政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/152503

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/152503

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113324/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51123553 Online Users : 864

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of Accounting > Theses > Item 140.119/152503

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152503

Title:	董事會多樣性與綠色併購之關聯 The Relationship between Board Diversity and Green Mergers and Acquisitions
Authors:	黃珮姍 Huang, Pei-Shan
Contributors:	翁嘉祥 Weng, Chia-Hsiang 黃珮姍 Huang, Pei-Shan
Keywords:	董事會多樣性綠色併購異質性理論利益相關者理論 Board diversity Green mergers and acquisitions Heterogeneity theory Stakeholder theory
Date:	2024
Issue Date:	2024-08-05 12:24:46 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究旨在探討董事會多樣性與綠色併購之關聯性，研究2011~2021年Boardex北美資料庫中所有公司之董事會多樣性是否影響企業執行綠色併購活動。參照Chen, Lin, Lo, and Chen (2023)，選擇性別、國籍、年齡、教育及行業知識作為董事會多樣性之特徵，並綜合多樣性特徵建立固有性董事會多樣性、獲得性董事會多樣性及整體董事會多樣性。實證結果顯示，就董事會個別多樣性層面，性別多樣性、年齡多樣性及行業知識多樣性與綠色併購呈顯著正相關，國籍多樣性與教育多樣性則相反，而就董事會綜合多樣性層面，獲得性董事會多樣性與整體董事會多樣性皆與綠色併購呈現顯著正向關係。此外，在測試董事會多樣性之長期影響、採主成分因子分析重新衡量綜合多樣性之後皆得出一致之結果，研究結論支持多樣性除了為董事會帶來豐富的資源，董事會亦同時考量永續經營對企業之長遠影響，有效監督管理階層採取綠色投資決策，滿足廣泛的利益相關者需求。本研究為現有文獻提供貢獻之處，除了補充既有文獻對多樣性之不同見解，也證實董事會多樣性確實會影響企業內部考慮長期投資決策之動機，有助於了解董事會之潛在價值，以利企業在組織董事會或主管機關推行公司治理相關守則時，能夠加以考量多樣性對董事會之實質影響。 This study aims to investigate the relationship between board diversity and green mergers and acquisitions (green M&As), examining whether the diversity of boards of directors in companies from the Boardex North America database from 2011 to 2021 influences corporate engagement in green M&A activities. Referring to Chen et al. (2023), gender, nationality, age, education, and industry knowledge were selected as the characteristics of board diversity. Additionally, comprehensive diversity characteristics were used to establish inherent board diversity, acquired board diversity, and aggregated board diversity. The empirical results indicate that, at the individual dimensions of board diversity, gender diversity, age diversity, and industry knowledge diversity are significantly positively correlated with green M&As, whereas nationality diversity and educational diversity are negatively correlated. At the comprehensive dimensions of board diversity, both acquired board diversity and aggregated board diversity are significantly positively related to green M&As. Furthermore, consistent results were obtained when testing the long-term effects of board diversity and re-evaluating comprehensive diversity using principal component factor analysis. The findings support the conclusion that diversity brings a wealth of resources to the board. Additionally, the board considers the long-term impacts of sustainable operations on the company, effectively supervises management in making green investment decisions, and meets the needs of a broad range of stakeholders. This study contributes to the existing literature by supplementing the diverse perspectives on diversity and confirming that board diversity indeed influences the motivation for considering long-term investment decisions within firms. The results help elucidate the potential value of diverse boards, aiding firms in organizing their boards and regulatory authorities in implementing corporate governance codes by considering the substantive impact of diversity on board performance.
Reference:	邱金龍、潘愛玲與張國珍，2018，正式環境規制、非正式環境規制與重污染企業綠色併購，廣東社會科學，第2期：51-59。(Qiu, J. L., A. L. Pan, and G. Z. Zhang. 2018. Formal environmental regulation,informal environmental regulation and the heavy-polluting enterprises’ green M&As decisions. Social Sciences in Guangdong 2: 51-59.) 章硯、孫自願與盛安琪，2023，實質性轉型還是策略性回應——綠色併購對企業綠色技術創新的影響，科技進步與對策，第40卷第7期：68-78。(Zhang, Y., Z. Y. Sun, and A. Q. Sheng. 2023. Substantial transformation or strategic response? The impact of green mergers and acquisitions on enterprise green technology innovation. Science & Technology Progress and Policy 40: 68-78.) https://doi.org/10.6049/kjjbydc.2022050775 資誠聯合會計師事務所，2023，2023台灣併購白皮書，網址：https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/topic-invest/2023-taiwan-mna.html，搜尋日期：2023年10月22日。潘愛玲、王慧與邱金龍，2021，儒家文化與重污染企業綠色併購，會計研究，第5期：133-147。(Pan, A. L., H. Wong and J. L. Qiu. 2021. Confucianism and Green M&As in heavy polluters. Accounting Research 5: 133-147.) 潘愛玲、劉昕、邱金龍與申宇，2019，媒體壓力下的綠色併購能否促使重污染企業實現實質性轉型，中國工業經濟，第2期：174-192。(Pan, A. L., X. Liu, J. L. Qiu and Y. Shen. 2019. Can green M&A of heavy polluting enterprises achieve substantial transformation under the pressure of media. China Industrial Economics 2: 174-192.) https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.20190131.005 Adams, R. B. and D. Ferreira. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics 94 (2): 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007 An, H., C. R. Chen, Q. Wu, and T. Zhang. 2021. Corporate innovation: Do diverse boards help? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 56 (1): 155-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109019001005 Anderson, R. C., D. M. Reeb, A. Upadhyay, and W. Zhao. 2011. The economics of director heterogeneity. Financial Management 40 (1): 5-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01133.x Arnaboldi, F., B. Casu, E. Kalotychou, and A. Sarkisyan. 2018. The performance effects of board heterogeneity: What works for EU banks? The European Journal of Finance 26 (10): 897-924. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2018.1479719 Bantel, K. A. 1993. Strategic clarity in banking: Role of top management-team demography. Psychological Reports 73 (3): 1187-1201. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.73.3f.1187 Bantel, K. A. and S. E. Jackson. 1989. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal 10 (S1): 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100709 Bear, S., N. Rahman, and C. Post. 2010. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics 97: 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2 Ben-Amar, W., M. Chang, and P. McIlkenny. 2017. Board gender diversity and corporate response to sustainability initiatives: Evidence from the carbon disclosure project. Journal of Business Ethics 142 (2): 369-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2759-1 Bernile, G., V. Bhagwat, and S. Yonker. 2018. Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies. Journal of Financial Economics 127 (3): 588-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.12.009 Blau P. M. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. Free Press: Glencoe. Burns, N., K. Minnick, and A. H. Smith. 2021. The role of directors with related supply chain industry experience in corporate acquisition decisions. Journal of Corporate Finance 67: 101911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101911 Campbell, K. and A. Mínguez-Vera. 2008. Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics 83: 435-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y Cao, J., K. M. Ellis, and M. Li. 2019. Inside the board room: The influence of nationality and cultural diversity on cross-border merger and acquisition outcomes. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 53: 1031-1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0774-x Carter, D. A., B. J. Simkins, and W. G. Simpson. 2003. Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review 38 (1): 33-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034 Carter, D. A., F. D'Souza, B. J. Simkins, and W. G. Simpson. 2010. The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review 18 (5): 396-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00809.x Chen, I. J., W. C. Lin, H. C. Lo, and S. S. Chen. 2023. Board diversity and corporate innovation. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 61 (1): 63-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-023-01145-4 Chen, J., W. S. Leung, and K. P. Evans. 2018. Female board representation, corporate innovation and firm performance. Journal of Empirical Finance 48: 236-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2018.07.003 Chen, J., W. S. Leung, W. Song, and M. Goergen. 2019. Why female board representation matters: The role of female directors in reducing male CEO overconfidence. Journal of Empirical Finance 53: 70-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.06.002 Cyert, R. M. and J. G. March. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall. Degl’Innocenti, M., M. Frigerio, and S. Zhou. 2022. Development banks and the syndicate structure: Evidence from a world sample. Journal of Empirical Finance 66: 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2022.01.002 Earley, P. C. and E. Mosakowski. 2000. Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal 43 (1): 26-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556384 Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14 (1): 57-74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 Engle, R. F., S. Giglio, B. Kelly, H. Lee, and J. Stroebel. 2020. Hedging climate change news. The Review of Financial Studies 33 (3): 1184-1216. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz072 Estélyi, K. S. and T. M. Nisar. 2016. Diverse boards: Why do firms get foreign nationals on their boards? Journal of Corporate Finance 39: 174-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.006 Freeman, R. E. 2010. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press. Ginglinger, E. and C. Raskopf. 2023. Women directors and E&S performance: Evidence from board gender quotas. Journal of Corporate Finance 83: 102496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102496 Gormley, T. A., V. K. Gupta, D. A. Matsa, S. C. Mortal, and L. Yang. 2023. The big three and board gender diversity: The effectiveness of shareholder voice. Journal of Financial Economics 149 (2): 323-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2023.04.001 Griffin, D., K. Li, and T. Xu. 2021. Board gender diversity and corporate innovation: International evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 56 (1): 123-154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002210901900098X Gunasekarage, A., M. Khedmati, K. Minnick, and S. Shams. 2023. Board gender diversity and acquisition choices. Journal of Financial Research 46 (4): 949-991. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.12345 Hambrick, D. C., T. S. Cho, and M. J. Chen. 1996. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly: 659-684. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393871 Harjoto, M., I. Laksmana, and R. Lee. 2015. Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 132: 641-660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2343-0 Hitt, M. A. and B. B. Tyler. 1991. Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 12 (5): 327-351. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120502 Houle, C. 1990. Who should be on your board. Nonprofit World 8 (1): 33-35. Inderst, G., C. Kaminker, and F. Stewart. 2012. Defining and measuring green investments. Working paper, OECD. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9312twnn44-en Imbert, F. 2023. Exxon Mobil agrees to buy Pioneer Natural Resources for nearly $60 billion in all-stock merger. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/10/11/exxon-mobil-agrees-to-buy-pioneer-natural-resources-for-nearly-60-billion-in-all-stock-merger.html. Accessed: October 22, 2023. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X Kang, H., M. Cheng, and S. J. Gray. 2007. Corporate governance and board composition: Diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate governance: An International Review 15 (2): 194-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00554.x Kanter, R. M. 1977. Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 965-990. https://doi.org/10.1086/226425 Levi, M., K. Li, and F. Zhang. 2014. Director gender and mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance 28: 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.005 Li, K., B. Qiu, and R. Shen. 2018. Organization capital and mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 53 (4): 1871-1909. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109018000145 Liu, C. 2018. Are women greener? Corporate gender diversity and environmental violations. Journal of Corporate Finance 52: 118-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.08.004 Mahadeo, J. D., T. Soobaroyen, and V. O. Hanuman. 2012. Board composition and financial performance: Uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics 105: 375-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0973-z Masulis, R. W., C. Wang, and F. Xie. 2012. Globalizing the boardroom—The effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics 53 (3): 527-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.12.003 Miller, T. and M. del Carmen Triana. 2009. Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies 46 (5): 755-786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00839.x Milliken, F. J. and L. L. Martins. 1996. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review 21 (2): 402-433. https://doi.org/10.2307/258667 Murray, A. I. 1989. Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 10 (S1): 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100710 Oxelheim, L. and T. Randøy. 2003. The impact of foreign board membership on firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance 27 (12): 2369-2392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00395-3 Oxelheim, L., A. Gregorič, T. Randøy, and S. Thomsen. 2013. On the internationalization of corporate boards: The case of Nordic firms. Journal of International Business Studies 44: 173-194. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.3 Payne, G. T., G. S. Benson, and D. L. Finegold. 2009. Corporate board attributes, team effectiveness and financial performance. Journal of Management Studies 46 (4): 704-731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00819.x Pfeffer, J. 1972. Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly: 218-228. Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row. Richard, O. C., B. S. Murthi, and K. Ismail. 2007. The impact of racial diversity on intermediate and long‐term performance: The moderating role of environmental context. Strategic Management Journal 28 (12): 1213-1233. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.633 Simons, T. and L. H. Pelled. 1999. Understanding executive diversity: More than meets the eye. Human Resource Planning 22 (2): 49-52. Singh, J. V., R. J. House, and D. J. Tucker. 1986. Organizational change and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly 31 (4): 587-611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392965 Smith, K. G., K. A. Smith, J. D. Olian, H. P. Sims, D. P. O'Bannon, and J. A. Scully. 1994. Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly: 412-438. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393297 Srinidhi, B., F. A. Gul, and J. Tsui. 2011. Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research 28 (5): 1610-1644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01071.x Tuggle, C. S., K. Schnatterly, and R. A. Johnson. 2010. Attention patterns in the boardroom: How board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues. Academy of Management Journal 53 (3): 550-571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468687 Useem, M. and J. Karabel. 1986. Pathways to top corporate management. American Sociological Review: 184-200. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095515 Wiersema, M. F. and K. A. Bantel. 1992. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. The Academy of Management Journal 35 (1): 91-121. https://doi.org/10.2307/256474 Zahra, S. A. and J. A. Pearce. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management 15 (2): 291-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500208
Description:	碩士國立政治大學會計學系 111353111
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111353111
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Accounting] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
311101.pdf		938Kb	Adobe PDF	0	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback