Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152650
|
| Title: | 以快思慢想理論研究台灣消費者在陌生保健食品的廣告連結點擊意願—以睡眠保健食品「養眠寧」為例
The Study of Thinking, Fast and Slow in the Willingness to Click on Advertisements for Unfamiliar Health Supplements of Taiwanese Consumers— Taking the Sleep Aid Product ";Herbyoung-sleep";for Example |
| Authors: | 吳品瑩
Wu, Pin-Ying |
| Contributors: | 許牧彥
Hsu, Mu-Yen
吳品瑩
Wu, Pin-Ying |
| Keywords: | 保健食品
消費者行為
行為經濟學
快思慢想
臉書廣告
Health supplement
Consumer Behavior
Thinking Fast and Slow
Behavioral Economics
Facebook Ad |
| Date: | 2024 |
| Issue Date: | 2024-08-05 13:05:34 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著醫療知識的普及和「預防勝於治療」觀念的盛行，民眾對於保健食品的需求日益增長。全球保健食品市場從2017年至2022年間，年均複合成長率為5.5%，預估2026年市場規模將突破1兆美元。在台灣，保健食品市場同樣蓬勃發展，通路多元，競爭激烈。消費者在購買保健食品時的行為動機和決策方式成為品牌成功的關鍵因素。
然而，保健食品品牌的選擇多元，但消費者的注意力有限，要如何讓投放的廣告順利吸引消費者目光，進而讓消費者願意點擊未使用過的保健食品，並不容易。除了要設定合適的廣告受眾，圖片內容也必須能夠吸引消費者。為此，本研究希望了解消費者在網路上看到睡眠保健食品廣告的決策行為，並以快思與慢想理論，分析消費者在看到睡眠保健食品廣告時，會如何決定是否深入了解該睡眠保健食品，並希望研究結果能為品牌行銷策略提供建議。
本研究鎖定在研究社群廣告的點擊意願，會以Facebook的使用者為調查對象，因此會在Facebook上發放問卷。此次共回收232份有效問卷，並使用SPSS分析問卷內容。經過問卷分析的資料，可發現無論是是傾向快思或慢想的消費者，都會願意點擊陌生產品的廣告，且無論人口統計變數為何，都傾向以慢思作為決定是否點擊陌生睡眠保健食品廣告連結的決策基礎。且人口統計變數本身的變化，與慢想決策的強烈無顯著相關性。
因此根據研究結果，會建議養源專科或其他新的保健食品品牌在推廣睡眠保健食品時，可以善用消費者的慢想決策型態和可得性捷思型態，在廣告素材中多說明該睡眠保健食品的成分、功效、可解決之特定問題等。而若品牌方希望廣告能有多種變化，也可以提供部分影響快思的廣告資訊，例如強調品牌重視食品安全、草本、專業醫療服務的特色。
With the dissemination of medical knowledge and the increasing prevalence of the "prevention is better than cure" concept, the demand for health supplements has been growing. The global health supplement market experienced the growth rate (CAGR) of 5.5% from 2017 to 2022, and it is estimated that the market size will surpass 1 trillion USD by 2026. In Taiwan, the health supplement market is also thriving, characterized by diverse distribution channels and intense competition. Consumers' motivations and decision-making processes in purchasing health supplements have become critical factors for brand success.
However, despite the wide array of health supplement brands available, capturing consumers' limited attention and motivating them to click on advertisements for unfamiliar products is challenging. It requires not only targeting the right audience but also ensuring that the ad visuals are compelling. Therefore, this study aims to understand consumers' decision-making behavior when encountering advertisements for sleep health supplements online. By applying the theories of fast and slow thinking, it analyzes how consumers decide whether to further explore sleep health supplements upon seeing these ADs. The findings are intended to offer strategic marketing recommendations for brands.
This study focuses on examining the willingness to click sleep-well health supplements on social media advertisements, specifically targeting Facebook users for the survey. A total of 232 valid questionnaires were collected and analyzed using SPSS. The data analysis revealed that both fast and slow-thinking consumers are willing to click on ads for unfamiliar products. Regardless of demographic variables, consumers tend to base their decision to click on the advertisement link of an unfamiliar sleep health supplement on slow thinking. Additionally, changes in demographic variables themselves do not show a significant correlation with the intensity of slow thinking decision-making.
Based on the study results, it is recommended that Herbyoung or other new health supplement brands promoting sleep health supplements should leverage consumers' slow thinking decision-making style. This can be achieved by including detailed information about the supplement's ingredients, efficacy, and specific problems it addresses in the ad content. If the brand seeks to diversify its advertisements, it can also include elements that influence fast thinking, such as emphasizing the brand's commitment to food safety, herbal ingredients, and professional medical services. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
1. Facebook，2024年，廣告受眾廣告目標設定， https://www.facebook.com/business/ads/ad-targeting
2. I-Buzz research，2023年，剖析20大保健食品功效趨勢，掌握保健食品五大商機， https://www.i-buzz.com.tw/article/article?atype=brandranking&id=279
3. 中華民國統計資訊網，2021年，行業統計分類， https://www.stat.gov.tw/StandardIndustrialClassificationContent.aspx?n=3144&sms=11195&RID=11&PID=MDg5OA==&Level=4&=1
4. 朱瓊慧、宋國上、陳志益、潘豐泉（2017）。淺談眼疾預防與葉黃素保健食品健康信念模式應用與葉黃素消費行為。寶建醫護與管理雜誌，14(1/2)，p.35- 50。
5. 江靜儒、李政道、洪新來 (2009)。銀髮族對保健食品品牌形象、涉入程度與再購買意願之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，8(1)，110-117。
6. 呂宜臻（2023）。台灣消費者電子商務平台選擇與購物行為之實證研究—快思慢想的全面性決策分析。﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
7. 何清治、洪錦墩、張睿欣、黃湘雄 (2018)。醫療品質、知覺價值、病患滿意度與忠誠度之相關性探討－以中部某區域醫院門診病患及其親屬為例。醫學與健康期刊，7(1)，17-28。
8. 呂麗戎、周佩瑾、張怡秋)、黃鈺峰 (2016)。社群網站涉入對高齡者成功老化之影響。《醫療資訊雜誌》 25卷2期 (2016/06) Pp. 9-23
9. 林百也、邱建智、徐欽賢、李貞 (2012)。保健食品消費者知覺價值及滿意度對行為意圖之影響。體育運動與Amos統計應用期刊，1(2)，1-11。
10. 孫武、潘豐泉、張婷婷 (2014)。國際志工預防旅遊傳染病行為研究: 健康信念模式。寶建醫護與管理雜誌，12(2)，71-87。
11. 商標權組，2021年，6.1、保健營養食品製造業產業〈申請商標指定商品及服務策略手冊〉，https://www.kantarworldpanel.com/tw/news/2023-H2-health-supplement-market-trends
12. 張炳華、吳佩容、張珽宇、馮兆康、龔建吉(2021)。應用健康信念模式於保健食品之消費行為分析。運動與遊憩研究。Vol. 16 No. 2, p.01~10
13. 張嘉雯、王惠玄、詹又諳 (2010)。病患參與醫療服務的前置因素及後續行為之探討：以一般外科為例。管理學報，27(6)，603-621。
14. 陳佳伶、黃惠鈞、劉宜廉、史麗珠 (2012)。桃園地區夜校高二生的性行為、使用保險套行為：健康信念模式。性學研究，3(1)， 1-23。
15. 凱度Kantar，2023年，保健品M型化平均消費增54% 熟齡網購勢力漸起， https://www.kantarworldpanel.com/tw/news/2023-H2-health-supplement-market-trends
16. 黃貞禎，2020年，保健食品這樣吃，精巧補充所需營養素， 中國醫藥大學附設醫院，https://www.cmuh.cmu.edu.tw/NewsInfo/NewsArticle?no=4761
17. 黃國忠、張艾君 (2016)。探討芳療保健消費者知覺價值與顧客滿意度之關係。運動與遊憩研究，11(1)，16-25。
18. 楊雅婷、林作慶 (2019)。彰化縣游泳運動參與者涉入程度對活躍老化關係之研究。運動與遊憩研究，13(4)，70-79。
19. 經理人雜誌，GO SURVEY，2022年， 疫後健康新主張：GO SURVEY協助品牌掌握消費者選購趨勢，搶攻保健食品無限商機https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/65919?utm_source=copyshare
20. 經濟部統計處，2019年，高齡化及健康預防觀念提升，保健營養食品產值連5年創新高。產業經濟統計簡訊，https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/dos/bulletin/Bulletin.aspx?kind=9&html=1&menu_id=18808&bull_id=10282
21. 鄧芳枝，自我藥療態度與非處方藥品購買意圖之關係： 以計畫行為理論為基礎，2014，國立台北大學
22. 鄭佩真，2022年，國際保健營養食品創新商模動向案例。經濟部產業技術司產業技術評析，https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/doit/industrytech/IndustryTech.aspx?menu_id=13545&it_id=446
23. 養源專科 (2024)。熱銷商品。首頁， https://www.herbyoung.com
24. 謝明瑞（2007），行為經濟學理論的探討，商學學報(15)，253-298。
25. 蘇雅琴、梁朝雲、王淑美（2020）。甘藷消費者之產品知識、知覺價值與消費者倫理對其購買意願的影響。傳播與發展學報，(35)，69-88。
二、英文部分
1. Zhang, B., & Wing, Y. (2006). Sex differences in insomnia: a meta-analysis. Sleep, 29(1), 85-93
2. De Langhe, B., Fernbach, P. M., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (2016). Navigating by the stars: Investigating the actual and perceived validity of online user ratings. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 817-833.
3. Sherif, Cantril, The Psychology of Ego-involvements, New York, 1947
4. Nigg, C. R., Lippke, S., & Maddock, J. E. (2009). Factorial invariance of the theory of planned behavior applied to physical activity across gender, age, and ethnic groups. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(2), 219-225.
5. Laurent, G., & Kapferer, J. N. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of marketing research, 41-53.
6. Richard H. Thaler (2016). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioural Economics .London,UK：Penguin Books.
7. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179–211.
8. Rosenstock IM (1974), Historical origins of the health belief model, Health Edu Mono; 2(4): 328-35
9. Hayden, J.A. (2014). Health Belief Model. Introduction to Health Behavior Theory (pp. 31-44). Wayne, NJ.
10. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory , New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Consumption values and market choices: Theory and applications: South-Western Pub. Cinicinnati, OH.
12. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170.
13. Janz NK, Becker MH. The Health Belief model: a decade later. Health Edu Quar 1984; 11(1): 1-47
14. Daniel Kahneman (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow, New York:Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
15. Daniel Kahneman, & Amos Tversky (1979).Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2 , 263-292.
16. Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky(1972).Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology,Volume 3, Issue 3, 430-454.
17. Baumeister, R. F.,Bratslavsky, E.,Muraven, M.,Tice, D. M.(1998).Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.74(5),1252-1265.
18. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 39(5), 752.
19. A. Tversky & D. Kahneman (1973) “Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability”, Cognitive Psychology 5, 207-232
20. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988), “Consumer Perception of Price, Quality and Value: A MeansEnd Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, No. 3, 222.
21. Dodds, W. B., K. B. Monroe & D. Grewal（1991）, “The Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’Product Evaluation,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.28, pp.307319. 13.
22. Smith, Wendell R. (1956). Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing, 21, 3–8. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
111364111 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111364111 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 411101.pdf | 2904Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
