English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50804462      Online Users : 752
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/152727
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152727


    Title: 短債、長債有差別嗎?債務期限結構對股票報酬率的影響:以臺灣及美國股票市場為例
    Is There a Difference Between Short-term and Long-term Debt? The Impact of Debt Maturity Structure on Stock Returns: A Comparison of Taiwan and U.S. Stock Markets
    Authors: 胡憲傑
    Hu, Hsien-Chieh
    Contributors: 李志宏
    Lee, Jie-Haun
    胡憲傑
    Hu, Hsien-Chieh
    Keywords: 債務期限結構
    資本結構
    融資來源
    Debt maturity structure
    Capital structure
    Source of financing
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-08-05 13:43:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   由於臺灣的公司債市場規模較小,銀行業發展歷史悠久,臺灣企業更傾向與銀行進行借款,導致臺灣企業在公司債務方面表現出與美國企業不同的特性,如臺灣企業擁有高比例的短期債務,美國企業則有約八成債務屬於長期債務,這個結果導致臺灣企業的再融資強度(Refinancing intensity, RI)及短期負債比比美國企業高。但是銀行在進行放款時相較於公開市場有許多優勢,如銀行可以獲取企業內部資訊,在對企業徵信或進行監管時更有著規模經濟及比較利益的優勢,所以銀行對企業風險資訊的掌握比公開市場投資人更完整,更能夠確保企業在面臨風險時仍舊有能力還款,因此與企業借款相應的風險都較美國企業低,投資人不會要求額外的股票報酬作為風險補償。
      本研究因此對於臺灣企業及美國企業的再融資強度、負債比和長、短期負債比與股票報酬率的關係進行研究與比較,實證結果發現臺灣企業不論是再融資強度、負債比和長、短期負債比都與股票報酬率無關。美國企業則是再融資強度、負債比和長、短期負債比皆與股票報酬率呈正相關,其中高短期負債比組合比低短期負債比組合每月多出0.356%的超額報酬率,代表美國企業若短期負債比較高,其在負債比與再融資強度的交互作用下會有較大的展期風險暴露。
    Due to the relatively small size of Taiwan's corporate bond market and the long-standing development of its banking industry, Taiwanese companies prefer borrowing from banks rather than issuing corporate bonds. This has led to distinct characteristics in the debt structure of Taiwanese companies compared to US companies. For instance, Taiwanese companies have a higher proportion of short-term debt, whereas around 80% of US corporate debt is long-term. As a result, Taiwanese companies exhibit higher refinancing intensity (RI) and short-term leverages compared to US companies. However, banks possess several advantages over public markets when providing loans, such as access to internal corporate information and economies of scale in credit assessment and monitoring. Consequently, banks have a more comprehensive understanding of corporate risk information, allowing them to better ensure a company's repayment capability during times of risk. Therefore, the risks associated with corporate borrowing in Taiwan are lower than those of US companies, and investors do not require additional stock returns as risk compensation.
    This study thus compares the RI, leverages, and long- and short-term leverages in relation to stock returns between Taiwanese and US companies. The empirical results reveal that for Taiwanese companies, RI, leverages, and long- and short-term leverages are unrelated to stock returns. In contrast, for US companies, RI, leverages, and long- and short-term leverages are positively correlated with stock returns. Specifically, US companies with higher short-term leverages achieve an excess monthly return of 0.356% more than those with lower short-term leverages. This indicates that US companies with higher short-term debt face greater RI due to the interaction between leverages and RI.
    Reference: 一、 中文參考資料
    吳貞和、洪振虔、鍾紹熙、張俊文(2021)。市價淨值比和資本結構:市場時機與成長機會之論。管理與系統,28(1),1-31。
    蔡宛玲、王熙碩(2012)。我國公司債市場之現況發展。證券櫃檯月刊159期,60-74。
    櫃檯買賣中心(無日期),上櫃債券流通在外餘額月報表,https://www.tpex.org.tw/web/bond/publish/publish_download/download_03.php?l=zh-tw,擷取日期:2024年3月12日。
    二、 英文參考資料
    Aggarwal, R., & Goodell, J. W. (2009). Markets and institutions in financial intermediation: National characteristics as determinants. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(10), 1770-1780.
    Anginer, D., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Simsir, S. A., Tepe, M. (2022). Is short-term debt a substitute for or complementary to good governance? Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(2), 197-208.
    Barclay, M. J., & Smith Jr, C. W. (1995). The maturity structure of corporate debt. the Journal of Finance, 50(2), 609-631.
    Bhandari, L. C. (1988). Debt/equity ratio and expected common stock returns: empirical evidence. The Journal of Finance, 43(2), 507-528.
    Campbell, J. Y., & Vuolteenaho, T. (2004). Bad beta, good beta. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1249-1275.
    Chaderina, M., Weiss, P., & Zechner, J. (2022). The maturity premium. Journal of Financial Economics, 144(2), 670-694.
    Chang, K., Wee, J.B. and Yi, H.-C. (2012), Does National Culture Influence the Firm’s Choice of Debt Maturity?. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 41,424-457.
    Chen, A. (2002). The stable factors for the stock returns in Taiwan: cross-validation, factor analysis and simulation. Journal of Management, 19(3), 519-42.
    Chen, A., & Tu, E. H. (2002). The determinants for stock returns in emerging markets: The case of Taiwan. Studies in Economics and Finance, 20(2), 58-77.
    Chen, H., Wang, H., & Zhou, H. (2014). Stock Return Volatility and Capital Structure Decisions. PBCSF-NIFR Research Paper No. 13-04. Retrieved from SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2346642
    Chen, H., Xu, Y., & Yang, J. (2021). Systematic risk, debt maturity, and the term structure of credit spreads. Journal of Financial Economics, 139(3), 770-799.
    Chui, A. C. W., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Zhou, G. (S.). (2016). National culture and the cost of debt. Journal of Banking & Finance, 69, 1-19.
    Dangl, T., & Zechner, J. (2021). Debt Maturity and the Dynamics of Leverage. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(12), 5796-5840.
    De Fiore, F., & Uhlig, H. (2011). Bank Finance versus Bond Finance. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 43(7), 1399-1421.
    De Fiore, F., & Uhlig, H. (2011). Bank finance versus bond finance. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 43(7), 1399-1421.
    Demarzo, P.M. and He, Z. (2021). Leverage Dynamics without Commitment. The Journal of Finance, 76: 1195-1250.
    Diamond, D. W. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. The review of economic studies, 51(3), 393-414.
    El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kim, H., & Park, K. (2018). Corporate Environmental Responsibility and the Cost of Capital: International Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 335-361.
    Emery, K. M., & Cantor, R. (2005). Relative default rates on corporate loans and bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(6), 1575-1584.
    Fama, E. F. (1985). What's different about banks?. Journal of monetary economics, 15(1), 29-39.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of financial economics, 33(1), 3-56.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1995). Size and book‐to‐market factors in earnings and returns. The journal of finance, 50(1), 131-155.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2008). Dissecting anomalies. The journal of finance, 63(4), 1653-1678.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of financial economics, 116(1), 1-22.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2018). Choosing factors. Journal of financial economics, 128(2), 234-252.
    Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of political economy, 81(3), 607-636.
    Fan, J. P., Titman, S., & Twite, G. (2012). An international comparison of capital structure and debt maturity choices. Journal of Financial and quantitative Analysis, 47(1), 23-56.
    Friewald, N., Nagler, F., & Wagner, C. (2022). Debt Refinancing and Equity Returns. The Journal of Finance, 77(4), 2287-2329.
    Friewald, N., Wagner, C., & Zechner, J. (2014). The Cross-Section of Credit Risk Premia and Equity Returns. The Journal of Finance, 69(6), 2419-2469.
    Gambacorta, L., Yang, J., & Tsatsaronis, K. (2014). Financial structure and growth. BIS Quarterly Review March. Retrieved from : https://ssrn.com/abstract=2457106 on March 5, 2024.
    Gopalan, R., Song, F., & Yerramilli, V. (2014). Debt Maturity Structure and Credit Quality. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(4), 817–842.
    Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2–3), 187-243.
    Harford, J., Klasa, S., & Maxwell, W. F. (2014). Refinancing Risk and Cash Holdings. The Journal of Finance, 69(3), 975-1012.
    He, Z. and Xiong, W. (2012). Rollover Risk and Credit Risk. The Journal of Finance, 67, 391-430.
    Huberman, G., & Kandel, S. (1987). Mean‐variance spanning. The Journal of Finance, 42(4), 873-888.
    Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    Kurshev, A., & Strebulaev, I. A. (2015). Firm size and capital structure. Quarterly Journal of Finance, 5(03), 1550008.
    La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Legal Determinants of External Finance. The Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1131-1150.
    Lally, M. (2002). Time varying market leverage, the market risk premium and the cost of capital. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(9‐10), 1301-1318.
    Leland, H. E., & Toft, K. B. (1996). Optimal capital structure, endogenous bankruptcy, and the term structure of credit spreads. The journal of finance, 51(3), 987-1019.
    Levine, O., & Wu, Y. (2020). Asset Volatility and Capital Structure: Evidence from Corporate Mergers. Management Science, Forthcoming. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2399154.
    Li, Y., Wang, A., Wu, Q., & Zhang, T. (2023). Debt Refinancing and Corporate Bond Returns. Available at SSRN 4720640.
    Li, Y., Wang, A., Wu, Q., & Zhang, T. (2024). Corporate Refinancing and Expected Bond Returns. Available at SSRN 4720640.
    Lin, C., Ko, K.-C., & Yang, N.-T. (2023). Is there the maturity premium in Taiwan? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, 101937.
    Liu, J. F., Lee, N. R., Lin, Y. B., & Zang-Po, H. (2015). The capital investment increases and stock returns. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 5(1), 1.
    MacKie-Mason, J. K. (1990). Do firms care who provides their financing?. Asymmetric information, corporate finance, and investment, 63-104.University of Chicago Press.
    Modigliani, F. and Miller, M.H. (1963). Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction. American Economic Review, 53, 433-443.
    Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of financial economics, 5(2), 147-175.
    Myers, S. C. (2003). Financing of corporations. In Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Vol. 1, pp. 215-253). Elsevier.
    Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix. Econometrica, 55(3), 703–708.
    Nguyen, C., & Wald, J. K. (2022). Debt maturity and the choice between bank loans and public bonds. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 59(1), 239-272.
    O'Connor Keefe, M., & Yaghoubi, M. (2016). The influence of cash flow volatility on capital structure and the use of debt of different maturities. Journal of Corporate Finance, 38, 18-36.
    Ozkan, A. (2000). An empirical analysis of corporate debt maturity structure. European Financial Management, 6(2), 197-212.
    Ozkan, A. (2002). The determinants of corporate debt maturity: evidence from UK firms. Applied Financial Economics, 12(1), 19-24.
    Shen, C. H., & Wang, C. A. (2005). Does bank relationship matter for a firm's investment and financial constraints? The case of Taiwan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(2), 163-184.
    Stohs, M. H., & Mauer, D. C. (1996). The determinants of corporate debt maturity structure. Journal of business, 279-312.
    Strebulaev, I. A., & Yang, B. (2013). The mystery of zero-leverage firms. Journal of financial Economics, 109(1), 1-23.
    U.S. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (2024). US Corporate Bonds Statistics, Retrieved from https://www.sifma.org/resources/research/us-corporate-bonds-statistics/ on March 12, 2024.
    Wang, C. W., & Chiu, W. C. (2019). Effect of short-term debt on default risk: Evidence from Pacific Basin countries. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 57, 101026.
    Wang, C.-W., Chiu, W.-C., & Peña, J. I. (2017). Effect of rollover risk on default risk: Evidence from bank financing. International Review of Financial Analysis, 54, 130-143.
    Yang, C. C., Lee, C. F., Gu, Y. X., & Lee, Y. W. (2010). Co-determination of capital structure and stock returns—A LISREL approach: An empirical test of Taiwan stock markets. The quarterly review of economics and finance, 50(2), 222-233.
    Zheng, X., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Kwok, C. C. Y. (2012). National culture and corporate debt maturity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(2), 468-488.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理學系
    111357025
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111357025
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    702501.pdf2752KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback