政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/152971
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50924244      Online Users : 924
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152971


    Title: 中港之間的政教角力：香港佛聯會2001年「反邪教」與「宗教自由」的立法辯論
    Contesting of Politics and Religion Between China and Hong Kong: Hong Kong Legislative Debate on “Anti-evil Cult” vs Religious Freedom 2001, Initiated by Hong Kong Buddhist Association
    Authors: 劉宇光
    Lau, Lawrence Yue-kwong
    Contributors: 中國大陸研究
    Keywords: 香港佛教;香港宗教自由;香港政教關係
    Hong Kong Buddhism;Religious Freedom of Hong Kong;Political-Religious Relationship of Hong Kong
    Date: 2024-06
    Issue Date: 2024-08-08
    Abstract: 本文以2001 年由香港佛教組織挑起的「反邪教」立法辯論為線索，探討當年佛教在香港的政治與宗教關係之狀態。2000 年前後香港政權轉移未幾，變化表面尚不明顯，在香港社會素來低調的佛教一反常態，其規模最大的組織香港佛教聯合會在立法會要求通過由佛聯會所提出類似「反邪教」的法案，以便特區當局可取締佛聯會所不滿的信仰團體。本文據香港立法會的會議紀錄，探討2001 年香港佛教聯合會在立法機構力倡通過類似反邪教法的前因後果，及由此引發的反彈。本文由五節組成，除了前言外，正文包括：一、香港佛教聯合會的性質；二、力促立法「反邪教」的佛聯會陳辭；三、反對立法維護宗教自由的基督宗教陳辭；四、爭論的弦外音：公私之別與政教分合；五、其他的衍生議題，及最後全文結論的「四個疑問」。
    The article is a study of the legislative debate on “Anti-evil Cult” vs Religious Freedom in February 2002, initiated by Hong Kong Buddhist Association (HKBA), according to the word-by-word official proceeding of the Legislative Council, while the context and background of the debate is also addressed. Other than the introduction and conclusion, the article is composed of five main sections. Section One is a comprehensive analysis on the nature of the Hong Kong Buddhist Association, the mainstream Buddhist organization of the city, in the contrast context with her counterpart in China and Taiwan. Section Two is the reconstruction of the Buddhist legislative argument for the bill drawing of “Anti-evil Cult” in the council. Section Three is the reconstruction of Christian and other religious groups’ counter argument of objection on “Anti-evil cult” and defense on Religious Freedom. Section Four is the analysis and inquiry on the hidden meaning between the lines. It includes the distinctions between constitutional-public vs faith-private languages, and two patterns of religious-political relationship. Section Five is a further discussion on related issues derived from above situation. And at the conclusion of the article is a brief description on several unsolved puzzles that would need further analysis through other writings.
    Relation: 中國大陸研究, 67(2), 93-131
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: https://doi.org/10.30389/MCS.202406_67(2).0003
    DOI: 10.30389/MCS.202406_67(2).0003
    Appears in Collections:[Mainland China Studies] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    67-2-3.pdf1829KbAdobe PDF59View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback