政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/152674
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50926708      線上人數 : 909
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152674


    題名: 影響銀行逾期放款比率的因子之研究
    A Study of Factors Affecting the Non-Performing Loan Ratio in Banks
    作者: 林欣怡
    Lin, Sin-Yi
    貢獻者: 林左裕
    Lin, Tso-Yu
    林欣怡
    Lin, Sin-Yi
    關鍵詞: 逾放比
    逾期放款比率
    銀行
    股價指數
    迴歸分析
    多元迴歸分析
    Non-performing loan ratio
    Non -performing loan
    Bank
    Stock index
    Regression analyze
    Mutiple regression analyze
    日期: 2024
    上傳時間: 2024-08-05 13:29:04 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 逾放比被廣泛認為是評估銀行業資產品質的重要指標。本研究通過構建多元迴歸模型，並採用逐步迴歸方法實證研究影響逾放比的因素，分析從2000年第一季到2023年第四季的數據。

    實證結果表明，失業率、新冠疫情、2008年金融危機和互聯網泡沫與逾放比呈正相關關係；存放比率、ROE、滯後兩期的ROE、滯後兩期的失業率、滯後兩期的股票指數和滯後兩期的2008年金融危機與逾放比呈負相關關係，且迴歸模型表現出良好的解釋力。

    基於研究結果，本研究建議銀行應高度重視內部因素和總體經濟。使銀行可以減輕因錯誤的信貸決策而導致的逾放比上升的風險。理解和管理這些因素將有助於銀行維護更健康的金融環境，並確保更穩定的財務表現。對這些因素的適當關注將使銀行能夠制定有效的風險管理策略，從而防止逾期放款的增加。
    The non-performing loan ratio is widely regarded as a crucial indicator for evaluating the asset quality of the banking industry. This study constructs a multiple regression model and empirically examines the factors influencing the non-performing loan ratio through a stepwise regression approach. The analysis utilizes data spanning from the first quarter of 2000 to the fourth quarter of 2023.
    The empirical results show that Unemployment Rate , COVID-19 pandemic , 2008 financial crisis , Dot-com bubble , are positively correlated with the non-performing loan ratio, Loan-to-Deposit Ratio , Return on Equity , lagged two-period Return on Equity, lagged two-period Unemployment Rate
    ,lagged two-period Stock index , lagged two-period 2008 financial crisis are negatively correlated with the non-performing loan ratio, and the regression model exhibits good explanatory power.
    Based on the research findings, this study suggests that banks should place significant emphasis on both internal factors and macroeconomic variables. By doing so, banks can mitigate the risk of erroneous credit granting decisions that could lead to an increase in the non-performing loan ratio. Understanding and managing these elements will help banks maintain healthier loan portfolios and ensure more stable financial performance. Proper attention to these factors will enable banks to develop more effective risk management strategies, thereby preventing the escalation of non-performing loans.
    參考文獻: 1. Bliss, R. R., & Kaufman, G. R (2002). Bank Procyclicality, Credit Crunches, and Asymmetric Monetary Policy Effects: A Unifying Model (pp. 1-25). Federal Reserve of Chicago, Working Paper, WP 2002-18
    2. Bolat, Süleyman & Işık, Özcan. (2016). Determinants of non-performing loans of deposit banks in Turkey. Pressacademia. 5. 341-350.
    3. Berger, A.N. and De Young, R. (1997) Problem Loans and Cost Efficiency in Commercial Banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21, 849-870
    4. Cecchetti, Stephen G. and Cecchetti, Stephen G. and King, Michael and Yetman, James, Weathering the Financial Crisis: Good Policy or Good Luck? (August 1, 2011). BIS Working Paper No. 351
    5. Cebenoyan, A. S., Cooperman, E. S., & Register, C. A. (1995). Deregulation, Reregulation, Equity Ownership, and S&L Risk-Taking. Financial Management, 24(3), 63–76.
    6. Cifter, Atilla & Yilmazer, Sait & Cifter, Elif, 2009. "Analysis of sectoral credit default cycle dependency with wavelet networks: Evidence from Turkey," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 1382-1388
    7. Dimitrios P. Louzis, Angelos T. Vouldis, Vasilios L. Metaxas,
    8. Gonzalez-Hermosillo, B., Pazarbasioglu, C., & Billings, R. (1997). Determinants of Banking System Fragility: A Case Study of Mexico. IMF Staff Papers, 1997(003)
    9. Güngör Turan&Arjeta Koskija Nonperforming Loans in Albania. (2014). Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(3), 491.
    10. Handorf, William C and Zhu, Lili, Us Bank Loan-Loss Provisions, Economic Conditions, and Regulatory Guidance. Journal of Applied Finance, Vol. 16, No. 1, Spring/Summer 2006
    11. Kashyap, A.K., Rajan, R. and Stein, J.C. (2002) Banks as Liquidity Providers: An Explanation for the Coexistence of Lending and Deposit-Taking. Journal of Finance, 57, 33-73.
    12. Kryzanowski, Lawrence & Liu, Jinjing & Zhang, Jie, 2023. "Effect of COVID-19 on non-performing loans in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    13. Lu, Wenling & Whidbee, David. (2016). US bank failure and bailout during the financial crisis: Examining the determinants of regulatory intervention decisions. Journal of Financial Economic Policy. 8. 316-347.
    14. Macroeconomic and bank-specific determinants of non-performing loans in Greece: A comparative study of mortgage, business and consumer loan portfolios,Journal of Banking & Finance,Volume 36, Issue 4,2012,Pages 1012-1027
    15. Messai, A. S., & Jouini, F. (2013). Micro and Macro Determinants of Non-performing Loans. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(4), 852–860
    16. Packer, Frank and Zhu, Haibin, Loan Loss Provisioning Practices of Asian Banks (April 1, 2012). BIS Working Paper No. 375,
    17. Salas, Vicente & Saurina, Jesús. (2002). Credit Risk in Two Institutional Regimes: Spanish Commercial and Savings Banks. Journal of Financial Services Research. 22. 203-224.
    18. Schularick, M., & Taylor, A. M. (2012). Credit Booms Gone Bust: Monetary Policy, Leverage Cycles, and Financial Crises, 1870–—2008. The American Economic Review, 102(2)
    19. Wall, L., & Koch, T.W. (2000). Bank loan-loss accounting: a review of theoretical and empirical evidence. Econometric Reviews, 85, 1-20.
    20. Wood, A.P., & Skinner, N. (2018). Determinants of non-performing loans: evidence from commercial banks in Barbados.

    1. 徐紹娟（2021）。銀行逾放比率之影響因素。[國立中山大學碩士論文]。
    2. 高健清（2012）。2000年美國網際網路泡沫破滅對台灣中小企業逾期放款及中小企業信保基金代位清償之衝擊。[銘傳大學碩士論文]。
    3. 許珮甄（2010）。兩岸商業銀行逾放比之比較研究。[國立交通大學碩士論文]。
    4. 鄭逸民（2010）。總體經濟指標與逾期放款比率之關聯性研究－以臺灣土地銀行為例。[國立高雄第一科技大學碩士論文]。
    5. 黃文啟（2012）。以 Logit 模式研究借款人特性與不動產抵押貸款提前清償之關係。[政治大學財務管理所碩士論文]。
    6. 張麗娟、李育貞（2011）。本國銀行風險管理與財務危機對財務績效之影響。[臺灣銀行季刊，62（1），1-25]。
    7. 陳慧瑜（2013）。台灣地區各類型銀行影響逾放比因素之研究。[國立中正大學碩士論文]。
    8. 江幸眞（2024）。論銀行股東權益報酬率、逾放比率及 備抵呆帳覆蓋率之間的關係—以第一銀行為例。[國立高雄科技大學碩士論文]。
    9. 施至軒（2022）。新冠肺炎前後，台股大盤、產業股價與公司股價之影響差異分析。[國立中山大學碩士論文]。
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程(IMES)
    111266009
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111266009
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程 (IMES)] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    600901.pdf1578KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋