政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/152859
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50998671      Online Users : 851
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152859


    Title: 國家安全考量下的特殊難民 - 以2019年香港反送中事件後遷台港人為例
    At the Intersection of Refugees and Taiwanese National Security: A Case Study of Hong Kongese Refugees Following the 2019 Hong Kong Protests
    Authors: 黃尚卿
    Huang, Shang-Ching
    Contributors: 林佳和
    黃尚卿
    Huang, Shang-Ching
    Keywords: 國際難民公約
    難民法
    脫北者
    港人
    反送中
    尋求庇護者
    Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees,
    Asylum Seekers
    Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement
    Refugee Law
    North Korean Defectors
    Hong Kongers
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-08-05 14:26:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文首先探討我國在沒有難民法之情況下如何協助2019年反送中運動後來臺港人。以2020年「臺港服務交流辦公室」(後稱「交流辦」)之成立為分水嶺,之前由公民團體協助,之後由交流辦接手,加以公私協力之方式進行。論文以質性訪談之方式,訪談對象為尋求庇護之港人及協助之公民團體,以爬梳其經歷之庇護審查機制與流程。

    此外,為了解我國之機制是否符合或接近國際規範,文中亦整理聯合國難民署之尋求庇護相關規範、歐洲共同庇護系統相關指令、以及國際難民法官協會之難民申請案件審理原則,以比較提供庇護國應盡之義務與政策之原則方式。

    本文後半部旨在分析南韓政府對於脫北者之庇護政策。由於國家安全一直為我國庇護機制無法通過施行之主要原因,因此比較對於脫北者同樣有國安考量之南韓政府,如何以審核制度與安置機制處理尋求庇護之脫北者。進而討論出我國目前之庇護機制是否應有重新調整,以平衡國家安全與人權考量之建議方向。
    This thesis first explores how Taiwan assists Hong Kong people who came to Taiwan after the 2019 Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement in the absence of a refugee law, and the establishment of the "Taiwan-Hong Kong Services and Exchanges Office” (hereafter referred to as the “Services Office") in 2020 serves as a watershed. Before the office opens, the asylum seeker support system was mainly provided by civil groups, while afterwards, the Services Office took over, implementing a public-private partnership approach to offer help. The thesis uses qualitative interviews, interviewing Hong Kong asylum seekers who successfully received the “special ID” to stay in the country and the assisting civil groups, to review the Hong Kong asylum seeker support system and the processes they experienced, which is not expressly stipulated currently.
    Additionally, to understand whether Taiwan’s asylum seeker policy has complied with or is closed to international standards, the article also organizes relevant regulations or international instruments on asylum-seekers' solutions from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, directives from the European Common Asylum System, and the principles for handling refugee applications from the International Association of Refugee Law Judges, comparing the obligations and policy principles that asylum-providing countries should fulfill.
    The later part of this article aims to analyze South Korea's asylum policies for North Korean defectors. Given that national security has been the main reason for the failure of Taiwan's refugee law, the thesis compares how the South Korean government, which also has national security considerations regarding North Korean defectors, handles their asylum applications through review systems and resettlement systems. It further discusses whether Taiwan's asylum seeker support system should be adjusted to balance national security and human rights, providing recommendations for a revised approach.
    Reference: 中文
    一、期刊論文

    程明修、李東穎、魏培軒,我國難民法治之展望學術座談會- 會議紀錄,臺灣法學雜誌,第375期,2019/9/28,頁1-6。

    李建良,論國際條約的國內法效力與法位階定序 - 國際條約與憲法解釋之關係的基礎課題,憲法解釋之理論與實務,第8輯,中央研究院法律學研究所,2017年,頁175-275。

    張文貞,國際人權法與內國憲法的匯流:台灣實行兩大人權公約之後,社團法人台灣學會主編:台灣法學新課題(八),台北:元照,2010年3月,頁1-26。

    李震山,論移民制度與外國人基本權利,台灣本土法學雜誌,第48期,2003/07/01,頁51-65。

    翁燕菁,國門前的難民 - 不遣返原則與難民法,月旦法學雜誌,第250期,2016/02/05,頁158-170。

    江旻諺,是不能說,還是不知從何說起- 談臺灣援助香港的庇護工具與法制化的挫敗,臺灣人權學刊,第5卷第4期,2020/12,頁159-170。

    許義寶,我國難民法草案之初探,中央警察大學國土安全與國境管理學報,35期,2021/6,頁1-28。

    郭鋭,朝鮮脫北者的難民身份認定淺析,隴東學院學報,第24卷第6期,頁90-94,2013年

    陳蒿堯,南韓文在寅政府政府的對北政策及朝鮮半島安全局勢展望,時代法學,第12卷第5期,頁3-10,2017年

    蔡昀昕,國際難民處理之現狀及其法治與困境,華岡法粹,Vol. 69, 頁183-250,2020年。
    許藝寶,我國難民法草案之初探,國土安全與國境管理學報,第35期,2021/06。

    曾冠球,協力治理觀點下公共管理者的挑戰與能力建立,文官制度季刊,第三卷第一期,2021/01,頁27-52。

    簡江作、劉順福,韓國與朝鮮現代史,國立編譯館,2009/10/01,頁 70。
    吳楚克,北朝鮮非法越界與原因探析,中國編政,第171期,2007/09,頁 51-64。

    二、碩博士學位論文

    黃微雯,難民庇護申請程序中之權利保護,東吳大學法學院法律學系,2023年。

    李浩銘,我國政治難民庇護政策之研究,國立台灣大學社會科學院國家發展研究所,2017年。

    蘇柏綸,以香港居民來台尋求庇護條件論我國政治庇護機制與公私協力運作,國立台灣大學社會科學院國家發展研究所,2021年。

    黃柏瑋,難民不遣返原則之研究 - 以歐洲司法暨行政為中心,國立政治大學法律學研究所,2020年。

    林靜苡,脫北者相關政策與衍生問題研究 - 以中國、韓國為中心,中國文化大學韓國文學研究所,2020年。

    魏庭禎,歐洲聯盟難民庇護政策之研究,國立台灣大學政治學研究所,2006年。

    林楷軒,我國難民法立法之研究,國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所, 2018年。

    高恩榮,國民或難民?韓國政府對脫北者的初階安置援助,國立臺灣大學社會科學院政治學系,2022年09月。

    林彥廷,內國氣候難民的國際人權思考:以松鶴社區遷村為例,國立臺灣大學法律學院科技整合法律研究所,2016年。

    林韋秀,人類安全思辨下的移民議題研究-已脫北者為例,中央警察大學國境警察研究所,2019年1月。

    武平,「脫北者」法律地位及應對機制研究,西南政法大學國際法學院,2018年01月11日。

    三、專書

    柳宗勳,解密金正恩 - 南韓的第一首北韓觀察報告,台北市:時報文化出版企業股份有限公司,2018/12/18。

    四、網際網路資料

    曾建元,台灣香港人道援助相關法規及機制之探討,上網日期 2023/2/22,檢自:風傳媒https://www.storm.mg/article/4737871?page=1

    梁景鴻,看到難拿到的「專案身份」- 上千香港尋求庇護者通不過的兩道窄門,上網日期 2022/6/17,檢自:報導者https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwj3ucWljNyEAxWema8BHTUvBkAQFnoECBAQAQ&url=https://www.twreporter.org/a/hong-kong-taiwan-asylum&usg=AOvVaw3x5uEHBbh-tGztpsIcutqT&opi=89978449

    林楷軒,《難民法》草案撐香港?獨步全球的庇護機制,上網日期 2023/3/2,檢自:法律白話文運動 https://plainlaw.me/posts/refugee-3

    劉愷詩,中央社路透社,反送中運動影響深遠救援港人讓國際看見台灣- 台灣撐香港沒難民法也能做到人權保障,48期,2021年
    白麥克(Michael Britow) ,從創傷新生:走進迎接朝鮮的脫北者的韓國統一院,上網日期 2023/7/28, 檢自:BBC NEWS中文 https://web.archive.org/web/20230730135952/https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/world-66162912

    姜遠珍,大紀元,南韓大幅削減北韓投靠者定居援助金,2004/12/07,https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/4/12/7/n740004.htm

    謝莉慧,「台港服務交流辦公室」援助對象 陸委會:需合法入境者,上網日期 2020/6/18,檢自:新頭殼 https://tw.news.yahoo.com/台港服務交流辦公室-援助對象-陸委會-須合法入境者-104155083.html

    中華民國大陸委員會,陸委會公布「香港人道援助關懷行動專案」成立「臺港服務交流辦公室」提供港人必要協助,上網日期 2020/06/18,檢自:https://www.mac.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=B383123AEADAEE52&s=B6D96A501C175E4D

    台灣人權促進會新聞稿,「落實港澳條例18條援港機制 啟動HF177庇護居留運作」記者會,上網日期 2022/03/04,檢自:https://www.tahr.org.tw/news/3145

    張詩芸,台灣人一定要知道的香港《送中條例》修法5大爭議QA,上網日期 2019/6/11,檢自:報導者 https://www.twreporter.org/a/about-hong-kong-china-extradition-law-qanda
    Yahoo即時新聞,反送中示威!林鄭月娥:習近平支持港府依法止暴制亂,上網日期 2019/11/5,檢自:Yahoo 即時新聞 https://tw.sports.yahoo.com/news/反送中示威林鄭月娥習近平支持港府依法止暴制亂-110846043.html
    林姝涵,從反送中到俄烏戰爭,在立院卡關17年的『難民法』為何遲遲不實現?,上網日期 2022/03/17,檢自:關鍵評論 https://www.thenewslens.com/article/164131
    楊智強,真的假的?台灣無「法」提供難民政治庇護?,上網日期 2019/11/26,檢自:報導者 https://www.twreporter.org/a/mini-reporter-taiwan-refugee-law

    張維媖、曾郁芯,台灣人對難民法與庇護機制沒共識?從社會調查與立法倡議經驗談起,上網日期 2022/11/24,檢自:https://www.tahr.org.tw/event/3281

    立法院新聞稿,「聯合國人權兩公約之國內實踐 -以兩公約施行法為中心」,上網日期2016/09/01,檢自: https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6586&pid=85233

    自由亞洲電台,國台辦斥支援「反送中」港人 蔡英文回應只關心不介入
    ,上網日期 2019/08/15,檢自:https://www.rfa.org/cantonese/news/htm/tw-takein-08192019063300.html

    梁景鴻,看得到難拿到的「專案身份」- 上千香港尋求庇護者通不過的兩道窄門,上網日期 2022/06/17,檢自:報導者 https://www.twreporter.org/a/hong-kong-taiwan-asylum

    鍾泓良,新法規提高門檻,假投資、國安成兩大限制理由,港人『無期限補件』,港人不願來台灣? ,上網日期 2023/10/18,檢自:今周刊 https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183027/post/202310180030/

    洪培英,「《香港人在台灣》謝謝你們以愛對待我... 香港青年:『我最牽掛的是香港、第二是台灣...』」,上網日期 2023/07/01,檢自:信傳媒 https://tw.news.yahoo.com/香港人在台灣-謝謝你們以愛對待我-香港青年-我最牽掛的是香港-第二是台灣-010201291.html
    吳書緯,自由時報,受台庇護香港勇武派青年現身 王定宇證明「港澳條例」授權足夠,2020/5/28,https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/3179943

    風傳媒,被三個國家拋棄的最慘「脫北者」:在南韓被剝奪一切支援、甚至完全失去國籍的北韓華僑們,上網日期 2021/10/22,檢自: https://tw.news.yahoo.com/被三個國家拋棄的最慘-脫北者-在南韓被剝奪-切支援-甚至完全失去國籍的北韓華僑們-065058227.html

    大陸委員會新聞稿,陸委會公布「香港人道援助關懷行動專案」成立「臺港服務交流辦公室」提供港人必要協助,上網日期 2020/06/18,檢自:https://www.mac.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=B383123AEADAEE52&s=B6D96A501C175E4D

    內政部,難民法草案總說明,上網日期 2016/3/16,檢自:https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/OldFile/Act_file/難民法草案總說明.PDF

    監察院調查報告,調查案號112內調0039,上網日期 2023/08/15,檢自:https://www.cy.gov.tw/CyBsBox.aspx?CSN=1&n=133&_Query=d48d85f5-eb05-4eb6-a0f3-dc5a625df6e2

    內政部入出國及移民署,我國難民法制定現況自行研究報告,2010,檢自:www.immigration.gov.tw/media/6020/我國難民法制訂現況自行研究報告.pdf

    內政部移民署,港澳居民歷年移居台灣人數,上網日期 2022/09/14,檢自:https://www.immigration.gov.tw/5385/7344/70395/143266/

    Unikorea大韓民國統一部,脫北居民現況,上網日期 2024/03,檢自:https://www.unikorea.go.kr/cn_unikorea/news/statistics1/defectors/

    朴鍵ㄧ、李志斐,朝鮮脫北者問題的國際化演變及其影響,民初思韻,上網日期 2015/08,檢自:http://www.rocidea.com/one?id=30739

    2020年第136號法律公告,港區國安法,檢自:https://www.gld.gov.hk/egazette/pdf/20202444e/cs220202444136.pdf


    英文

    一、期刊論文

    Eric Neumayer, Bogus Refugees? The Determinations of Asylum Migration to Western Europe, Oxford University Press, pp. 389-409 (2005/08/08)

    James Milner, Responding to Protracted Refugee Situations- Lessons from a Decade of Discussion, Oxford Department of International Development Refugee Studies Centre, (2011/01)
    Guy S. Goodwin-Gill, Non-Refoulement and the New Asylum Seekers, Refuge from Inhumanity? War Refugees and International Humanitarian Law, Chapter 18, pp.433-459
    (1986)

    Kristina Kironska, Formosa as a Safe Haven? Taiwan’s Asylum Situation and What People Think of It, (2023/04)

    Chris Ansell and Alison Gash, Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press (2007)

    Michael Garkisch, Jens Heidingsfelder & Markus Beckmann, Third Sector Organizations and Migration: A systematic Literature Review on the Contribution of Third Sector Organizations in View of Flight, Migration and Refugee Crises, International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 28 (2017)

    Meryll Dean, Miki Nagashima, Sharing the Burden: The Role of Government and NGOs in Protecting and Providing for Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Japan, Journal of Refugee Studies Volume 20, Issue 3, 481-508 (2007/09)

    In-Jin Yoon, North Korean Diaspora: North Korean Defectors Abroad and in South Korea, Development and Society, vol. 30, No.1, 1-26 (2001)

    Andrei Lankov, Bitter Taste of Paradis: North Korean Refugees in South Korea, Journal of East Asia Studies, vol. 6, No. 1, 105-138 (2006)
    Kim Tae Jong, Kim Jihong, Lee Insook, Economic Assimilation of North Korean Refugees, , KDI School of Public Policy and Management (2006)

    Sung Kil Min, Divided Countries, Divided Mind 1: Psycho-Social Issues in Adaptation Problems of North Korean Defectors, Psychiatry Investig. (2008)

    Khalid Koser, International migration - A very short introduction, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press (2016)

    Eric Neumayer, Bogus Refugees? The Determinations of Asylum Migration to Western Europe, Oxford University Press, 389-409 (2005)

    Allen Machey, John Barnes, International Association of Refugee Law Judges Assessment of Credibility in Refugee and Subsidiary Protection claims under the EU Qualification Directive Judicial criteria and standards, 20-59 (2012)

    K. Koh and G. Baek, North Koran Defectors: A window into a Reunified Korea, Korea Briefing (2002)

    Scott Snyder, North Korea’s Challenge of Regime Survival: Internal Problems and Implications for the Future, Pacific Affairs (2000)

    Koh Dae-Won, Dynamics of Inter-Korean Conflict and North Korea’s Recent Policy Changes, an Inter-Systemic View, Asian Survey, 422-441 (2004/5)

    Samuel Soonki Kim, The Future of the Post-Kim II Sung System in North Korea, The Two Koreas and the United States (2000)

    Kwon Jung, Stephan Haggard, Changyong Choi, Value Systems and Adaptation: A Typology of North Korean Defectors, International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, Vol. 28, No.2, 67-96, (2019/12)

    Jin Woong Kang, Human Rights and Refugee Status of the North Korean Diaspora, North Korean Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 4-17 (2013)

    Eric Bidet, Social Capital and Work Integration of Migrants: The Case of North Korean Defectors in South Korea, Asian Perspective, Vol. 33, No. 2, 151-179 (2009)

    Yoon In-Jin, Social Integration and Well-Being of North Korean Migrants in South Korea, Journal of Social Issues, Vol 78, Issue 3, (2021/08/28)


    二、專書

    Barbara Demick, Nothing to Envy: Ordinary Lives in North Korea (2009)

    David J. Whittaker, Asylum Seekers and Refugees in the Contemporary World, (2006)

    三、網路資料

    Scott A. Snyder (2011), Delivering Social Justice for North Korean Refugees in South Korea: The Role of Civil SOciety and Opportunities for US-South Korea Cooperation, CFR Presents, available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20150910084512/http://blogs.cfr.org/asia/2011/05/01/delivering-social-justice-for-north-korean-refugees-in-south-korea-the-role-of-civil-society-and-opportunities-for-u-s-south-korea-cooperation/

    Se Eun Gong, Fewer North Korean Defectors Reach South Korea, and Questions Grow About Unification, NPR World, 2023/09/15, available at: https://www.npr.org/2023/09/15/1191126701/south-korea-unification-ministry-north-korea-defectors

    UNHCR, Procedural Standards for Refugee Status Determination under UNHCR’s Mandate (2020), available at: https://www.refworld.org/policy/legalguidance/unhcr/2020/en/12330

    Sokeel Park, Increasing Information Access for the North Korean People, United States Institute of Peace (2024), available at: https://www.usip.org/publications/2024/04/increasing-information-access-north-korean-people

    Brian Padden, Defector: North Koran Regime Crumbling, Voice of America East Asia (2017), available at: https://www.voanews.com/a/defector-north-korea-regime-crumbling/3692918.html
    UNHCR, Refugee Q&A, available at: https://www.unhcr.org/hk/about-us/faq-of-refugees

    Statista, Acceptance Rate of Asylum Seekers in South Korea from 2004-2022, available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/876020/south-korea-refugee-application-approval-rate/

    Amnesty International, South Korea: Jail Sentence for Man Who Praised North an Attach on Freedom of Expression (2023/11/27), available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/11/south-korea-jail-sentence-for-man-who-praised-north-an-attack-on-freedom-of-expression/
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    法學院碩士在職專班
    110961041
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110961041
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Master of Laws Program for Executives] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    104101.pdf4794KbAdobe PDF1View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback