English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50891358      Online Users : 823
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153075


    Title: 包容性學校指標建構之研究
    A Study of Construction of Inclusive School Indicators
    Authors: 蔡述恩
    Tsai, Shu-En
    Contributors: 郭昭佑
    Guo, Chao-Yu
    蔡述恩
    Tsai, Shu-En
    Keywords: 包容性學校
    模糊德懷術
    概念構圖
    Inclusive School
    Fuzzy delphi method
    Concept mapping
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-09-04 13:43:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究之目的主要在建構包容性學校指標,提供包容性學校發展之參考。首先,在文獻探討部分,歸納國外相關研究及文獻,初擬包容性學校指標。研究方法部分,經由文獻探討初擬之包容性學校指標,透過邀請若干位教育領域專家學者及具經驗之國民小學教職人員,進行專家適切性評估分析,以確立包容性學校指標,後續實施模糊德懷術及概念構圖問卷分析,將所確定的指標進行重要性程度分析及進行分類,並得出上位概念之指標構面及向度,以利建構包容性學校指標系統,依據研究結果與分析,歸納結論與建議如下:
    一、結論:
    (一)本研究建構之包容性學校指標系統共計三構面十向度與31項指標,構面分別為「一、正向參與與共榮」、「二、尊重多元與協作」及「三、環境友善與支持」。向度則分別為「(一)參與領導」包含4項指標、「(二)正向氛圍」包含3項指標、「(三)社區共榮」包含3項指標、「(四)理解尊重」包含3項指標、「(五)互助協作」包含3項指標、「(六)包容多元性」包含3項指標、「(七)提供庇護」包含3項指標、「(八)友善性空間」包含3項指標、「(九)無歧視校園」包含3項指標及「(十)構建成功經驗」包含3項指標。
    (二)「環境友善與支持」為最重要之包容校學校指標構面。
    (三)「無歧視校園」為最重要之包容性學校指標向度。
    (四)「學校不會忽略身心障礙的學校成員及學生之特殊需求。」及「大家不會歧視弱勢的學校成員。」為最重要之包容性學校指標。
    (五)不同對象對於包容性學校個別指標重要性程度排序有其差異。
    (六)不同對象對於包容性學校指標重要性之認同程度有其差異。
    二、建議:
    (一)對教育現場與學校發展之建議
    1.學校應營造出友善的組織環境並且提供學校成員成功支持。
    2.學校成員間除了應該平等對待彼此外,更應該協助且顧及學校內弱勢族群的需求,並接納其為學校的一份子。
    (二)對未來相關研究領域之建議
    1.包容性學校指標宜持續更新
    2.包容性學校指標建構應參酌更多面向的建議
    3.包容性學校指標尚可使用其他研究方法檢驗
    The primary purpose of this study is to develop indicators for inclusive schools, providing a reference for the development of inclusive schools. First, in the literature review section, relevant studies and literature from abroad were summarized to draft preliminary indicators for inclusive schools. In the research methodology section, the preliminary indicators derived from the literature review were evaluated for appropriateness by inviting several experts and scholars in the field of education as well as experienced elementary school staff. This process aimed to establish the indicators for inclusive schools. Subsequently, the Fuzzy Delphi Method and concept mapping questionnaire analyses were implemented to analyze the importance of the confirmed indicators and to classify them. This helped derive the higher-level conceptual indicators and dimensions, facilitating the construction of an inclusive school indicator system. Based on the research results and analysis, the conclusions and recommendations are summarized as follows:
    Section One:The Conclusions
    1.The inclusive school indicator system developed in this study comprises three dimensions, ten aspects, and 31 indicators. The dimensions are:I. Positive Participation and Shared Prosperity;II.Respect for Diversity and Collaboration;III.Environmentally Friendly and Supportive. The aspects are: "Participatory Leadership" with 4 indicators;"Positive Atmosphere" with 3 indicators;"Community Prosperity" with 3 indicators;"Understanding and Respect" with 3 indicators;"Mutual Aid and Collaboration" with 3 indicators;"Inclusion of Diversity" with 3 indicators;"Providing Shelter" with 3 indicators;"Friendly Spaces" with 3 indicators;"Non-Discriminatory Campus" with 3 indicators;"Building Successful Experiences" with 3 indicators.
    2."Environmentally Friendly and Supportive" is the most important dimension of the inclusive school indicators.
    3."Non-Discriminatory Campus" is the most important aspect of the inclusive school indicators.
    4.The indicators "The school does not neglect the special needs of members and students with physical and mental disabilities" and "No one discriminates against disadvantaged school members" are considered the most important inclusive school indicators.
    5.Different stakeholders have varying rankings of the importance of individual inclusive school indicators.
    6.Different stakeholders also have varying levels of agreement on the importance of the inclusive school indicators.
    Section Two:Recommendations
    I.Recommendations for Education Practice and School Development:
    1.Schools should create a friendly organizational environment and provide strong support for all school members.
    2.School members should not only treat each other equally but also assist and consider the needs of disadvantaged groups within the school, accepting them as integral parts of the school community.
    II.Recommendations for Future Research:
    1.The inclusive school indicators should be continuously updated.
    2.The construction of inclusive school indicators should consider suggestions from a broader range of perspectives.
    3.Other research methods should be used to validate the inclusive school indicators.
    Reference: 壹、中文文獻
    公立高級中等以下學校委託私人辦理實驗教育條例(2021年12月22日)修正公布。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0070062
    吳政達(2005)。我國地方政府層級教育課責系統建構之評估:模糊德菲法之應用。教育與心理研究,28(4),645-665。
    吳政達(2008)。教育政策分析-概念、方法與應用:Educational PolicyAnalysis: Concepts, Methods, and Applications。高等教育文化事業有限公司。
    吳政達,郭昭佑(1997)。概念構圖法在國民小學教科書評鑑標準建構之應用。教育與心理研究,20(2),217-242。
    林震岩(2018)。多變量分析:SPSS的操作與應用(三版)。智勝文化事業有限公司。(原著出版年:2007)。https://www.books.com.tw/products/0010787022
    高級中等以下教育階段非學校型態實驗教育實施條例(2018年1月31日)修正公布。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0070059
    教育部(2023)教育部推動友善校園計畫。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/10/relfile/8783/91313/04a1b1b3-5c3b-4559-b84a-76178397308b.pdf
    郭昭佑(2000)。概念構圖法在評鑑指標建構上之應用--以國民中學校務評鑑指標建構為例。教育政策論壇,3(2),173-203。
    學校型態實驗教育實施條例(2018年1月31日)修正公布。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0070060
    羅恩冕,郭昭佑(2018)。我國大學學生評鑑教師教學指標之研究:概念構圖法的調整應用。教育研究與發展期刊,14(1),1-33。
    羅健文,邱良忠(2015)。應用模糊德爾菲法與分析網路程序法建立綠色運輸與遊憩路線規劃指標之研究。臺灣土地研究,18(2),81-108。
    貳、英文文獻
    Aboud, F. E., & Levy, S. R. (2000). Interventions to reduce prejudice and discrimination in children and adolescents.
    Ainscow, M. (2007). Taking an inclusive turn. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 7(1), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2007.00075.x
    Ainscow, M. (2014). Struggling for equity in education: The legacy of Salamanca. In Inclusive Education Twenty Years after Salamanca. (pp. 41-56). Peter Lang.
    Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Hopwood, L., & Thomson, S. (2016). Primary schools responding to diversity: Barriers and possibilities. York: Cambridge Primary Review Trust.
    Alan, H., Matthew, G., & Ben, E. (2008). Social inclusion - origins, concepts and key themes. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/APO-8799
    Alcaraz-García, S., & Arnaiz-Sánchez, P. (2020). La escolarización del alumnado con necesidades educativas especiales en España: un studio longitudinal. Revista Colombiana de Educación, (78), 299-320.
    Alzahrani, N. (2020). The development of inclusive education practice: A review of literature. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 12(1), 68-83.
    Anderberg, M. R. (1973). Cluster Analysis for Applications. Academic Press.
    Arduin, S. (2015). A review of the values that underpin the structure of an education system and its approach to disability and inclusion. Oxford Review of Education, 41(1), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1006614
    Arnesen, A. L., & Allan, J. (2009). Policies and practices for teaching sociocultural diversity: Concepts, principles and challenges in teacher education. Council of Europe.
    Bigler, R. S. (1999). The use of multicultural curricula and materials to counter racism in children. Journal of Social Issues, 55(4), 687-705.
    Booth, T. (2011). Curricula for the Common School: What Shall We Tell Our Children?. In FORUM: For promoting 3-19 comprehensive education (Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 31-47). Symposium Books. PO Box 204, Didcot, Oxford, OX11 9ZQ, UK.
    Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools. Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education (CSIE), Rm 2S203 S Block, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QU, United Kingdom, England (24.50 British pounds).
    Braunsteiner, M. L., & Germany, S. (2009). Evaluation eines Schulentwicklungs-und Netzwerkbildungsprozesse in Wiener Neudorf (Oesterreich) von der Integration zur Inklusion in Boerner. S., Glink, A., Jaepelt, B., Sanders, D. & Sasse, A.(Eds.) Integration im vierten Jahrzehnt. Bilanz und Perspektiven, 13-16.
    Braunsteiner, M. L., & Mariano-Lapidus, S. (2014). A perspective of inclusion: Challenges for the future. Global Education Review, 1(1).
    Braunsteiner, M. L., & Mariano-Lapidus, S. (2014). A perspective of inclusion: Challenges for the future. Global Education Review, 1(1).
    Braunsteiner, M.-L., & Mariano-Lapidus, S. (2017). Using the Index for Inclusion to measure attitudes and perceptions of inclusion in teacher and school building leader candidates in the USA and Austria. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(13), 1443-1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1396503
    Bravo Mancero, P., & Santos Jiménez, O. (2019). Percepciones respecto a la atención a la diversidad o inclusión educativa en estudiantes universitarios. Sophia, colección de Filosofía de la Educación, (26), 327-352.
    Buitendijk, S., Curry, S., & Maes, K. (2019). Equality, diversity and inclusion at universities: the power of a systemic approach. LERU Position Paper. Available online: https://www. leru. org/files/LERU-EDI-paper_final. pdf (accessed on 8 January 2022).
    Buli-Holmberg, J., Nilsen, S., & Skogen, K. (2014). Inclusive and Individually Adapted Education in Norway Results from a Survey Study in Two Municipalities Focusing the Roles of Headteachers, Teachers and Curriculum Planning. International Journal of Special Education, 29(1), 47-60.
    Calvo, Y. A. (2011). Atención a la diversidad en la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Estudio y propuestas para un cambio metodológico y organizativo inclusivo. Universidad de Granada.
    Carrington, S. B., Saggers, B. R., Shochet, I. M., Orr, J. A., Wurfl, A. M., Vanelli, J., & Nickerson, J. (2021). Researching a whole school approach to school connectedness. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(7), 785-802. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1878298
    Chen, M.J., Guo, C.Y., & Tang, C. W. (2022). Monitoring learning-oriented school education: Indicator construction and their application. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 73, 101142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101142
    Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications (Vol. 375). Springer Science & Business Media.
    Cigman, R. (2007). A question of universality: Inclusive education and the principle of respect. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(4), 775-793.
    Cline, T., & Frederickson, N. (2009). Special educational needs, inclusion and diversity. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
    Collet Sabé, J., Besalú, X., Feu, J., & Tort, A. (2014). Escuelas, familias y resultados académicos. Un nuevo modelo de análisis de las relaciones entre docentes y progenitores para el éxito de todo el alumnado.
    Cóppola, L. B. (2010). Prácticas inclusivas en el aula: validación de un instrumento para conocer la perspectiva del alumnado de primaria y secundaria/Inclusive practices in the classroom: validation instrument for knowledge perspective of the primariy and high school... Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 10(3).
    Cruz-Ortiz, M., Carmen Perez-Rodriguez, M., Jenaro-Río, C., Sevilla-Santo, D. E., & Cruz-Ortiz, S. (2016). When differences do not matter: inclusion in a Mexican primary school/Cuando las diferencias no importan: la inclusión en una escuela primaria mexicana. Cultura y Educación, 28(1), 72-98.
    Davison, M. L. (1983). Multidimensional Scaling. Wiley.
    Deppeler, J., & Harvey, D. (2004). Validating the British Index for Inclusion for the Australian context: stage one. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(2), 155-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360311032000158033
    Dignath, C., Rimm-Kaufman, S., van Ewijk, R., & Kunter, M. (2022). Teachers’ Beliefs About Inclusive Education and Insights on What Contributes to Those Beliefs: a Meta-analytical Study. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2609-2660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09695-0
    Donath, J. L., Lüke, T., Graf, E., Tran, U. S., & Götz, T. (2023). Does Professional Development Effectively Support the Implementation of Inclusive Education? A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09752-2
    Douglas, G., McLinden, M., Robertson, C., Travers, J., & Smith, E. (2015). Including Pupils with Special Educational Needs and Disability in National Assessment: Comparison of Three Country Case Studies through an Inclusive Assessment Framework. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 63(1), 98-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912x.2015.1111306
    Douglas, G., McLinden, M., Robertson, C., Travers, J., & Smith, E. (2015). Including Pupils with Special Educational Needs and Disability in National Assessment: Comparison of Three Country Case Studies through an Inclusive Assessment Framework. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 63(1), 98-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912x.2015.1111306
    Education, A. (2013). Indicators of inclusive schools: Continuing the conversation. Recuperado de https://education. alberta. ca/media/6880391/indicators_of_inclusive_ schools. pdf.
    Fasting, R. B. (2013). Adapted education: the Norwegian pathway to inclusive and efficient education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(3), 263-276.
    Fernández -Archilla, J. A., Álvarez, J. F., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Trigueros, R., Alonso-López, I. D., & Echeita, G. (2020). Validation of the Index for Inclusion Questionnaire for Compulsory Secondary Education Students. Sustainability, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062169
    Fernandez-Archilla, J. A., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Alvarez-Hernandez, J. F., Luque de la Rosa, A., Echeita, G., & Trigueros, R. (2020). Validation of the Index for Inclusion Questionnaire for Parents of Non-University Education Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093216
    Fernandez-Archilla, J. A., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Alvarez-Hernandez, J. F., Luque de la Rosa, A., Echeita, G., & Trigueros, R. (2020). Validation of the Index for Inclusion Questionnaire for Parents of Non-University Education Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093216
    Ferreira, C., Vieira, M. J., & Vidal, J. (2014). Sistema de indicadores sobre el apoyo a los estudiantes con discapacidad en las universidades españolas. Ministerio de Educación.
    Florian, L., & Camedda, D. (2020). Enhancing teacher education for inclusion. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 4-8.
    Forlin, C. (Ed.). (2010). Teacher education for inclusion. London: Routledge.
    Frankel, E. B., Gold, S., & Ajodhia-Andrews, A. (2010). International Preschool Inclusion: Bridging the Gap Between Vision and Practices. Young Exceptional Children, 13(5), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250610379983
    Fulcher, G. (2015). Disabling policies?: A comparative approach to education policy and disability. Routledge.
    Gans, J. (2000). Facilitating synthesis and advancing methodological development in strategic planning. Cornell University.
    Garg, S., & Sangwan, S. (2020). Literature Review on Diversity and Inclusion at Workplace, 2010–2017. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 25(1), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920959523
    Garzón Castro, P. (2015). Inclusión educativa: Actitudes y estrategias del profesorado.
    Gidley, J., Hampson, G., Wheeler, L., & Bereded-Samuel, E. (2010). Social inclusion: Context, theory and practice. The Australasian Journal of University Community Engagement, 5(1), 6-36.
    Higham, R., & Booth, T. (2016). Reinterpreting the authority of heads. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 140-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216659294
    Hoy, A. W., Davis, H., & Pape, S. J. (2006). Teacher knowledge and beliefs.
    Hu, B. Y., Mak, M. C. K., Zhang, C., Fan, X., & Zhu, J. (2017). Chinese Parents’ Beliefs about the Importance and Feasibility of Quality Early Childhood Inclusion. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 65(2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912x.2017.1358809
    Jenkinson, J., & Gow, L. (1989). Integration in Australia: A research perspective. Australian Journal of Education, 33(3), 267-283.
    Juvonen, J., Lessard, L. M., Rastogi, R., Schacter, H. L., & Smith, D. S. (2019). Promoting Social Inclusion in Educational Settings: Challenges and Opportunities. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 250-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1655645
    Juvonen, J., Lessard, L. M., Rastogi, R., Schacter, H. L., & Smith, D. S. (2019). Promoting Social Inclusion in Educational Settings: Challenges and Opportunities. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 250-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1655645
    Kane, M., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Sage Publications, Inc.
    Kardaras, D. K., Karakostas, B., & Mamakou, X. J. (2013). Content presentation personalisation and media adaptation in tourism web sites using Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(6), 2331–2342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.031
    Kiely, M. T., Brownell, M. T., Lauterbach, A. A., & Benedict, A. E. (2014). Teachers' beliefs about students with special needs and inclusion. In International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs (pp. 475-491). Routledge.
    Koutsouris, G., Stentiford, L., & Norwich, B. (2022). A critical exploration of inclusion policies of elite UK universities. British Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 878-895. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3799
    Koutsouris, G., Stentiford, L., & Norwich, B. (2022). A critical exploration of inclusion policies of elite UK universities. British Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 878-895. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3799
    Krämer, S., Möller, J., & Zimmermann, F. (2021). Inclusive Education of Students With General Learning Difficulties: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 432-478. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321998072
    Lin, H., Lai, W. & Wu, B. (2020). How to Determine the Critical Ratios for Fuzzy Delphi Method? International Journal of Intelligent technologies and applied statistics, 13(3), 257-266.
    Losada Puente, L., Fiuza Asorey, M., & Bana Castro, M. (2022). What defines inclusion in higher education institutions? Validation of an instrument based on the ‘index for inclusion’. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(1), 91-105.
    Losinski, M., Ennis, R., Katsiyannis, A., & Rapa, L. J. (2019). Schools as Change Agents in Reducing Bias and Discrimination: Shaping Behaviors and Attitudes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(10), 2718-2726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01452-2
    McMaster, C. (2015). " Where Is _?": Culture and the Process of Change in the Development of Inclusive Schools. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 11(1), 16-34.
    McMaster, C. (2015). " Where Is _?": Culture and the Process of Change in the Development of Inclusive Schools. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 11(1), 16-34.
    Messiou, K. (2016). Research in the field of inclusive education: time for a rethink? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(2), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1223184
    Messiou, K., Ainscow, M., Echeita, G., Goldrick, S., Hope, M., Paes, I., ... & Vitorino, T. (2016). Learning from differences: a strategy for teacher development in respect to student diversity. School effectiveness and school improvement, 27(1), 45-61.
    Mitchell, D., & Sutherland, D. (2020). What really works in special and inclusive education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies. Routledge.
    Moore, M., Ainscow, M., & Fox, S. (2007). The Manchester Inclusion Standard. Manchester: Manchester City Council, 7.
    Nes, K. (2009). The Role of the Index for Inclusion in Supporting School Development in Norway: A Comparative Perspective. Research in Comparative and International Education, 4(3), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2009.4.3.305
    Nes, K. (2009). The Role of the Index for Inclusion in Supporting School Development in Norway: A Comparative Perspective. Research in Comparative and International Education, 4(3), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2009.4.3.305
    Nilsen, S. (2010). Moving towards an educational policy for inclusion? Main reform stages in the development of the Norwegian unitary school system. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(5), 479-497.
    Norwich, B. (2013). Addressing tensions and dilemmas in inclusive education: Living with uncertainty. Routledge.
    Okoye-Johnson, O. (2011). Does Multicultural Education Improve Students’ Racial Attitudes? Implications for Closing the Achievement Gap. Journal of Black Studies, 42(8), 1252-1274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934711408901
    Oswald, M. (2014). Positioning the individual teacher in school-based learning for inclusion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 1-10.
    Oswald, M. M. (2010). Teacher learning during the implementation of the index for inclusion in a primary school (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch).
    Oswick, C., & Noon, M. (2014). Discourses of diversity, equality and inclusion: trenchant formulations or transient fashions?. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 23-39.
    Peperkorn, M., Müller, K., Mertz, K., & Paulus, P. (2020). Dealing with inclusion – teachers’ assessment of internal and external resources. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1821450
    Peters*, S., Johnstone, C., & Ferguson, P. (2005). A disability rights in education model for evaluating inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 9(2), 139-160.
    Pillay, H., Carrington, S., Duke, J., Chandra, S., Heeraman, J., & Tones, M. (2015). Mobilising school and community engagement to implement disability-inclusive education through action research: Fiji, Samoa, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. Queensland University of Technology.
    Pillay, H., Carrington, S., Duke, J., Chandra, S., Heeraman, J., & Tones, M. (2015). Mobilising school and community engagement to implement disability-inclusive education through action research: Fiji, Samoa, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. Queensland University of Technology.
    Porter, G., & Towell, D. (2017). Promoviendo la educación inclusiva. Inclusive Education Canadá y Centre for Inclusive Futures del Reino Unido. Recuperado de.
    Rebernik, N., Szajczyk, M., Bahillo, A., & Goličnik Marušić, B. (2020). Measuring Disability Inclusion Performance in Cities Using Disability Inclusion Evaluation Tool (DIETool). Sustainability, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041378
    Rinta, T., Purves, R. S., Welch, G., Stadler Elmer, S., & Bissig, R. (2011). Connections between children's feelings of social inclusion and their musical backgrounds. Journal of Social Inclusion, 2(2), 34-57.
    Rustemier, S., & Booth, T. (2005). Learning about the Index in use: A study of the use of the Index for Inclusion in schools and LEAs in England. CSIE.
    Sabharwal, M. (2014). Is Diversity Management Sufficient? Organizational Inclusion to Further Performance. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 197-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026014522202
    Saffie, N.A. M., Shukor, N.M., & Rasmani, K.A. (2016, July 24-27). Fuzzy delphi method: Issues and hallenges. International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS), Sydney, NSW, pp. 1–7.
    Sarrionandia, G. E. (2017). Educación inclusiva. Sonrisas y lágrimas. Aula abierta, 46(2), 17-24.
    Simón, C., & Giné, C. (2016). Escuela, familia y comunidad: construyendo alianzas para promover la inclusión. Revista latinoamericana de educación inclusiva, 10(1), 25-42.
    Symeonidou, S. (2017). Initial teacher education for inclusion: a review of the literature. Disability & Society, 32(3), 401-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1298992
    Thomas, G., Walker, D., & Webb, J. (1998). The making of the inclusive school. Psychology Press.
    Trochim, W. M. (1993). The reliability of concept mapping. Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association. Dallas, Texas.
    Trochim, W. M. K. (1985). Pattern Matching, Validity, and Conceptualization in Program Evaluation. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 575–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8500900503
    Urton, K., Wilbert, J., & Hennemann, T. (2014). Attitudes towards inclusion and self-efficacy of principals and teachers. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 12(2), 151-168.
    Valle, J. W., & Connor, D. J. (2019). Rethinking disability: A disability studies approach to inclusive practices. Routledge.
    Vaughan, M. (2002). An Index for Inclusion. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 197-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250210139316
    Vaughan, M. (2002). An index for inclusion. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 197-201.
    Volckmar, N. (2008). Knowledge and solidarity: The Norwegian social‐democratic school project in a period of change, 1945–2000. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(1), 1-15.
    Vorhaus, J. (2006). Respecting profoundly disabled learners. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(3), 313-328.
    Warnock, M., & Norwich, B. (2010). Special educational needs: A new look. Bloomsbury Publishing.
    Wildeman, R. A., & Nomdo, C. (2007). Implementation of inclusive education: How far are we?. IDASA-Budget Information Servi
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    學校行政碩士在職專班
    110911005
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110911005
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[學校行政碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    100501.pdf5008KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback