政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/153185
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51032870      線上人數 : 915
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153185


    題名: 藥廠如何實踐永續於企業文化中之探討:以A外商藥廠公司個案為研究對象
    Pharmaceutical companies practice sustainability in organizational culture
    作者: 賴思穎
    Lai, Si-Ying
    貢獻者: 陳立民
    Chen, Li-Min
    賴思穎
    Lai, Si-Ying
    關鍵詞: 永續
    藥廠
    醫藥產業
    永續發展實踐
    永續組織文化
    日期: 2024
    上傳時間: 2024-09-04 14:11:25 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 醫藥產業研發製造各種醫藥產品，對全球公共健康和個體福祉有著深遠的影響。然而，COVID-19疫情暴露了醫藥供應鏈的脆弱性，促使藥廠更加重視營運的永續發展。永續一詞的現代用法十分廣泛，很難精確定義（Lackey和Robert，1995）。最初，永續性意味著僅利用自然可再生資源，根據聯合國在1987年發表的《我們共同的未來》 中，永續發展被定義為「在不損害後代子孫滿足其自身需求的情況下，滿足當代需求的發展模式」 。而永續經營的定義是指企業在追求經濟效益的同時，也將環境、社會、治理三大面向納入考量，追求平衡和協調，以確保企業長期穩健的發展。這種經營方式強調不僅僅是商業獲利，更重視照顧未來世代的需求，同時也反映出企業在經營的過程中，注重長期且可持續性發展的永續經營理念，其中包含對環境的尊重、對社會的貢獻，以及對企業治理的強調。對企業而言，「永續」如今是獲得顧客青睞及採購選擇的關鍵，是投資人審視值得投資與否的評估點，更已是企業所有利害關係人界定組織是否正朝永續發展的審視觀點。
    隨著各國法規如歐盟《歐洲綠色新政》和《巴黎協定》的推動，全球製藥企業面臨更嚴格的環境要求。歐美大廠如阿斯特捷利康和嬌生公司已宣佈具體的減碳目標，積極響應永續發展。在台灣，政府於2023年實施「氣候變遷因應法」，設定了2050年淨零排放目標，並推動相關法規，強調永續發展的重要性。近年來，部分永續學者逐漸將關注議題轉往永續組織文化上。許多研究指出，組織文化對於企業社會責任實踐的重要性不容忽視。許多學者指出，組織文化是企業效能的關鍵因素，並且影響企業的永續發展目標。
    本研究透過回顧多篇永續組織文化相關文獻，探討各式各樣的研究方法及框架，並嘗試以Ketprapakorn和Kantabutra（2022）的永續組織文化模型來建立研究架構，並以A外商藥廠於台灣分公司的三名中高階主管為深度研究訪談對象，期望能填補目前關於如何建立永續組織文化的研究缺口。
    研究結論顯示，Ketprapakorn和Kantabutra的永續組織文化模型確實能應用於企業實際建立永續組織文化的流程中， A公司永續發展價值觀的關鍵行為指標與Kantabutra所提出的企業的永續發展實踐密切相關；研究結果發現，溝通過程在深植永續組織文化的步驟中是十分重要的一個步驟，其中人資部門扮演了重要的腳色，在A公司中，人資部門不僅將永續發展價值觀納入選才和人才培育的標準中，同時也負責主導和落實公司的永續發展願景和價值觀；此外，我們發現個案公司在溝通及實踐的過程中大量運用敏捷的精神來快速推動永續文化的落實，大幅提升了員工對於永續文化的認知程度。這些主管並承認實踐永續發展價值觀對員工的滿意的影響難以被直接觀察，所有的受訪經理人都都一致認同員工的工作的投入程度和對公司活動的參與度有顯著的提升。
    The pharmaceutical industry develops and manufactures various medical products, which profoundly affect global public health and individual well-being. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed vulnerabilities in pharmaceutical supply chains, prompting pharmaceutical companies to prioritize sustainable operations. The modern use of the term 'sustainability' is very broad and difficult to define precisely (Lackey and Robert, 1995). Initially, sustainability meant only utilizing naturally renewable resources. According to the United Nations' 1987 report "Our Common Future," sustainable development is defined as "development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." The definition of sustainable business refers to enterprises that, while pursuing economic benefits, also take into account the three dimensions of environment, society, and governance, seeking balance and coordination to ensure long-term and stable development. This business approach emphasizes not only commercial profit but also the care for the needs of future generations. It reflects the enterprise's commitment to long-term sustainable development in the process of operation, including respect for the environment, contributions to society, and emphasis on corporate governance. For businesses, 'sustainability' is now key to gaining customer favor and procurement choices, a critical point for investors assessing investment worthiness, and a perspective for all stakeholders to evaluate whether the organization is moving towards sustainable development.
    With regulatory pressures mounting globally, driven by initiatives like the EU's Green Deal and the Paris Agreement, pharmaceutical companies face stricter environmental demands. Major players like AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson have announced concrete carbon reduction targets, actively responding to sustainability imperatives.
    In Taiwan, the government implemented the Climate Change Response Act in 2023, setting a net-zero emissions target for 2050 and promoting related regulations that underscore the importance of sustainability. Recently, sustainability scholars have increasingly focused on organizational culture within sustainability. Studies highlight the crucial role of organizational culture in corporate social responsibility practices. Many scholars emphasize that organizational culture is a key factor in business performance and influences sustainability goals.
    This study explores various research methods and frameworks by reviewing numerous sustainability organizational culture-related literatures. It attempts to establish a research framework based on Ketprapakorn and Kantabutra's (2022) sustainability organizational culture model. Depth interviews were conducted with three mid- to senior-level executives at the Taiwan branch of a foreign pharmaceutical company to address current research gaps in establishing a sustainable organizational culture.
    The findings indicate that Ketprapakorn and Kantabutra's sustainability organizational culture model is indeed applicable in guiding the process of building sustainable organizational culture within businesses. Key behavioral indicators of sustainable development values at Company A closely align with Kantabutra's proposed practices for corporate sustainability. The study reveals that the communication process is a crucial step in embedding a sustainable organizational culture. The Human Resources department plays a pivotal role at Company A, integrating sustainable development values into talent acquisition and development standards while leading the implementation of the company's sustainability vision and values.
    Furthermore, the case study identifies extensive use of agile methodologies in the communication and implementation processes to rapidly advance sustainability culture. This includes agile communication teams and Bravo system's quick win initiatives, significantly enhancing employee awareness of sustainability culture. Executives recognize the challenging impact of practicing sustainable development values on employee satisfaction, noting substantial increases in employee engagement and participation in company activities across all interviewed managers.
    參考文獻: 方曉萍 (2011) 。透視創造共享價值提昇企業經營成效之研究：以A藥廠護眼衛教宣導活動為例，未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣大學商學組，台灣。
    甘傑丰 (2010) 。企業社會責任、企業形象、雇主品牌與求職者應徵意圖之關聯性研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺北大學，國立臺北大學企業管理學系，台灣。
    李洋廣、謝文偉、李詩賓 (2023) 。運動企業社會責任之探究。運動健康休閒學報， (14) ，31-44。
    沈中華、張元 (2008) 。企業的社會責任為可以改善財務績效嗎？－以英國FTSE社會責任指數為例。經濟論文，36 (3) ，339-385。
    池祥麟、陳庭萱 (2004) 。銀行業企業社會責任之探討。台灣金融財務季刊，5 (2) ，111-127。
    池祥萱、池祥麟、梁綺羚 (2016) 。企業社會責任之策略性分析。管理評論，35 (1) ，21-45。
    汪瑞芝、李佳駿 (2019) 。企業社會責任對避稅行為之影響。證券市場發展季刊，31 (1) ，47-86。
    涂秋汝 (2007) ，定期海運業企業社會責任、企業形象與組織績效之探討。未出版之碩士論文，國立成功大學，交通管理學系碩博士班，台灣。
    康峰菁 (2010) 。企業社會責任的整體認知與實際作為之研究：以台灣服務業為例。企業管理學報， (86) ，75-114。
    陳育成、許峰睿、黃聖雯 (2013) 。企業社會責任與經營績效之關聯性研究。評價學報， (6) ，53-72。
    陳郁文 (2014) 。企業社會責任與股價報酬的關聯性。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺北大學，企業管理學系，台灣。
    陳振遠、王健聰、洪世偉 (2017) 。公司治理對於企業社會責任、公司價值之影響。中山管理評論，25 (1) ，135-176。
    陳冠志 (2011) 。我國企業社會責任揭露概況與影響因素之探討，未出版之碩士論文，國立臺北大學，會計學系，台灣。
    葉珮筑 (2019) 。企業社會責任的實踐-以歐洲某大藥廠為例未出版之碩士論文，國立暨南國際大學，管理學院經營管理碩士學位學程碩士在職專班，台灣。
    翁望回、黃俊英、劉水深 (1988) 。企業正當性之實證研究―社會責任的觀點。管理評論，153-171。
    郭良文、林素甘 (2001) 。質化與量化研究方法之比較分析。資訊傳播與圖書館學，7:4卷，1-13。
    黃瓊瑤、方世榮、陳育成 (2012) 。家族控制與企業社會責任績效之關聯性。中山管理評論，20 (2) ，673-711。
    趙忠傑、楊子申、孔心怡 (2016) 。國際企業社會責任趨勢與台灣未來展望。兩岸企業社會責任與社會企業家學術期刊， (1) ，74-89。
    萬文隆 (2004) 。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育，37 (4) ，17-23。
    蘇麗娟 (2013) 。台灣中小企業採行企業社會責任方式對企業形象與經營績效之關係研究。未出版之碩士論文，朝陽科技大學，財務金融系，台灣。
    劉書愷 (2016) 。企業社會責任執行歷程之探討─以中小企業為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺北大學，企業管理學系，台灣。
    欒家瑞 (2020) 。台灣銀行業實施企業社會責任對永續經營發展之影響----以臺灣中小企業銀行為例。未出版之碩士論文，淡江大學，財務金融學系碩士在職專班，台灣。
    鍾宜玲 (2011) 。跨國企業在台灣實行企業社會責任之探討--以醫藥產業為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學，經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)，台灣。
    鄭永琪 (2020) 。跨國公司在台灣執行企業社會責任之研究--以某日商藥廠為例，國立政治大學，經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)，台灣。
    Aleksić, A., Braje, I. N., & Jelavić, S. R. (2019). Creating sustainable work environments by developing cultures that diminish deviance. Sustainability, 11(24), 7031.
    Assoratgoon, W., & Kantabutra, S. (2023). Toward a sustainability organizational culture model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 400, 136.
    Avery, G. (2005). Leadership for sustainable futures: achieving success in a competitive world. Cheltenham, UK.
    Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197-218.
    Barney, J. F. (1991). Resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag., 17, 99–120.
    Baumgartner, R. J., & Zielowski, C. (2007). Analyzing zero emission strategies regarding impact on organizational culture and contribution to sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod., 15, 13-14.
    Baumgartner, R. J. (2009). Organizational culture and leadership: preconditions for the development of a sustainable corporation. Sustainable Development, 17(2), 102-113.
    Baumgartner, R. J. (2014). Managing corporate sustainability and CSR: a conceptual framework combining values, strategies and instruments contributing to sustainable development. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., 21(5), 258-271.
    Baumgartner, R. J., & Rauter, R. (2017). Strategic perspectives of corporate sustainability management to develop a sustainable organization. J. Clean. Prod., 140, 81-92.
    Batista, A. A. D. S., & Francisco, A. C. D. (2018). Organizational sustainability practices: a study of the firms listed by the Corporate Sustainability Index. Sustainability, 10, 226.
    Belkhir, L., & Elmeligi, A. (2019). Carbon footprint of the global pharmaceutical industry and relative impact of its major players. J. Clean. Prod., 214, 185–194.
    Berns, M., Townend, A., Khayat, Z., Balagopal, B., Reeves, M., Hopkins, M., & Kruschwitz, N. (2009). Sustainability and competitive advantage. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev., 51, 19–26.
    Bertels, S., Papania, L., & Papania, D. (2010). Embedding sustainability in organizational culture. A Systematic Review of the Body of Knowledge. London, ON, Canada: Network for Business Sustainability 25.
    Bertels, S., Papania, L., & Papania, D. (2010). Embedding sustainability in organizational culture. A systematic review of the body of knowledge. Network for Business Sustainability: London, Canada.
    Bhattacharya, C. B., Korschun, D., & Sen, S. (2009). Strengthening stakeholder–company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. J. Bus. Ethics, 85, 257–272.
    Boiral, O., & Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2020). Sustainability reporting assurance: creating stakeholder accountability through hyperreality? J. Clean. Prod., 243.
    Boeske, J., & Murray, P. A. (1978). The intellectual domains of sustainability leadership in smes. Sustainability, 2022, 14.
    Chatman, C. A., & O'Reilly, C. (2016). Paradigm lost: reinvigorating the study of organizational culture. Res. Organ. Behav., 36, 199-224.
    Correll, J., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2004). An affirmed self and an open mind: self-affirmation and sensitivity to argument strength. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 40, 350–356.
    Coleman, J. Six components of a great corporate culture. Harvard Business Review Blog Network. Retrieved July 22 2024, from: http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2013/05/six_components_of_culture.html
    Datu, J. A. D. (2021). Beyond passion and perseverance: review and future research initiatives on the science of grit. Front. Psychol., 11, 545526.
    Debnath, B., Shakur, M. S., Bari, A. B. M. M., Saha, J., Porna, W. A., Mishu, M. J., ... & Rahman, M. A. (2023). Assessing the critical success factors for implementing industry 4.0 in the pharmaceutical industry: implications for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Plos One, 18(6), e0287149.
    DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 147-160.
    Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Luo, Z., & Wamba, S. F. et al. (2019). Can big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 534-545.
    Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Wamba, S. F., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). The impact of big data on world-class sustainable manufacturing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 84(1-4), 631-645.
    Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif. Manag. Rev., 36, 90–100.
    Fauzi, H., Svensson, G., & Rahman, A. A. (2010). Triple bottom line as sustainable corporate performance: a proposition for the future. Sustainability, 2, 1345–1360.
    Ferren, M., Ah, D. V., & Menachemi, N. (2022). Ebp champion responsibilities and sustainability. Nursing Management, 53(8), 22-33.
    Fetter, B., & Zilahy, G. (2022). Challenges of the green supply chain management in the pharmaceutical industry. St. Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, 38(2), 235-258.
    Freeman, R. (2010). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
    Galpin, T., Whittington, J.L., & Bell, G. (2015). Is your sustainability strategy sustainable? creating a culture of sustainability. Corporate Governance, 15(1), 1-17.
    Griffiths, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. J. World Bus., 45(4), 357-366.
    Glavas, A., & Mish, J. (2015). Resources and capabilities of triple bottom line firms: going over old or breaking new ground? J. Bus. Ethics, 127(3), 623-642.
    Galpin, T. J., Whittington, J. L., & Bell, G. (2015). Is your sustainability strategy sustainable? Creating a culture of sustainability. Corp. Govern., 15(1), 1-17.
    Glavas, A., & Mish, J. (2015). Resources and capabilities of triple bottom line firms: going over old or breaking new ground? J. Bus. Ethics, 127, 623–642.
    Gordon, G. G., & ditomaso, N. (1992). Predicting corporate performance from organizational culture. J. Manag. Stud., 29(6), 783-798.
    Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2006). Inside the "black box": how organizational culture and subcultures inform interpretations and actions on environmental issues. Organ. Environ., 19(1), 46-73.
    Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015-1052.
    Jabbour, C. J. C., Sarkis, J., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Renwick, D. W. S., Singh, S. K., Grebinevych, O., et al. (2019). Who is in charge? A review and a research agenda on the ‘human side’of the circular economy. J. Clean. Prod., 222, 793-801.
    Jiang, Y., Jamil, S., Zaman, S. I., & Fatima, S. A. (2023). Elevating organizational effectiveness: synthesizing human resource management with sustainable performance alignment. J. Organ. Eff. People Perform., 11(2), 392-447.
    Kantabutra, S., & Ketprapakorn, N. (2020). Toward a theory of corporate sustainability: a theoretical integration and exploration. J. Clean. Prod., 270.
    Kantabutra, S. (2021). Exploring relationships among sustainability organizational culture components at a leading Asian industrial conglomerate. Sustainability, 13(4), 1733.
    Kantabutra, S. (2022). Toward a system theory of corporate sustainability: an interim struggle. Sustainability, 14, 15931.
    Karamat, J., Tong, S., Ahmad, N., Afridi, S., Khan, S., & Khan, N. (2019). Developing sustainable healthcare systems in developing countries: examining the role of barriers, enablers and drivers on knowledge management adoption. Sustainability, 11(4), 954.
    Ketprapakorn, N., & Kantabutra, S. (2022). Toward an organizational theory of sustainability culture. Sustain. Prod. Consum., 32, 638-654.
    Kiesnere, A. L., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2019). Sustainability management emergence.
    Kumar, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Mangla, S. K., Agrawal, V., Sharma, K., & Gupta, D. (2018). When risks need attention: adoption of green supply chain initiatives in the pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Production Research, 57(11), 3554-3576.
    Lewin, M. (1992). The impact of Kurt Lewin’s life on the place of social issues in his work. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 15-29.
    Levinthal, D., & March, J. G. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2, 307-333.
    Liza, S. A. et al. (2022). Barriers to achieving sustainability in pharmaceutical supply chains in the post-covid-19 era. International Journal of Emerging Markets. Retrieved July 22, 2024, from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJOEM-11-2021-1680/full/html
    Lok, P., & Crawford, J. (1999). The relationship between commitment and organizational culture, subculture, leadership style and job satisfaction in organizational change and development. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 20(7), 365-374.
    Lozano, R. (2018). Proposing a definition and a framework of organizational sustainability: a review of efforts and a survey of approaches to change. Sustainability, 10(4), 1157.
    Lozano, R. (2018). Sustainable business models: providing a more holistic perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1159-1166.
    Lozano, R., & von Haartman, R. (2018). Reinforcing the holistic perspective of sustainability: analysis of the importance of sustainability drivers in organizations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 508-522.
    Luo, Y. (2007). A coopetition perspective of global competition. Journal of World Business, 42, 129-144.
    Linnenluecke, M. K., & Griffiths, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 357-366.
    May, K. A. (1991). Interview techniques in qualitative research: concerns and challenges. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: a contemporary dialogue, Rev. ed., 188-20.
    MacLean, T. L., & Behnam, M. (2010). The dangers of decoupling: the relationship between compliance programs, legitimacy perceptions, and institutionalized misconduct. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1499-1520.
    Metz, D., Ilieş, L., & Nistor, R. (2020). The impact of organizational culture on customer service effectiveness from a sustainability perspective. Sustainability, 12(15), 6240.
    Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am. J. Sociol., 83(2), 340-363.
    Mervelskemper, L., & Streit, D. (2017). Enhancing market valuation of ESG performance: is integrated reporting keeping its promise? Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 536-549.
    Merriman, K. K. (2017). Leadership and perseverance. In J. Marques, S. Dhiman (Eds.), Leadership today. Springer: Cham, Switzerland.
    Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995). In-depth interviewing: principles, techniques, analysis. 2nd Edition. Longman: Melbourne.
    Morsing, M., & Oswald, D. (2009). Sustainable leadership: management control systems and organizational culture in Novo Nordisk A/S. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9, 83-99.
    Newport, D., Chesnes, T., & Lindner, A. (2003). The “environmental sustainability” problem: ensuring that sustainability stands on three legs. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 4(4), 357-363.
    Nguyen, T., Pham, T., Le, Q., Pham, T., Bui, T., & Nguyen, T. (2020). Impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment through organizational trust and organizational identification. Management Science Letters, 10(14), 3453-3462.
    Nonaka, I. A. (1994). Dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 14-37.
    Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of the “triple bottom line”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14, 243-262.
    Obeidat, B. Y., Altheeb, S., & Masa'deh, R. (2018). The impact of internal corporate social responsibility on job satisfaction in Jordanian pharmaceutical companies. Modern Applied Science, 12(11).
    Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Manag. Rev., 16(1), 145-179.
    O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: past, present and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 324-338.
    Otoo, F. N. K., Otoo, E. A., Abledu, G. K., & Bhardwaj, A. (2019). Impact of human resource development (HRD) practices on pharmaceutical industry’s performance. European Journal of Training and Development, 43(1/2), 188-210.
    Pennington, L. K., & More, E. (2016). Culture's roles in organizational sustainability. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(1), Article 15415, 10.5465
    Peng, X. (2023). Do environmental scores become multinational corporations' strategic “greenwashing” tool for window‐dressing carbon reduction? a cross‐cultural analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 2084-2115.
    Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2012). Essentials of organizational behavior. Prentice Hall: Englewood, US.
    Santos, C. M. R. G. d., Coelho, A., & Marques, A. (2021). Does greenwashing affect employee’s career satisfaction? the mediating role of organizational pride, negative emotions and affective commitment. Research Square. Retrieved July 22, 2024, from: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1197221/v1.
    Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass.
    Schein, E.H. (1997). The concept of “client” from a process consultation perspective: a guide for change agents. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 10, 202-216.
    Scott, W.R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 493-511.
    Sheldon, R. A. (2017). Metrics of green chemistry and sustainability: past, present, and future. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 6(1), 32-48.
    Singh, R. M., Pramanik, R., & Hazra, S. (2021). Role of green chemistry in pharmaceutical industry: a review. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 23(12), 291-299.
    Suriyankietkaew, S. (2019). Sustainable leadership and entrepreneurship for corporate sustainability in small enterprises: an empirical analysis. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 15, 256-275.
    Tzortzaki, A.M., & Mihiotis, A.A. (2014). Review of knowledge management theory and future directions. Knowledge and Process Management, 21, 29-41.
    Von Bertalanffy, L. (1973). The meaning of general system theory. In L. Von Bertalanffy (Ed.), General system theory: foundations, development, applications (pp. 30-53). New York, NY.
    Vuong, Q.H., & Napier, N.K. (2015). Acculturation and global mindsponge: an emerging market perspective. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 49, 354-367.
    Vuong, Q.H. (2016). Global mindset as the integration of emerging socio-cultural values through mindsponge processes: a transition economy perspective. In J. Kuada (Ed.), Global mindsets: exploration and perspectives. London, UK.
    Westerman, J., Rao, M., & Vanka, S. M. (2020). Gupta. Sustainable human resource management and the triple bottom line: multi-stakeholder strategies, concepts, and engagement. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev., 30(3), 100742.
    Wilkins, A.L., & Ouchi, W.G. (1983). Efficient cultures: exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 468.
    Williams, M. (1997). Social surveys: design to analysis. In T. May (Ed.), Social research issues, methods and process. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    111363091
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111363091
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[企業管理研究所（MBA學位學程）] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML68檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋