Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152505
|
| Title: | ESG與非擔任主管職務員工薪資之關聯性
The association between ESG and non-executive employee compensation |
| Authors: | 陳鈺升
Chen, Yu-Sheng |
| Contributors: | 林宛瑩
陳鈺升
Chen, Yu-Sheng |
| Keywords: | 利害關係人理論
合理性理論
環境社會治理績效
非主管職務員工薪資
Stakeholder theory
Legitimacy theory
ESG performance
Non-executive employee compensations |
| Date: | 2024 |
| Issue Date: | 2024-08-05 12:25:09 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究以2019年至2022年間台灣上市櫃公司為樣本，探討企業環境、社會、治理績效對非擔任主管職務員工薪資的影響，以及不符薪資合理性標準的低薪公司是否會持續為低薪公司，並分析將薪資合理性之篩選標準替換後，企業是否仍然存在低薪之現象。此外，並進一步探討低薪企業是否會為了降低公司之合理性缺口，調整非主管員工薪資，以及不同的低薪原因是否會影響公司調薪的效果。
研究結果發現，企業ESG績效較佳，非擔任主管職務之平均員工薪資較高。企業若前一年度不符合金管會合理性標準或不符合本研究提出的薪資合理性標準，相對於符合標準之公司，當年度非主管員工之薪資仍較低。不符合薪資合理性標準的低薪企業可能存在短期無法改善的因素，使得非主管員工薪資仍然偏低。此外，若公司前一年度被標示為低薪公司，則公司當年度調薪幅度較為顯著，其中以未提供合理原因低薪公司之調漲薪資幅度較為顯著。額外測試結果發現， ESG個別面向績效愈佳的公司，其非擔任主管職務員工薪資愈高。不同的低薪原因對於非主管員工薪資皆有負向影響，惟未合理論述低薪原因的公司負向影響較小，其非主管員工薪資較接近正常水準。
Based on a sample of Taiwan-listed companies over the period of 2019 to 2022, this study investigates the effects of corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on non-executive employee compensations and whether companies failing to meet the Financial Supervisory Commission's standards for salary rationality remain low-wage. The study also explores the salary adjustments behavior of the low-wage firms and whether the reasons for low-wage affect the salary adjustments.
The results indicate that better ESG performance is associated with higher non-executive employees’ compensations. Comparing to the companies that meet FSC or this study’s criteria for reasonable salary, companies failing to meet FSC or this study’s criteria for salary pay significantly lower non-executive compensations. Such low-wage firms may face short-term constraints preventing salary improvement. Additionally, companies labeled as low-wage firms in the previous year show significant salary adjustments in the current year, especially those not providing reasonable explanations. Additional tests reveal that companies with higher performance of individual ESG aspects tend to pay higher salaries to non-executive employees. The analyses also show that all low-wage reasons have negative effects on the non-executive employee compensations, though companies that do not provide reasonable explanations have a relatively smaller negative impact resulting in a close to normal non-executive employee compensations. |
| Reference: | 汪進揚與王妤如，2021，董事及高階管理者超額薪酬對員工薪酬之影響:執行長 權力調節效果之探討，會計學報，第 8 卷第 2 期：35-69。
林郁琪，2017，企業舉債程度對管理階層薪酬及員工薪資之影響. 國立臺灣大學財務金融學系學位論文.
梁嘉紋、吳幸蓁與林芯妤，2022，非擔任主管職務之全時員工薪資與企業揭露員工薪資調整情形之關聯性研究，會計審計論叢，第 12 卷第 2 期：87-138。
許涵崴，2022，我國非主管員工薪酬揭露政策下被警示公司之薪資調整情形及對員工流動率之影響. 國立臺北大學會計學系學位論文.
薛敏正、葉淑玲與盧怡妏，2022，股權結構、公司治理與企業社會責任對員工薪酬的影響，中華會計學刊，第 18 卷第 2 期：89-128。
Adam, J. S. 1965. In equity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2: 267-299 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2.
Adwan, S., I. I. Alaa, and R. Jelic. 2022. Non-executive employee ownership and financial reporting quality: evidence from Europe. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 59 (2): 793-823.
Bae, K. H., J. K. Kang, and J. Wang. 2011. Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure. Journal of financial economics 100 (1): 130-153.
Bednar, M. K., S. Boivie, and N. R. Prince. 2013. Burr under the saddle: How media coverage influences strategic change. Organization Science 24(3): 910-925.
Benkraiem, R., A. Hamrouni, F. Lakhal, and N. Toumi. 2017. Board independence, gender diversity and CEO compensation. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society 17(5): 845-860.
Bova, F., Y. Dou, and O. K. Hope. 2015. Employee ownership and firm disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research 32 (2): 639-673.
Campbell, J. J., M. D. Dunnette, E. E. Lawler, and K. E. Weick. 1970. Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. McGraw-Hill.
Chan, H. L., B. Kawada, T. Shin, and J. Wang. 2020. CEO-employee pay gap and firm R&D efficiency. Review of Accounting and Finance 19 (2): 271-287.
Chang, X., K. Fu, A. Low, and W. Zhang. 2015. Non-executive employee stock options and corporate innovation. Journal of financial economics 115 (1): 168-188.
Chen, J., T. H. D. King, and M. M. Wen. 2020. Non-executive ownership and private loan pricing. Journal of Corporate Finance 64 (October): 101638.
Chen, Y., Z. Zhang, J. Zhou, C. Liu, X. Zhang, and T. Yu. 2023. A cognitive evaluation and equity-based perspective of pay for performance on job performance: A meta-analysis and path model. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (January): 1039375.
Cheng, M., and Y. Zhang. 2023. Corporate stakeholders and CEO-worker pay gap: evidence from CEO pay ratio disclosure. Review of Accounting Studies 29(August):1-39.
Christensen-Salem, A., L. F. Mesquita, M. Hashimoto, P. W. Hom, and L. R. Gomez-Mejia. 2021. Family firms are indeed better places to work than non-family firms! Socioemotional wealth and employees’ perceived organizational caring. Journal of Family Business Strategy 12 (1): 100412.
Crifo, P., M. A. Diaye, and S. Pekovic. 2023. Wages and corporate social responsibility: entrenchment or ethics? Employee Relations: The International Journal 45 (2): 495-515.
De Bussy, N. M., and L. Suprawan. 2012. Most valuable stakeholders: The impact of employee orientation on corporate financial performance. Public Relations Review 38 (2): 280-287.
Deephouse, D. L., W. Newburry, and A. Soleimani. 2016. The effects of institutional development and national culture on cross-national differences in corporate reputation. Journal of World Business 51 (3): 463-473.
Diaye, M. A., H. Lasram, and S. Pekovic. 2023. How does CSR affect workers’ compensation? An approach by the theory of incentives. International Journal of Production Economics 260 (June): 108860.
D'Mello, R., S. Kwon, and F. Toscano. 2024. Corporate Social Responsibility and the Executive-Employee Pay Disparity. Journal of Banking & Finance 162 (May): 107154.
Flammer, C., and J. Luo. 2017. Corporate social responsibility as an employee governance tool: Evidence from a quasi‐experiment. Strategic Management Journal 38 (2): 163-183.
Freeman, R. E. 2010. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
Gerhart, B, H. Minkoff, and R. Olsen. 1995. “Employee compensation: Theory, practice, and evidence.” Working paper. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relation.
Gerhart, B., and M. Fang. 2015. Pay, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, performance, and creativity in the workplace: Revisiting long-held beliefs. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 2 (1): 489–521.
Good, V., D. E. Hughes, A. H. Kirca, and S. McGrath. 2022. A self-determination theory-based meta-analysis on the differential effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on salesperson performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 50(3): 586-614.
Hennessey, B. A., and T. M. Amabile. 2010. Creativity. Annual review of psychology 61 (1): 569-598.
Hsu, L., and B. Lawrence. 2016. The role of social media and brand equity during a product recall crisis: A shareholder value perspective. International journal of research in Marketing 33 (1): 59-77.
Hur, W., T. Moon, and S. Ko. 2018. How employees' perceptions of CSR increase employee creativity: Mediating mechanisms of compassion at work and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Business Ethics 153 (December): 629–644.
Jiang, W., X. Liao, B. Lin, and Y. Liu. 2018. The effect of compensation disclosure on compensation benchmarking: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 33 (2): 252-276.
Ko, C. Y., H. Pan, L. C. Kuo, C., and Y. C. Ko. 2022. The association between non-executive compensation and firm performance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 29 (2): 386–401.
Kohn, A. (1993). Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard business review 71 (September): 09.
Kollmann, T., C. Stöckmann, J. M. Kensbock, and A. Peschl. 2020. What satisfies younger versus older employees, and why? An aging perspective on equity theory to explain interactive effects of employee age, monetary rewards, and task contributions on job satisfaction. Human Resource Management 59 (1): 101-115.
Lawler, E. E. 1971. Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Lee, M. T., and R. L. Raschke. 2023. Stakeholder legitimacy in firm greening and financial performance: What about greenwashing temptations?☆. Journal of Business Research 155 (January): 113393.
Lindblom, C. K. 1994. The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference. New York
Lu, C., and Y. Niu. 2022. Do companies compare employees’ salaries? Evidence from stated-owned enterprise group. China Journal of Accounting Research 15 (3): 100252.
Lv, W., Y. Wei, X. Li, and L. Lin. 2019. What dimension of CSR matters to organizational resilience? Evidence from China. Sustainability 11 (6): 1561.
Manzoor, F., L. Wei, and M. Asif. 2021. Intrinsic rewards and employee's performance with the mediating mechanism of employee's motivation. Frontiers in psychology 12 (July): 563070.
Martens, W., and C. N. M. Bui. 2023. An exploration of legitimacy theory in accounting literature. Open Access Library Journal 10 (1): 1-20.
Jensen M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (October): 305-360.
Nawaz, T. 2022. How much does the board composition matter? The impact of board gender diversity on CEO compensation. Sustainability 14 (18): 11719.
Nguyen, T. D., T. Harvison, and A. Ashraf. 2024. Unveil the benefit of independent leadership structure on employee welfare. International Journal of Managerial Finance. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-11-2023-0582.
Nirino, N., G. Santoro, N. Miglietta, and R. Quaglia. 2021. Corporate controversies and company's financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 162 (January): 120341.
Paais, M., and J. R. Pattiruhu. 2020. Effect of motivation, leadership, and organizational culture on satisfaction and employee performance. The Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business 7 (8): 577-588.
Shakil, M. H., N. Mahmood, M. Tasnia, and Z. H. Munim. 2019. Do environmental, social and governance performance affect the financial performance of banks? A cross-country study of emerging market banks. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 30 (6): 1331-1344.
Skinner, B. F. 1938. The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. Appleton-Century.
Suchman, M.C. 1995, “Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches”, Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571‐610.
Sun, L., and T. R. Yu. 2015. The impact of corporate social responsibility on employee performance and cost. Review of Accounting and Finance 14 (3): 262-284.
Taddeo, S., P. Agnese, and F. Busato. 2024. Rethinking the effect of ESG practices on profitability through cross-dimensional substitutability. Journal of Environmental Management 352 (February): 120115.
Tan, W., X. Li, J. Zhao, L. Cao, and H. Wang. 2023. Internal capital markets and employee wage: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis 88 (July): 102680.
Thijssens, T., L. Bollen, and H. Hassink. 2015. Secondary stakeholder influence on CSR disclosure: An application of stakeholder salience theory. Journal of Business Ethics 132 (March): 873-891.
Vroom, V. H. 1964. Work and Motivation. Wiley, New York.
Wang, X., Y. Yin, D. Chun, and P. Li. 2024. How does ESG disclosure promote technological innovation? Moderating effects based on product market competition. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-08-2023-1398.
Watkins, R., and P. Fusch. 2022. Employee Monetary Compensation and Employee Job Satisfaction. Open Journal of Social Sciences 10(9): 321-339.
Werner, S., and D. S. Ones. 2000. Determinants of perceived pay inequities: The effects of comparison other characteristics and pay-system communication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30 (6): 1281-1309.
Wong, J. B., and Q. Zhang. 2022. Stock market reactions to adverse ESG disclosure via media channels. The British Accounting Review 54 (1): 101045.
Yao, W., Y. Qian, H. Yang, and W. Xu. 2023. Does minimum wages affect executive compensation?–Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 80 (September): 102080.
Yoon, Y., and S. Sengupta. 2019. The effect of employee share ownership on employee commitment and turnover: comparing the cases in Britain and South Korea and the role of the economy. Industrial Relations Journal 50 (5–6): 486–516.
Zhang, D., T. Zhang, G. Ma. 2020. Can non-executive equity incentives reduce internal control ineffectiveness? Evidence from China Account Finance 60 (5): 4467–4496.
Zhang, F., X. Qin, and L. Liu. 2020. The interaction effect between ESG and green innovation and its impact on firm value from the perspective of information disclosure. Sustainability 12 (5): 1866.
Zhang, H., X. Cui, L. Xu, and K. Wang. 2024. Non-executive employee stock ownership plans and corporate innovation efficiency: Evidence from China. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 72 (May): 102125.
Zhang, Q., K. Zhou, Y. Zhang, P. Zhou, and Z. Zhang. 2024. Reexamining the relationship between extrinsic rewards and creativity: a study from the creative process engagement perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 1–28.
Zhang, T., J. Zhang, and S. Tu. 2024. An Empirical Study on Corporate ESG Behavior and Employee Satisfaction: A Moderating Mediation Model. Behavioral Sciences 14 (4): 274–299 https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14040274. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計學系
111353114 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111353114 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 311401.pdf | | 2901Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
