Century,” International Social Sciences Journal, 59(193-194): 331-342.
    Loo, B. P. Y., Bryson, J. R., Song, M. and Harris, C., 2018, “Risking Multi-billion Decisions on Underground Railways: Land Value Capture, Differential Rent and Financialization in London and Hong Kong,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 81: 403-412.
    Ma, J., 1995, “Modeling Central-Local Fiscal Relations in China,” China Economic Review, 6: 105-136.
    Malhotra, A., Mishra, A. K., and Vyas, I., 2020, “Financing Urban Infrastructure in India Through Tax Increment Financing Instruments: A Case for Smart Cities Mission,” Journal of Public Affairs, 22(3): 1-13.
    McAllister, P., 2017, “The Calculative Turn in Land Value Capture: Lessons from the English Planning System,” Land Use Policy, 63: 122-129.
    McIntosh, J., Newman, P., Trubka, R., and Kenworthy, J., 2017, “Framework for Land Value Capture from Investments in Transit in Car-dependent Cities,” Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(1): 155-185.
    Medda, F., 2012, “Land Value Capture Finance for Transport Accessibility: A Review,” Journal of Transport Geography, 25: 154-161.
    Merriman, D., 2018, Improving Tax Increment Financing (TIF) for Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
    Mkandawire, T., 2007, “Good Governance: The Itinerary of an Idea,” Development in Practice, 17(4/5): 679-681.
    Mohammad, S. I., Graham, D. J. and Melo, P. C., 2015, “The Effect of the Dubai Metro on the Value of Residential and Commercial Properties,” Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(1): 263-290.
    Mueller, D. C., 2003, Public Choice III, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Myerson, R.B., 1991, Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Nguyen-Hoang, P., 2021, “Is Tax Increment Financing a Fiscal Bane or Boon?” Journal of Planning Education and Research, 41(1): 94-105.
    Niskanen, W. A., 1971, Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine, Atherton.
    North, D. C., 1990, Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    O’Brien, P., Pike, A., and Tomaney, J., 2019, “Governing the “Ungovernable”? Financialisation and the Governance of Transport Infrastructure in the London “Global City-Region”, Progress in Planning, 132: 1-33.
    OECD, 2022, Financing Transportation Infrastructure through Land Value Capture: Concepts, Tools, and Case Studies, OECD Regional Development Papers, 27, Paris: OECD Publishing.
    OECD, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and PKU-Lincoln Institute Center, 2022a, Global Compendium of Land Value Capture Policies, OECD Regional Development Studies, Paris: OECD Publishing.
    OECD, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and PKU-Lincoln Institute Center, 2022b, Building a Global Compendium on Land Value Capture, Paris: OECD Publishing.
    Ogundiya, I. S., 2010, “Democracy and Good Governance: Nigeria's Dilemma,” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 4(6): 201-208.
    Olesen, K., 2017, “Talk to the Hand: Strategic Spatial Planning as Persuasive Storytelling of the Loop City,” European Planning Studies, 25(6): 978-993.
    Olesen, K., 2020, “Infrastructure Imaginaries: The Politics of Light Rail Projects in the Age of Neoliberalism,” Urban Studies, 57(9): 1811-1826.
    Peterson, G. E., 2009, Unlocking Land Values to Finance Urban Infrastructure, Washington, DC: World Bank and Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF).
    Pillay, S., 2004, “Corruption–the Challenge to Good Governance: A South African Perspective, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(7): 586-605.
    Pratiwi, D. A., and Sari, M. E. P., 2017, “An Analysis of Good Governance in the Public Service Sector of Batam,” Journal of Techno-Social, 9(1): 71-80.
    Purcell, T. F. and Ward, C., 2023, “The Political Economy of Land Value Capture in the UK: Rent and Viability in Salford’s New Municipalist Turn,” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 55(6): 1600-1617.
    Ramamurti, R., 1986, “Public Entrepreneurs: Who They are and How They Operate,” California Management Review, 28(3): 142-158.
    Ramos, F. V., 2001, “Good Governance Against Corruption,” The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 25(2): 9-17.
    Rennert, L., 2022, “A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Rail Stations on Property Values: Applying a Transit Planning Lens,” Transportation Research Part A, 163: 165-180.
    Rhodes, R. A. W., 1996, “The New Governance: Governing without Government,” Political Studies, 44(4): 652-667.
    Rhodes, R. A. W., 1997, “Understanding Governance: Ten Years On,” Organization studies, 28(8): 1243-1264.
    Rose-Ackerman, S., 2005, “The Challenge of Poor Governance and Corruption,” Revista Direito Gv, 1: 207-266.
    Rosenau, J. and Czempiel, E.O., 1992, Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press, London.
    Rowley, C. K., 2008, “Public Choice and Constitutional Political Economy,” pp.3-29 in Readings in Public Choice and Constitutional Political Economy, edited by Rowley, C. K. and Schneider, F. G., New York: Springer.
    Rubasundram, G. A. and Rasiah, R., 2019, “Corruption and Good Governance: An Analysis of ASEAN’s E-Governance Experience,” Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 36(1): 57-70.
    Rybeck, R., 2004, “Using Value Capture to Finance Infrastructure and Encourage Compact Development,” Public Works Management Policy, 8(4): 249-260.
    Salminen, A. and Ikola-Norrbacka, R., 2010, “Trust, Good Governance, and Unethical Actions in Finnish Public Administration,” International Journal of Public Sector Management 23(7): 647-668.
    Salon, D. and Shewmake, S., 2011, “Opportunities for Value Capture to Fund Public Transport: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature with a Focus on East Asia,” SSRN Electronic Journal: 1-39.
    Samsura, A. A. and van der Krabben, E., 2011, “Funding Transport Infrastructure Development through Value Capturing: A Game Theoretical Analysis,” pp. 59-80 in Transitions Towards Sustainable Mobility, edited by van Nunen, J., Huijbregts, P. and Rietveld, P., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
    Samsura, D. A. A. and van der Krabben, E., 2012, “Negotiating Land and Property Development: A Game Theoretical Approach to Value Capturing,” Journal of European Real Estate Research, 5(1): 48-65.
    Samsura, D. A. A., van der Krabben, E., and van Deemen, A. M. A., 2010, “A Game Theory Approach to the Analysis of Land and Property Development Processes,” Land Use Policy, 27(2): 564-578.
    Sharma, S. D., 2007, “Democracy, Good Governance, and Economic Development,” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 3(1): 29-62.
    Siemiatycki, M., Fagan D., and Arku, R. N., 2023, Land Value Capture Study: Paying for Transit-Oriented Communities, Toronto: Infrastructure Institute, School of Cities, University of Toronto.
    Sinha, M., 2021, “Harnessing Land Value Capture: Perspectives from India’s Urban Rail Corridors,” Land Use Policy, 108: 1-13.
    Smith, J. J. and Gihring, T. A., 2006, “Financing Transit Systems through Value Capture: An Annotated Bibliography,” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65(3): 751-786.
    Smolka, M., 2013, Implementing Value Capture in Latin America. Policies and Tools for Urban Development, Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
    Squires, G. and Lord, A., 2012, “The Transfer of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) as an Urban Policy for Spatially Targeted Economic Development Initiatives,” Land Use Policy, 29(4): 817-826.
    Stojanović, I., Ateljević, J., and Stević, R. S., 2016, “Good Governance as a Tool of Sustainable Development,” European Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(4): 558-573.
    Stoker, 1998, “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions,” International Social Science Journal, 50(155): 17-28.
    Sun, H., Wang, Y., and Li, Q., 2016, “The Impact of Subway Lines on Residential Property Values in Tianjin: An Empirical Study Based on Hedonic Pricing Model,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2016: 164-173.
    Sun, J., Chen, T., Cheng, Z., Wang, C. C., and Ning, X., 2017, “A Financing Mode of Urban Rail Transit Based on Land Value Capture: A Case Study in Wuhan City,” Transport Policy, 57: 59-67.
    Suzuki, H., Murakami, J.; Hong, Y.-H.; and Tamayose, B., 2015, Financing Transit-Oriented Development with Land Values: Adapting, Land Value Capture in Developing Countries, Washington, DC: World Bank.
    Tontisirin, N. and Anantsuksomsri, S., 2021, “Measuring Transit Accessibility Benefits and Their Implications on Land Value Capture: A Case Study of the Bangkok Metropolitan Region,” The Annals of Regional Science, 67: 415-449.
    UNDP, 1997, Governance for Sustainable Human Development－A UNDP Policy Document, UNDP, New York.
    UNESCAP, 2009, What Is Good Governance? United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
    UNODC, 2023, Knowledge Tools for Academics and Professionals-Module Series on Anti-Corruption: Module 2 Corruption and Good Governance.
    Wagner, R., 2018, “Tax Increment Financing: History, Basics, Issues, and Evolution,” Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 20(9): 95-107.
    Waldron, R., 2019, “Financialization, Urban Governance and the Planning System: Utilizing ‘Development Viability’ as a Policy Narrative for the Liberalization of Ireland’s Post-Crash Planning System,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(4): 685-704.
    Wang, J., Samsura, D. A. A., and van der Krabben, E., 2019, “Institutional Barriers to Financing Transit-Oriented Development in China: Analyzing Informal Land Value Capture Strategies,” Transport Policy, 82: 1-10.
    Weber, R., 2010, “Selling City Futures: The Financialization of Urban Redevelopment Policy,” Economic Geography, 86(3): 251-274.
    Wen, S., Shi, J., and Zhang, W., 2021, “Impact of Urban Rail Transit Network on Residential and Commercial Land Values in China: A Complex Network Perspective,” Complexity, 2021: 1-11.
    Williamson, O. E., 1996, The Mechanisms of Governance, Oxford University Press USA.
    Wilson, J., 2014, “Given a Hammer: Tax Increment Financing Abuse in the St. Louis Region,” Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 34(1): 83-102.
    Winarno, R. and Retnowati, E., 2019, “Good Governance Based Public Services,” Jurnal Notariil, 4(1): 8-17.
    World Bank, 1994a, The World Bank Group: Learning from the Past, Embracing the Future, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
    World Bank, 1994b, Governance: The World Bank's experience, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
    World Bank, 2008, Sustainable Infrastructure Action Plan (SIAP), Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
    World Bank, 2013a, World Development Report 2014: Risk and Opportunity - Managing Risk for Development, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
    World Bank, 2013b, What is Governance? Retrieved July 8, 2013 from World Bank on the World Wide Web: http://go.worldbank.org/G2CHLXX0Q0.
    Yang, J., Chen, J., Le, X., and Zhang, Q., 2016, “Density-Oriented versus Development-Oriented Transit Investment: Decoding Metro Station Location Selection in Shenzhen,” Transport Policy, 51: 93-102.
    Yen, B. T.H., Mulley, C., and Zhang, M., 2020, “Equity in Financing Public Transport Infrastructure: Evaluating Funding Options,” Transport Policy, 95: 68-77.
    Yen, B. T.H., Mulley, C., Shearer, H., and Burke, M., 2018, “Announcement, Construction or Delivery: When Does Value Uplift Occur for Residential Properties? Evidence from the Gold Coast Light Rail System in Australia,” Land Use Policy, 73: 412-422.
    Youngman, J. M., 2011, “TIF at a Turning Point: Defining Debt Down,” State Tax Notes, May 2: 321-329.
    Zhao, Z., Iacono, M., Lari, A., and Levinson, D., 2012, “Value Capture for Transportation Finance,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48: 435-448.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    100257502
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100257502
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[地政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    750201.pdf9984KbAdobe PDF2检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈