政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/152835
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51290138      線上人數 : 876
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152835


    題名: 不同繼承型態在農地細碎過程中扮演的角色分析
    The Analysis of Inheritance Types on Farmland Fragmentation
    作者: 許淮哲
    Hsu, Huai-Che
    貢獻者: 丁秀吟
    Ting, Hsiu-Yin
    許淮哲
    Hsu, Huai-Che
    關鍵詞: 農地細碎
    農地繼承
    均分繼承
    分割繼承
    Farmland Fragmentation
    Farmland Inheritance
    Equal Divided Inheritance
    Partition of Inheritance
    日期: 2024
    上傳時間: 2024-08-05 14:16:54 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 探究台灣農地細碎之原因，過去文獻指出，一則基於制度面「耕者有其田」的政策誘導；另則，我國民法關於繼承事件之規定，採全體繼承人當然繼承主義之正式制度規範，以及傳統有土斯有財、多子均分繼承習俗。此外，過去許多國內外文獻皆將農地細碎的矛頭指向多子均分繼承，認為繼承會使農地在世代間遭到不斷的分割，使得農地面積不斷變小。
    然而，在面對農地細碎的議題時，過去文獻主要聚焦於農地細碎對於農地利用、農業經營效率等經濟層面的問題，鮮少有人探討繼承與農地細碎兩者之間的關聯。有鑑於過去研究缺乏可靠證據表明繼承與農地細碎之關係，本研究透過長時間的大樣本實證資料，以空間分析及敘事研究之方式進行分析。分析結果顯示不管是分割繼承或一般繼承只要走向多子繼承皆有可能產生面積細碎的影響。然而，從實證資料中可以發現，農地繼承多為分割繼承且單獨繼承取得之農地，占整體資料68%，而農地細碎關係較大的一般繼承且多子繼承農地，僅占整體資料比例7%，使得繼承並非嘉義縣農地細碎的主要原因。除此之外，從空間分析以及相關文獻可以發現，因為鄰近建築用地之農地，在未來有更高的機會變為非農業使用，使得農地具有轉用增值的空間，繼承人普遍繼承意願較高，產生面積細小，產權較為複雜之情形，導致農地細碎地區多集中於鄉村區與都市計畫區周邊。另外，在農地細碎地區中又以一般繼承農地之權利較為分散，鮮少有繼承人之應繼分大於2/3，對於農地之處分與管理影響程度較大。
    Previous research pointed out that the causes of farm land fragmentation in Taiwan included policy effects such as "Land to the Tiller", the adoption of all inheritance by civil law, the formal system of inheritance forms, the custom of equally divided inheritance for more than one child, and the prevailing attitude of ‘with land comes wealth’. Additionally, some literatures mentioned that equal divided inheritance led to smaller and smaller size plots across generations.
    However, past studies primarily focused on the economic impacts of land fragmentation as the efficiency of land use and agriculture production, but rarely examined the relationship between inheritance and land fragmentation. We study if inheritance is a critical role on farmland fragmentation by analyzing the official data from 1998 to 2018. It is found that multiple heirs, no matter with either partition or equal divided inheritance, should be one factor in farmland fragmentation. Nevertheless, the multiple heirs cases are only 15% with partition and 7% with equal divided inheritance. This finding suggests that inheritance might not be the key cause of land fragmentation in Chiayi County.
    Moreover, spatial analysis and related literature indicate that heirs tend to be influenced by the potential value appreciation of land for future development, leading to smaller plot sizes and more complex ownership patterns near urban planning areas and rural area. In these fragmented regions, equal divided inheritance results in more dispersed land holdings, with few heirs’ holding more than two-thirds of the land share, significantly impacting land management and disposal.
    參考文獻: 1.丁秀吟，2006，「台灣地區農地重劃之角色變遷與展望」，《土地經濟年刊》，17: 31-56。
    2.丁秀吟、林子欽與劉佳欣，2021，「農地重劃減緩土地產權細碎化成效之評估—以嘉義縣為例」，《應用經濟論叢》，110：131-162。
    3.毛育剛，2002，「 台灣農地保護政策之演變」，《土地問題研究季刊》 1(4): 11-23。
    4.毛育剛，2006，「台灣農業發展重要轉捩點的政策含義」，《土地問題研究季刊》，17:2-13。
    5.江璧帆，2007，「農地集團化利用治理模式之比較分析」，政治大學研究所碩士論文:台北。
    6.李承嘉，2012，《農地與農村發展政策-新農業體制下的轉向》，五南圖書，初版1 刷，p.298。
    7.李建德，1990，「再論農業規模經濟」，『爭鳴』4:40－43。
    8.阮明淑，2019，「資料敘事分析之概念性框架初探」，圖書館學與資訊科學 ，45 (1):97-125。
    9.周羚翔，2014，「應用時空分析方法於環境公害陳情案件之研究」，國立台灣大學理學院地理環境資源學系碩士論文:台北。
    10.林志謙，2018，「農地細碎化課題之研究-以宜蘭縣冬山鄉為例」，中國文化大學環境設計學院都市計畫與開發管理學系碩士論文:台
    北。
    11.林英彥，1976，「農地政策論」，幼獅文化事業公司:台北
    12.林國慶，1994，「台灣農地政策分析與政策建議」，《經社法制論叢》，13：15-40。
    13.張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧與吳聰敏，2004，「經濟學-理論與實際」，台北:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。
    14.莊文忠，2018，「循證的政策制定與資料分析：挑戰與前瞻」，《文官制度季刊》，10(2):1-20。
    15.莊文忠，2020，「大數據的政策敘事分析：基本框架與案例演示」，國家文官學院T&D飛訊，268:1-34。
    16.莊谷中，2019，「臺灣農地經營規模之探討-以衝突型農村與傳統農業型農村農地產權實證分析為例」，《土地經濟年刊》，30：
    1-63。
    17.陳維斌、李俊霖、張琪如與王瓊芯，2016，「蘭陽平原農地轉用影響因子分析與空間規劃政策探討:系統方法之引入」，《台灣土地
    研究》，19(2):1-35。
    18.馮俞璇，2022，「臺北市使用容積增加基地之住宅開發特性分析」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文:台北。
    19.溫在弘、劉擇昌與林民浩，2010，「犯罪地圖繪製與熱區分析方法及其應用：以1998-2007年台北市住宅竊盜犯罪為例」，《地理研
    究》，52。
    20.劉欽泉與蕭景楷，2001，「促進台灣農地使用權流動性之研究」，《農業經濟半年刊》，69：1-29。
    21.Ali, F., Parikh, A., & Shah, M. K., 1996, “Measurement of economic efficiency using the behavioral and stochastic cost
    frontier approach”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 18(3): 271-287.
    22.Bauer, P. T., & Basil S. Yamey., 1957, “The Economics of Under-developed Countries”, University of Chicago Press.
    23.Bentley, J. W., 1987, “Economic and ecological approaches to land fragmentation: in defense of a much-maligned
    phenomenon”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 16（1）:31-67.
    24.Binns, B. O., 1950, “The Consolidation of Fragmented Agricultural Holdings”, FAO Agricultural Studies 11, Washington.
    25.Blarel, B., Hazell, P., Place, F., & Quiggin, J., 1992, “The economics of farm fragmentation: evidence from Ghana and
    Rwanda”, The World Bank Economic Review, 6(2):233-254.
    26.Boliari, N., 2013, “Does land fragmentation affect land productivity? Empirical evidence from Bulgaria”, Reveiew of
    Agricultural and Environmental Studies, 94-3, pp.273-302.
    27.Boliari, N., 2017, “Can partible inheritance explain land fragmentation? The case of Bulgaria”, Agrarian South: Journal
    of Political Economy, 6(3):334-353.
    28.Deininger, K., Savastano, S., & Carletto, C., 2012, “Land fragmentation, cropland abandonment, and land market operation
    in Albania”, World Development, 40（10）:2108-2122.
    29.Demetriou, Demetris, 2013, “The development of an integrated planning and decision support system (IPDSS) for land
    consolidation”, Springer Science & Business Media.
    30.Dhungana, P., 2022, “Farmland fragmentation, problems, and remedies”.
    31.Dorner, Peter., 1977, “Land Ownership and Tenure”, In E. R. Duncan, ed., Dimensions in World Food Problems, Ames: Iowa
    State University Press.
    32.Downing, T. E., 1977, “Partible inheritance and land fragmentation in a Oaxaca village”, Human Organization, 235-243.
    33.Dykes, B, 2016, “Data storytelling: The essential data science skill everyone needs”, Retrieved from
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/brentdykes/2016/03/31/data-storytelling-the-essential-data-science-skill-everyone-needs/#
    79214a7952ad
    34.Fleisher, B. and Liu, Y. H., 1992, “Economies of scale, plot size,human capital and productivity in Chinese
    agriculture”,Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 32(3):112-123.
    35.Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M., 2000, “Quantitative geography: perspectives on spatial data analysis:
    Sage”.
    36.Gatterer, M., Leonhardt, H., Morawetz, U., & Salhofer, K., 2022, “Inheritance tradition and farm land fragmentation:
    evidence from Austria”, Joint Conference DAES and ÖGA: Ljubljana.
    37.Hardin, G., 2009, “The tragedy of the commons”, Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 1(3):243-253.
    38.Heller, M. A., 1998, “The tragedy of the anticommons: property in the transition from Marx to markets”, Harvard law
    review, 621-688.
    39.Hyodo, S., 1963, "Aspects of Land Consolidation in Japan”, Land Tenure, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
    40.Jabarin, A. S., & Epplin, F. M., 1994, “Impacts of land fragmentation on the cost of producing wheat in the rain-fed
    region of northern Jordan”, Agricultural Economics, 11(2-3):191-196.
    41.Jia, L & Martin, P., 2012, “How land fragmentation affects off-farm labor supply in China: Evidence from household panel
    data”, GEWISOLA, Halle: Germany.
    42.Kawasaki, K., 2010, “The costs and benefits of land fragmentation of rice farms in Japan.”, Australian Journal of
    Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54(4): 509-526.
    43.Keeler, M. E., & Skuras, D. G., 1990, “Land fragmentation and consolidation policies in Greek agriculture”, Geography,
    75(1):73-76.
    44.Kosara, R., & Mackinlay, J., 2013, “Storytelling: The next step for visualization”, Computer, 46(5):44-50.
    45.Latruffe, L., & Piet, L., 2014, “Does land fragmentation affect farm performance? A case study from Brittany, France”,
    Agricultural systems, 129:68-80.
    46.Lee, B., Riche, N. H., Isenberg, P., & Carpendale, S., 2015,” More than telling a story: Transforming data into visually
    shared stories”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 35(5):84-90.
    47.Leibenstein, H., 1957, “Economic Backwardness and Economic Growth”, New York: Wiley & Sons.
    48.Lipton, M., 1968, “The Theory of the Optimizing Peasant”, Journal of Develop- ment Studies, 4: 327-51.
    49.Lorenz, M., 2010, “What is there to learn?”, Data-driven journalism, Retrieved from
    http://ij7.innovationjournalism.org/
    50.Lupi, G., 2015, “The new aesthetic of data narrative”, In D. Bihanic (Ed.)”, New challenges for data design, London:
    Springer, 57-88.
    51.Lusho, S., & Papa, D. ,1998, “Land fragmentation and consolidation in Albania”, Land Tenure Center, University of
    Wisconsin-Madison, No.25.
    52.McCloskey, D. N., 1975, “The persistence of English common fields”, European peasants and their markets: Essays in
    agrarian economic history, 92-120.
    53.McKinnon, R. 1., 1973, “Money, Capital, and Economic Development”, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
    54.McPherson, M. F., 1982, “Land fragmentation: a selected literature review”.
    55.Meer, P. V., 1975, “Land Consolidation through Land Fragmentation： Case Studies from Taiwan”, Land Economics,
    51（3）： 275-283.
    56.Nguyen, Tin, Enjiang Cheng, and Christopher Findlay., 1996, “Land fragmentation and farm productivity in China in the
    1990s.”, China Economic Review, 7(2): 169-180.
    57.Rahman, S., & Rahman, M., 2009, “Impact of land fragmentation and resource ownership on productivity and efficiency: The
    case of rice producers in Bangladesh”, Land use policy, 26(1): 95-103.
    58.Sargent, F. 0., 1952, “Fragmentation of French Farm Land: Its Nature, Extent, and Causes”, Land Economics 28: 218-29.
    59.Schulz, N., Parisi, F., & Depoorter, B., 2002, “Fragmentation in property: Towards a general model”, Journal of
    Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE, 158(4):594-613.
    60.Shoup, D. C., 1970, “The optimal timing of urban land development”, Papers in Regional Science, 25(1):33-44.
    61.Tan, S., Heerink, N., Kruseman, G. & Qu, F., 2008, “Do fragmented landholdings have higher production costs? Evidence
    from rice farmers in Northeastern Jiangxi province, PR China”, China Economic Review, 19(3):347-358.
    62.Thirsk, J., 1964, "The Common Fields”, Past and Present 29:3-25.
    63.Wan, G., & Cheng, E., 2001, “Effects of land fragmentation and returns to scale in the Chinese farming sector”, Applied
    Economics, 33:183–194.
    64.Wong, D.W.-S., & Lee, J., 2005, “Statistical analysis of geographic information with ArcView GIS and Arcgis: John Wiley
    & Sons Hoboken”, NJ, USA.
    65.Wu, Z., Liu, M., & Davis, J., 2005, “Land consolidation and productivity in Chinese household crop production”, China
    Economic Review, 16(1): 28-49.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    111257030
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111257030
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[地政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    703001.pdf3558KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋