English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50915234      Online Users : 792
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152602


    Title: 考試還是甄補?公部門人力進用途徑與工作適配情形之研究
    Examination or Recruitment? A Study on The Manpower Recruitment Approach and Person-Job Fitness in The Public Sector
    Authors: 張雅菁
    Chang, Ya-Ching
    Contributors: 董祥開
    張雅菁
    Chang, Ya-Ching
    Keywords: 考試分發制度
    契約甄補制度
    適配
    Civil Service Examination Placement System
    Recruitment
    Person-Job Fit
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-08-05 12:55:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討我國「考試分發」及「契約甄補」二途徑進用人力之適配情形,以某中央機關(下稱A機關)近年新進公務人員及新進約聘僱人員及其督導主管為研究對象,並以新進人員分發、甄補經驗、進用前、後之期望落差及調適、工作適配情形等,分析新進人員與A機關、職位間的適配度。經訪談A機關18名人員,包含12名新進人員及6名督導主管,歸納研究發現如下:
    一、新進考試分發人員多採正式管道及非正式管道併行蒐集職缺資訊,並認為正式管道提供之職缺資訊較為粗略、未符合需求,易導致選填志願產生錯誤期待,新進約聘僱人員皆採正式管道蒐集職缺資訊,且表示公告職缺資訊大致符合需求,惟未詳盡列出工作細目易導致誤判等現象,二者均以工作層面之職缺內容最為重視,又新進人員與機關所認應提供之職缺資訊存在落差。
    二、新進人員對公務機關認知不同導致進用前、後產生期望落差之情形,如進用後工作複雜、工作量大、加班頻繁及辦理業務與進用前想像不同,惟表示可透過良好組織氛圍、人際互動、強化工作能力、調整工作流程、累積工作經驗或改變自我需求及期待等進行調適,以適應工作環境。
    三、新進人員多認同A機關的價值觀、組織文化及處事,如流暢溝通的文化、組織氛圍和諧、處事明快等,於制度及措施供給滿足程度則不太認同,如工作環境不友善、軟、硬體設備不佳等。另認為目前工作與自身興趣不相符,所獲得尊敬及受重視度不高,惟仍獲得成就感,於知識、技術、能力及特質則大致符合工作要求。
    四、督導主管多數認為工作適配度與人格特質有關,積極、負責任者績效高而較適配,與進用制度較無相關。另有認為任職期間長短影響適配程度,新進考試分發人員經過訓練2至3年以上適配度可能高於新進約聘僱人員。
    最後,據上述研究發現,自新進人員進用前、後二階段研提實務建議,盼能強化政府公務人力進用制度,使進用人員達到「人」與「事」的適切配合、適才適所之目標。
    The aim of this study is to investigate the suitability of manpower utilization through two pathways in our country: "civil service examination placement" and "recruitment." It focuses on recent recruits and newly contracted personnel, as well as their supervisory managers within a certain central agency (hereinafter referred to as Agency A). The analysis involves the alignment between the new recruits and Agency A in terms of recruitment distribution, supplementation experiences, pre- and post-employment expectation gaps and adjustments, as well as job suitability. Through interviews with 18 personnel from Agency A, including 12 new recruits and 6 supervisory managers, the following research findings are summarized:
    1. New recruits from the examination distribution pathway often gather job vacancy information through both formal and informal channels. They perceive that the information provided through formal channels is generally rough and may not meet their needs, leading to incorrect expectations when selecting preferences. On the other hand, newly contracted personnel primarily gather job vacancy information through formal channels. They find that the advertised job vacancy information generally meets their needs but lacks detailed job descriptions, which can lead to misjudgments. Both groups prioritize the job content aspect when evaluating job vacancies. There is a discrepancy between the job vacancy information that new recruits and the agency believe should be provided.
    2. The different perceptions of public agencies among new recruits lead to expectation gaps before and after employment. For example, after being employed, recruits find that the job is more complex, has a higher workload, requires frequent overtime, and involves tasks that are different from their pre-employment expectations. However, they believe that they can adapt to these differences through fostering a positive organizational atmosphere, interpersonal interactions, enhancing job skills, adjusting workflow, accumulating work experience, or modifying personal needs and expectations to fit into the work environment.
    3. Most new recruits agree with the values, organizational culture, and decision-making processes of Agency A, such as its culture of smooth communication, harmonious organizational atmosphere, and efficient decision-making. However, they express dissatisfaction with certain aspects of the institutional and procedural support, such as unfriendly working environments and inadequate hardware and software facilities. They also feel that their current job does not align with their interests, and they receive limited respect and recognition. Nevertheless, they still derive a sense of accomplishment from their work, and their knowledge, skills, abilities, and characteristics generally meet the job requirements.
    4. Supervisory managers mostly believe that job suitability is related to personality traits, with individuals who are proactive and responsible performing better and being more suitable for their roles, regardless of the employment system. Some also believe that the length of tenure affects the degree of suitability, suggesting that new recruits from the examination distribution pathway, who undergo training for two to three years or more, may have higher suitability than newly contracted personnel.
    Based on the aforementioned research findings, practical recommendations are proposed for both pre- and post-employment stages of new recruits, with the aim of strengthening the government's civil service employment system to achieve the goal of appropriate matching between individuals and positions, as well as ensuring the right person is in the right place.
    Reference: 壹、中文部分
    石立慈(2015)。個人-組織適配、個人-工作適配對離職傾向的影響:以工作特性、自我效能為中介。國立交通大學管理學院管理科學學程碩士班碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
    朱愛群(2005)。契約進用公務人力之研究。國家菁英,1(1),205-228。
    朱愛群、林鍾沂、侯漢君、余致力、魯俊孟、劉嘉發(2004)。契約進用公務人力之範圍、甄選、權利及義務之研究。考試院考銓研究報告,未出版。
    考試院(2002)。考試院院會就政府改造委員會討論「地方自治層級改造方案」、「政府人力運用彈性化計畫方案」一案作成相關決定案,2023年3月7日,取自:https://www.exam.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=3438&s=18288。
    考試院(2023)。考試院令:修正「公務人員高等考試三級考試暨普通考試規則」,2023年3月7日,取自:https://law.moj.gov.tw/News/NewsDetail.aspx?msgid=174343。
    行政院人事行政總處(2022)。聘僱人員管理作業參考手冊(111年11月編印版),2023年3月10日,取自:https://www.dgpa.gov.tw/information?uid=94&pid=11201。
    行政院人事行政總處人事個案智慧共享整合平臺(2022)。01.行政院所屬各機關高普考試分發作業,2023年3月16日,取自:https://www.dgpa.gov.tw/acase/information?uid=555&pid=10378。
    行政院人事行政總處網站公務人事統計專區(2023)。行政院所屬公教人力統計,2023年3月5日,取自:https://www.dgpa.gov.tw/informationlist?uid=330。
    余芝潔(2014)。招募管道與離職意願之關聯性探討-以工作態度為調節變項。元智大學管理碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,桃園市。
    余韶誠(2012)。政府人力資源的招募管理-以公務人員高普考試為例。文官制度季刊,4(1),61-83。
    余韶誠(2013)。行政機關外補甄選的招募管理研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士學位論文,未出版,臺北市。
    李佳珍(2021)。公務人員調任經驗:詮釋現象學觀點。中國行政評論,27(4),86-115。
    李婉菱(2008)。組織變革過程中內部工作轉換機制與個人特性對轉職者個人與環境適配程度之影響。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園市。
    林千甯(2005)。框架效應、個人與工作適配度、認知需求對工作預期與求職吸引力之影響。國立政治大學心理系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    林志憲(2022)。約聘人員工作價值觀、工作滿意度與工作績效之研究-以中央研究院研究助理為例。致理科技大學企業管理系服務業經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,新北市。
    林庭光(2004)。政府約聘僱人員工作滿意與工作績效之相關研究-以經濟部標準檢驗局為例。義守大學管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    林雅芬(2014)。反彈復甦力、工作適應與心理福樂安適關係之研究-以南部某醫學中心為例。南臺科技大學碩士論文,未出版,臺南 。
    林敬瑄(2022)。某中央機關新進公務人員高普考試分發經驗、分發工作性質及工作適配情形之研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士學位論文,未出版,臺北市。
    武家騮(2011)。人格特質、個人與工作適配、個人與組織適配對績效的影響。雄工學報,10,45-74。
    金佩縈(2006)。真實工作預覽對新進員工離職傾向之影響-以工作期望相符程度為中介變數。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    施能傑(2022)。用人機關參與國家考試選人的變革。文官制度,14(2),1-15。
    施能傑、蔡秀涓(2003)。契約性人力運用之理論與實踐。公務人員月刊,81,15-26。
    紀乃文、陳皓怡、楊美玉、鄭妃君、蔡維奇(2008)。個人-工作適配量表發展:多元構面觀點。管理學報,25,577-598。
    倪家珍(2005)。護理人員個人-組織契合度與個人-工作契合度之差異性探討。醫護科技學刊,7(4),363-378。
    倪家珍(2010)。員工性別與自尊對個人-工作契合度影響之研究-以男性傳統職業為例。國防管理學報,31(1),43-55。
    徐宜君(2011)。招募人員專業能力與招募成效影響之個案研究-以生技公司為例。國立新竹教育大學人力資源發展研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
    徐英傑(2004)。公務人員職場自我導向學習、工作調適與工作績效之相關性研究:以嘉義縣公務人員為例。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣 。
    高于涵、董祥開(2022)。國考分發與類科對資淺公務人員轉調傾向之影響:公共服務動機為調節變項。文官制度,14(2),21-51。
    張火燦(1996)。策略性人力資源管理。臺北:揚智文化。
    張祈良(2001)。公務人員進用制度中考選機關與用人機關的運作落差。國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
    張家綺(2015)。高科技從業人員之個人與工作適配、個人與組織適配及幸福感的影響:以勤勉審慎性與主動性人格為調節變項。大葉大學管理學院碩士班碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
    張適年(2005)。面談結構及面談者行為對求職者之影響:程序正義及人與組織契合知覺之中介角色。中原大學心理學系碩士學位論文,未出版,桃園市。
    莊若妤(2011)。組織社會化策略與個人組織適配之關聯性研究:以員工需求為調節變項。國立臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    許世雨、楊雪倫、李長晏、蔡秀涓、張瓊玲、范宜芳譯(2009)。人力資源管理(David A. DeCenzo & Stephen P. Robbins原著)。臺北:五南。
    許道然、劉坤億、熊忠勇、黃建銘譯(2000)。政府未來的治理模式(B. Guy Peters原著)。臺北:智勝文化。
    陳盈臻(2007)。真實工作預覽對新進人員工作態度之影響-以個人與工作適配為中介變數。國立中正大學勞工關係研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
    陳欽雨、呂博裕、鄭芷楡(2020)。社會變遷對企業聘用人力方式及招募人才條件之影響。管理實務與理論研究,14(2),27-46。
    陳逸欣(2003)。新進人員早期離職影響因素之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    彭錦鵬(2022)。國家考試增加口試作為考選用人的判斷,2023年4月3日,取自:https://www.exam.gov.tw/NHRF/News_EpaperContent.aspx?n=3778&s=44782&type=3D7C9BFC4F86BF4A。
    曾琡雅(2003)。影響個人與組織適配及個人與工作適配長期變化因素之研究。國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士班碩士學位論文,未出版,臺北市。
    項慶武(2016)。社會工作者工作適應關聯因素之研究-以雙北市社會福利服務中心社會工作者為例。國立臺北大學社會工作學系碩士論文,未出版,新北市。
    黃俊景(2016)。我國政府約聘僱人員留任原因之探討-以台北市政府為例。國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    黃英忠(1997)。人力資源管理。臺北:三民。
    黃英忠、張國義、杜佩蘭(2002)。報紙招募廣告內容及訴求-招募者與求職者觀點。人力資源管理學報,2(2),99-112。
    黃英忠、黃培文(2004)。工作適性的組織、群體及職務層次對工作滿意、工作績效與工作轉換意圖的同時效果-以台灣休閒旅館業餐飲部員工為例。載於編者財團法人中華飲食文化基金會,第九屆餐飲管理學術研討會論文集(101-138 頁)。 花蓮,中國飲食文化基金會。
    黃崇文(2006)。公務人員任用考試制度運作問題研究。國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    黃瑞琴(2021)。質性教育研究方法(第三版)。臺北市:心理。
    黃聖為(2012)。工作調適、工作能力與離職傾向之研究。國立高雄應用科技大學碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    黃嬇櫻(2019)。學校人事人員個人與工作適配、個人與組織適配對學校認同之研究。國立嘉義大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
    楊文芬(2019)。需求與知行的落差?初探招募資訊揭露對應徵者及新進員工組織工作認知之影響。管理學報,36(4),391-419。
    董祥開、高于涵(2020)。雙盲約會?國考分發制度下的工作契合與分發滿意度研究。國家菁英季刊,13(1),21-51。
    熊忠勇(2010)。職能評估角度談考試方式及應試科目設計-以高考三級及三等特考一般行政類科為例。國家菁英季刊,6(3),75-90。
    劉紀儀(2019)。影響員工工作輪調因素之初探-以台灣某電信公司為例。科技與人力教育季刊,5(3),70-96。
    潘淑滿(2022)。質性研究-理論與運用(第二版)。臺北:心理。
    蔡佩君、連雅慧 (2001)。相似配適高就好嗎?探討個人-組織配適雙構面對知識分享與創意行為之 影響。輔仁管理評論,18(3),75-94。
    簡士評(2001)。招募管道成效之評估。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園市。
    簡銘宏(2009)。國中生的職業期望。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    顏弘欽(2013)。個人-工作適配理論的實證分析:以國小教師為例。嘉大教育研究學刊,31,59-83。
    蘇偉業(2010)。從地方政府運用約聘僱人員之調查剖析我國契約公務人力之改革。政策與人力管理,1(1),77-109。
    蘇偉業(2012)。政府契約人力之政策定位與現實:政府內部人力市場之啟示。文官制度季刊,4(1),33-59。
    蘇偉業、黎世輝(2011)。為什麼初任公務人員職位配置採用「分發」制度?一個歷史回顧分析。行政暨策政學報,53,25-64。
    鐘若方(2019)。政府公務人力運用彈性化之研究-以約聘僱人員為例。嶺東科技大學企業管理系碩士班碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
    龔昶銘(2002)。基層員警工作困擾、組織承諾與工作適應關係研究。國立中正大學碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
    龔黎榛(2015)。個人與工作適配、工作熱情與職業承諾之研究。國立高雄師範大學人力與知識管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    貳、英文部分
    Alderfer, C. P., & McCord, C. G. (1970). Personal and situational factors in the recruitment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(4), 377-385.
    Allen, D. G., Van Scotter, J. R., & Otondo, R. F. (2004). Recruitment Communication Media: Impact on Prehire Outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 143-171.
    Autry, C. W. & Daugherty, P. J. (2003). Warehouse Operations Employees: Linking Person-Organization Fit, Job Satisfaction, and Coping Responses, Journal of Business Logistics, 24, 171-197.
    Barber, A. E. (1998). Recruiting Employees: Individual and Organizational Perspectives. Sage Publications, Inc.
    Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
    Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1994). Effect of newcomer involvement in work-related activities: A longitudinal study of socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 211-223.
    Bilal, S., & Bashir, A. (2016). Effects of the realistic job previews on employees job satisfaction and met expectations. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(4), 219-227.
    Boon, C., & Biron, M. (2016). Temporal issues in person–organization fit, person–job fit and turnover: The role of leader–member exchange. Human Relations, 69(12), 2177-2200.
    Breaugh, J. A. (1981). Relationships between recruiting sources and employee performance, absenteeism, and work attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 24(1), 142-147.
    Breaugh, J. A. (1992). Recruitment: Science and Practice. PWS-KENT, Boston.
    Buitendach, J. H., & De Witte, H. (2005). Job insecurity, extrinsic and intrinsic job satisfaction, and affective organisational commitment of maintenance workers in a parastatal. South African Journal of Business Management, 36, 27-37.
    Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The multiple dimensions of person-job fit and their impact on managerial work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530-541.
    Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294-311.
    Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 459-484.
    Chuang, A., & Sackett, P. R. (2005). The perceived importance of person-job fit and person-organization fit between and within interview stages. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 33(3), 209-226.
    Collins, C. J., & Han, J. (2004). Exploring applicant pool quantity and quality: The effects of early recruitment practice strategies, corporate advertising, and firm reputation. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 685-717.
    Cooper, D., I. T. Robertson, & G. Tinline (2003). Recruitment and Selection: A Framework for Success. London: South-Western Cengage Learning.
    D. B. (2001). Promoting work adjustment in workforce investment act consumers: A role for employment counselors. Journal of Employment Counseling, 38(1).
    Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A Psychological Theory of Work Adjustment: An Individual-differences Model and Its Applications. University of Minnesota Press.
    Dawis, R. V., Lofquist, L. H., & Weiss, D. J. (1968). A theory of work adjustment: A revision. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 23, 15.
    Decker, P. J., & Cornelius, E. T. (1979). A note on recruiting sources and job survival rates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 463-464.
    Drucker, P. F (1990). Managing the Non-Profit Organization: Practices and Principles. New York: Harper Collins.
    Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1991, Vol. 6, pp. 283-357). John Wiley & Sons.
    Edwards, J. R., & Shipp, A. J. (2007). The relationship between person-environment fit and outcomes: An integrative theoretical framework. In C. Ostroff & T. A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on Organizational Fit (pp. 209-258). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    Edwards, J. R., Cable, D. M., Williamson, I. O., Lambert, L. S., & Shipp, A. J. (2006). The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 802-827.
    Gannon, M. J. (1971). Sources of referral and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 226-228.
    Gatewood, R. D., H. S. Feild, & M. Barrick (2008). Human Resource Selection (6th Ed.). Manson, Ohio: Thomson/South-Western.
    Greenhaus, J. H., Seidel, C., & Marinis, M. (1983). The impact of expectations and values on work attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31(3), 394-417.
    Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170.
    Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
    Hershenson, D. B. (1996). Work adjustment: A neglected area in career counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74(5), 442–446.
    Holland, J. L. (1973). Making Vocational Choices. A Theory of Careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530-541.
    Kirnan, J. P., Farley, J. A., & Geisinger, K. F. (1989). The relationship between recruiting source, applicant quality, and hire performance: An analysis by sex, ethnicity, and age. Personnel Psychology, 42(2), 293-308.
    Kolenko, T. A., & Aldag, R. J. (1989). Congruence Perceptions and Managerial Career/Work Outcomes: An Exploratory Analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Academy of Management.
    Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1-49.
    Kristof-Brown, A. L. (2000). Perceived applicant fit: Distinguishing between recruiters' perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 643-671.
    Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individual's fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
    Laschinger, H. K. S., Wong, C. A., & Greco, P. (2006). The impact of staff nurse empowerment on person-job fit and work engagement/burnout. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 358-367.
    Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees' perceptions of person--job and person--organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 454-470.
    Lee, T. W., & Mowday, R. T. (1987). Voluntarily leaving an organization: An empirical investigation of Steers and Mowday's model of turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 30(4), 721-743.
    Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology.(F. Heider & G. M. Heider, Trans.). McGraw-Hill.
    Luksyte, A., Spitzmueller, C., & Maynard, D. C. (2011). Why do overqualified incumbents deviate? Examining multiple mediators. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(3), 279-296.
    Maitland, I. (1994). How to Recruit. Hampshire, U.K.: Gower.
    Moser, Petra. (2005). How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World's Fairs. American Economic Review, 95 (4): 1214-1236.
    Muchinsky, P. M., & Monahan, C. J. (1987). What is person€nvironment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 268-277.
    Oh, I.-S., Guay, R. P., Kim, K., Harold, C. M., Lee, J.‐H., Heo, C.-G., & Shin, K.-H. (2014). Fit happens globally: A meta-analytic comparison of the relationships of person-environment fit dimensions with work attitudes and performance across East Asia, Europe, and North America. Personnel Psychology, 67(1), 99-152.
    Parsons, F. (1909). Choosing a Vocation. Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
    Phillips, J. M. (1998). Effects of realistic job previews on multiple organizational outcomes: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 673-690.
    Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80(2), 151-176.
    Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.
    Premack, S. L., & Wanous, J. P. (1985). A meta-analysis of realistic job preview experiments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(4), 706-719.
    Rynes, S. L. (1991). Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences: A call for new research directions. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 399-444). Consulting Psychologists Press.
    Rynes, S. L., Bretz, R. D., & Gerhart, B. (1991). The importance of recruitment in job choice: A different way of looking. Personnel Psychology, 44(3), 487-521.
    Saks, A. M. (1994). A psychological process investigation for the effects of recruitment source and organization information on job survival. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3), 225–244.
    Schneider, B., Smith, D. B., & Goldstein, H. W. (2000). Attraction-selection-attrition: Toward a person-environment psychology of organizations. In W. B. Walsh, K. H. Craik, & R. H. Price (Eds.), Person-environment Psychology: New Directions and Perspectives (pp. 61-85). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    Seashore, S. E., & Taber, T. D. (1975). Job satisfaction indicators and their correlates. American Behavioral Scientist, 18(3), 333-368.
    Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2006). Motivational Cultural Intelligence, Realistic Job Preview, Realistic Living Conditions Preview, and Cross-Cultural Adjustment. Group & Organization Management, 31(1), 154-173.
    Vreugdenhil, H. (2012). Do Older Employees Use Task Crafting in Order to Reduce the Perceived Misfit with Their Job ? Unpublished Master Thesis in human Resource Students, University of Van Tilburg.
    Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and Motivation. Wiley.
    Wanberg, C. R., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of proactivity in the socialization process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 373-385.
    Wanberg, C. R., Zhu, J., & Van Hooft, E. A. J. (2010). The job search grind: Perceived progress, self-reactions, and self-regulation of search effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 788-807.
    Weller, I., Hymer, C. B., Nyberg, A. J., & Ebert, J. (2019). How matching creates value: Cogs and wheels for human capital resources research. The Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 188-214.
    Weller, I., Michalik, A., & Mühlbauer, D. (2014). Recruitment source implications for organizational tenure. In K. Y. T. Yu & D. M. Cable (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Recruitment (pp. 139-160). Oxford University Press.
    Wendy R. Boswell, Mark V. Roehling, Marcie A. LePine & Lisa M. Moynihan (2003). Individual job-choice decisions and the impact of job attributes and recruitment practices: A longitudinal field study, Human Resource Management. 42(1), 23-37.
    Wood, R., & T. Payne (1998). Competency Based Recruitment and Selection. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    110921004
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110921004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    100401.pdf4186KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback