政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/152613
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51051342      線上人數 : 924
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152613


    題名: 碳排放與租稅規避之關聯性
    The Relationship between Carbon Emissions and Tax Avoidance
    作者: 吳靜惠
    Wu, Ching-Hui
    貢獻者: 何怡澄
    郭振雄
    吳靜惠
    Wu, Ching-Hui
    關鍵詞: 碳排放
    租稅規避
    企業社會責任
    ESG
    Carbon emissions
    Tax avoidance
    CSR
    ESG
    日期: 2024
    上傳時間: 2024-08-05 12:57:23 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究探討碳排放與租稅規避的關聯性。有別於過去企業經營著重極大化企
    業價值為經營目標，近年投資人越來越重視企業社會責任(Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR)，開始著重回饋社會、環境永續發展達成平衡所有利害關係人的利益。雖然碳排放減量與租稅透明度分別屬於ESG(Environmental, Social, and Governance)的環境與治理層面，但兩者具有關聯性。本論文透過檢視企業碳排放與租稅規避，企業權衡不同面向目標的策略。本文以2016年至2022年間臺灣上市上櫃公司為研究對象，運用追蹤資料的公司固定效果模型進行迴歸分析。研究結果發現企業的碳排放量與租稅規避具有正向關係，顯示企業的碳排放減量與承擔租稅負擔兩項目標，採用一致策略。在敏感性分析，採用不同租稅規避指標及碳排放量衡量指標。內生性方面使用工具變數法，均獲得穩健性的結果。在額外測試發現家族企業特性舒緩碳排放量與租稅規避的正向關係。
    This study examines the relationship between carbon emissions and tax avoidance. Unlike in the past, when enterprises focused on maximizing corporate value as their primary objective, in recent years, investors have increasingly emphasized Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), shifting towards giving back to society and promoting environmental sustainability to balance the interests of all stakeholders. While carbon emissions reduction and tax transparency fall under the environmental and governance dimensions of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance), respectively, the two are interconnected. This paper examines how enterprises weigh different strategic objectives regarding carbon emissions and tax avoidance. Using listed firms in Taiwan from 2016 to 2022 and adopting panel data regression with firm fixed effects model, the empirical results suggest a positive association between a company's carbon emissions and tax avoidance, indicating a consistent strategy between reducing carbon emissions and managing tax burdens. In sensitivity analysis, different proxies of tax avoidance and carbon emission were used. Regarding endogeneity, the instrumental variables method is utilized, yielding robust results. Lastly, additional analyses reveal that family firm characteristics mitigate the positive relationship between carbon emissions and tax avoidance.
    參考文獻: 邱士宗、張崇倫、郭振雄、何怡澄 (2020)。 總經理過度自信、家族企業與租稅規避。中華會計學刊，第16卷第1期，頁87-134。
    郭振雄、何怡澄、徐書凡、彭火樹(2017)。企業策略、企業社會責任報告與租稅規避之關聯性。中華會計學刊。第12卷(特刊)，頁367-421。
    許詠晴(2023)。碳風險對企業投資決策影響之研究。淡江大學財務金融學系未出版碩士論文。
    羅能清、周麗芳(2023)。上市櫃公司永續報告書應揭露稅務透明度之研析。財稅研究，第52卷第3期，頁32-55。
    Ambec, S., & Ehlers, L. (2016). Regulation via the Polluter‐pays Principle. The Economic Journal, 126(593), 884-906.
    Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (2001). Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments. Journal of Economics perspectives, 15(4), 69-85.
    Atwood, T. J., Drake, M. S., Myers, J. N., & Myers, L. A. (2012). Home country tax system characteristics and corporate tax avoidance: International evidence.
    The Accounting Review, 87(6), 1831-1860.
    Aus Dem Moore, N., Großkurth, P., & Themann, M. (2019). Multinational corporations and the EU Emissions Trading System: The specter of asset erosion and creeping deindustrialization. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 94, 1-26
    Brown, J. R., Martinsson, G., & Thomann, C. (2022). Can environmental policy encourage technical change? Emissions taxes and R&D investment in polluting firms. The Review of financial studies, 35(10), 4518-4560.
    Cai, H., and Liu, Q. (2009). Competition and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms. The Economic Journal, 119(537), 764-795.
    Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. (2011). Vice or virtue? The impact of corporate social responsibility on executive compensation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 159-173.
    Capasso, G., Gianfrate, G., & Spinelli, M. (2020). Climate change and credit risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121634.
    Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?. Journal of financial economics, 95(1), 41-61.
    Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic management journal, 35(1), 1-23.
    Chow, T., Fan, Z., Huang, L., Li, O. Z., & Li, S. (2023). Reciprocity in Corporate Tax Compliance—Evidence from Ozone Pollution. Journal of Accounting Research, 61(5), 1425-1477. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 23(4), 19-39.
    Chyz, J. A., Gaertner, F. B., Kausar, A., & Watson, L. (2019). Overconfidence and corporate tax policy. Review of Accounting Studies, 24, 1114-1145.
    Commission of the European Communities (CEC). (2001). Green paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Commission of the European Communities.
    Compagnie, V., Struyfs, K., & Torsin, W. (2023). Tax avoidance as an unintended consequence of environmental regulation: Evidence from the EU ETS. Journal of Corporate Finance, 82, 102463.
    Dalby, S., Marlier, F., Weaver, B., & Whipp, M. (2021). ESG Tax Transparency: You Might Want to Check out BRT's Statement Signed by 181 CEOs. Tax Executive, 73, 16.
    Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of financial Economics, 79(1), 145-179.
    Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2009). Earnings management, corporate tax shelters, and book-tax alignment. National Tax Journal, 62(1), 169-186.
    Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2008). Long‐run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61-82.
    Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2010). The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. The accounting review, 85(4), 1163-1189.
    Fisman, R., Heal, G., & Nair, V. B. (2007). A model of corporate philanthropy. Working Paper. Columbia University.
    Frank, M. M., L. J. Lynch, and S. O. Rego. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467-496.
    Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Vivid Economics (2020). Carbon pricing options for Taiwan. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, and Vivid Economics.
    Griffin, P. A., Lont, D. H., & Sun, E. Y. (2017). The relevance to investors of greenhouse gas emission disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 1265-1297.
    Han, Y. G., Huang, H. W., Liu, W. P., & Hsu, Y. L. (2023). Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures: evidence from Taiwan. Accounting Horizons, 37(3), 171-191.
    Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127-178.
    Hapsoro, D., & Falih, Z. N. (2020). The effect of firm size, profitability, and liquidity on the firm value moderated by carbon emission disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 21(2), 240-257.
    Hardiyansah, M., Agustin, A. T., & Purnamawati, I. (2021). The effect of carbon emission disclosure on firm value: environmental performance and industrial type. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 123-133.
    Hoi, C. K., Q. Wu, and H. Zhang. (2013). Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) associated with tax avoidance? Evidence from irresponsible CSR activities. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 2025-2059.
    Hsu, P. H., Li, K., & Tsou, C. Y. (2023). The pollution premium. The Journal of Finance, 78(3), 1343-1392.
    Hu, J., Crijns-Graus, W., Lam, L., & Gilbert, A. (2015). Ex-ante evaluation of EU ETS during 2013–2030: EU-internal abatement. Energy Policy, 77, 152-163.
    Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of international business studies, 43, 834-864.
    Jacob, M., & Zerwer, K. L. (2024). Emission taxes and capital investments: The role of tax incidence. The Accounting Review, 1-32.
    Jung, J., Herbohn, K., & Clarkson, P. (2018). Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. Journal of business ethics, 150, 1151-1171.
    Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of accounting and economics, 39(1), 163-197.
    Kreps, D. M. (1990). Corporate culture and economic theory. Perspectives on positive political economy, 90(109-110), 8.
    Lai, S.-M., Liu, C.-L. (2023). Management Quality and Carbon Emission Disclosures. Taiwan Accounting Review, 19(2) ,139-180.
    Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public policy, 31(1), 86-108.
    Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: a test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(1), 75-100.
    Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2015). Is corporate social responsibility performance associated with tax avoidance? Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 439-457.
    Levitt, S. D. (1996). The effect of prison population size on crime rates: Evidence from prison overcrowding litigation. The quarterly journal of economics, 111(2), 319-351.
    McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of management review, 26(1), 117-127.
    Phan, D. H. B., Tran, V. T., Ming, T. C., & Le, A. (2022). Carbon risk and corporate investment: A cross-country evidence. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102376.
    Rego, S. O. (2003). Tax‐avoidance activities of US multinational corporations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(4), 805-833.
    Rezai, A., Foley, D. K., & Taylor, L. (2012). Global warming and economic externalities. Economic theory, 49, 329-351.
    Sikka, P. (2010). Smoke and mirrors: Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance. Accounting Forum, 34 (3-4): 153-168.
    Sun, Z. Y., Wang, S. N., & Li, D. (2022). The impacts of carbon emissions and voluntary carbon disclosure on firm value. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(40), 60189-60197.
    Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic management journal, 18(4), 303-319.
    Weisbach, D. A. (2002). An economic analysis of anti‐tax‐avoidance doctrines. American Law and Economics Review, 4(1), 88-115.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    111921055
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111921055
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    105501.pdf2268KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋