English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51577209      Online Users : 943
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/152492
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152492


    Title: ESG與公司價值:財務績效調節效果之探討
    ESG Performance and Firm value: The Moderating Effect of Financial Performance
    Authors: 陳之敏
    Chen, Chih-Min
    Contributors: 林宛瑩
    陳之敏
    Chen, Chih-Min
    Keywords: 環境社會治理績效
    公司價值
    財務績效
    ESG performance
    Firm value
    Financial performance
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-08-05 12:22:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 面對著全球暖化、COVID-19以及國際衝突等問題,投資人除了將企業的財務表現作為選擇投資標的時的指標外,亦開始將公司的環境、社會、治理(ESG)表現作為投資決策的重要考量因素。本研究以2018年至2022年臺灣上市(櫃)公司為研究對象,探討公司ESG表現與公司價值間是否存在關聯性,並探討公司ESG表現與公司價值之關聯性是否會受到財務表現影響。
    本研究之實證結果顯示:公司的ESG表現與公司價值間存在顯著正向之關係,亦即公司的ESG表現愈佳,公司價值愈高,支持利害關係人理論。本研究亦發現,財務績效對ESG表現與公司價值之關聯性具有調節效果,財務績效佳之公司,其ESG表現對公司價值之關聯性較強。
    Confronted with global warming, COVID-19, and international conflicts, investors have started to consider a company's Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance as an important factor in their investment decisions, in addition to the company's financial performance. This study examines whether there is a correlation between ESG performance and firm value for listed companies in Taiwan over the period of 2018 to 2022, and whether this correlation is influenced by financial performance.
    The empirical results indicate a significant and positive relationship between a company's ESG performance and its firm value. In other words, better ESG performance is associated with higher firm value which is in accordant with the stakeholder theory. The study also finds that financial performance moderates the relationship between ESG performance and firm value. In specific, companies with stronger financial performance show a stronger correlation between ESG performance and firm value.
    Reference: 林宛瑩、汪瑞芝與游順合,2012,研發支出、內部董事與經營績效,會計審計論叢,第 2 卷第 1 期(6月):61-90。
    鄭桂蕙、林宛瑩與汪瑞芝,2023,SASB準則下環境社會治理績效與企業績效之關聯性,會計審計論叢,第13卷第2期(12月):1-40。
    謝安軒、林宛瑩與鄭桂蕙,2023,環境社會治理績效與銀行借款條件,2023年中華會計教育協會年會研討會論文。
    Aydoğmuş, M., G. Gülay, and K. Ergun. 2022. Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review 22:S119-S127.
    Allouche, J., and P. Laroche. 2005. A meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Revue de gestion des ressources humaines (57):18.
    Barnea, A., and A. Rubin. 2010. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97:71-86.
    Benlemlih, M., and M. Bitar. 2018. Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency. Journal of Business Ethics 148:647-671.
    Bifulco, G. M., R. Savio, F. Paolone, and R. Tiscini. 2023. The CSR committee as moderator for the ESG score and market value. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 30 (6):3231-3241.
    Borghesi, R., J. F. Houston, and A. Naranjo. 2014. Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests. Journal of corporate finance 26:164-181.
    Broadstock, D. C., S. Managi, R. Matousek, and N. G. Tzeremes. 2019. Does doing “good” always translate into doing “well”? An eco‐efficiency perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment 28 (6):1199-1217.
    Brammer, S., and A. Millington. 2008. Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 29 (12):1325-1343.
    Brown, W. O., E. Helland, and J. K. Smith. 2006. Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of corporate finance 12 (5):855-877.
    Chen, L.-J., and S.-Y. Chen. 2011. The influence of profitability on firm value with capital structure as the mediator and firm size and industry as moderators. Investment Management and Financial Innovations (8, Iss. 3):121-129.
    Chen, X., J. Harford, and K. Li. 2007. Monitoring: Which institutions matter? Journal of Financial Economics 86 (2):279-305.
    Cho, W., J. Lee, and J. Park. 2024. Higher highs and lower lows: investor valuation of ESG and financial performance. Applied Economics Letters:1-6.
    Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt. 1994. A Simple Approximation of Tobin's q. Financial Management 23 (3):70-74.
    Chung, K. H., P. Wright, and B. Kedia. 2003. Corporate governance and market valuation of capital and R&D investments. Review of Financial Economics 12 (2):161-172.
    Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, A. E. Ellstrand, and J. L. Johnson. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 19 (3):269-290.
    Duque-Grisales, E., and J. Aguilera-Caracuel. 2021. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics 168 (2):315-334.
    Ellili, N. O. D. 2022. Impact of ESG disclosure and financial reporting quality on investment efficiency. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 22 (5):1094-1111.
    Elsayed, K. 2007. Does CEO Duality Really Affect Corporate Performance? Corporate Governance: An International Review 15 (6):1203-1214.
    Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88 (2):288-307.
    Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law & Economics 26 (2):301-325.
    Fatemi, A., M. Glaum, and S. Kaiser. 2018. ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global finance journal 38:45-64.
    Freeman, R. E. 1994. The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4): 409-421.
    Garel, A., and A. Petit-Romec. 2021. Investor rewards to environmental responsibility: Evidence from the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of corporate finance 68:101948.
    Ghani, R. A., A. Samah, N. Baharuddin, and Z. Ahmad. 2023. Determinants of Firm Value as Measured by the Tobin’s Q: A Case of Malaysian Plantation Sector. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 13 (2):420-432.
    Ghoul, S. E., O. Guedhami, and Y. Kim. 2017. Country-level institutions, firm value, and the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of International Business Studies 48:360-385.
    Griffin, J. J., and J. F. Mahon. 1997. The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate:Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business & Society 36 (1):5-31.
    Hatane, S. E. 2015. Employee Satisfaction and Performance as Intervening Variables of Learning Organization on Financial Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 211:619-628.
    Heracleous, L. 2001. What is the Impact of Corporate Governance on Organisational Performance? Corporate Governance: An International Review 9 (3):165-173.
    Hu, Y., S. Chen, Y. Shao, and S. Gao. 2018. CSR and Firm Value: Evidence from China. Sustainability 10 (12):4597.
    He, F., C. Ding, W. Yue, and G. Liu. 2023. ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis 87:102550.
    Javed, M., M. A. Rashid, G. Hussain, and H. Y. Ali. 2020. The effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and firm financial performance: Moderating role of responsible leadership. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27 (3):1395-1409.
    Jensen, M. C. 1993. The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. The Journal of Finance 48 (3):831-880.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4):305-360.
    Jo, H., and M. A. Harjoto. 2011. Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3):351-383.
    Jo, H., and Y. Kim. 2007. Disclosure frequency and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics 84 (2):561-590.
    Kao, E. H., C.-C. Yeh, L.-H. Wang, and H.-G. Fung. 2018. The relationship between CSR and performance: Evidence in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 51:155-170.
    Kim, W. S., K. Park, and S. H. Lee. 2018. Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and firm value: Evidence from Korea. Sustainability 10 (7):2497.
    Kotsantonis, S., C. Pinney, and G. Serafeim. 2016. ESG Integration in Investment Management: Myths and Realities. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 28 (2):10-16.
    La Porta, R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 2002. Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation. The Journal of Finance 57 (3):1147-1170.
    Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis. 1996. The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21 (1):107-138.
    Liu, A. Z., A. X. Liu, R. Wang, and S. X. Xu. 2020. Too much of a good thing? The boomerang effect of firms’ investments on corporate social responsibility during product recalls. Journal of Management Studies 57 (8):1437-1472.
    Luo, C., D. Wei, and F. He. 2023. Corporate ESG performance and trade credit financing – Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance 85:337-351.
    Liang, Y., M. J. Lee, and J. S. Jung. 2022. Dynamic capabilities and an ESG strategy for sustainable management performance. Frontiers in psychology 13:887776.
    Lins, K. V., H. Servaes, and A. Tamaya. 2017. Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. The Journal of Finance 72 (4):1785-1824.
    Masulis, R. W., C. Wang, and F. Xie. 2009. Agency Problems at Dual-Class Companies. The Journal of Finance 64 (4):1697-1727.
    McConnell, J. J., and H. Servaes. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27 (2):595-612.
    Naqvi, S. K., F. Shahzad, I. U. Rehman, F. Qureshi, and U. Laique. 2021. Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry: The moderating role of analyst coverage. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 28 (6):1549-1563.
    Nordhaus, W. 2019. Climate change: The ultimate challenge for economics. American Economic Review 109 (6):1991-2014.
    Peng, L. S., and M. Isa. 2020. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices and performance in Shariah firms: agency or stakeholder theory? Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance 16 (1).
    Pound, J. 1988. Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20:237-265.
    PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). 2021. PwC's Global investor survey.Trust, tech and transformation: Navigating investor priorities.
    Saona, P., and P. San Martín. 2018. Determinants of firm value in Latin America: an analysis of firm attributes and institutional factors. Review of Managerial Science 12 (1):65-112.
    Schuler, D. A., and M. Cording. 2006. A corporate social performance–corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of management Review 31 (3):540-558.
    Sudiyatno, B., E. Puspitasari, T. Suwarti, and M. M. Asyif. 2020. Determinants of firm value and profitability: Evidence from Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 7 (11):769-778.
    Verheyden, T., R. G. Eccles, and A. Feiner. 2016. ESG for All? The Impact of ESG Screening on Return, Risk, and Diversification. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 28 (2):47-55.
    Van Duuren, E., A. Plantinga, and B. Scholtens. 2016. ESG integration and the investment management process: Fundamental investing reinvented. Journal of Business Ethics 138:525-533.
    Vuković, B., T. Tica, and D. Jakšić. 2024. Firm value determinants: panel evidence from European listed companies. Strategic Management-International Journal of Strategic Management and Decision Support Systems in Strategic Management 29 (1).
    Wang, B., and M. Yang. 2022. A study on the mechanism of ESG performance on corporate value—Empirical evidence from A-share listed companies in China. Soft Sci 36 (6):78-84.
    Wijayaningsih, S., and A. Yulianto. 2021. The effect of capital structure, firm size, and profitability on firm value with investment decisions as moderating. Accounting Analysis Journal 10 (3):150-157.
    Wong, W. C., J. A. Batten, S. B. Mohamed-Arshad, S. Nordin, and A. A. Adzis. 2021. Does ESG certification add firm value? Finance Research Letters 39:101593.
    Yoon, B., J. H. Lee, and R. Byun. 2018. Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability 10 (10):3635.
    Yu, X., and K. Xiao. 2022. Does ESG Performance Affect Firm Value? Evidence from a New ESG-Scoring Approach for Chinese Enterprises. Sustainability 14 (24):16940.
    Zahra, S. A., and J. A. Pearce. 1989. Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model. Journal of Management 15 (2):291-334.
    Zhan, S. 2023. ESG and Corporate Performance: A Review. SHS Web of Conferences 169
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    111353043
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111353043
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    304301.pdf2354KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback